(11,'2011-02-12 13:34:22','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(4 inline comments)\n\n',2479,'AAAL23///0s='),(116,'2011-02-12 11:36:12','Patch Set 2:\n\nfixed spaces',2479,'AAAL23///1I='),(116,'2011-02-12 11:35:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',2479,'AAAL23///1M='),(116,'2011-02-12 11:06:19','Patch Set 1:\n\n@Mathias Kinzler\nThe action classes don\'t have to be public. The only class that must be accessible by other plugins is GitFileRevisionReference.java\n\n\n@Matthias Sohn\nFor example: our plugin displays a list of changed files. We know that they can be part of EGit repository, but from our plugin we can\'t perform such actions as described here.\nAfter this patch we just need to implement adapter to GitFileRevisionReference and the actions will appear in context menu.',2479,'AAAL23///1Q='),(11,'2011-02-12 07:20:11','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2479,'AAAL23///1U='),(4,'2011-02-11 21:12:17','Patch Set 1:\n\nI don\'t understand yet what this is good for, could you explain ?',2479,'AAAL23///24='),(46,'2011-02-11 16:16:19','Patch Set 1:\n\nShouldn\'t we put these into some package that\'s not called \"internal\"?',2479,'AAAL23///3E='),(116,'2011-02-24 11:01:53','Patch Set 4:\n\nThe CQ was already approved here: http://egit.eclipse.org/r/2356\n\nCheck this patch again, please.',2479,'AAAL23///M0='),(2,'2011-02-13 21:44:41','Uploaded patch set 4.',2479,'AAAL23///xc='),(2,'2011-02-13 21:45:08','Patch Set 4: Unclean IP, do not check in\n\nLooking better but this requires a CQ now.',2479,'AAAL23///xY='),(11,'2011-03-17 09:11:25','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',2479,'AAAL3n///vA='),(4,'2011-04-06 21:25:22','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(11 inline comments)\n\nThe CQ approved for Change I56a1d4cd5078240a9bb518d7991d01f033a0fd51 can\'t also apply to this change. Every change which changes more than 250 LOC must go through IP review individually, for each one a dedicated CQ must be filed and approved. See [1].\n\nI don\'t get where these actions are used (didn\'t find them in EGit UI). How can your implementation be tested? How about an automated test ?\n\n[1] figure 6 in http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf',2479,'AAAL4H///14='),(2,'2011-02-11 17:14:58','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2480,'AAAL23///28='),(2,'2011-02-11 17:14:57','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2480,'AAAL23///3A='),(1,'2011-02-12 02:01:00','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved\n\nIs it just me, or there must be a better way to do this.  This script is out of control now.  I thought it would be an easy Perl hack to do the search-replace for the version, but its not.  Its horrific at this point.',2481,'AAAL23///20='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:16:42','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2481,'AAAL23///2E='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:16:41','Patch Set 1: Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nyeah it\'s a mess\n\nI think it\'s time to give maven 3 and tycho a chance here and use the tycho release plugin, I believe our maven guys use that',2481,'AAAL23///2M='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:16:42','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2482,'AAAL23///2I='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:14:20','Patch Set 1: Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2482,'AAAL23///2Q='),(1,'2011-02-12 02:01:51','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved\n\n',2482,'AAAL23///2w='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:22:55','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nunnecessary bumping of version as we don\'t plan to ship a bug fix release for 0.11.1',2483,'AAAL23///1w='),(1,'2011-02-12 02:03:54','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2483,'AAAL23///2o='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:12:36','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2483,'AAAL23///2Y='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:17:31','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2484,'AAAL23///10='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:17:30','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2484,'AAAL23///2A='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:17:30','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2485,'AAAL23///18='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:04:32','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2485,'AAAL23///2g='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:17:31','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2486,'AAAL23///14='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:04:15','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2486,'AAAL23///2k='),(4,'2011-02-12 02:13:26','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n',2486,'AAAL23///2U='),(4,'2011-02-12 14:09:42','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2487,'AAAL23///0k='),(4,'2011-02-12 14:09:41','Patch Set 1: Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2487,'AAAL23///0o='),(1,'2011-02-12 02:45:48','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved\n\n',2487,'AAAL23///1s='),(4,'2011-02-12 14:41:26','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2488,'AAAL23///0c='),(4,'2011-02-12 14:41:27','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2488,'AAAL23///0U='),(4,'2011-02-12 14:41:08','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2489,'AAAL23///0g='),(4,'2011-02-12 14:41:26','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2489,'AAAL23///0Y='),(46,'2011-02-14 13:19:46','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2490,'AAAL23///wM='),(46,'2011-02-14 13:19:45','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThanks Alex.',2490,'AAAL23///wQ='),(100,'2011-02-17 19:58:08','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(4 inline comments)\n\nGood idea to add more tests to the CloneCommandTest class.',2491,'AAAL23///h8='),(2,'2011-02-16 00:18:27','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2492,'AAAL23///pc='),(2,'2011-02-16 00:18:14','Uploaded patch set 4.',2492,'AAAL23///pg='),(2,'2011-02-16 00:18:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2492,'AAAL23///pY='),(4,'2011-02-15 21:15:07','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2492,'AAAL23///qg='),(1,'2011-02-15 02:40:57','Uploaded patch set 3.',2492,'AAAL23///tk='),(1,'2011-02-13 21:52:05','Uploaded patch set 2.',2492,'AAAL23///xM='),(44,'2011-02-14 16:32:50','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2493,'AAAL23///vM='),(44,'2011-02-14 16:32:49','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2493,'AAAL23///vQ='),(3,'2011-02-14 13:23:02','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nLooks good to me.',2493,'AAAL23///wI='),(44,'2011-02-15 20:50:00','Patch Set 5:\n\nRebased to current master',2494,'AAAL23///q8='),(4,'2011-02-15 21:10:34','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2494,'AAAL23///qo='),(4,'2011-02-15 21:10:33','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2494,'AAAL23///qs='),(44,'2011-02-15 20:49:33','Uploaded patch set 5.',2494,'AAAL23///rA='),(4,'2011-02-15 06:00:10','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nWhen clicking \"Commit\" from the repository node in the Repositories View \"modified, not staged\" files under this repo\'s working tree aren\'t checked by default in the file list of the commit dialog. This is not consistent with the behavior of the team menu in the package explorer. I think they should behave in the same way as the input for the operation when calling it from the repository node is the whole repository.',2494,'AAAL23///tc='),(44,'2011-02-15 08:43:40','Uploaded patch set 4.',2494,'AAAL23///tM='),(44,'2011-02-14 14:56:41','Uploaded patch set 3.',2494,'AAAL23///v4='),(44,'2011-02-14 14:49:00','Uploaded patch set 2.',2494,'AAAL23///v8='),(2,'2011-02-14 21:13:33','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2495,'AAAL23///u8='),(2,'2011-02-14 21:13:33','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2495,'AAAL23///vA='),(46,'2011-02-14 15:32:30','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nDoesn\'t fix the issue for children of the project (see remark in bug 336744).',2496,'AAAL23///vc='),(4,'2011-02-15 22:06:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2497,'AAAL23///qE='),(4,'2011-02-15 22:05:59','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2497,'AAAL23///qI='),(4,'2011-02-15 22:05:10','Uploaded patch set 3.',2497,'AAAL23///qM='),(46,'2011-02-15 09:53:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',2497,'AAAL23///tE='),(4,'2011-02-15 21:31:20','Uploaded patch set 2.',2498,'AAAL23///qc='),(4,'2011-02-15 21:32:04','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2498,'AAAL23///qU='),(4,'2011-02-15 21:32:03','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2498,'AAAL23///qY='),(4,'2011-02-15 22:49:19','Patch Set 4:\n\nrebased',2499,'AAAL23///p0='),(4,'2011-02-15 22:48:40','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2499,'AAAL23///p4='),(4,'2011-02-15 22:48:39','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2499,'AAAL23///p8='),(4,'2011-02-15 22:49:21','Patch Set 4:\n\nrebased',2499,'AAAL23///pk='),(4,'2011-02-15 22:49:21','Patch Set 4:\n\nrebased',2499,'AAAL23///po='),(4,'2011-02-15 22:49:20','Patch Set 4:\n\nrebased',2499,'AAAL23///ps='),(4,'2011-02-15 22:49:20','Patch Set 4:\n\nrebased',2499,'AAAL23///pw='),(4,'2011-02-15 22:46:36','Uploaded patch set 4.',2499,'AAAL23///qA='),(44,'2011-02-15 20:45:14','Patch Set 3:\n\nRebased to current master',2499,'AAAL23///rE='),(44,'2011-02-15 20:44:35','Uploaded patch set 3.',2499,'AAAL23///rI='),(44,'2011-02-15 20:32:12','Patch Set 2:\n\nWorks on MAC.',2499,'AAAL23///rM='),(44,'2011-02-15 11:53:19','Patch Set 2:\n\nTest failed on Linux with different problem. Fixed on Linux and verified on Windows.