Performance of org.eclipse.osgi: I20110613-1736 relative to R-3.6-201006080911 (201106021708)

SLED 10 Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Win XP Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)

Scenario Status

• an icon showing whether the test fails or passes and whether it's reliable or not.
  The legend for this icon is:
  • Green (): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
  • Red (): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
  • Gray (): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
  • Yellow ( or ): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
  • Black (): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)
  • "n/a": mark a test for with no performance results
• the value of the deviation from the baseline as a percentage (ie. formula is: (build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)
• the value of the standard error of this deviation as a percentage (ie. formula is: sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)
  When test only has one measure, the standard error cannot be computed and is replaced with a '[n/a]'.

• fly over image of failing tests to see the complete error message
• to look at the complete and detailed test results, click on its image

All 10 scenarios	SLED 10 Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)	Win XP Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
StatePerformanceTest#testCreation()	- 3.0% [±4.0]	+6.1% [±3.5]	- 1.9% [±4.1]	+0.2% [±3.5]
StatePerformanceTest#testResolution100()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 1.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1s - 17.1% [±1.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 1.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1s - 27.8% [±1.5]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201105201800': Elapsed Process= 1.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1s - 13.7% [±1.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201105271800': Elapsed Process= 1.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.1s - 10.1% [±2.3]
StatePerformanceTest#testResolution1000()	- 7.5% [±0.6]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 0.76s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.68s - 12.5% [±0.8]	- 4.9% [±0.7]	+3.3% [±1.7]
StatePerformanceTest#testResolution500()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 0.88s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.8s - 10.7% [±1.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 0.92s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.78s - 18.0% [±1.0]	- 8.7% [±0.7]	- 2.1% [±2.1]
StatePerformanceTest#testResolution5000()	+3.4% [±10.8]	+5.2% [±10.2]	+4.1% [±10.2]	+5.0% [±10.7]
StatePerformanceTest#testStoreAndRetrieve()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 3.1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2.4s - 26.3% [±2.9]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 3.1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2.4s - 26.9% [±2.7]	- 5.4% [±2.3]	+2.6% [±2.5]
StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution00100()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 0.75s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.58s - 29.3% [±1.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 0.79s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.59s - 33.0% [±1.6]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201105201800': Elapsed Process= 0.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.59s - 35.4% [±0.8]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201105271800': Elapsed Process= 0.78s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.65s - 20.6% [±2.3]
StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution00500()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 0.34s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.27s - 24.4% [±1.0]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 0.35s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.27s - 27.6% [±0.9]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201105201800': Elapsed Process= 0.34s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.27s - 26.2% [±1.4]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201105271800': Elapsed Process= 0.34s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.28s - 21.9% [±1.3]
StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution01000()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 0.8s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.68s - 17.5% [±0.5]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 0.82s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.67s - 21.9% [±0.2]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201105201800': Elapsed Process= 0.82s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.68s - 21.0% [±0.6]	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201105271800': Elapsed Process= 0.82s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.7s - 17.5% [±1.1]
StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution05000()	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 1.1s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.89s - 22.1% [±9.9]	- 3.5% [±7.8]	- 3.7% [±8.1]	+6.4% [±7.8]