| Select which kind of scale you want to use: |
Help on fingerprints

): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
or
): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)(build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)All 12 scenarios |
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 (x86_64) |
| *CollatorPerformanceTest#testCollator() (vs. I20180601-0915) |
+12.5% [±42.3]
|
| *ComboViewerRefreshTest#testRefreshSmall() (vs. I20180601-0915) |
+2.9% [±4.0]
|
| *FastTableViewerRefreshTest#testRefreshMultiple() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
+52.9% [±0.6]
|
| *FastTableViewerRefreshTest#testUpdateMultiple() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
+62.3% [±0.8]
|
| *FastTreeTest#testAddFiftyTenTimes() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
- 1.3% [±2.3]
|
| *FastTreeTest#testAddHundredTenTimes() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20180530-0200': Elapsed Process= 0.43s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.37s
- 18.7% [±0.7]
|
| *FastTreeTest#testAddTenTenTimes() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
- 9.9% [±7.0]
|
| *ListViewerRefreshTest#testRefresh() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
+32.9% [±1.0]
|
| *ProgressMonitorDialogPerformanceTest#testLongNames() (vs. I20180601-0915) |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20180601-0915': Elapsed Process= 2.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 2s
- 12.9% [±4.9]
|
| *ShrinkingTreeTest#testTreeViewerRefresh() (vs. I20180601-0915) |
+2.8% [±4.1]
|
| *TreeAddTest#testAddThousand() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20180530-0200': Elapsed Process= 0.42s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.33s
- 27.6% [±2.0]
|
| *TreeAddTest#testAddThousandPreSort() (vs. I20180531-0700) |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20180531-0700': Elapsed Process= 0.39s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.33s
- 19.2% [±9.1]
|