Performance of org.eclipse.jdt.ui: M20100908-0800 relative to R-3.5-200906111540 (201008301800)

Back to global results

The following fingerprints show results for the most representative tests of the org.eclipse.jdt.ui component.
Select which kind of scale you want to use:
Help on fingerprints

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)


Scenario Status

The following table gives a complete but compact view of performance results for the component.
Each line of the table shows the results for one scenario on all machines.

The name of the scenario is in bold when its results are also displayed in the fingerprints
and starts with an '*' when the scenario has no results in the last baseline run.

Here are information displayed for each test (ie. in each cell): Hints:

All 67 scenarios
SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
CleanUpPerfTest#testAllCleanUps() - 4.9% [±2.4] - 7.2% [±1.2] - 7.1% [±10.0] - 8.3% [±10.4]
CleanUpPerfTest#testCodeFormatCleanUp() +0.0% [±5.6] - 1.8% [±13.8] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 1.9s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.6s - 19.0% [±37.7] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 1.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.5s - 20.3% [±34.4]
CleanUpPerfTest#testCodeStyleCleanUp() - 9.3% [±1.2] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 1.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.1s - 13.5% [±2.4] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 2.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.8s - 19.1% [±24.1] - 2.8% [±24.2]
CleanUpPerfTest#testControlStatementsCleanUp() +2.4% [±3.9] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 0.56s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.51s - 10.2% [±2.8] - 2.6% [±31.7] +16.6% [±25.2]
CleanUpPerfTest#testConvertLoopCleanUp() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.4s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.33s - 21.1% [±21.6] - 8.8% [±3.3] - 1.9% [±1.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.45s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.31s - 44.6% [±36.8]
CleanUpPerfTest#testExpressionsCleanUp() - 0.9% [±0.6] - 5.9% [±0.3] +27.0% [±28.0] - 5.7% [±1.4]
CleanUpPerfTest#testJava50CleanUp() +10.8% [±12.3] - 4.1% [±3.4] +16.6% [±31.5] +16.9% [±32.0]
CleanUpPerfTest#testNullCleanUp() - 0.8% [±7.1] - 6.8% [±5.3] - 2.4% [±6.7] - 5.6% [±5.0]
CleanUpPerfTest#testOrganizeImports() +2.3% [±25.6] +1.7% [±5.0] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 1.4s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.2s - 18.0% [±38.9] +19.9% [±32.1]
CleanUpPerfTest#testSortMembersCleanUp() +2.5% [±3.5] - 4.0% [±3.9] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.2s - 61.3% [±38.7] +0.0% [±32.1]
CleanUpPerfTest#testStringCleanUp() - 3.0% [±4.3] - 9.4% [±5.1] +56.4% [±23.8] +5.1% [±28.7]
CleanUpPerfTest#testUnnecessaryCodeCleanUp() +13.8% [±15.2] - 6.6% [±0.8] - 3.1% [±1.0] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.26s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.24s - 11.4% [±3.8]
CleanUpPerfTest#testUnusedCodeCleanUp() +0.4% [±1.0] - 5.6% [±1.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.39s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.32s - 23.8% [±28.4] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.38s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.26s - 47.7% [±38.3]
CleanUpPerfTest#testVariableDeclarationCleanUp() - 8.0% [±12.9] - 5.6% [±0.2] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 2.1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.8s - 18.4% [±28.5] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 1.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.6s - 15.4% [±26.2]
OpenTypePerfTest#testColdException() - 7.1% [n/a] +30.1% [n/a] +5.7% [n/a] +2.6% [n/a]
OpenTypePerfTest#testWarmException() - 4.3% [n/a] +8.6% [n/a] +0.0% [n/a] +45.5% [n/a]
OpenTypePerfTest#testWarmException10() +0.0% [±12.9] +37.9% [±2.0] - 1.0% [±5.4] - 8.6% [±7.4]
OpenTypePerfTest#testWarmOpenSWT() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.34s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.3s - 12.4% [n/a] +18.0% [n/a] +0.0% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.59s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.53s - 11.7% [n/a]
OpenTypePerfTest#testWarmOpenSWTHistory10() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.29s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.25s - 13.9% [±1.4] +40.2% [±10.2] - 4.7% [±2.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.44s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.39s - 12.0% [±2.3]
