Performance of org.eclipse.osgi: I20100608-0911 relative to R-3.5-200906111540 (201006181800)

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Scenario Status

• an icon showing whether the test fails or passes and whether it's reliable or not.
  The legend for this icon is:
  • Green (): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
  • Red (): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
  • Gray (): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
  • Yellow ( or ): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
  • Black (): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)
  • "n/a": mark a test for with no performance results
• the value of the deviation from the baseline as a percentage (ie. formula is: (build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)
• the value of the standard error of this deviation as a percentage (ie. formula is: sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)
  When test only has one measure, the standard error cannot be computed and is replaced with a '[n/a]'.

• fly over image of failing tests to see the complete error message
• to look at the complete and detailed test results, click on its image

All 10 scenarios	SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
*StatePerformanceTest#testCreation() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 3.8% [±2.9]	+13.0% [±3.0]	- 1.4% [±3.2]	+10.5% [±3.2]
*StatePerformanceTest#testResolution100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 4.9% [±1.0]	+18.4% [±1.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.4s - 15.0% [±0.8]	+14.4% [±0.6]
*StatePerformanceTest#testResolution1000() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 2.8% [±0.5]	+8.8% [±0.9]	- 8.2% [±0.4]	+8.9% [±0.5]
*StatePerformanceTest#testResolution500() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 3.0% [±0.5]	+11.8% [±0.7]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.1s - 11.0% [±0.5]	+10.4% [±0.8]
*StatePerformanceTest#testResolution5000() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.5% [±10.6]	- 2.5% [±11.0]	- 4.5% [±10.1]	+3.1% [±9.7]
*StatePerformanceTest#testStoreAndRetrieve() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.0% [±1.1]	+21.7% [±1.8]	+1.0% [±1.0]	+24.0% [±1.6]
*StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution00100() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 5.3% [±1.7]	+9.8% [±1.3]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.89s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.8s - 11.0% [±1.1]	+3.6% [±1.2]
*StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution00500() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 5.1% [±1.0]	+12.3% [±1.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.4s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.36s - 10.6% [±1.2]	+8.9% [±1.2]
*StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution01000() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 2.7% [±0.4]	+11.8% [±0.3]	- 8.3% [±0.5]	+9.3% [±0.5]
*StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution05000() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.5% [±8.6]	+7.5% [±7.6]	+0.0% [±8.6]	+4.4% [±8.0]