Performance of org.eclipse.core: M20100205-0800 relative to R-3.4-200806172000 (201002011800)

Back to global results

The following fingerprints show results for the most representative tests of the org.eclipse.core component.
Select which kind of scale you want to use:
Help on fingerprints

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)


Scenario Status

The following table gives a complete but compact view of performance results for the component.
Each line of the table shows the results for one scenario on all machines.

The name of the scenario is in bold when its results are also displayed in the fingerprints
and starts with an '*' when the scenario has no results in the last baseline run.

Here are information displayed for each test (ie. in each cell): Hints:

All 52 scenarios

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
BenchFileStore#testStoreExists() - 6.0% [±1.0] - 1.4% [±2.0] +8.4% [±1.0]
BenchFileStore#testStoreIsReadOnly() - 7.1% [±0.4] - 2.9% [±0.9] +8.4% [±0.6]
BenchFileStore#testStoreLastModified() - 7.1% [±0.5] - 2.9% [±0.7] +8.3% [±0.5]
BenchMiscWorkspace#testGetProject() - 0.8% [±1.0] +0.0% [±1.1] +1.8% [±0.8]
BenchMiscWorkspace#testNoOp() - 1.1% [±2.3] +2.0% [±1.8] +1.8% [±1.6]
BenchWorkspace#testCountResources() - 7.2% [±0.5] +0.0% [±0.4] +1.1% [±3.0]
BenchWorkspace#testCountResourcesDuringOperation() +6.7% [±0.5] +1.2% [±0.4] +12.8% [±0.5]
BenchWorkspace#testFindMaxProblemSeverity() - 3.1% [±0.2] - 3.2% [±0.1] - 2.4% [±0.1]
BuilderPerformanceTest#testManualBuildWithAutobuildOn() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 0.47s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.32s - 46.4% [±17.6] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 0.38s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.29s - 29.4% [±0.9] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 1.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.3s - 280.9% [±36.4]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testAddState() +5.0% [±4.6] +0.0% [±6.4] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 0.25s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.18s - 43.2% [±3.9]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testBug28603() +0.0% [±7.6] +0.0% [±3.7] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 0.18s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 90ms - 95.6% [±7.4]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testClearHistory100x4() - 7.7% [±21.2] +0.0% [±18.9] +88.8% [±85.6]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testClearHistory20x20() +0.0% [±5.8] +0.0% [±0.0] +15.4% [±1.0]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testClearHistory4x100() +14.3% [±3.6] +0.0% [±7.6] +34.0% [±11.6]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testCopyHistory100x4() +0.4% [±1.9] +20.0% [±7.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 3.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2s - 63.7% [±7.1]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testCopyHistory20x20() +0.0% [±1.3] +7.1% [±2.8] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 1.4s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.8s - 78.9% [±30.0]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testCopyHistory4x100() - 2.6% [±4.3] +62.0% [±30.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 0.66s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.39s - 70.7% [±38.2]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testGetDeletedMembers100x4() +4.0% [±19.7] - 5.0% [±23.7] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 1.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 31ms - 4,912.9% [±1,996.5]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testGetDeletedMembers20x20() +9.1% [±6.4] +0.0% [±0.0] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 0.84s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 23ms - 3,530.4% [±1,456.7]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testGetDeletedMembers4x100() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 11ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 9ms - 22.2% [±22.2] +0.0% [±8.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 27ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 23ms - 17.4% [±35.5]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testGetHistory() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 10ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 9ms - 11.1% [n/a] +0.0% [n/a] +6.2% [n/a]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testHistoryCleanUp100x4() - 2.0% [±7.4] +1.0% [±6.9] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 11s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 5.5s - 99.9% [±16.2]
LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testHistoryCleanUp20x20() +1.4% [±1.1] +2.8% [±1.6] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 10.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 6.5s - 62.6% [±26.3]
MarkerPerformanceTest#testSetAttributes1() +14.2% [n/a] - 5.1% [n/a] - 0.5% [n/a]
MarkerPerformanceTest#testSetAttributes2() +6.5% [n/a] - 5.5% [n/a] +0.7% [n/a]
PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testGetProperty100x4() - 0.9% [±1.7] +0.0% [±1.3] - 3.2% [±10.3]
PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testGetProperty20x20() - 1.2% [±0.2] - 0.4% [±0.2] +0.5% [±0.6]
PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testGetProperty4x100() +0.0% [±0.1] +0.0% [±0.0] +0.5% [±0.2]
PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testSetProperty100x4() - 2.8% [±0.9] +0.0% [±0.5] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 1.1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.92s - 18.2% [±11.7]
PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testSetProperty20x20() +1.2% [±1.2] - 0.9% [±1.2] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 0.66s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.53s - 25.7% [±23.3]
PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testSetProperty4x100() +2.6% [±1.0] - 3.3% [±1.6] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 0.49s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.43s - 14.8% [±19.0]
WorkspacePerformanceTest#testCreateResources() +0.8% [±1.0] +0.8% [±1.8] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 1mn 27s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 59.1s - 47.9% [±2.6]
WorkspacePerformanceTest#testDeleteProject() - 1.6% [±12.6] +9.5% [±11.8] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 37.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 28.9s - 29.8% [±2.3]
WorkspacePerformanceTest#testFolderCopy() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 10.4s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 8.5s - 23.3% [±18.2] +0.0% [±8.9] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 1mn 54s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1mn 25s - 34.2% [±0.6]
WorkspacePerformanceTest#testFolderMove() - 2.9% [±1.2] +5.4% [±1.0] +8.0% [±6.3]
WorkspacePerformanceTest#testRefreshProject() +0.2% [±1.2] +7.2% [±0.6] +12.5% [±10.4]
BenchPath#testHash() - 0.7% [±0.1] +0.0% [±0.3] - 1.4% [±0.2]
BenchPath#testPathCreation() +0.2% [±0.2] +2.1% [±0.4] +2.5% [±0.2]
BenchPath#testToOSString() - 1.0% [±0.5] - 3.6% [±0.5] +4.4% [±0.6]
BenchPath#testToString() +2.9% [±0.4] - 3.6% [±0.7] +3.6% [±0.8]
*ContentTypePerformanceTest#testContentMatching() (vs. I20090407-1430) +0.2% [±0.9] +0.3% [±1.0] +0.2% [±1.1]
*ContentTypePerformanceTest#testIsKindOf() (vs. I20090407-1430) - 6.7% [±1.6] - 5.1% [±1.4] - 4.4% [±1.0]
*ContentTypePerformanceTest#testLoadCatalog() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800': Elapsed Process= 48ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 35ms - 37.1% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200912141800': Elapsed Process= 50ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 34ms - 47.1% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 49ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 31ms - 58.1% [n/a]
*ContentTypePerformanceTest#testNameMatching() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800) +34.0% [±0.6] +27.3% [±0.8] +35.1% [±0.8]
PreferencePerformanceTest#testGetStringCommonPrefixKeys() +13.3% [±0.8] - 1.5% [±1.5] +9.4% [±0.6]
PreferencePerformanceTest#testGetStringMisses() +7.9% [±0.2] - 1.3% [±0.2] +9.6% [±2.3]
PreferencePerformanceTest#testGetStringSequentialKeys() +14.1% [±0.3] +0.0% [±0.5] +7.4% [±0.4]
PreferencePerformanceTest#testGetStringUniqueKeys() +12.0% [±0.7] - 0.9% [±1.8] +9.8% [±0.8]
PreferencePerformanceTest#testPutStringKeys() +3.0% [±0.6] - 0.1% [±0.9] - 1.1% [±0.4]
PreferencePerformanceTest#testRemoveStringKeys() +3.6% [±0.3] +0.0% [±0.4] +5.7% [±2.1]
StartupTest.testApplicationStartup Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 1.5s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.3s - 13.1% [±17.6] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 1.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1s - 12.6% [±18.7] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 1.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.5s - 16.0% [±16.1]
*UIStartupTest.testUIApplicationStartup (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800': Elapsed Process= 11.4s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 8.8s - 29.2% [±5.9] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800': Elapsed Process= 8.1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 6.9s - 16.6% [±8.0] - 2.4% [±6.0]