Performance of org.eclipse.osgi: M20110909-1335 relative to R-3.6-201006080911 (201109021800)

Back to global results

The following fingerprints show results for the most representative tests of the org.eclipse.osgi component.
Select which kind of scale you want to use:
Help on fingerprints

Scenario Status

The following table gives a complete but compact view of performance results for the component.
Each line of the table shows the results for one scenario on all machines.

The name of the scenario is in bold when its results are also displayed in the fingerprints
and starts with an '*' when the scenario has no results in the last baseline run.

Here are information displayed for each test (ie. in each cell): Hints:

All 10 scenarios

SLED 10 Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
RHEL 5.0 Sun 6.0_04 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
Win XP Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
Win XP Sun 1.6.0_17 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
StatePerformanceTest#testCreation() - 2.3% [±3.6] - 3.4% [±4.5] n/an/a
StatePerformanceTest#testResolution100() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201109021800': Elapsed Process= 1.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1s - 15.9% [±1.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201109021800': Elapsed Process= 1.2s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1s - 20.1% [±2.0] n/an/a
StatePerformanceTest#testResolution1000() - 9.7% [±0.9] - 5.7% [±0.8] n/an/a
StatePerformanceTest#testResolution500() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201109021800': Elapsed Process= 0.9s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.79s - 13.7% [±1.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201109021800': Elapsed Process= 0.89s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.79s - 13.3% [±1.6] n/an/a
StatePerformanceTest#testResolution5000() +4.9% [±10.3] +2.8% [±10.0] n/an/a
StatePerformanceTest#testStoreAndRetrieve() - 4.5% [±2.6] +0.0% [±2.5] n/an/a
StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution00100() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201109021800': Elapsed Process= 0.76s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.58s - 32.2% [±1.1] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201109021800': Elapsed Process= 0.78s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.6s - 29.7% [±1.2] n/an/a
StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution00500() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201109021800': Elapsed Process= 0.34s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.27s - 26.9% [±1.3] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201109021800': Elapsed Process= 0.34s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.28s - 24.0% [±1.4] n/an/a
StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution01000() Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201109021800': Elapsed Process= 0.83s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.67s - 22.9% [±0.6] Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-3.6-201006080911_201109021800': Elapsed Process= 0.82s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.68s - 22.2% [±0.5] n/an/a
StateUsesPerformanceTest#testUsesResolution05000() - 8.4% [±8.1] - 5.8% [±7.4] n/an/a