\nNeeds to be checked on MAC.',2499,'AAAL23///s8='),(44,'2011-02-15 11:50:40','Uploaded patch set 2.',2499,'AAAL23///tA='),(4,'2011-02-20 23:10:40','Uploaded patch set 7.',2500,'AAAL23///d0='),(49,'2011-02-20 23:58:15','Patch Set 7:\n\nThank you Matthias! Honestly, I didn\'t saw this issue :|',2500,'AAAL23///do='),(4,'2011-02-20 23:13:23','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2500,'AAAL23///ds='),(4,'2011-02-20 23:13:22','Patch Set 7: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nIn Java workspace model of synchronize view Java classes are passed as type CompilationUnit (not IFile). Fortunately these can be adapted to IResource, this way we can avoid to add a dependency to JDT.',2500,'AAAL23///dw='),(49,'2011-02-19 23:15:48','Patch Set 5:\n\nremoved issue with whitespace character in test class sources',2500,'AAAL23///ec='),(49,'2011-02-19 23:14:56','Uploaded patch set 5.',2500,'AAAL23///eg='),(49,'2011-02-19 23:12:59','Patch Set 4:\n\nNow tests should pass in any scenario ... I hope so ;)',2500,'AAAL23///ek='),(49,'2011-02-19 23:12:03','Uploaded patch set 4.',2500,'AAAL23///eo='),(49,'2011-02-20 00:33:54','Patch Set 6:\n\nStrange ... I\'m able to run those tests from eclipse on my linux box without any errors, they all are green. Maybe it is some how connected yours environment.',2500,'AAAL23///eQ='),(4,'2011-02-19 21:54:12','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nTests succeed if run one by one, if running the test suite I hit the following failures (tried many times). I am ready to release as soon as this is fixed.\n\n\nRerun org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest\norg.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest\nshouldOpenCompareEditorInGitChangeSet(org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest)\norg.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.exceptions.WidgetNotFoundException: Could not find widget.\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntilWidgetAppears(SWTBotFactory.java:348)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.finder.SWTWorkbenchBot.editor(SWTWorkbenchBot.java:200)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.finder.SWTWorkbenchBot.editorByTitle(SWTWorkbenchBot.java:234)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.changeFilesInProject(SynchronizeViewTest.java:370)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.shouldOpenCompareEditorInGitChangeSet(SynchronizeViewTest.java:221)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)\n	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)\n	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)\n	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)\n	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)\n	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76)\n	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.junit.SWTBotJunit4ClassRunner.run(SWTBotJunit4ClassRunner.java:54)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:49)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.core.RemotePluginTestRunner.main(RemotePluginTestRunner.java:64)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.core.UITestApplication.runTests(UITestApplication.java:117)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.testing.WorkbenchTestable$1.run(WorkbenchTestable.java:71)\n	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)\nCaused by: org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.widgets.TimeoutException: Timeout after: 5000 ms.: Could not find editor matching: with name \'\"test.txt\"\'\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntil(SWTBotFactory.java:398)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntil(SWTBotFactory.java:372)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntil(SWTBotFactory.java:360)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntilWidgetAppears(SWTBotFactory.java:346)\n	... 34 more\n\nshouldOpenCompareEditorInWorkspaceModel(org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest)\norg.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.exceptions.WidgetNotFoundException: Could not find widget.\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntilWidgetAppears(SWTBotFactory.java:348)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.finder.SWTWorkbenchBot.editor(SWTWorkbenchBot.java:200)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.finder.SWTWorkbenchBot.editorByTitle(SWTWorkbenchBot.java:234)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.changeFilesInProject(SynchronizeViewTest.java:370)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.shouldOpenCompareEditorInWorkspaceModel(SynchronizeViewTest.java:251)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)\n	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)\n	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)\n	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)\n	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)\n	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76)\n	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.junit.SWTBotJunit4ClassRunner.run(SWTBotJunit4ClassRunner.java:54)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:49)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.core.RemotePluginTestRunner.main(RemotePluginTestRunner.java:64)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.core.UITestApplication.runTests(UITestApplication.java:117)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.testing.WorkbenchTestable$1.run(WorkbenchTestable.java:71)\n	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)\nCaused by: org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.widgets.TimeoutException: Timeout after: 5000 ms.: Could not find editor matching: with name \'\"test.txt\"\'\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntil(SWTBotFactory.java:398)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntil(SWTBotFactory.java:372)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntil(SWTBotFactory.java:360)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntilWidgetAppears(SWTBotFactory.java:346)\n	... 34 more',2500,'AAAL23///es='),(4,'2011-02-20 00:09:45','Patch Set 6: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n- fixed typo in test method name\n- now tests are ok and opening compare from workspace model works\n\n:)\n\n- but opening compare from java workspace model doesn\'t work (double click has no effect), could not find errors in error log for that',2500,'AAAL23///eU='),(4,'2011-02-20 00:07:53','Uploaded patch set 6.',2500,'AAAL23///eY='),(49,'2011-02-17 21:22:15','Patch Set 3:\n\n@Chris I\'ve added tests for this issue. Can we now merge it?',2500,'AAAL23///hk='),(49,'2011-02-15 17:14:35','Uploaded patch set 3.',2500,'AAAL23///rw='),(2,'2011-02-15 14:11:13','Patch Set 1:\n\nCan we have a test for this to ensure it doesn\'t happen again?',2500,'AAAL23///s0='),(2,'2011-02-15 14:11:13','Patch Set 1:\n\nCan we have a test for this to ensure it doesn\'t happen again?',2500,'AAAL23///s4='),(49,'2011-02-15 15:21:36','Uploaded patch set 2.',2500,'AAAL23///sg='),(49,'2011-02-23 10:21:10','Patch Set 1:\n\nSynchronizing against particular commits would be a nice feature, but it will require some \"paging\" or sth. to avoid reading and putting into drop down list of all commits in repository.',2501,'AAAL23///VQ='),(6,'2011-02-23 10:17:38','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2501,'AAAL23///VU='),(6,'2011-02-23 10:17:37','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nStraight-forward.\n\nMaybe later on we could think about offering to synchronize with an arbitrary commit, like Compare With -> Commit...\nBut I\'m not sure if that is a common use-case.',2501,'AAAL23///VY='),(2,'2011-02-15 15:30:10','Patch Set 1:\n\nAny idea why this specific mechanism should be pluggable via an extension point? Before creating extension points, it\'s generally good to have at least two cases in mind.',2502,'AAAL23///sc='),(116,'2011-02-15 15:44:54','Patch Set 1:\n\nIn the case of extension specific Mylyn connector can use it\'s internal classes and cached tasks data to resolve task repository.',2502,'AAAL23///sU='),(116,'2011-02-15 15:44:52','Patch Set 1:\n\nIn the case of extension specific Mylyn connector can use it\'s internal classes and cached tasks data to resolve task repository.',2502,'AAAL23///sY='),(3,'2011-02-21 17:53:01','Patch Set 2: (6 inline comments)\n\nCan you verify the changes in uitext.properties - there seems to be a lot of messages added which aren\'t part of this change set?',2503,'AAAL23///bw='),(46,'2011-02-17 17:21:43','Patch Set 2:\n\nAs for the remarks in the last review:\n\n1. We can not check out selectively for the selected projects, so I think letting the user select only a single project would be less confusing (we have many actions like this already in the team menu, so I believe people are getting used to that over time).\n\n2. Branch names are sorted now.',2503,'AAAL23///jw='),(46,'2011-02-17 17:18:12','Uploaded patch set 2.',2503,'AAAL23///kA='),(3,'2011-02-15 19:47:50','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nA few comments - apologies for lack of inline but iPhone doesn\'t permit me :-)\n\nYou\'re limiting selection to one project. Why? If they are all the same repository then there\'s no harm. If there are multiple repos then we might disable, or could show common names. For example, I might naively think I have to select all EGit projects to switch to another branch, or in the future, you might want to switch all EGit and JGit projects to the 0.11 branch. Although the branch would be different in each case they have the same name. \n\nThe entry set could give branches in arbitrary order if I read this correctly. If so, can we sort?