| Select which kind of scale you want to use: |
Help on fingerprints




): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
or
): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)(build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)All 5 scenarios |
SLED 10 Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) | RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) | Win XP Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) | Win XP Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM) |
| OpenManifestEditorPerfTest#testEditorOpenMF() |
- 6.3% [±1.3]
|
- 6.7% [±1.3]
|
+1.4% [±2.0]
|
+48.1% [±16.5]
|
| OpenManifestEditorPerfTest#testEditorOpenXML() |
- 1.7% [±0.9]
|
- 1.1% [±0.9]
|
+4.0% [±0.9]
|
+26.5% [±9.5]
|
| SchemaLoaderPerfTest#testSchemaAbbreviated() |
+0.0% [±0.2]
|
+0.0% [±0.1]
|
+0.8% [±0.1]
|
+46.8% [±3.1]
|
| SchemaLoaderPerfTest#testSchemaUnabbreviated() |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 0.25s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.22s
- 11.3% [±0.2]
|
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201106021708': Elapsed Process= 0.25s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.23s
- 10.6% [±0.1]
|
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201105201800': Elapsed Process= 0.24s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.22s
- 14.0% [±0.2]
|
+2.0% [±1.0]
|
| SchemaTraversePerfTest#testSchemaTraverse() |
+0.0% [±0.2]
|
+0.0% [±0.2]
|
+1.6% [±0.2]
|
+45.4% [±3.6]
|