OpenTypePerfTest#testWarmS10() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.28s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.25s - 12.5% [±3.1] +38.0% [±3.9] +2.9% [±4.7] - 2.0% [±1.7]
OrganizeImportsPerfTest#testOrganizeImport() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.13s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 89ms - 49.4% [±9.6] +14.8% [±10.0] +4.3% [±10.7] +11.7% [±7.5]
PackageExplorerColdPerfTest#testOpen() +22.6% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 24ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 21ms - 14.3% [n/a] +51.6% [n/a] +0.0% [n/a]
PackageExplorerEmptyPerfTest#testOpen() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.89s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.12s - 660.7% [n/a] +32.7% [n/a] +13.8% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.14s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.12s - 12.8% [n/a]
PackageExplorerPerfTest#testExpand() +4.2% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 21ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 17ms - 23.5% [n/a] +3.1% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 47ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 31ms - 51.6% [n/a]
PackageExplorerPerfTest#testOpen() +0.0% [n/a] +6.0% [n/a] +0.9% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.17s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.16s - 10.3% [n/a]
PackageExplorerPerfTest#testSelect() - 4.2% [n/a] - 4.2% [n/a] - 6.7% [n/a] - 6.7% [n/a]
PackageExplorerWarmPerfTest#testOpen() +9.1% [±4.1] +7.5% [±4.2] - 1.1% [±7.0] - 3.6% [±3.4]
TypeHierarchyPerfTest#testOpenCollHierarchy() +91.0% [n/a] +89.3% [n/a] +81.9% [n/a] +77.7% [n/a]
TypeHierarchyPerfTest#testOpenObjectHierarchy() +68.1% [n/a] +66.7% [n/a] +63.6% [n/a] +40.3% [n/a]
TypeHierarchyPerfTest#testOpenObjectHierarchy2() +47.6% [±27.4] +57.7% [±3.3] +59.6% [±3.5] +26.5% [±2.3]
IntroduceIndirectionPerfAcceptanceTests#testIntroduceIndirection() +1.3% [n/a] - 4.8% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 13.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 11.9s - 14.7% [n/a] - 1.5% [n/a]
MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests1#test_1000_10() - 0.5% [n/a] - 1.6% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 21.5s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 17.7s - 21.7% [n/a] +9.8% [n/a]
MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests1#test_100_10() +1.1% [n/a] - 2.6% [n/a] - 0.9% [n/a] +1.4% [n/a]
MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests1#test_10_10() +0.6% [±3.3] - 0.8% [±3.1] +36.3% [±40.2] +42.0% [±40.1]
MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests2#test_10_10() - 2.4% [±5.5] - 2.4% [±2.5] +0.0% [±3.7] +46.8% [±47.6]
MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests2#test_10_100() - 1.0% [n/a] - 2.0% [n/a] +36.9% [n/a] +0.3% [n/a]
MoveCompilationUnitPerfTests2#test_10_1000() +2.1% [n/a] - 2.6% [n/a] - 1.0% [n/a] - 0.4% [n/a]
MoveStaticMembersPerfTests1#test_1000_10() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 18.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 16.1s - 13.2% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 15.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 14.3s - 10.7% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 32.5s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 28.5s - 14.0% [n/a] +0.5% [n/a]
MoveStaticMembersPerfTests1#test_100_10() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 2.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2.4s - 14.5% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.8s - 11.2% [n/a] +7.3% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 2.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2s - 11.4% [n/a]
MoveStaticMembersPerfTests1#test_10_10() - 5.7% [±1.2] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 0.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.26s - 13.3% [±6.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.68s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.44s - 56.1% [±54.2] - 5.1% [±4.3]
MoveStaticMembersPerfTests2#test_10_10() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.65s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.35s - 85.7% [±78.3] - 8.0% [±3.7] - 7.6% [±4.3] - 8.9% [±5.1]
MoveStaticMembersPerfTests2#test_10_100() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 2.1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.7s - 27.7% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 1.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.1s - 46.2% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 2.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.8s - 30.3% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 1.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.1s - 48.6% [n/a]