\n\nThe comment in the single arg constrictor has \"default constructor\" which seems to be a cut and paste from the single arg version. \n\nThe other menu should probably be disabled in the case of multiple projects being selected with individual repositories.',2503,'AAAL23///rU='),(46,'2011-02-22 11:14:01','Patch Set 4: (3 inline comments)\n\n',2503,'AAAL23///X8='),(46,'2011-02-22 08:25:12','Patch Set 2: (6 inline comments)\n\n',2503,'AAAL23///Y0='),(46,'2011-02-22 08:24:12','Uploaded patch set 3.',2503,'AAAL23///Y4='),(46,'2011-02-22 11:12:50','Patch Set 4:\n\nRegarding documentation: out documenation is not checked into the respository, but maintained in the wiki and copied from there when a new version is released. Normally, we do an update of the wiki shortly before the next version is released thus avoiding too much discrepancies between the current release and the wiki.\nSo yes, we should update the documentation, but not just yet.',2503,'AAAL23///YM='),(3,'2011-02-22 10:49:29','Patch Set 4: (3 inline comments)\n\nLooks good, but I\'m not sure whether the \'create branch page/wizard\' document changes are supposed to be part of this changeset?',2503,'AAAL23///YQ='),(46,'2011-02-22 09:11:46','Patch Set 4:\n\nRebased to current master.',2503,'AAAL23///Ys='),(46,'2011-02-22 09:10:42','Uploaded patch set 4.',2503,'AAAL23///Yw='),(107,'2011-03-24 01:08:08','Patch Set 9:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/153/ ',2503,'AAAL3n//+oc='),(4,'2011-03-24 01:08:04','Uploaded patch set 9.',2503,'AAAL3n//+og='),(107,'2011-03-24 01:07:53','Patch Set 8: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/152/ : SUCCESS',2503,'AAAL3n//+ok='),(4,'2011-03-24 01:14:33','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2503,'AAAL3n//+oM='),(4,'2011-03-24 01:14:33','Patch Set 9: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- fixed whitespace error',2503,'AAAL3n//+oQ='),(107,'2011-03-24 01:04:02','Patch Set 8:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/152/ ',2503,'AAAL3n//+os='),(107,'2011-03-24 01:12:04','Patch Set 9: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/153/ : SUCCESS',2503,'AAAL3n//+oU='),(4,'2011-03-24 01:03:59','Uploaded patch set 8.',2503,'AAAL3n//+ow='),(4,'2011-03-24 01:08:19','Patch Set 8: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2503,'AAAL3n//+oY='),(46,'2011-03-23 18:23:34','Patch Set 7:\n\nI suggest to add the preferences separately, as it requires some more changes: we have to add this to a Git Preference page so that users can change this.',2503,'AAAL3n//+tE='),(107,'2011-03-23 12:40:04','Patch Set 7: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/123/ : FAILURE',2503,'AAAL3n//+v0='),(107,'2011-03-23 12:30:02','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/123/ ',2503,'AAAL3n//+v4='),(46,'2011-03-23 12:29:59','Uploaded patch set 7.',2503,'AAAL3n//+v8='),(107,'2011-03-23 13:17:12','Patch Set 7: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/124/ : SUCCESS',2503,'AAAL3n//+vs='),(49,'2011-03-23 15:48:13','Patch Set 7: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2503,'AAAL3n//+vU='),(107,'2011-03-23 13:06:45','Patch Set 7: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/124/ ',2503,'AAAL3n//+vw='),(107,'2011-03-23 11:55:44','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/120/ ',2503,'AAAL3n//+wc='),(46,'2011-03-23 11:47:43','Uploaded patch set 6.',2503,'AAAL3n//+wo='),(107,'2011-03-23 12:05:40','Patch Set 6: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/120/ : FAILURE',2503,'AAAL3n//+wY='),(3,'2011-03-23 07:39:27','Patch Set 5:\n\nSo, the automated build filter works then :) Is it a transient failure?',2503,'AAAL3n//+y0='),(107,'2011-03-23 07:35:56','Patch Set 5: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/112/ : FAILURE',2503,'AAAL3n//+y4='),(46,'2011-03-23 07:26:36','Patch Set 5:\n\n* Rebased to current master\n* Removed the \"RFC\" prefix after positive feedback from Alex and Dariusz',2503,'AAAL3n//+y8='),(107,'2011-03-23 07:25:57','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/112/ ',2503,'AAAL3n//+zA='),(46,'2011-03-23 07:25:53','Uploaded patch set 5.',2503,'AAAL3n//+zE='),(49,'2011-03-14 00:34:29','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nI\'m looking forward for having this feature in EGit it is more useful then \"Checkout\" dialog.',2503,'AAAL3X///8g='),(4,'2011-02-16 22:57:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2504,'AAAL23///mQ='),(4,'2011-02-16 22:57:28','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2504,'AAAL23///mU='),(4,'2011-02-16 22:56:58','Uploaded patch set 3.',2504,'AAAL23///mY='),(49,'2011-02-16 09:32:24','Patch Set 2:\n\n@Jens, yes this is some how duplicated functionality with repositories view. But personally I would prefer delete branch from branch selection dialog because for me it is more natural and straight forward way to done it. To reduce the code duplication I use same action (RemoveBranchCommand) as it is used in repositories view to reduce duplication.',2504,'AAAL23///oc='),(44,'2011-02-16 09:08:57','Patch Set 2:\n\nI\'m not sure if we should really do this. This action is already available in Repositories View. We get more and more duplicated functionality.',2504,'AAAL23///oo='),(49,'2011-02-15 20:12:32','Uploaded patch set 2.',2504,'AAAL23///rQ='),(2,'2011-02-16 17:42:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2505,'AAAL23///nQ='),(2,'2011-02-16 17:42:27','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good, thanks Dariusz.',2505,'AAAL23///nU='),(2,'2011-02-16 17:42:13','Uploaded patch set 2.',2505,'AAAL23///nY='),(46,'2011-02-16 07:41:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2506,'AAAL23///os='),(46,'2011-02-16 07:41:00','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2506,'AAAL23///ow='),(2,'2011-02-16 02:06:33','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2507,'AAAL23///pM='),(2,'2011-02-16 02:06:33','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nSimple change, looks good.',2507,'AAAL23///pQ='),(2,'2011-02-16 02:07:47','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2508,'AAAL23///pE='),(2,'2011-02-16 02:07:47','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nStraightforward, looks good.',2508,'AAAL23///pI='),(2,'2011-02-16 02:24:49','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2509,'AAAL23///o8='),(2,'2011-02-16 02:24:49','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nSeems fine to me. I hardly use the launch shortcuts.',2509,'AAAL23///pA='),(2,'2011-02-16 03:52:01','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2510,'AAAL23///o0='),(2,'2011-02-16 03:52:01','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2510,'AAAL23///o4='),(2,'2011-02-16 14:38:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2511,'AAAL23///oM='),(2,'2011-02-16 14:38:01','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks ok.',2511,'AAAL23///oQ='),(44,'2011-02-16 09:30:22','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2512,'AAAL23///og='),(44,'2011-02-16 09:30:21','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2512,'AAAL23///ok='),(4,'2011-02-16 17:16:59','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2513,'AAAL23///n0='),(4,'2011-02-16 17:14:46','Uploaded patch set 2.',2513,'AAAL23///n4='),(4,'2011-02-16 17:16:59','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2513,'AAAL23///nw='),(1,'2011-02-16 15:15:31','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2514,'AAAL23///oE='),(1,'2011-02-16 15:15:30','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2514,'AAAL23///oI='),(49,'2011-02-21 20:32:31','Uploaded patch set 6.',2515,'AAAL23///a8='),(4,'2011-02-21 22:28:25','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2515,'AAAL23///aI='),(4,'2011-02-21 22:28:25','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2515,'AAAL23///aM='),(49,'2011-02-18 01:45:50','Uploaded patch set 5.',2515,'AAAL23///g0='),(49,'2011-02-17 23:13:42','Patch Set 4:\n\nad1. This is a know bug 331002 in orbit mockito bundle, and it is fixed in v201102171835 of this bundle.\r\nad2. I\'ll inspect it',2515,'AAAL23///g8='),(49,'2011-02-18 01:46:31','Patch Set 5:\n\nNow everything is compiling from maven.',2515,'AAAL23///gw='),(4,'2011-02-17 23:10:37','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n- the build in Eclipse fails since org.mockito 1.8.4 does not export any packages\n- the build in Maven also fails since it can\'t find org.mockito',2515,'AAAL23///hA='),(49,'2011-02-17 14:26:50','Patch Set 4:\n\nWe\'ve got approval for CQ 4957',2515,'AAAL23///kg='),(49,'2011-02-17 09:09:34','Patch Set 4:\n\nrebased, restored .eclipse_iplog and org.eclipse.egit.ui.test/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF from previous commit.',2515,'AAAL23///ko='),(49,'2011-02-17 09:08:22','Uploaded patch set 4.',2515,'AAAL23///ks='),(4,'2011-02-17 08:56:14','Patch Set 3:\n\nyou can also leave the iplog unchanged, we anyway update it before every release',2515,'AAAL23///kw='),(49,'2011-02-16 22:55:10','Patch Set 3:\n\nI\'ve create CQ 4957 for reusing org.objenesis. When it\'ll be approved I\'ll (this time) generate .eclipse_iplog using jgit and push updated patch set.',2515,'AAAL23///mc='),(49,'2011-02-16 22:32:57','Patch Set 3:\n\nI\'ve don it manually.',2515,'AAAL23///mg='),(4,'2011-02-16 22:29:50','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nwe also need org.objenesis since that seems to be used by mockito\n\nsee http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/egit-dev/msg01895.html\n\ndid you generate the iplog entry using jgit iplog tool or did you change that manually ?',2515,'AAAL23///mk='),(49,'2011-02-16 