Performance of org.eclipse.jdt.ui: I20100608-0911 relative to R-3.5-200906111540 (201006181800)

Back to global results

The following fingerprints show results for the most representative tests of the org.eclipse.jdt.ui component.
Select which kind of scale you want to use:
Help on fingerprints

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)


Scenario Status

The following table gives a complete but compact view of performance results for the component.
Each line of the table shows the results for one scenario on all machines.

The name of the scenario is in bold when its results are also displayed in the fingerprints
and starts with an '*' when the scenario has no results in the last baseline run.

Here are information displayed for each test (ie. in each cell): Hints:

All 67 scenarios
SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
*CleanUpPerfTest#testAllCleanUps() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 4.7% [±3.1] - 8.6% [±1.4] - 2.3% [±8.5] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 4.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 3.7s - 12.6% [±7.6]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testCodeFormatCleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.76s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.68s - 11.3% [±29.4] - 9.5% [±13.5] +17.9% [±24.8] - 5.6% [±28.5]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testCodeStyleCleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.4s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.2s - 15.4% [±5.0] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.1s - 12.5% [±0.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 1.9s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.7s +6.5% [±19.2] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.5s - 10.8% [±18.6]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testControlStatementsCleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +6.9% [±12.6] +0.4% [±4.6] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.98s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.84s - 16.1% [±32.1] +10.3% [±27.8]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testConvertLoopCleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +0.0% [±3.3] - 6.1% [±0.9] +0.5% [±1.2] - 4.7% [±1.7]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testExpressionsCleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +2.6% [±4.3] - 6.9% [±0.2] +26.2% [±27.9] +23.3% [±27.1]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testJava50CleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 4.8% [±11.2] - 1.8% [±3.7] +2.4% [±27.8] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.94s - 20.8% [±32.4]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testNullCleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.44s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.4s - 10.1% [±10.9] - 5.4% [±5.1] - 1.0% [±6.2] - 9.4% [±5.2]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testOrganizeImports() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +16.0% [±17.3] - 4.9% [±6.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.1s - 18.9% [±35.5] - 3.6% [±25.3]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testSortMembersCleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.99s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.82s - 20.0% [±17.0] +1.0% [±4.0] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 1.5s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.3s +3.4% [±25.9] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.5s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.3s - 19.2% [±26.9]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testStringCleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 5.1% [±5.6] - 4.0% [±0.2] - 0.7% [±1.9] - 2.8% [±2.2]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testUnnecessaryCodeCleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +23.3% [±19.4] - 8.0% [±0.3] - 4.3% [±1.3] - 6.9% [±1.4]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testUnusedCodeCleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.31s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.27s - 14.7% [±11.8] - 7.7% [±0.5] - 2.7% [±1.3] - 8.0% [±1.0]
*CleanUpPerfTest#testVariableDeclarationCleanUp() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 1.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.1s - 8.2% [±13.5] - 5.2% [±0.2] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 1.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.6s +5.9% [±20.7] +2.6% [±18.9]
*OpenTypePerfTest#testColdException() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +11.6% [n/a] +16.2% [n/a] +13.2% [n/a] +0.0% [n/a]
*OpenTypePerfTest#testWarmException() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.28s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.24s - 16.8% [n/a] +22.8% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.12s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.11s +0.0% [n/a] - 6.4% [n/a]
*OpenTypePerfTest#testWarmException10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.28s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.24s - 17.8% [±3.1] +21.6% [±2.9] - 8.3% [±4.8] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201005281800': Elapsed Process= 0.27s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.24s - 2.2% [±15.4]
*OpenTypePerfTest#testWarmOpenSWT() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.58s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.3s - 91.4% [n/a] +10.1% [n/a] +5.3% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.59s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.52s - 15.3% [n/a]
*OpenTypePerfTest#testWarmOpenSWTHistory10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.28s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.25s - 11.6% [±1.3] +20.6% [±2.5] - 4.6% [±2.2] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.44s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.39s - 12.5% [±2.5]
