Performance of org.eclipse.pde.ui: M20100908-0800 relative to R-3.5-200906111540 (201008301800)

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Scenario Status

• an icon showing whether the test fails or passes and whether it's reliable or not.
  The legend for this icon is:
  • Green (): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
  • Red (): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
  • Gray (): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
  • Yellow ( or ): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
  • Black (): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)
  • "n/a": mark a test for with no performance results
• the value of the deviation from the baseline as a percentage (ie. formula is: (build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)
• the value of the standard error of this deviation as a percentage (ie. formula is: sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)
  When test only has one measure, the standard error cannot be computed and is replaced with a '[n/a]'.

• fly over image of failing tests to see the complete error message
• to look at the complete and detailed test results, click on its image

All 5 scenarios	SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
OpenManifestEditorPerfTest#testEditorOpenMF()	- 0.5% [±1.4]	- 1.5% [±1.2]	- 6.0% [±2.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.19s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.13s - 47.7% [±4.3]
OpenManifestEditorPerfTest#testEditorOpenXML()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.41s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.32s - 25.8% [±1.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 0.37s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.29s - 27.1% [±1.0]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.38s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.28s - 36.5% [±1.6]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.37s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.23s - 59.1% [±2.4]
SchemaLoaderPerfTest#testSchemaAbbreviated()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 89ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 24ms - 270.8% [±2.3]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 78ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 22ms - 254.5% [±2.0]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.14s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 25ms - 460.0% [±1.8]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.13s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 22ms - 472.7% [±2.0]
SchemaLoaderPerfTest#testSchemaUnabbreviated()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.26s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.23s - 17.3% [±0.3]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 0.22s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.19s - 14.6% [±0.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.26s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.22s - 18.2% [±0.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.22s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.19s - 18.3% [±0.2]
SchemaTraversePerfTest#testSchemaTraverse()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 88ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 24ms - 266.7% [±2.7]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008231800': Elapsed Process= 78ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 21ms - 271.4% [±2.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.14s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 24ms - 483.3% [±2.5]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 0.12s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 22ms - 468.2% [±2.0]