21:01:10','Uploaded patch set 3.',2515,'AAAL23///mo='),(49,'2011-02-16 17:22:07','Uploaded patch set 2.',2515,'AAAL23///ns='),(2,'2011-02-16 17:53:18','Uploaded patch set 3.',2516,'AAAL23///m0='),(NULL,'2011-02-16 17:51:45','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2516,'AAAL23///m4='),(2,'2011-02-16 17:51:44','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nWe may want to include this in stable-0.11 if we spin another build...',2516,'AAAL23///m8='),(2,'2011-02-16 17:53:42','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2516,'AAAL23///ms='),(2,'2011-02-16 17:53:41','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThanks Jens.',2516,'AAAL23///mw='),(2,'2011-02-16 17:45:02','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\nlooks good, just style-nit issues',2516,'AAAL23///nA='),(44,'2011-02-16 17:45:01','Uploaded patch set 2.',2516,'AAAL23///nE='),(4,'2011-02-21 23:24:25','Uploaded patch set 4.',2517,'AAAL23///aA='),(49,'2011-02-21 20:32:31','Uploaded patch set 3.',2517,'AAAL23///bA='),(49,'2011-02-18 01:45:50','Uploaded patch set 2.',2517,'AAAL23///g4='),(2,'2011-02-23 17:42:40','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2517,'AAAL23///RI='),(2,'2011-02-23 17:42:39','Patch Set 8: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2517,'AAAL23///RM='),(49,'2011-02-23 16:18:57','Uploaded patch set 8.',2517,'AAAL23///Ro='),(49,'2011-02-23 14:35:26','Uploaded patch set 7.',2517,'AAAL23///T0='),(49,'2011-02-23 14:37:14','Patch Set 7: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nRebased on current master and cherry-picked so it doesn\'t depends on Id8411470893220819c7a7c3992ca4cc6b66bab2f',2517,'AAAL23///Tw='),(6,'2011-02-23 13:47:10','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2517,'AAAL23///Uw='),(49,'2011-02-22 23:17:54','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2517,'AAAL23///V0='),(49,'2011-02-22 22:07:35','Uploaded patch set 6.',2517,'AAAL23///WQ='),(49,'2011-02-22 13:57:38','Patch Set 5:\n\nAdded maven configuration for launching JUnit tests',2517,'AAAL23///X0='),(49,'2011-02-22 13:56:57','Uploaded patch set 5.',2517,'AAAL23///X4='),(49,'2011-02-22 13:57:39','Patch Set 5:\n\nAdded maven configuration for launching JUnit tests',2517,'AAAL23///Xw='),(4,'2011-02-21 23:25:44','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- fixed some typos in method names\n- fixed formatting\n\n- could you integrate the new tests into maven build so that they are run from maven as well ?',2517,'AAAL23///Z8='),(2,'2011-02-17 17:19:21','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2518,'AAAL23///j4='),(2,'2011-02-17 17:19:20','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2518,'AAAL23///j8='),(1,'2011-02-17 17:56:26','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2519,'AAAL23///jc='),(1,'2011-02-23 21:54:09','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nMoved to change Iece43632086afadf175af6638255041ccaf2bfbb',2519,'AAAL23///Ok='),(4,'2011-02-17 22:29:32','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2520,'AAAL23///hI='),(4,'2011-02-17 22:29:31','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- fixed typo\n- fixed formatting\n- rebased',2520,'AAAL23///hM='),(4,'2011-02-17 22:28:10','Uploaded patch set 3.',2520,'AAAL23///hQ='),(4,'2011-02-17 22:27:23','Uploaded patch set 2.',2520,'AAAL23///hU='),(4,'2011-02-17 22:22:05','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2520,'AAAL23///hY='),(44,'2011-02-18 14:05:44','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2521,'AAAL23///f0='),(44,'2011-02-18 14:29:07','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2521,'AAAL23///fk='),(44,'2011-02-18 14:29:06','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nRebased to current master',2521,'AAAL23///fo='),(44,'2011-02-18 14:27:03','Uploaded patch set 2.',2521,'AAAL23///fs='),(NULL,'2011-02-18 14:05:44','Change cannot be merged due to unsatisfiable dependencies.\n\nThe following dependency errors were found:\n\n* Depends on patch set 1 of Ie2823c3c, however the current patch set is 3.\n\nPlease rebase the change and upload a replacement commit.',2521,'AAAL23///fw='),(46,'2011-02-18 07:27:42','Patch Set 1:\n\nTry the Linux repository... \n\ngit://android.git.kernel.org/kernel/linux-2.6.git',2521,'AAAL23///gg='),(4,'2011-02-17 22:43:35','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nI did not find any merge commit where the History View would show any file in jgit. Anything I miss or is this a problem in the History View ?',2521,'AAAL23///hE='),(44,'2011-02-18 16:15:44','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nIn the current master the text control is updated when I change the wrap comments option.',2522,'AAAL23///fg='),(46,'2011-02-18 18:44:49','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nLooks like we don\'t actually need this.',2522,'AAAL23///fQ='),(2,'2011-02-17 20:06:50','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nShould be good enough now.',2523,'AAAL23///h0='),(2,'2011-02-17 20:06:35','Uploaded patch set 2.',2523,'AAAL23///h4='),(2,'2011-02-17 20:06:51','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2523,'AAAL23///hw='),(1,'2011-02-17 17:59:20','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',2523,'AAAL23///jQ='),(2,'2011-02-17 17:10:45','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2524,'AAAL23///kM='),(2,'2011-02-17 17:10:44','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2524,'AAAL23///kQ='),(44,'2011-02-17 17:17:34','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\npush accident',2525,'AAAL23///kE='),(44,'2011-02-17 17:17:15','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\npush accident',2526,'AAAL23///kI='),(2,'2011-02-17 20:09:26','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2527,'AAAL23///ho='),(2,'2011-02-17 20:08:34','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine, thanks for references the SWTBot bug.',2527,'AAAL23///hs='),(44,'2011-02-17 17:20:21','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nThis change needs repair...',2527,'AAAL23///j0='),(44,'2011-02-17 17:30:47','Uploaded patch set 2.',2527,'AAAL23///js='),(46,'2011-02-17 19:06:34','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2528,'AAAL23///jI='),(46,'2011-02-17 19:06:29','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2528,'AAAL23///jM='),(2,'2011-02-18 19:30:19','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2529,'AAAL23///fI='),(2,'2011-02-18 19:30:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2529,'AAAL23///fM='),(44,'2011-02-18 13:26:35','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2530,'AAAL23///gA='),(44,'2011-02-18 13:26:34','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2530,'AAAL23///gE='),(6,'2011-02-18 13:58:48','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2531,'AAAL23///f4='),(6,'2011-02-18 13:58:47','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThanks, Tomasz',2531,'AAAL23///f8='),(118,'2011-02-18 10:42:37','Uploaded patch set 2.',2531,'AAAL23///gc='),(44,'2011-02-18 13:08:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2532,'AAAL23///gQ='),(44,'2011-02-18 13:08:27','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nVerified on Linux and Windows.',2532,'AAAL23///gU='),(44,'2011-02-18 13:20:03','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2533,'AAAL23///gI='),(44,'2011-02-18 13:20:02','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2533,'AAAL23///gM='),(46,'2011-02-18 18:41:47','Uploaded patch set 2.',2534,'AAAL23///fc='),(46,'2011-02-18 18:43:25','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2534,'AAAL23///fU='),(46,'2011-02-18 18:43:24','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nMinor style nit fixed.',2534,'AAAL23///fY='),(8,'2011-02-19 10:44:25','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2535,'AAAL23///e4='),(2,'2011-02-20 01:54:17','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2535,'AAAL23///eI='),(2,'2011-02-20 01:54:16','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2535,'AAAL23///eM='),(1,'2011-02-19 01:37:01','Uploaded patch set 2.',2535,'AAAL23///fA='),(4,'2011-02-19 00:25:34','Uploaded patch set 2.',2536,'AAAL23///fE='),(6,'2011-02-23 15:32:04','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2536,'AAAL23///SE='),(6,'2011-02-23 15:32:02','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2536,'AAAL23///SI='),(6,'2011-02-23 15:31:13','Uploaded patch set 3.',2536,'AAAL23///SM='),(NULL,'2011-02-23 15:28:53','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2536,'AAAL23///SQ='),(6,'2011-02-23 15:28:52','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nGood usability improvement',2536,'AAAL23///SU='),(8,'2011-02-19 10:46:19','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2537,'AAAL23///e0='),(2,'2011-02-20 01:54:39','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2537,'AAAL23///eA='),(2,'2011-02-20 01:54:39','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nSimple fix.',2537,'AAAL23///eE='),(2,'2011-02-20 01:55:27','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2538,'AAAL23///d4='),(2,'2011-02-20 01:55:27','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nStraightforward fix.',2538,'AAAL23///d8='),(2,'2011-02-22 00:56:44','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2539,'AAAL23///Zs='),(2,'2011-02-22 00:56:43','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2539,'AAAL23///Zw='),(2,'2011-02-22 00:57:49','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2540,'AAAL23///Zk='),(2,'2011-02-22 00:57:32','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2540,'AAAL23///Zo='),(2,'2011-02-22 00:59:11','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2541,'AAAL23///Zc='),(2,'2011-02-22 00:59:10','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2541,'AAAL23///Zg='),(1,'2011-02-21 17:53:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2542,'AAAL23///bg='),(1,'2011-02-21 17:53:12','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2542,'AAAL23///bs='),(46,'2011-02-21 17:53:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2543,'AAAL23///bo='),(NULL,'2011-02-21 08:42:15','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.