*OpenTypePerfTest#testWarmS10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.28s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.25s - 12.3% [±2.2] +18.9% [±3.1] - 3.0% [±6.2] - 2.9% [±1.4]
*OrganizeImportsPerfTest#testOrganizeImport() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.13s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 96ms - 37.5% [±9.1] +13.8% [±9.9] +9.4% [±9.1] +13.0% [±8.9]
*PackageExplorerColdPerfTest#testOpen() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +4.3% [n/a] +4.8% [n/a] +48.4% [n/a] +48.4% [n/a]
*PackageExplorerEmptyPerfTest#testOpen() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +5.0% [n/a] +27.0% [n/a] +12.0% [n/a] +0.0% [n/a]
*PackageExplorerPerfTest#testExpand() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 4.5% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 19ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 17ms +0.0% [n/a] +48.4% [n/a] +0.0% [n/a]
*PackageExplorerPerfTest#testOpen() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +0.0% [n/a] +8.1% [n/a] +12.8% [n/a] +0.6% [n/a]
*PackageExplorerPerfTest#testSelect() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +3.8% [n/a] +7.4% [n/a] +0.0% [n/a] +0.0% [n/a]
*PackageExplorerWarmPerfTest#testOpen() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +3.9% [±5.3] +5.9% [±4.5] +1.1% [±5.2] +0.9% [±3.3]
*TypeHierarchyPerfTest#testOpenCollHierarchy() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +95.5% [n/a] +86.2% [n/a] +86.1% [n/a] +81.3% [n/a]
*TypeHierarchyPerfTest#testOpenObjectHierarchy() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +68.4% [n/a] +64.9% [n/a] +65.5% [n/a] +43.8% [n/a]
*TypeHierarchyPerfTest#testOpenObjectHierarchy2() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +60.9% [±4.5] +52.1% [±6.7] +61.0% [±4.2] +28.0% [±2.2]
*IntroduceIndirectionPerfAcceptanceTests#testIntroduceIndirection() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +3.8% [n/a] - 7.0% [n/a] - 1.8% [n/a] - 1.0% [n/a]
*MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests1#test_1000_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +1.9% [n/a] - 1.2% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 22.9s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 15.4s - 48.9% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 14.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 12.4s - 14.4% [n/a]
*MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests1#test_100_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +1.4% [n/a] - 6.9% [n/a] - 1.9% [n/a] +23.1% [n/a]
*MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests1#test_10_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +1.8% [±4.3] - 1.6% [±3.9] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.26s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.22s +35.6% [±34.9] - 3.1% [±4.7]
*MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests2#test_10_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.49s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.18s - 175.8% [±184.0] - 0.8% [±3.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.24s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.22s +7.9% [±5.3] +0.0% [±4.3]
*MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests2#test_10_100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 3.8% [n/a] - 1.0% [n/a] +5.4% [n/a] +44.8% [n/a]
*MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests2#test_10_1000() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +1.8% [n/a] - 1.2% [n/a] - 0.5% [n/a] +0.5% [n/a]
*MoveStaticMembersPerfTests1#test_1000_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 18.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 16.3s - 7.9% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 15.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 14.2s - 11.2% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 34.5s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 25.9s - 33.0% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 24.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 21.6s - 14.1% [n/a]
*MoveStaticMembersPerfTests1#test_100_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 2.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2.4s - 12.4% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 2.1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.8s - 11.3% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 3.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2.9s - 10.3% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 2.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2.1s - 11.3% [n/a]
*MoveStaticMembersPerfTests1#test_10_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 6.6% [±1.2] - 9.1% [±4.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.46s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.39s +15.3% [±23.7] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.43s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.3s - 43.8% [±36.2]
*MoveStaticMembersPerfTests2#test_10_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 6.3% [±2.7] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.29s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.26s - 9.9% [±4.4] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.44s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.38s +28.8% [±30.2] - 5.1% [±4.4]
*MoveStaticMembersPerfTests2#test_10_100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 2.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.7s - 26.5% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.1s - 47.7% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 2.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.7s - 27.0% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.3s - 20.5% [n/a]
