| Select which kind of scale you want to use: |
Help on fingerprints

): mark a successful result, which means this test has neither significant performance regression nor significant standard error
): mark a failing result, which means this test shows a significant performance regression (more than 10%)
): mark a failing result (see above) with a comment explaining this degradation.
or
): mark a failing or successful result with a significant standard error (more than 3%)
): mark an undefined result, which means that deviation on this test is not a number (NaN) or is infinite (happens when the reference value is equals to 0!)(build_test_time - baseline_test_time) / baseline_test_time)sqrt(build_test_stddev^2 / N + baseline_test_stddev^2 / N) / baseline_test_time)All 7 scenarios |
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 (x86_64) |
| *OpenCheatSheetTest#testOpenCompositeCheatSheet() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
+25.7% [±0.3]
|
| *OpenCheatSheetTest#testOpenSimpleCheatSheet() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
+28.6% [±0.7]
|
| *BuildHtmlSearchIndex#testCreateHtmlSearchIndex() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
Performance criteria not met when compared to 'I20180530-0200': Elapsed Process= 2.3s is not within [0%, 110'%] of 0.57s
- 303.7% [±2.2]
|
| *HelpServerTest#testServletRead100x() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
- 0.4% [±0.1]
|
| *HelpServerTest#testStartServer() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
+0.4% [±0.1]
|
| *IndexAssemblePerformanceTest#testIndexAssemble() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
+24.0% [±1.2]
|
| *TocAssemblePerformanceTest#testTocAssemble() (vs. I20180530-0200) |
+35.8% [±0.2]
|