\n\nThe following changes must also be submitted:\n\n* I48cca12fcc6212fbe6c42109e44e4a2dc20ecada\n',2543,'AAAL23///dI='),(46,'2011-02-21 08:06:09','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2543,'AAAL23///dY='),(4,'2011-02-21 20:34:24','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\n',2544,'AAAL23///a4='),(4,'2011-02-21 20:34:25','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2544,'AAAL23///aw='),(1,'2011-02-21 17:52:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Unclean IP, do not check in\n\nI wish we could include this in 0.11.3, but its a non-committer authored patch. That\'s why it missed 0.11.1 in the first place.\n\n:-(',2544,'AAAL23///b4='),(1,'2011-02-21 19:58:55','Patch Set 1:\n\nIts already in master, this was a cherry-pick back to 0.11.3.',2544,'AAAL23///bE='),(2,'2011-02-21 19:54:49','Patch Set 1:\n\nI\'d update the ip log and move on. I haven\'t found anything in the dev process that prevents us from doing this. I can double check with the IP team, but everyone is off today in Canada Day due to Family Day. I mean, if we can live without this one in 0.11.3 then let\'s just dump it to master and not take chances.',2544,'AAAL23///bI='),(1,'2011-02-21 19:51:07','Patch Set 1: IP review completed\n\nReally? I thought we cannot include non-committer contributions without doing an IP log, even for a maintenance release, and even for small ones such as this.',2544,'AAAL23///bM='),(2,'2011-02-21 19:35:29','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nThere\'s nothing in the dev process that would prevent us from including this in the maintenance release.',2544,'AAAL23///bY='),(4,'2011-02-21 20:35:06','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2545,'AAAL23///ao='),(1,'2011-02-21 17:54:16','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2545,'AAAL23///bc='),(NULL,'2011-02-21 20:34:25','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.',2546,'AAAL23///a0='),(6,'2011-02-21 20:35:05','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2546,'AAAL23///as='),(NULL,'2011-02-21 17:53:29','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.\n\nThe following changes must also be submitted:\n\n* Ib4c40f9db177322c7a2640808a6c10b3c4a73819\n* Ic1ceb9c99dca2c69e61ea0ef03ec64f13714b80a\n',2546,'AAAL23///bk='),(6,'2011-02-21 08:42:15','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2546,'AAAL23///dM='),(4,'2011-02-21 20:38:32','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2547,'AAAL23///ac='),(4,'2011-02-21 20:38:31','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2547,'AAAL23///ag='),(46,'2011-02-21 08:08:54','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2548,'AAAL23///dQ='),(46,'2011-02-21 08:08:53','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2548,'AAAL23///dU='),(44,'2011-02-21 09:26:08','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2549,'AAAL23///dA='),(44,'2011-02-21 09:26:08','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2549,'AAAL23///dE='),(44,'2011-02-21 09:31:41','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2550,'AAAL23///c4='),(44,'2011-02-21 09:31:40','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2550,'AAAL23///c8='),(44,'2011-02-21 09:38:00','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2551,'AAAL23///c0='),(44,'2011-02-21 09:38:01','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2551,'AAAL23///cw='),(44,'2011-02-21 09:41:24','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2552,'AAAL23///co='),(44,'2011-02-21 09:41:24','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2552,'AAAL23///cs='),(2,'2011-02-21 19:36:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2553,'AAAL23///bQ='),(2,'2011-02-21 19:35:59','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2553,'AAAL23///bU='),(4,'2011-02-21 20:41:34','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2554,'AAAL23///aU='),(4,'2011-02-21 20:41:33','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2554,'AAAL23///aY='),(103,'2011-02-21 10:13:08','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2554,'AAAL23///ck='),(49,'2011-02-21 07:46:33','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2555,'AAAL23///dc='),(49,'2011-02-21 07:46:26','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2555,'AAAL23///dg='),(4,'2011-02-21 00:56:44','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\ncherry-picked from stable-0.11',2555,'AAAL23///dk='),(1,'2011-02-21 17:51:15','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2556,'AAAL23///cA='),(1,'2011-02-22 15:45:51','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2556,'AAAL23///Xc='),(1,'2011-02-22 15:45:51','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2556,'AAAL23///Xg='),(46,'2011-02-22 08:12:08','Uploaded patch set 2.',2556,'AAAL23///ZU='),(4,'2011-03-03 00:58:27','Uploaded patch set 2.',2557,'AAAL3H///wc='),(4,'2011-03-03 01:09:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2557,'AAAL3H///wU='),(4,'2011-03-03 01:09:26','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- improved positioning of tooltip so that it\'s rendered above the mouse cursor, it seems this also fixed the conflict with the commit message tooltip\n- use standard tooltip background color\n- added missing copyright headers',2557,'AAAL3H///wY='),(2,'2011-02-22 16:07:51','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2558,'AAAL23///XA='),(2,'2011-02-22 16:07:50','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2558,'AAAL23///XE='),(4,'2011-02-21 22:51:26','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2559,'AAAL23///aE='),(49,'2011-02-23 14:51:16','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2559,'AAAL23///Tk='),(49,'2011-02-23 14:50:47','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nRebased and cherry-picked. Merged into master based on Matthias +2 from first path set.',2559,'AAAL23///To='),(49,'2011-02-23 14:49:25','Uploaded patch set 4.',2559,'AAAL23///Ts='),(49,'2011-02-22 23:17:23','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2559,'AAAL23///V4='),(49,'2011-02-22 16:14:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',2559,'AAAL23///W0='),(49,'2011-02-22 22:07:34','Uploaded patch set 3.',2559,'AAAL23///Wc='),(49,'2011-02-22 16:15:03','Patch Set 2:\n\nrebased on patch set 5 of I6b5ca33c',2559,'AAAL23///Ww='),(NULL,'2011-02-22 16:06:30','Change cannot be merged due to unsatisfiable dependencies.\n\nThe following dependency errors were found:\n\n* Depends on patch set 3 of I6b5ca33c, however the current patch set is 5.\n\nPlease rebase the change and upload a replacement commit.',2559,'AAAL23///XM='),(6,'2011-02-24 08:43:15','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2560,'AAAL23///NI='),(6,'2011-02-24 08:43:14','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2560,'AAAL23///NM='),(49,'2011-02-23 18:20:50','Patch Set 2: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2560,'AAAL23///Qc='),(49,'2011-02-23 18:21:06','Uploaded patch set 3.',2560,'AAAL23///QY='),(49,'2011-02-23 13:21:54','Patch Set 2:\n\nCurrently I can\'t recall when it was occurring, but I\'m sure that it occurs some where when I was fixing bugs 337396 and 337540',2560,'AAAL23///U0='),(6,'2011-02-23 13:04:40','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nCan you describe more precisely when the MissingObjectException occurs? I did not succeed to reproduce it.',2560,'AAAL23///U4='),(49,'2011-02-22 23:18:13','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2560,'AAAL23///Vw='),(49,'2011-02-22 22:07:34','Uploaded patch set 2.',2560,'AAAL23///WY='),(2,'2011-02-23 17:43:30','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2561,'AAAL23///RA='),(2,'2011-02-23 17:43:30','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2561,'AAAL23///RE='),(49,'2011-02-23 16:19:39','Patch Set 4:\n\nRebased, resolved conflicts\r\n\r\nIMPORTANT: notice that this change depends from I6b5ca33c042c935bd299a956858528d0bea2989a',2561,'AAAL23///Rk='),(49,'2011-02-23 16:18:56','Uploaded patch set 4.',2561,'AAAL23///Rs='),(2,'2011-02-23 15:20:23','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2561,'AAAL23///S0='),(2,'2011-02-23 15:20:38','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\ncan you rebase and fix issues?',2561,'AAAL23///Ss='),(NULL,'2011-02-23 15:20:23','Change cannot be merged due to unsatisfiable dependencies.\n\nThe following dependency errors were found:\n\n* Depends on patch set 3 of Ie904980c, however the current patch set is 4.\n* Depends on commit 503e6b0840802890162fafb2fedcac3a82a0d517 which has no change associated with it.\n* Depends on commit c7bf93ac1eada5f93bf38435213e1a23059190d8 which has no change associated with it.