Performance of org.eclipse.core: I20100608-0911 relative to R-3.5-200906111540 (201006181800)

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Scenario Status

• an icon showing whether the test fails or passes and whether it's reliable or not.
  The legend for this icon is:
  • Green (): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
  • Red (): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
  • Gray (): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
  • Yellow ( or ): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
  • Black (): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)
  • "n/a": mark a test for with no performance results
• the value of the deviation from the baseline as a percentage (ie. formula is: (build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)
• the value of the standard error of this deviation as a percentage (ie. formula is: sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)
  When test only has one measure, the standard error cannot be computed and is replaced with a '[n/a]'.

• fly over image of failing tests to see the complete error message
• to look at the complete and detailed test results, click on its image

All 55 scenarios	SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
*BenchFileStore#testStoreExists() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+25.0% [±1.7]	+17.1% [±1.8]	- 0.2% [±1.3]	+1.7% [±0.7]
*BenchFileStore#testStoreIsReadOnly() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+26.2% [±0.7]	+14.3% [±1.0]	- 1.3% [±0.4]	+1.3% [±0.5]
*BenchFileStore#testStoreLastModified() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+24.1% [±0.6]	+14.5% [±0.7]	- 0.4% [±0.4]	+1.0% [±0.3]
*BenchMiscWorkspace#testGetProject() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+2.7% [±1.0]	+9.8% [±1.0]	- 2.9% [±0.8]	+0.0% [±1.1]
*BenchMiscWorkspace#testNoOp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 3.4% [±1.8]	- 6.2% [±1.8]	- 2.7% [±0.6]	- 5.2% [±0.7]
*BenchWorkspace#testCountResources() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 77ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 43ms - 79.1% [±20.7]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 82ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 65ms - 26.2% [±13.0]	+2.1% [±3.0]	+8.0% [±3.0]
*BenchWorkspace#testCountResourcesDuringOperation() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+1.2% [±0.6]	- 0.3% [±0.3]	- 2.8% [±0.8]	- 1.2% [±0.4]
*BenchWorkspace#testFindMaxProblemSeverity() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 4.2% [±0.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 3.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 3s - 26.9% [±0.5]	- 6.4% [±0.2]	- 9.9% [±0.2]
*BuilderPerformanceTest#testManualBuildWithAutobuildOn() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+94.6% [±0.4]	+94.5% [±1.0]	+94.6% [±0.3]	+93.7% [±2.2]
*FileSystemPerformanceTest#testPutFileInfo() (vs. I20091210-1301)	+21.9% [±11.1]	+25.6% [±3.3]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20091210-1301': Elapsed Process= 2.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2.3s - 12.1% [±11.7]	+2.7% [±9.7]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testAddState() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 5.3% [±4.9]	- 3.2% [±9.9]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.21s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.16s - 28.7% [±32.6]	+0.0% [±46.3]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testBug28603() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+3.6% [±6.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 44ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 20ms - 120.0% [±119.6]	+20.0% [±5.4]	+0.0% [±6.5]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testClearHistory100x4() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+7.1% [±17.5]	+10.0% [±22.3]	+22.4% [±10.4]	+27.3% [±54.6]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testClearHistory20x20() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.0% [±6.8]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 6ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 5ms +14.3% [±21.3]	+5.7% [±8.7]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 4ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 3ms - 33.3% [±182.8]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testClearHistory4x100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 7ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 6ms +12.5% [±26.5]	+0.0% [±7.1]	- 6.5% [±6.6]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201005281800': Elapsed Process= 11ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0ms +97.3% [±97.5]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testCopyHistory100x4() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+2.7% [±1.8]	- 3.0% [±7.9]	+6.7% [±11.3]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.6s - 10.5% [±11.5]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testCopyHistory20x20() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.13s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.11s - 13.2% [±17.4]	+11.5% [±1.0]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.67s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.53s +20.3% [±36.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.58s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.46s - 24.5% [±49.7]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testCopyHistory4x100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.0% [±3.8]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 60ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 37ms - 62.2% [±8.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.41s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.25s - 9.9% [±66.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 96ms - 212.5% [±211.3]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testGetDeletedMembers100x4() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+14.8% [±25.8]	+15.0% [±24.6]	+0.0% [±27.3]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 31ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 23ms - 34.8% [±32.7]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testGetDeletedMembers20x20() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.0% [±0.0]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 8ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 7ms - 14.3% [±7.1]	+25.8% [±25.9]	+50.0% [±50.0]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testGetDeletedMembers4x100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.0% [±11.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 7ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 6ms - 16.7% [±0.0]	+69.6% [±46.1]	+0.0% [±141.4]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testGetHistory() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+11.1% [n/a]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 8ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 7ms - 14.3% [n/a]	+0.0% [n/a]	[n/a]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testHistoryCleanUp100x4() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 2.4% [±7.7]	- 1.0% [±7.0]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 8.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 7.4s - 17.9% [±25.0]	- 9.8% [±24.1]
