Performance of org.eclipse.jface: M20100205-0800 relative to R-3.4-200806172000 (201002011800)

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Scenario Status

• an icon showing whether the test fails or passes and whether it's reliable or not.
  The legend for this icon is:
  • Green (): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
  • Red (): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
  • Gray (): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
  • Yellow ( or ): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
  • Black (): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)
  • "n/a": mark a test for with no performance results
• the value of the deviation from the baseline as a percentage (ie. formula is: (build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)
• the value of the standard error of this deviation as a percentage (ie. formula is: sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)
  When test only has one measure, the standard error cannot be computed and is replaced with a '[n/a]'.

• fly over image of failing tests to see the complete error message
• to look at the complete and detailed test results, click on its image

All 12 scenarios	SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
*CollatorPerformanceTest#testCollator() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	+0.5% [±0.7]	+3.7% [±1.6]	+1.7% [±1.8]
*ComboViewerRefreshTest#testRefreshSmall() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 2.1% [±0.3]	- 1.9% [±0.2]	- 0.7% [±0.7]
*FastTableViewerRefreshTest#testRefreshMultiple() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 5.3% [±7.9]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800': Elapsed Process= 1.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.1s - 10.2% [±10.9]	- 3.4% [±1.5]
*FastTableViewerRefreshTest#testUpdateMultiple() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 4.9% [±8.0]	- 4.9% [±10.5]	- 4.2% [±1.7]
*FastTreeTest#testAddFiftyTenTimes() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 1.2% [±0.8]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800': Elapsed Process= 0.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.22s - 167.1% [±10.9]	+1.0% [±6.4]
*FastTreeTest#testAddHundredTenTimes() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 3.4% [±0.7]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800': Elapsed Process= 0.75s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.32s - 135.0% [±3.7]	+0.2% [±6.6]
*FastTreeTest#testAddTenTenTimes() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 0.4% [±3.1]	- 5.6% [±3.0]	+9.7% [±3.8]
*ListViewerRefreshTest#testRefresh() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 3.8% [±0.2]	- 7.6% [±0.4]	+0.0% [±1.5]
*ProgressMonitorDialogPerformanceTest#testLongNames() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 1.1% [±2.8]	- 1.3% [±3.7]	+25.0% [±24.8]
*ShrinkingTreeTest#testTreeViewerRefresh() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	+0.0% [±0.7]	+0.0% [±0.6]	+0.5% [±0.0]
*TreeAddTest#testAddThousand() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 3.3% [±0.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800': Elapsed Process= 0.32s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.27s - 19.3% [±0.7]	- 5.0% [±0.3]
*TreeAddTest#testAddThousandPreSort() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 3.5% [±0.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800': Elapsed Process= 0.29s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.24s - 17.6% [±0.2]	- 5.5% [±0.2]