| Select which kind of scale you want to use: |
Help on fingerprints



): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
or
): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)(build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)All 7 scenarios |
SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) | RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) | Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) |
| OpenAntEditorTest#testOpenAntEditor1() |
- 5.5% [±29.8]
|
- 5.8% [±35.2]
|
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200906121800': Elapsed Process= 0.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.6s
- 16.4% [±42.0]
|
| OpenAntEditorTest#testOpenAntEditor2() |
- 4.9% [±1.4]
|
- 6.8% [±3.9]
|
- 5.6% [±1.4]
|
| OpenAntEditorTest#testOpenAntEditorNoFolding() |
- 5.8% [±1.4]
|
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200906121800': Elapsed Process= 0.25s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.22s
- 10.2% [±1.9]
|
- 8.3% [±1.1]
|
| SeparateVMTests#testBuild() |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200906121800': Elapsed Process= 5.5s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 5s
- 10.1% [±1.8]
|
- 0.8% [±1.4]
|
- 1.2% [±0.5]
|
| SeparateVMTests#testBuildMinusDebug() |
- 4.6% [±0.7]
|
- 3.9% [±0.3]
|
- 0.4% [±0.1]
|
| SeparateVMTests#testBuildNoConsole() |
+1.5% [±0.7]
|
+3.0% [±0.4]
|
+0.0% [±0.1]
|
| SeparateVMTests#testBuildWithLotsOfLinks() | n/a | n/a |
- 1.4% [±0.1]
|