Performance of org.eclipse.pde.ui: M20110210-1200 relative to R-3.5-200906111540 (201102071800)

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 1.6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Scenario Status

• an icon showing whether the test fails or passes and whether it's reliable or not.
  The legend for this icon is:
  • Green (): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
  • Red (): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
  • Gray (): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
  • Yellow ( or ): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
  • Black (): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)
  • "n/a": mark a test for with no performance results
• the value of the deviation from the baseline as a percentage (ie. formula is: (build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)
• the value of the standard error of this deviation as a percentage (ie. formula is: sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)
  When test only has one measure, the standard error cannot be computed and is replaced with a '[n/a]'.

• fly over image of failing tests to see the complete error message
• to look at the complete and detailed test results, click on its image

All 5 scenarios	SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
OpenManifestEditorPerfTest#testEditorOpenMF()	- 0.9% [±1.2]	- 0.5% [±1.3]	+1.2% [±2.0]	- 3.1% [±2.0]
OpenManifestEditorPerfTest#testEditorOpenXML()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.41s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.32s - 26.5% [±0.9]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.36s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.29s - 27.2% [±1.0]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.4s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.28s - 45.7% [±1.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.31s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.24s - 31.4% [±1.2]
SchemaLoaderPerfTest#testSchemaAbbreviated()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 91ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 24ms - 279.2% [±2.8]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 78ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 22ms - 254.5% [±2.0]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.14s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 25ms - 464.0% [±1.8]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.13s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 22ms - 472.7% [±2.0]
SchemaLoaderPerfTest#testSchemaUnabbreviated()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.29s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.22s - 29.9% [±0.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.25s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.19s - 29.0% [±0.1]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.29s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.22s - 30.5% [±0.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.24s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.19s - 28.0% [±0.2]
SchemaTraversePerfTest#testSchemaTraverse()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 90ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 23ms - 291.3% [±2.9]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 78ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 21ms - 271.4% [±1.9]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.14s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 24ms - 487.5% [±2.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.5-200906111540_201102071800': Elapsed Process= 0.13s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 21ms - 500.0% [±2.1]