| Select which kind of scale you want to use: |
Help on fingerprints

): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
or
): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)(build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)All 5 scenarios |
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64) |
| OpenCheatSheetTest#testOpenCompositeCheatSheet() |
- 1.6% [±2.4]
|
| OpenCheatSheetTest#testOpenSimpleCheatSheet() |
+4.3% [±2.2]
|
| BuildHtmlSearchIndex#testCreateHtmlSearchIndex() |
- 8.8% [±3.5]
|
| IndexAssemblePerformanceTest#testIndexAssemble() |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'R-4.6-201606061100': Elapsed Process= 0.62s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.5s
- 24.0% [±8.8]
|
| TocAssemblePerformanceTest#testTocAssemble() |
+2.9% [±3.3]
|