Performance of org.eclipse.swt: I20100608-0911 relative to R-3.5-200906111540 (201006181800)

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Scenario Status

• an icon showing whether the test fails or passes and whether it's reliable or not.
  The legend for this icon is:
  • Green (): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
  • Red (): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
  • Gray (): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
  • Yellow ( or ): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
  • Black (): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)
  • "n/a": mark a test for with no performance results
• the value of the deviation from the baseline as a percentage (ie. formula is: (build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)
• the value of the standard error of this deviation as a percentage (ie. formula is: sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)
  When test only has one measure, the standard error cannot be computed and is replaced with a '[n/a]'.

• fly over image of failing tests to see the complete error message
• to look at the complete and detailed test results, click on its image

All 7 scenarios	SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
*Create composites (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 2.2% [±0.1]	+0.6% [±0.1]	- 1.7% [±0.3]	+0.4% [±0.4]
*Create composites and widgets (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 0.6% [±2.2]	- 1.2% [±1.6]	+1.8% [±0.5]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201005281800': Elapsed Process= 11.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 9.8s - 0.5% [±0.5]
*Draw on a window (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 0.5% [±0.3]	- 0.2% [±0.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 1.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.4s - 24.8% [±15.5]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201005281800': Elapsed Process= 15.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 13.6s +20.7% [±10.8]
*Draw on an image (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.0% [±0.7]	+0.1% [±0.7]	+0.9% [±1.0]	- 1.7% [±1.2]
*Draw strings using GC.drawString() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.3% [±0.1]	+0.3% [±0.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.84s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.69s - 22.1% [±12.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201005281800': Elapsed Process= 2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.7s +24.5% [±10.6]
*Draw strings using GC.drawText (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.3% [±0.3]	- 2.7% [±3.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2.5s - 17.2% [±14.9]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201005281800': Elapsed Process= 6.5s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 5.6s +4.2% [±15.9]
*Layout Composites (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.5% [±2.8]	- 1.5% [±2.1]	- 7.4% [±3.1]	+0.4% [±8.9]