*MoveStaticMembersPerfTests2#test_10_1000() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1mn 7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 8.6s - 691.5% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 57.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 7.8s - 640.0% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1mn 11s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 8.8s - 711.3% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 58.1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 7.2s - 701.3% [n/a]
*RenameMethodPerfTests1#test_1000_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 1.2% [±2.7] - 1.5% [±1.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 22s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 15.1s - 45.9% [±4.3] - 0.5% [±2.6]
*RenameMethodPerfTests1#test_100_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +7.5% [±11.8] +2.9% [±6.5] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.4s - 16.5% [±18.8] - 1.2% [±15.9]
*RenameMethodPerfTests1#test_10_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.25s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.15s - 64.0% [±63.7] - 0.9% [±2.8] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.26s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.19s - 3.9% [±23.3] +18.1% [±18.5]
*RenameMethodPerfTests2#test_10_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +0.7% [±4.4] +1.7% [±3.6] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.23s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.19s +0.9% [±3.8] +24.5% [±17.9]
*RenameMethodPerfTests2#test_10_100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +0.0% [±14.7] - 2.1% [±6.9] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.34s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.26s - 2.4% [±26.6] +7.1% [±13.2]
*RenameMethodPerfTests2#test_10_1000() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 0.4% [±0.3] - 0.6% [±0.1] +2.0% [±2.6] - 3.0% [±2.2]
*RenameMethodWithOverloadPerfTests#test_1000_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 1.2% [±1.5] - 2.9% [±0.5] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 30.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 24.3s - 24.7% [±1.9] - 1.1% [±1.8]
*RenameMethodWithOverloadPerfTests#test_100_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 2.0% [±5.5] - 1.3% [±4.5] - 2.5% [±11.0] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.8s - 10.0% [±11.0]
*RenameMethodWithOverloadPerfTests#test_10_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +0.8% [±3.2] - 3.7% [±3.6] +2.2% [±3.4] - 3.1% [±2.1]
*RenamePackagePerfTests1#test_1000_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 3.0% [±2.4] - 3.4% [±1.4] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 23.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 16.6s - 42.3% [±3.1] - 2.9% [±2.8]
*RenamePackagePerfTests1#test_100_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 2.6% [±4.9] - 2.7% [±4.8] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.7s - 17.5% [±17.9] - 9.7% [±16.0]
*RenamePackagePerfTests1#test_10_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.26s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.21s - 25.1% [±24.3] - 6.0% [±3.5] - 6.9% [±17.6] +8.2% [±10.7]
*RenamePackagePerfTests2#test_10_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 1.9% [±4.5] - 4.8% [±3.8] +6.0% [±10.1] +3.6% [±10.2]
*RenamePackagePerfTests2#test_10_100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 3.9% [±5.7] - 4.8% [±4.9] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.5s - 22.8% [±21.6] - 6.3% [±16.1]
*RenamePackagePerfTests2#test_10_1000() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +0.3% [±1.6] - 1.9% [±1.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 24.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 19.2s - 28.0% [±2.9] - 2.5% [±2.3]
*RenameTypePerfAcceptanceTests#testWarm() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +2.7% [n/a] - 0.2% [n/a] - 2.3% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2.2s - 40.5% [n/a]
*RenameTypePerfTests1#test_1000_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +0.0% [±2.7] - 1.5% [±1.2] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 22s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 15s - 47.4% [±3.6] - 0.8% [±3.2]
*RenameTypePerfTests1#test_100_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +0.6% [±7.3] +2.5% [±5.8] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.3s - 18.4% [±19.6] +0.0% [±16.5]
*RenameTypePerfTests1#test_10_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 0.7% [±4.0] +11.4% [±9.1] +18.4% [±17.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.17s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.14s - 16.8% [±16.4]
*RenameTypePerfTests2#test_10_10() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +1.4% [±4.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.12s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.11s - 8.0% [±12.3] - 1.9% [±22.5] - 2.1% [±3.0]
*RenameTypePerfTests2#test_10_100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +12.1% [±16.6] - 2.6% [±6.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.32s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.26s - 20.2% [±21.0] +22.4% [±18.3]
*RenameTypePerfTests2#test_10_1000() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) - 0.7% [±1.3] - 0.8% [±0.3] +3.7% [±2.7] - 3.1% [±1.7]
*ExtractInterfaceHeapAcceptanceTests#testExtractControl() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +6.2% [n/a] - 2.1% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 18.9s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 16.4s - 15.1% [n/a] +0.8% [n/a]
*ExtractInterfacePerfAcceptanceTests#testExtractControl() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800) +6.3% [n/a] - 8.8% [n/a] - 0.8% [n/a] - 3.2% [n/a]