*LocalHistoryPerformanceTest#testHistoryCleanUp20x20() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+39.8% [±42.0]	+1.9% [±1.9]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 8.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 7.5s - 15.8% [±19.1]	- 4.9% [±17.2]
*MarkerPerformanceTest#testSetAttributes1() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+2.1% [n/a]	- 1.2% [n/a]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 4.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 4.2s - 12.2% [n/a]	- 0.5% [n/a]
*MarkerPerformanceTest#testSetAttributes2() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+1.2% [n/a]	- 5.7% [n/a]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 4.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 4.3s - 13.5% [n/a]	+1.3% [n/a]
*PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testGetProperty100x4() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+1.8% [±1.1]	- 0.6% [±1.3]	+3.2% [±3.5]	- 3.2% [±9.3]
*PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testGetProperty20x20() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+3.1% [±2.9]	- 0.9% [±0.2]	+1.5% [±1.6]	+0.4% [±1.0]
*PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testGetProperty4x100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 0.6% [±0.1]	- 1.4% [±0.1]	+0.0% [±0.3]	- 0.5% [±0.3]
*PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testSetProperty100x4() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.8% [±1.0]	- 3.1% [±3.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.91s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.78s - 5.3% [±12.3]	+11.5% [±12.5]
*PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testSetProperty20x20() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 0.6% [±1.3]	- 3.5% [±1.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.55s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.46s - 6.0% [±20.9]	+0.3% [±19.4]
*PropertyManagerPerformanceTest#testSetProperty4x100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.0% [±1.1]	- 9.9% [±4.2]	+0.9% [±16.4]	+1.4% [±18.8]
*WorkspacePerformanceTest#testCloseOpenProject() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.4% [±0.8]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.71s - 45.0% [±64.9]	- 9.9% [±5.9]	+22.4% [±19.4]
*WorkspacePerformanceTest#testCreateResources() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.1% [±0.6]	- 2.9% [±2.7]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1mn 22s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1mn 3s - 30.2% [±2.1]	- 2.5% [±2.0]
*WorkspacePerformanceTest#testDeleteProject() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 0.9% [±9.0]	+1.7% [±0.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 37.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 30.4s - 23.6% [±2.4]	- 1.0% [±3.4]
*WorkspacePerformanceTest#testFolderCopy() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+24.1% [±14.1]	- 1.3% [±6.9]	+11.8% [±0.7]	+0.5% [±0.8]
*WorkspacePerformanceTest#testFolderMove() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+4.0% [±1.0]	+11.6% [±9.3]	- 1.2% [±0.8]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.5s - 14.9% [±9.6]
*WorkspacePerformanceTest#testLoadSnapshot() (vs. I20100323-0800)	- 1.5% [±3.2]	- 3.9% [±2.1]	+1.7% [±1.4]	+0.8% [±2.2]
*WorkspacePerformanceTest#testRefreshProject() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+14.9% [±20.5]	+10.3% [±0.9]	+1.5% [±0.7]	+13.0% [±9.8]
*BenchPath#testHash() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 3.2% [±1.2]	- 0.4% [±0.2]	+1.0% [±0.3]	+0.0% [±0.4]
*BenchPath#testPathCreation() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+1.3% [±0.2]	- 4.1% [±0.5]	+2.0% [±0.3]	- 1.9% [±0.4]
*BenchPath#testToOSString() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 1.7% [±0.8]	+2.2% [±0.5]	+0.3% [±1.1]	- 2.0% [±1.1]
*BenchPath#testToString() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+3.2% [±0.8]	+3.3% [±0.7]	+0.6% [±0.8]	- 2.0% [±1.0]
*ContentTypePerformanceTest#testContentMatching() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 0.5% [±1.5]	- 0.1% [±1.0]	- 0.3% [±1.5]	- 2.1% [±0.8]
*ContentTypePerformanceTest#testIsKindOf() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.0% [±0.9]	- 4.2% [±1.2]	+1.6% [±1.1]	+3.2% [±1.2]
*ContentTypePerformanceTest#testLoadCatalog() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.2% [±1.4]	- 1.5% [±2.3]	+15.9% [±4.5]	+9.5% [±6.4]
*ContentTypePerformanceTest#testNameMatching() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+1.8% [±1.2]	- 2.8% [±1.3]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.68s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.57s - 18.4% [±0.8]	+6.4% [±0.8]
*PreferencePerformanceTest#testGetStringCommonPrefixKeys() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 2.3% [±1.0]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.56s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.48s - 16.9% [±2.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.58s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.52s - 10.5% [±1.3]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201005281800': Elapsed Process= 0.54s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.48s - 4.2% [±1.3]
*PreferencePerformanceTest#testGetStringMisses() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+11.2% [±3.8]	- 2.5% [±0.4]	+8.8% [±2.4]	+3.5% [±0.5]
*PreferencePerformanceTest#testGetStringSequentialKeys() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+5.5% [±2.4]	- 0.2% [±0.3]	- 0.2% [±0.7]	+0.0% [±0.5]
*PreferencePerformanceTest#testGetStringUniqueKeys() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+4.5% [±2.7]	- 5.6% [±2.2]	- 1.1% [±2.6]	- 0.2% [±2.1]
*PreferencePerformanceTest#testPutStringKeys() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.5% [±0.7]	- 2.0% [±0.8]	- 2.9% [±0.7]	+4.8% [±0.8]
*PreferencePerformanceTest#testRemoveStringKeys() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+2.0% [±0.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 51ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 46ms - 10.9% [±0.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 53ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 47ms - 12.8% [±2.6]	- 2.1% [±1.7]
*StartupTest.testApplicationStartup (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 9.2% [±0.5]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1s - 33.6% [±1.6]	- 7.2% [±0.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.9s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.6s - 17.1% [±20.7]
*UIStartupTest.testUIApplicationStartup (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 10.9s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 9.3s - 17.8% [±4.9]	+0.0% [±6.6]	- 0.2% [±7.0]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 8.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 7.5s - 15.1% [±5.4]