Performance of org.eclipse.ui: I20181206-0815 relative to R-4.9-20180906074

SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 (x86_64)

Scenario Status

• an icon showing whether the test fails or passes and whether it's reliable or not.
  The legend for this icon is:
  • Green (): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
  • Red (): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
  • Gray (): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
  • Yellow ( or ): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
  • Black (): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)
  • "n/a": mark a test for with no performance results
• the value of the deviation from the baseline as a percentage (ie. formula is: (build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)
• the value of the standard error of this deviation as a percentage (ie. formula is: sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)
  When test only has one measure, the standard error cannot be computed and is replaced with a '[n/a]'.

• fly over image of failing tests to see the complete error message
• to look at the complete and detailed test results, click on its image

All 64 scenarios	SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 (x86_64)
*FormsPerformanceTest#test_createForm() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 1.2% [±0.1]
*CommandsPerformanceTest#testBindingCacheHitHard() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+0.0% [n/a]
*CommandsPerformanceTest#testBindingCacheHitHardReverse() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 8.3% [n/a]
*CommandsPerformanceTest#testBindingCacheHitSoft() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 0.73s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.62s - 18.3% [n/a]
*CommandsPerformanceTest#testBindingCacheMissLarge() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 34ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 27ms - 25.9% [n/a]
*EditorSwitchTest#testEditorSwitch:perf_basic,perf_outline() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 0.94s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.83s - 13.5% [±15.5]
*EditorSwitchTest#testEditorSwitch:perf_outline,java() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+9.5% [±3.8]
*GenerateIdentifiersTest#Generate 10000 identifiers() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+10.3% [±0.0]
*LabelProviderTest#DecoratingLabelProvider with Colors() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+3.8% [±36.7]
*LabelProviderTest#DecoratingLabelProvider() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 0.37s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.28s - 31.1% [±72.2]
*LabelProviderTest#DecoratingStyledCellLabelProvider with Colors() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+3.6% [±6.3]
*LabelProviderTest#DecoratingStyledCellLabelProvider() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+4.6% [±3.0]
*OpenCloseEditorTest#testOpenAndCloseEditors:java() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+23.3% [±5.7]
*OpenCloseEditorTest#testOpenAndCloseEditors:perf_basic() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 8.0% [±7.2]
*OpenCloseEditorTest#testOpenAndCloseEditors:perf_outline() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+15.5% [±22.2]
*OpenClosePerspectiveTest#testOpenClosePerspectives:DebugPerspective() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 7.9% [±23.3]
*OpenClosePerspectiveTest#testOpenClosePerspectives:JavaPerspective() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+12.1% [±13.3]
*OpenClosePerspectiveTest#testOpenClosePerspectives:resourcePerspective() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+17.2% [±10.5]
*OpenClosePerspectiveTest#testOpenClosePerspectives:EmptyPerspective2() (vs. I20181001-0920)	[n/a]
*OpenClosePerspectiveTest#testOpenClosePerspectives:performancePerspective1() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+29.0% [±5.0]
*OpenCloseWindowTest#testOpenCloseWindows:DebugPerspective() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+46.8% [±7.2]
*OpenCloseWindowTest#testOpenCloseWindows:JavaPerspective() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+49.0% [±5.3]
*OpenCloseWindowTest#testOpenCloseWindows:resourcePerspective() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+8.5% [±14.9]
*OpenCloseWindowTest#testOpenCloseWindows:EmptyPerspective2() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+12.6% [±15.3]
*OpenCloseWindowTest#testOpenCloseWindows:performancePerspective1() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 1.4s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.2s - 18.8% [±12.9]
*OpenMultipleEditorTest#testOpenMultipleEditors:java[closeAll]() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+3.7% [n/a]
*OpenMultipleEditorTest#testOpenMultipleEditors:java[closeEach]() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 1mn 15s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1mn 2s - 20.6% [n/a]
*OpenMultipleEditorTest#testOpenMultipleEditors:perf_basic[closeAll]() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 7.9s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 7.1s - 11.8% [n/a]