\n\nPlease rebase the change and upload a replacement commit.',2561,'AAAL23///Sw='),(49,'2011-02-22 23:18:33','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2561,'AAAL23///Vs='),(2,'2011-02-22 16:09:17','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nCan we get a test for this to ensure it doesn\'t regress? I recall this happening earlier.',2561,'AAAL23///W8='),(49,'2011-02-22 22:10:15','Patch Set 3:\n\nAdded required tests',2561,'AAAL23///WM='),(49,'2011-02-22 16:29:56','Patch Set 2:\n\nInitially I was thinking that we cannot test this issue or it would be very hard to test it, but currently I\'ve an idea how we can easily test it.',2561,'AAAL23///Ws='),(49,'2011-02-22 22:07:34','Uploaded patch set 3.',2561,'AAAL23///WU='),(49,'2011-02-22 09:32:12','Patch Set 2:\n\n* rebased\r\n* fixed typo',2561,'AAAL23///Yk='),(49,'2011-02-22 09:31:36','Uploaded patch set 2.',2561,'AAAL23///Yo='),(4,'2011-02-21 23:26:47','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2561,'AAAL23///Z0='),(1,'2011-02-22 15:12:42','Uploaded patch set 2.',2562,'AAAL23///Xo='),(1,'2011-11-04 22:11:51','Patch Set 2: Abandoned\n\nI have no interest in working on this further. If someone else wants to pick it up, well, they have the code attached. :-)',2562,'AABOCH///rw='),(6,'2011-02-23 14:58:49','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2563,'AAAL23///TA='),(6,'2011-02-23 14:58:48','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\n',2563,'AAAL23///TE='),(6,'2011-02-23 14:58:37','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2563,'AAAL23///TI='),(9,'2011-02-24 10:26:38','Patch Set 3: (6 inline comments)\n\nThe issues will be fixed in another change. This one was submitted before they were identified.',2564,'AAAL23///M4='),(1,'2011-02-23 17:58:23','Patch Set 3: (6 inline comments)\n\n',2564,'AAAL23///Qk='),(2,'2011-02-23 15:34:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2564,'AAAL23///R4='),(2,'2011-02-23 15:33:59','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2564,'AAAL23///R8='),(2,'2011-02-23 15:33:16','Uploaded patch set 3.',2564,'AAAL23///SA='),(9,'2011-02-23 12:12:34','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nRebased',2564,'AAAL23///VA='),(9,'2011-02-23 12:11:27','Uploaded patch set 2.',2564,'AAAL23///VE='),(9,'2011-02-22 15:08:55','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\ndon\'t review yet! I want to rebase this change.',2564,'AAAL23///Xs='),(2,'2011-02-22 16:06:30','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2565,'AAAL23///XI='),(2,'2011-02-22 16:06:29','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nGood move, thanks Mathias.',2565,'AAAL23///XQ='),(104,'2011-02-22 15:45:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2566,'AAAL23///Xk='),(1,'2011-02-22 15:46:09','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2566,'AAAL23///XU='),(1,'2011-02-22 15:46:09','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2566,'AAAL23///XY='),(2,'2011-02-23 14:09:29','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nnot needed anymore',2567,'AAAL23///Ug='),(4,'2011-02-22 23:15:23','Patch Set 1:\n\nthese build problems were caused by a failed download of the findbugs-maven-plugin, by default Maven will not retry the download. This can be fixed by either wiping the workspace (means .m2 repository) or by using the -U command line parameter which will enforce retrying the download on the next build. I reconfigure the egit build to use this -U option.\n\nNow we run into test problems since the egit.core tests seem not to be able to find the mockito jars, I am currently investigating why.',2567,'AAAL23///V8='),(4,'2011-02-22 23:59:30','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nI think we don\'t need this change as using maven command line option -U does fix the download problem',2567,'AAAL23///Vk='),(11,'2011-02-22 22:29:26','Patch Set 1:\n\nSorry, full changeId is If29cacd54605c243e6771572e61cae377f946118',2567,'AAAL23///WA='),(11,'2011-02-22 22:27:28','Patch Set 1:\n\nIf29cacd5 should fix this. For some reason Hudson tries to resolve released versions against this snapshot repository.',2567,'AAAL23///WE='),(4,'2011-02-22 22:04:13','Patch Set 1:\n\ncurrent situation looks like a mess\n\n- we should not depend on SNAPSHOT versions, why are there 2.3.2-SNAPSHOT and 2.4-SNAPSHOT but no released version in that range ?\n- the codehaus repo we reference has the 2.3.2-SNAPSHOT version [1] \nbut the build on hudson fails over and over again complaining that this doesn\'t exist\n\n[1] http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/mojo/findbugs-maven-plugin/2.3.2-SNAPSHOT/',2567,'AAAL23///Wg='),(2,'2011-02-22 21:30:09','Patch Set 1:\n\nAt the moment, it was to try to solve some recent build issues...\n\nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/egit/1057/console\n\nHaven\'t had time to dive in yet...',2567,'AAAL23///Wk='),(11,'2011-02-22 20:29:28','Patch Set 1:\n\nChris, why should we upgrade from 2.3.2-SNAPSHOT?',2567,'AAAL23///Wo='),(6,'2011-02-23 14:12:49','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2568,'AAAL23///UM='),(6,'2011-02-23 14:12:48','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2568,'AAAL23///UQ='),(4,'2011-02-24 00:00:53','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2569,'AAAL23///N4='),(4,'2011-02-24 00:00:53','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- fixed some bad formatting\n- added missing javadoc',2569,'AAAL23///N8='),(4,'2011-02-23 23:58:30','Uploaded patch set 2.',2569,'AAAL23///OA='),(11,'2011-02-22 22:23:44','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\nThis might fix current broken build. Now failing job tries to resolve maven-reporting-impl:jar:2.1 in codehaus.snapshots which is wrong.\n\nChris, what do you think?',2570,'AAAL23///WI='),(49,'2011-02-23 00:05:08','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2571,'AAAL23///Vc='),(49,'2011-02-23 00:05:02','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nIn deed with dependency from hamcrest build works for halios and galileo.',2571,'AAAL23///Vg='),(4,'2011-02-22 23:55:16','Patch Set 1:\n\nthis seems to fix the test errors we hit when running the maven build against helios. I do not yet fully understand why, the surefire log was pointing at this ...',2571,'AAAL23///Vo='),(2,'2011-02-23 15:19:38','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2572,'AAAL23///S4='),(2,'2011-02-23 15:19:38','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2572,'AAAL23///S8='),(2,'2011-02-23 15:25:01','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nAll good now.',2573,'AAAL23///Sc='),(2,'2011-02-23 15:24:18','Uploaded patch set 4.',2573,'AAAL23///Sg='),(44,'2011-02-23 15:22:31','Patch Set 3:\n\nRebased',2573,'AAAL23///Sk='),(44,'2011-02-23 15:21:28','Uploaded patch set 3.',2573,'AAAL23///So='),(2,'2011-02-23 15:25:01','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2573,'AAAL23///SY='),(44,'2011-02-23 14:54:03','Uploaded patch set 2.',2573,'AAAL23///Tc='),(NULL,'2011-02-23 14:55:30','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2573,'AAAL23///TM='),(49,'2011-02-23 14:55:24','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2573,'AAAL23///TQ='),(44,'2011-02-23 14:54:27','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2573,'AAAL23///TU='),(49,'2011-02-23 14:10:37','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',2573,'AAAL23///UU='),(6,'2011-02-23 17:17:54','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2574,'AAAL23///Rc='),(44,'2011-02-23 16:31:17','Uploaded patch set 2.',2574,'AAAL23///Rg='),(6,'2011-02-23 15:35:08','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2574,'AAAL23///Rw='),(6,'2011-02-23 17:17:54','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2574,'AAAL23///RY='),(1,'2011-02-23 23:08:50','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2575,'AAAL23///OE='),(1,'2011-02-23 23:08:49','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2575,'AAAL23///OI='),(4,'2011-02-23 22:46:57','Uploaded patch set 2.',2575,'AAAL23///OQ='),(1,'2011-02-23 18:46:14','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(4 inline comments)\n\nThe code is OK. I just wonder if we shouldn\'t be using FS.resolve().',2575,'AAAL23///QE='),(2,'2011-03-07 17:20:14','Uploaded patch set 2.',2576,'AAAL3H///jc='),(2,'2011-03-07 17:20:33','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2576,'AAAL3H///jU='),(2,'2011-03-07 17:20:32','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2576,'AAAL3H///jY='),(6,'2011-03-10 10:32:37','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2577,'AAAL3H///bo='),(6,'2011-03-10 10:32:37','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nRebased to master\n\nWorks for files but not for folders. The fix for folders has to be done in a different place. I\'ll open a bug for that.',2577,'AAAL3H///bs='),(6,'2011-03-10 10:31:21','Uploaded patch set 2.',2577,'AAAL3H///bw='),(6,'2011-02-23 14:17:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2578,'AAAL23///T4='),(6,'2011-02-23 14:17:19','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2578,'AAAL23///T8='),(44,'2011-02-23 14:16:34','Uploaded patch set 5.',2578,'AAAL23///UA='),(44,'2011-02-23 14:14:12','Uploaded patch set 4.',2578,'AAAL23///UE='),(44,'2011-02-23 14:12:59','Uploaded patch set 3.',2578,'AAAL23///UI='),(44,'2011-02-23 14:07:01','Uploaded patch set 2.',2578,'AAAL23///Uk='),(2,'2011-02-23 17:41:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2579,'AAAL23///RQ='),(2,'2011-02-23 17:41:28','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThat\'s reasonable.',2579,'AAAL23///RU='),(4,'2011-02-24 09:56:19','Patch Set 1:\n\nok, then you should rephrase your commit message ;-)\n\ne.g.