Performance of org.eclipse.pde.api.tools: M20090917-0800 relative to R-3.4-200806172000 (200909141800)

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Scenario Status

• an icon showing whether the test fails or passes and whether it's reliable or not.
  The legend for this icon is:
  • Green (): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
  • Red (): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
  • Gray (): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
  • Yellow ( or ): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
  • Black (): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)
  • "n/a": mark a test for with no performance results
• the value of the deviation from the baseline as a percentage (ie. formula is: (build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)
• the value of the standard error of this deviation as a percentage (ie. formula is: sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)
  When test only has one measure, the standard error cannot be computed and is replaced with a '[n/a]'.

• fly over image of failing tests to see the complete error message
• to look at the complete and detailed test results, click on its image

All 6 scenarios	SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
*AnnotationIncrementalBuildTests#testIncrementalAnnot() (vs. N20081218-2000)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'N20081218-2000': Elapsed Process= 0.86s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 23ms - 3,639.1% [±34.5]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'N20081218-2000': Elapsed Process= 0.69s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 18ms - 3,755.6% [±37.8]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'N20081218-2000': Elapsed Process= 0.97s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 16ms - 5,987.5% [±33.0]
ApiDescriptionTests#testCleanVisit()	+1.3% [±1.2]	+0.0% [±1.0]	- 1.5% [±2.7]
EnumIncrementalBuildTests#testIncremantalEnum()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200909141800': Elapsed Process= 0.87s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.7s - 24.9% [±1.6]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200909141800': Elapsed Process= 0.72s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.63s - 13.7% [±1.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200909141800': Elapsed Process= 1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.89s - 12.5% [±1.1]
FullSourceBuildTests#testCleanFullBuild()	+2.8% [±1.1]	+2.6% [±0.8]	+7.3% [±0.6]
FullSourceBuildTests#testFullBuild()	+1.5% [±1.7]	+3.6% [±1.1]	+9.7% [±1.1]
IncrementalBuildTests#testIncrementalBuildAll()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200909141800': Elapsed Process= 1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.86s - 17.3% [±1.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200909141800': Elapsed Process= 0.88s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.79s - 11.6% [±1.2]	- 1.3% [±0.8]