| Select which kind of scale you want to use: |
Help on fingerprints

): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
or
): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)(build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)All 7 scenarios |
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 (x86_64) |
| *OpenCheatSheetTest#testOpenCompositeCheatSheet() (vs. I20181001-0920) |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 0.56s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.41s
- 35.1% [±0.1]
|
| *OpenCheatSheetTest#testOpenSimpleCheatSheet() (vs. I20181001-0920) |
- 5.5% [±0.1]
|
| *BuildHtmlSearchIndex#testCreateHtmlSearchIndex() (vs. I20181001-0920) |
+8.6% [±1.7]
|
| *HelpServerTest#testServletRead100x() (vs. I20181001-0920) |
+9.9% [±3.1]
|
| *HelpServerTest#testStartServer() (vs. I20181001-0920) |
+15.4% [±2.4]
|
| *IndexAssemblePerformanceTest#testIndexAssemble() (vs. I20181001-0920) |
+2.9% [±0.9]
|
| *TocAssemblePerformanceTest#testTocAssemble() (vs. I20181001-0920) |
+11.8% [±0.1]
|