MoveStaticMembersPerfTests2#test_10_1000() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 1mn 9s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 8.6s - 710.9% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 56.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 7.7s - 631.4% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 1mn 14s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 8.8s - 738.6% [n/a] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 55.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 7.2s - 672.3% [n/a]
RenameMethodPerfTests1#test_1000_10() - 0.4% [±2.8] - 0.7% [±1.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 21.5s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 16.4s - 31.7% [±4.0] +8.1% [±2.7]
RenameMethodPerfTests1#test_100_10() +3.6% [±8.5] +1.8% [±8.5] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 1.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.4s - 22.1% [±18.2] +14.9% [±17.8]
RenameMethodPerfTests1#test_10_10() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.18s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.15s - 20.0% [±20.3] - 0.9% [±2.9] - 4.7% [±3.6] +3.3% [±3.0]
RenameMethodPerfTests2#test_10_10() +30.7% [±30.9] - 0.9% [±2.9] +14.0% [±14.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.19s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.15s - 25.2% [±28.7]
RenameMethodPerfTests2#test_10_100() +2.9% [±14.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 0.15s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.14s - 10.0% [±9.9] - 3.8% [±8.8] +3.9% [±27.5]
RenameMethodPerfTests2#test_10_1000() +1.0% [±0.2] - 1.6% [±0.6] - 1.0% [±5.1] - 1.0% [±0.6]
RenameMethodWithOverloadPerfTests#test_1000_10() +1.6% [±1.2] - 2.1% [±0.6] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 29.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 25.8s - 15.8% [±2.6] +4.5% [±1.4]
RenameMethodWithOverloadPerfTests#test_100_10() +0.0% [±5.1] +1.2% [±3.7] - 7.0% [±11.5] - 5.8% [±12.9]
RenameMethodWithOverloadPerfTests#test_10_10() +1.3% [±3.0] +0.0% [±2.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.36s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.32s - 14.9% [±16.2] - 6.4% [±2.2]
RenamePackagePerfTests1#test_1000_10() - 1.3% [±2.6] - 4.0% [±1.4] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 23.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 18.2s - 28.1% [±3.0] +5.8% [±2.5]
RenamePackagePerfTests1#test_100_10() +0.9% [±6.2] - 2.4% [±4.8] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 2.1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.6s - 27.1% [±18.4] +1.0% [±17.0]
RenamePackagePerfTests1#test_10_10() - 1.4% [±3.7] - 1.8% [±3.6] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.41s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.33s - 24.1% [±24.5] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.27s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.23s - 19.2% [±15.1]
RenamePackagePerfTests2#test_10_10() - 2.4% [±4.3] - 2.4% [±3.7] - 1.8% [±4.1] +15.8% [±20.8]
RenamePackagePerfTests2#test_10_100() - 1.6% [±4.9] - 5.7% [±4.8] - 8.3% [±19.4] - 3.8% [±18.2]
RenamePackagePerfTests2#test_10_1000() - 0.4% [±1.5] - 1.6% [±1.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 25.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 20.7s - 22.2% [±3.4] +8.4% [±1.6]
RenameTypePerfAcceptanceTests#testWarm() +8.3% [n/a] - 3.9% [n/a] - 0.6% [n/a] - 2.9% [n/a]
RenameTypePerfTests1#test_1000_10() +0.4% [±2.4] - 0.6% [±1.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 21.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 16.8s - 29.9% [±3.7] +10.3% [±2.6]
RenameTypePerfTests1#test_100_10() +3.5% [±8.0] +1.5% [±6.4] - 6.9% [±17.8] - 1.1% [±19.7]
RenameTypePerfTests1#test_10_10() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.14s - 39.2% [±39.9] +1.8% [±5.1] +14.7% [±14.6] +3.2% [±27.6]
RenameTypePerfTests2#test_10_10() +0.7% [±4.6] - 0.9% [±5.3] +14.9% [±13.7] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.17s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.14s - 20.0% [±17.9]
RenameTypePerfTests2#test_10_100() +8.7% [±14.0] - 7.9% [±7.8] +7.9% [±23.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.25s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.2s - 24.0% [±22.3]
RenameTypePerfTests2#test_10_1000() +0.5% [±0.3] - 1.1% [±0.4] +0.8% [±3.2] +1.3% [±2.1]
ExtractInterfaceHeapAcceptanceTests#testExtractControl() - 0.6% [n/a] - 4.1% [n/a] +4.3% [n/a] - 1.6% [n/a]
ExtractInterfacePerfAcceptanceTests#testExtractControl() - 1.3% [n/a] - 5.0% [n/a] - 1.2% [n/a] +0.0% [n/a]