| Select which kind of scale you want to use: |
Help on fingerprints

): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
or
): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)(build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)All 7 scenarios |
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64) |
| *Create composites (vs. R-4.5.2-201509040015) |
- 9.4% [±2.1]
|
| *Create composites and widgets (vs. R-4.5.2-201509040015) |
- 6.6% [±13.4]
|
| *Draw on a window (vs. R-4.5.2-201509040015) |
- 0.2% [±0.6]
|
| *Draw on an image (vs. R-4.5.2-201509040015) |
+0.0% [±0.5]
|
| *Draw strings using GC.drawString() (vs. R-4.5.2-201509040015) |
- 2.1% [±0.7]
|
| *Draw strings using GC.drawText (vs. R-4.5.2-201509040015) |
- 0.8% [±0.5]
|
| *Layout Composites (vs. R-4.5.2-201509040015) |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-4.5.2-201509040015': Elapsed Process= 0.12s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.11s
- 10.8% [±20.0]
|