Performance of org.eclipse.ua: I20100608-0911 relative to R-3.5-200906111540 (201006181800)

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Scenario Status

• an icon showing whether the test fails or passes and whether it's reliable or not.
  The legend for this icon is:
  • Green (): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
  • Red (): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
  • Gray (): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
  • Yellow ( or ): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
  • Black (): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)
  • "n/a": mark a test for with no performance results
• the value of the deviation from the baseline as a percentage (ie. formula is: (build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)
• the value of the standard error of this deviation as a percentage (ie. formula is: sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)
  When test only has one measure, the standard error cannot be computed and is replaced with a '[n/a]'.

• fly over image of failing tests to see the complete error message
• to look at the complete and detailed test results, click on its image

All 7 scenarios	SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
*OpenCheatSheetTest#testOpenCompositeCheatSheet() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.5% [±0.7]	- 6.6% [±0.4]	+2.8% [±1.6]	+0.4% [±0.5]
*OpenCheatSheetTest#testOpenSimpleCheatSheet() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 7.5% [±7.6]	- 2.5% [±0.7]	- 1.5% [±1.8]	+0.0% [±0.8]
*BuildHtmlSearchIndex#testCreateHtmlSearchIndex() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.6% [±3.5]	- 0.2% [±3.5]	+0.5% [±3.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.88s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.78s - 11.9% [±7.7]
*HelpServerTest#testServletRead100x() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+5.7% [±1.5]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.1s - 101.0% [±21.5]	- 5.0% [±1.9]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 99ms - 97.0% [±18.5]
*HelpServerTest#testStartServer() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 5.3% [±2.6]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800': Elapsed Process= 0.17s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.15s - 12.9% [±1.6]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201006041800': Elapsed Process= 0.31s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.27s - 5.0% [±4.5]	- 7.3% [±1.6]
*IndexAssemblePerformanceTest#testIndexAssemble() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	- 3.1% [±5.6]	- 0.7% [±7.6]	- 0.5% [±7.2]	+7.6% [±6.4]
*TocAssemblePerformanceTest#testTocAssemble() (vs. R-3.5-200906111540_201006111800)	+0.0% [±0.9]	+3.8% [±0.8]	- 1.1% [±0.9]	+10.4% [±1.0]