\n\n\"Disable actions when repository has no commits yet\"',2580,'AAAL23///M8='),(49,'2011-02-24 00:20:02','Patch Set 1:\n\nI mean \"bare\" in context that repository was just created (the project in eclipse were only shared) and there we no commits made in this repository. Not the repository that was initialized using \'git init --bare\'',2580,'AAAL23///Ng='),(4,'2011-02-24 00:13:14','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nI believe bare repositories typically also define HEAD, just semantics are different: for bare repository they point to the default branch which is the one a local branch is created for when cloning the repository\n\nI think instead you should check if the config parameter core.bare is true.',2580,'AAAL23///Nk='),(49,'2011-02-24 15:44:47','Uploaded patch set 2.',2580,'AAAL3H////U='),(49,'2011-03-01 20:34:43','Patch Set 4:\n\nRebased and implemented previously suggested features',2580,'AAAL3H///00='),(49,'2011-03-01 20:34:42','Patch Set 4:\n\nRebased and implemented previously suggested features',2580,'AAAL3H///04='),(49,'2011-03-01 20:34:14','Uploaded patch set 4.',2580,'AAAL3H///08='),(4,'2011-03-01 21:58:56','Patch Set 5: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(6 inline comments)\n\nthis test fails saying the menu is disabled, so it looks like this test needs to be removed since sychronize menu is disabled now for empty repo\n\n\nRerun org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.shouldSynchronizeInEmptyRepository\nshouldSynchronizeInEmptyRepository(org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest)\norg.eclipse.swt.SWTException: Failed to execute runnable (java.lang.IllegalStateException: Menu item is diabled)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.SWT.error(SWT.java:4083)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.SWT.error(SWT.java:3998)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Synchronizer.syncExec(Synchronizer.java:195)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.UISynchronizer.syncExec(UISynchronizer.java:150)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.syncExec(Display.java:4233)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.finders.UIThreadRunnable.run(UIThreadRunnable.java:76)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.finders.UIThreadRunnable.syncExec(UIThreadRunnable.java:142)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.finders.UIThreadRunnable.syncExec(UIThreadRunnable.java:125)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.test.ContextMenuHelper.clickContextMenu(ContextMenuHelper.java:55)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.showDialog(SynchronizeViewTest.java:483)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.shouldSynchronizeInEmptyRepository(SynchronizeViewTest.java:217)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)\n	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)\n	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)\n	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)\n	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)\n	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76)\n	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.junit.SWTBotJunit4ClassRunner.run(SWTBotJunit4ClassRunner.java:54)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:49)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.core.RemotePluginTestRunner.main(RemotePluginTestRunner.java:64)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.core.UITestApplication.runTests(UITestApplication.java:117)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.testing.WorkbenchTestable$1.run(WorkbenchTestable.java:71)\n	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)\nCaused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Menu item is diabled\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.test.ContextMenuHelper$1.run(ContextMenuHelper.java:59)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.test.ContextMenuHelper$1.run(ContextMenuHelper.java:1)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.finders.UIThreadRunnable$2.doRun(UIThreadRunnable.java:140)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.finders.UIThreadRunnable$1.run(UIThreadRunnable.java:89)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.RunnableLock.run(RunnableLock.java:35)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Synchronizer.runAsyncMessages(Synchronizer.java:134)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runAsyncMessages(Display.java:3586)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:3279)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:2640)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runUI(Workbench.java:2604)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.access$4(Workbench.java:2438)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$7.run(Workbench.java:671)\n	at org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:332)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:664)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.start(IDEApplication.java:115)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.core.UITestApplication.start(UITestApplication.java:54)\n	at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:196)\n	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:110)\n	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:79)\n	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:369)\n	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:179)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)\n	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)\n	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)\n	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:619)\n	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:574)\n	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1407)\n	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1383)',2580,'AAAL3H///0I='),(49,'2011-03-01 20:39:31','Uploaded patch set 5.',2580,'AAAL3H///0w='),(49,'2011-03-01 20:33:56','Patch Set 3:\n\nAs always you have right Matthias ;) I didn\'t check context menu on repository level.',2580,'AAAL3H///1A='),(4,'2011-02-28 23:46:57','Patch Set 3:\n\nUnfortunately this is not true (see screenshot I sent via separate email), I suspect that there is a problem with the menu activation rules in repositories view if the repository is empty.\n\nI thought we could show the information that the repo is empty on the label decorator of the repository (in repositories view) / \nproject level (package explorer).',2580,'AAAL3H///4g='),(49,'2011-02-28 18:54:07','Patch Set 3:\n\nWe don\'t need to change any action in repositories view because all actions appears only on branch/tag level, since there are no branch and tags they aren\'t show in context menu. I\'ve also add some code to disable push/fetch actions when there are no remotes and disable synchronize action when HEAD cannot be resolved. In case of changing tool tips for disabled action, I don\'t know how to achievieve this ... I\'m afraid that we can\'t change them or display on show on disabled elements.',2580,'AAAL3H///4s='),(49,'2011-02-28 18:48:38','Uploaded patch set 3.',2580,'AAAL3H///4w='),(4,'2011-02-28 11:48:12','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nLooks good, but I think the set of operations which should be disabled when there is no commit yet is incomplete. I think the following operations should be also disabled:\n\nTeam menu:\n- Synchronize\n- Pull (if no upstream configuration is available)\n\nRepositories View:\n- Merge\n- Rebase\n- Import Projects\n- Create Branch (on Branches node)\n- Push to Upstream (there is nothing to push yet)\n- Push...\n\nIn addition we should show some hint on the label decorators otherwise it\'s hard to understand why all these menus are disabled:\n\n[jgit|Empty master]',2580,'AAAL3H///50='),(49,'2011-02-28 11:54:50','Patch Set 2:\n\nGood point! I\'ll implement this and repush this change ;)',2580,'AAAL3H///5w='),(49,'2011-03-05 19:29:52','Patch Set 7:\n\nRebased\n\nrepositories view\n* actions like merge, rebase, tag, create branch, import projects are disabled instead of removing them from menu\n\nIn case of \"Configure fetch from/push to upstream\", those actions assume that the source/destination branch exists in repository, but in our scenario such branch does not exist therefore those actions are disabled\n\nNow \"Fetch from...\" action in enabled all the time.',2580,'AAAL3H///mc='),(49,'2011-03-05 19:23:26','Uploaded patch set 7.',2580,'AAAL3H///mg='),(49,'2011-03-01 22:15:43','Patch Set 5:\n\nActually I\'m not sure does we need to disable synchronize action on repositories when there are no commits. I see here a day to day use case here, when after user creates new project, shares it and made some changes he would like to review those changes in synchronize view. So actually we shouldn\'t disable a synchronize action. What do you think about this Matthias?',2580,'AAAL3H///z8='),(49,'2011-03-01 22:34:42','Uploaded patch set 6.',2580,'AAAL3H///zc='),(49,'2011-03-01 22:25:56','Patch Set 5: (6 inline comments)\n\nFixed typos.',2580,'AAAL3H///zg='),(4,'2011-03-01 23:31:23','Patch Set 6: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nstill I see the following problems:\n\nrepository view:\n- on repo node\n-- merge and rebase action are not disabled but removed, I think it\'s better to disable them so that users can see what operations they might expect when repo is not empty\n-- does \"Import Projects\" make sense in that state ?\n- on \"Branches\" node\n-- Create Branch doesn\'t work since it requires a source branch ?\n- on \"Tags\" node\n-- \"Create Tag\" should be disabled ?\n\nteam menu:\n- \"Remote > Configure Fetch from Upstream\" should be enabled since if you did that you may fill your empty repo by running \"Fetch from Upstream\", right ?\n-- configuring that should then enable \"Fetch from Upstream\"\n- similarly \"Remote > Fetch from...\" should be also enabled as this might be the way to get commits in\n- \"Remote > Configure Push to Upstream\" should be enabled as you may want to configure that before you created the first commit (or fetched some changes) (but \"Push to upstream\" and \"Remote > Push...) should be disabled until there is anything to puhs',2580,'AAAL3H///zQ='),(49,'2011-03-01 23:09:59','Patch Set 6:\n\nI\'ve reverted this change in patch set 6, now synchronize is enabled for empty repository.',2580,'AAAL3H///zU='),(4,'2011-03-01 23:05:32','Patch Set 6:\n\nah, ok, I missed this use case that synchronize also shows not yet committed changes, I agree we should not disable the synchronize menu entry due to this',2580,'AAAL3H///zY='),(107,'2011-03-23 00:52:42','Patch Set 8: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/107/ : SUCCESS',2580,'AAAL3n//+0g='),(4,'2011-03-23 00:44:48','Patch Set 8: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- found a use case why \"Import Projects\" should not be disabled: create a new project, share it with Git, create new repo, remove repository and project from workspace but don\'t delete them, add the repository again, now you need a way to import the project again despite the repo is empty, hence re-enabled \"Import Projects\"\n- disabled also \"Push...