*OpenMultipleEditorTest#testOpenMultipleEditors:perf_basic[closeEach]() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 1.3% [n/a]
*OpenMultipleEditorTest#testOpenMultipleEditors:perf_outline[closeAll]() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 4.6% [n/a]
*OpenMultipleEditorTest#testOpenMultipleEditors:perf_outline[closeEach]() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+0.3% [n/a]
*OpenNavigatorFolderTest#testOpenNavigatorFolder() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 6.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2s - 205.3% [n/a]
*PerspectiveSwitchTest#testPerspectiveSwitch:JavaPerspective,DebugPerspective,editor 1.java() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+9.4% [±14.5]
*PerspectiveSwitchTest#testPerspectiveSwitch:resourcePerspective,JavaPerspective,editor 1.java() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+3.9% [±5.4]
*PerspectiveSwitchTest#testPerspectiveSwitch:performancePerspective1,performancePerspective2,editor 1.perf_basic() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+14.1% [±5.2]
*ProgressReportingTest#testJobIsCanceled() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+11.1% [±4.3]
*ProgressReportingTest#testJobNoMonitorUsage() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+0.0% [±6.0]
*ProgressReportingTest#testJobSetTaskName() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 12.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 5.7s - 116.9% [n/a]
*ProgressReportingTest#testJobSubMonitorNewChild() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 0.6% [±11.3]
*ProgressReportingTest#testJobSubMonitorSplit() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+4.3% [±5.6]
*ProgressReportingTest#testJobSubMonitorWorked() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 0.8% [±2.2]
*ProgressReportingTest#testJobSubTask() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 6.7s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 6.1s - 10.3% [n/a]
*ProgressReportingTest#testJobWorked() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 9.3% [n/a]
*ProgressReportingTest#testProgressMonitorDialogIsCanceled() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 0.13s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.1s - 23.1% [±7.9]
*ProgressReportingTest#testProgressMonitorDialogNoMonitorUsage() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+28.9% [±6.2]
*ProgressReportingTest#testProgressMonitorDialogSetTaskName() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 4.9s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 1.4s - 247.0% [n/a]
*ProgressReportingTest#testProgressMonitorDialogSubTask() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+0.7% [±15.6]
*ProgressReportingTest#testProgressMonitorDialogWorked() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 0.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.18s - 64.3% [±9.1]
*ProgressReportingTest#testRunInForegroundIsCanceled() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+14.8% [±8.2]
*ProgressReportingTest#testRunInForegroundNoMonitorUsage() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 60ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 35ms - 71.4% [±8.0]
*ProgressReportingTest#testRunInForegroundSetTaskName() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 96ms is not within [0%, 110'%] of 84ms - 14.3% [±4.3]
*ProgressReportingTest#testRunInForegroundSubTask() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 0.24s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 90ms - 166.7% [±163.7]
*ProgressReportingTest#testRunInForegroundWorked() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 5.1% [±3.0]
*ResizeTest#Perspective DebugPerspective setSize() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+12.0% [±0.2]
*ResizeTest#Perspective JavaBrowsingPerspective setSize() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 1.1% [±0.3]
*ResizeTest#Perspective JavaHierarchyPerspective setSize() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+0.4% [±1.4]
*ResizeTest#Perspective JavaPerspective setSize() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 6.7% [±0.1]
*ResizeTest#Perspective PDEPerspective setSize() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 0.7% [±1.7]
*ResizeTest#Perspective TeamSynchronizingPerspective setSize() (vs. I20181001-0920)	Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20181001-0920': Elapsed Process= 0.58s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.44s - 32.3% [±7.1]
*ResizeTest#Perspective resourcePerspective setSize() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+3.9% [±2.5]
*ResizeTest#Perspective EmptyPerspective setSize() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+38.5% [±7.5]
*ResizeTest#Perspective EmptyPerspective2 setSize() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+10.3% [±18.9]
*ResizeTest#Perspective performancePerspective1 setSize() (vs. I20181001-0920)	+0.3% [±2.0]
*ResizeTest#Perspective performancePerspective2 setSize() (vs. I20181001-0920)	- 6.1% [±5.9]