| Select which kind of scale you want to use: |
Help on fingerprints

): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
or
): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)(build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)All 7 scenarios |
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 (x86_64) |
| *Create composites (vs. I20191016-1800) |
+1.4% [±0.0]
|
| *Create composites and widgets (vs. I20191016-1800) |
+10.1% [±0.7]
|
| *Draw on a window (vs. I20191016-1800) |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20191016-1800': Elapsed Process= 1.5s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 10ms
- 13,761.9% [±35.6]
|
| *Draw on an image (vs. I20191016-1800) |
+2.6% [±0.3]
|
| *Draw strings using GC.drawString() (vs. I20191016-1800) |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20191016-1800': Elapsed Process= 0.13s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 72ms
- 73.8% [±0.4]
|
| *Draw strings using GC.drawText (vs. I20191016-1800) |
- 3.6% [±0.2]
|
| *Layout Composites (vs. I20191016-1800) |
+4.7% [±0.6]
|