Performance of org.eclipse.swt: M20100205-0800 relative to R-3.4-200806172000 (201002011800)

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Scenario Status

• an icon showing whether the test fails or passes and whether it's reliable or not.
  The legend for this icon is:
  • Green (): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
  • Red (): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
  • Gray (): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
  • Yellow ( or ): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
  • Black (): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)
  • "n/a": mark a test for with no performance results
• the value of the deviation from the baseline as a percentage (ie. formula is: (build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)
• the value of the standard error of this deviation as a percentage (ie. formula is: sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)
  When test only has one measure, the standard error cannot be computed and is replaced with a '[n/a]'.

• fly over image of failing tests to see the complete error message
• to look at the complete and detailed test results, click on its image

All 7 scenarios	SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
*Create composites (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	+47.5% [±0.1]	+46.4% [±0.2]	+4.1% [±0.3]
*Create composites and widgets (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	+12.4% [±1.9]	+13.1% [±1.3]	+1.1% [±0.6]
*Draw on a window (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 0.2% [±0.1]	+0.0% [±0.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 2.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.4s - 100.7% [±27.8]
*Draw on an image (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	+0.0% [±0.7]	+0.0% [±0.7]	+0.0% [±1.2]
*Draw strings using GC.drawString() (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	+0.0% [±0.1]	- 0.6% [±0.6]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 1.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.72s - 78.8% [±16.7]
*Draw strings using GC.drawText (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	+2.6% [±0.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800': Elapsed Process= 38.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 31.6s - 22.3% [±0.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.4-200806172000_201002011800': Elapsed Process= 3.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2.5s - 43.6% [±19.3]
*Layout Composites (vs. R-3.4-200806172000_200911301800)	- 2.0% [±2.4]	+2.8% [±2.2]	+4.2% [±3.0]