| Select which kind of scale you want to use: |
Help on fingerprints



): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
or
): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)(build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)All 7 scenarios |
SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) | RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) | Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) |
| Create composites |
+48.5% [±0.1]
|
+46.1% [±0.2]
|
- 1.0% [±0.3]
|
| Create composites and widgets |
+12.9% [±1.9]
|
+13.2% [±0.9]
|
+0.3% [±0.6]
|
| Draw on a window |
+0.4% [±0.3]
|
+0.0% [±0.0]
|
+4.7% [±15.0]
|
| Draw on an image |
- 0.1% [±0.7]
|
+0.0% [±0.7]
|
+0.8% [±1.2]
|
| Draw strings using GC.drawString() |
+0.1% [±0.1]
|
- 1.9% [±0.2]
|
- 5.6% [±15.8]
|
| Draw strings using GC.drawText |
+3.6% [±0.2]
|
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200909141800': Elapsed Process= 45.4s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 37.1s
- 22.4% [±5.5]
|
+5.5% [±13.0]
|
| Layout Composites |
- 2.6% [±2.4]
|
+2.9% [±1.9]
|
- 3.0% [±1.3]
|