| Select which kind of scale you want to use: |
Help on fingerprints




): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
or
): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)(build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)All 7 scenarios |
SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) | RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) | Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) | Win XP Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) |
| Create composites |
+0.5% [±0.1]
|
- 0.2% [±0.1]
|
- 3.1% [±0.3]
|
- 1.2% [±0.4]
|
| Create composites and widgets |
+2.3% [±2.2]
|
- 0.4% [±1.3]
|
+0.7% [±0.5]
|
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201008301800': Elapsed Process= 11.6s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 10.1s
- 14.3% [±0.4]
|
| Draw on a window |
+0.2% [±0.0]
|
- 0.4% [±0.1]
|
+37.9% [±14.0]
|
+38.9% [±11.2]
|
| Draw on an image |
+2.1% [±0.9]
|
- 0.2% [±0.7]
|
+0.8% [±1.2]
|
+0.1% [±1.0]
|
| Draw strings using GC.drawString() |
+0.2% [±0.1]
|
+1.8% [±0.2]
|
+36.4% [±9.0]
|
+38.2% [±9.4]
|
| Draw strings using GC.drawText |
+4.3% [±0.4]
|
+1.3% [±0.5]
|
+33.8% [±13.0]
|
+20.0% [±12.0]
|
| Layout Composites |
- 2.0% [±2.6]
|
- 1.5% [±1.8]
|
+0.3% [±3.0]
|
+13.8% [±6.8]
|