\" in the git repositories view',2580,'AAAL3n//+0k='),(107,'2011-03-23 00:42:02','Patch Set 8:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/107/ ',2580,'AAAL3n//+0o='),(49,'2011-03-23 03:51:48','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2580,'AAAL3n//+0Q='),(4,'2011-03-23 00:41:58','Uploaded patch set 8.',2580,'AAAL3n//+0s='),(49,'2011-03-23 03:51:45','Patch Set 8: Looks good to me, approved\n\n',2580,'AAAL3n//+0U='),(2,'2011-02-23 22:44:53','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2581,'AAAL23///OU='),(2,'2011-02-23 22:44:53','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThis is fine.',2581,'AAAL23///OY='),(4,'2011-02-24 00:09:05','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2582,'AAAL23///No='),(1,'2011-02-24 14:55:47','Uploaded patch set 2.',2582,'AAAL3H////8='),(2,'2011-02-24 16:23:47','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2582,'AAAL3H////E='),(2,'2011-02-24 16:23:46','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2582,'AAAL3H////I='),(122,'2011-02-24 05:34:45','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2583,'AAAL23///NQ='),(122,'2011-02-24 00:07:53','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\nYou write: \n\" I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\" \nDoes this mean you don\'t want it submitted in the current form (we are obviously happy to fix the very reasonable suggestions) or do you not like the change in general?',2583,'AAAL23///Nw='),(1,'2011-02-24 00:24:16','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\nMy -1 score is just denoting this isn\'t ready for inclusion as-is, but if you address the comments it might be OK.',2583,'AAAL23///NY='),(1,'2011-02-23 21:51:31','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(18 inline comments)\n\n',2583,'AAAL23///Oo='),(1,'2011-02-24 14:57:20','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2583,'AAAL3H////0='),(107,'2011-03-07 21:17:51','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/35/',2583,'AAAL3H///hU='),(107,'2011-03-07 21:14:19','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/35/ ',2583,'AAAL3H///hY='),(1,'2011-03-07 18:15:07','Patch Set 4:\n\nI should say, nice work guys. Thanks for bearing with us through the review process. As soon a the CQ is approved, lets submit this.',2583,'AAAL3H///i0='),(1,'2011-03-07 18:14:38','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved\n\n',2583,'AAAL3H///i4='),(2,'2011-03-07 16:52:49','Patch Set 4: Unclean IP, do not check in\n\nI created a CQ for this contribution:\n\nhttps://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5004\n\nI will need John and Roland to state some information in bug 336749 regarding the provenance of the contribution for the IP team.',2583,'AAAL3H///jg='),(2,'2011-03-07 16:50:24','Uploaded patch set 4.',2583,'AAAL3H///jk='),(107,'2011-03-06 22:24:40','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/32/',2583,'AAAL3H///lo='),(107,'2011-03-06 22:21:46','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/32/ ',2583,'AAAL3H///ls='),(122,'2011-03-05 01:01:22','Uploaded patch set 3.',2583,'AAAL3H///nM='),(1,'2011-03-04 00:49:10','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(29 inline comments)\n\nI\'m really happy with this approach. I\'m just down to style nits, and what appears to be a bug where you use milliseconds but document the timeout as seconds.',2583,'AAAL3H///sY='),(121,'2011-03-03 22:11:50','Uploaded patch set 2.',2583,'AAAL3H///u0='),(107,'2011-03-04 00:07:13','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/22/',2583,'AAAL3H///uQ='),(107,'2011-03-04 00:04:48','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/22/ ',2583,'AAAL3H///uU='),(4,'2011-03-04 00:04:21','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(6 inline comments)\n\n',2583,'AAAL3H///uY='),(2,'2011-03-23 15:56:14','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2583,'AAAL3n//+u4='),(2,'2011-03-23 15:56:13','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nCQ 5004 is now approved!\n\nThanks for your patience guys.',2583,'AAAL3n//+u8='),(107,'2011-03-23 15:51:36','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/169/ : SUCCESS',2583,'AAAL3n//+vI='),(107,'2011-03-23 15:48:59','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/169/ ',2583,'AAAL3n//+vM='),(2,'2011-03-23 15:48:55','Uploaded patch set 5.',2583,'AAAL3n//+vQ='),(44,'2011-02-24 09:39:42','Patch Set 1:\n\nThree runs on Windows 7 ok, Run #4 failed:\n\njava.lang.AssertionError: \nExpected: \"Touched at 1298540144183\"\n     got: \"<!-- EGit jUnit test case -->Touched at 1298540144183\"\n\n	at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:778)\n	at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:736)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.shouldExchangeCompareEditorSidesBetweenIncomingAndOutgoingChangesInGitChangeSet(SynchronizeViewTest.java:233)',2584,'AAAL23///NA='),(44,'2011-02-24 09:37:16','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nFirst run of the test on Ubuntu was ok. Second run failed:\n\norg.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.exceptions.WidgetNotFoundException: Could not find node with text: folder\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.widgets.SWTBotTreeItem.getNodes(SWTBotTreeItem.java:330)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.widgets.SWTBotTreeItem.getNode(SWTBotTreeItem.java:305)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.widgets.SWTBotTreeItem.getNode(SWTBotTreeItem.java:342)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.getCompareEditorForFileInGitChangeSet(SynchronizeViewTest.java:560)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.shouldOpenCompareEditorInGitChangeSet',2584,'AAAL23///NE='),(49,'2011-02-24 19:25:26','Patch Set 3:\n\nrebased on current master',2584,'AAAL3H///+c='),(49,'2011-02-24 19:25:10','Uploaded patch set 3.',2584,'AAAL3H///+g='),(44,'2011-02-25 14:50:44','Patch Set 4:\n\nFails on Win 7 on run #10\n\n\norg.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.widgets.TimeoutException: Timeout after: 10000 ms.: null\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntil(SWTBotFactory.java:398)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntil(SWTBotFactory.java:372)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.test.TestUtil.waitUntilTreeHasNodeContainsText(TestUtil.java:187)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.waitForNodeWithText(SynchronizeViewTest.java:595)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.getCompareEditorForFileInGitChangeSet(SynchronizeViewTest.java:579)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.shouldOpenCompareEditorInGitChangeSet(SynchronizeViewTest.java:153)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)\n	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)\n	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)\n	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)\n	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)\n	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76)\n	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.junit.SWTBotJunit4ClassRunner.run(SWTBotJunit4ClassRunner.java:54)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:49)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.core.RemotePluginTestRunner.main(RemotePluginTestRunner.java:64)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.core.UITestApplication.runTests(UITestApplication.java:117)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.testing.WorkbenchTestable$1.run(WorkbenchTestable.java:71)\n	at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)',2584,'AAAL3H///+I='),(49,'2011-02-24 19:24:52','Patch Set 2:\n\nI\'ve updated the test cases and manage to run successfully ten times all test cases in SynchronizeViewTest on my Gentoo Linux.',2584,'AAAL3H///+k='),(44,'2011-02-25 14:49:12','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nFails on Ubunto on run #2\n\norg.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.widgets.TimeoutException: Timeout after: 10000 ms.: null\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntil(SWTBotFactory.java:398)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.SWTBotFactory.waitUntil(SWTBotFactory.java:372)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.test.TestUtil.waitUntilTreeHasNodeContainsText(TestUtil.java:187)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.waitForNodeWithText(SynchronizeViewTest.java:595)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.view.synchronize.SynchronizeViewTest.shouldListFileDeletedChange(SynchronizeViewTest.java:188)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)\n	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)\n	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)\n	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)\n	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)\n	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76)\n	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)\n	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)\n	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.swt.finder.junit.SWTBotJunit4ClassRunner.run(SWTBotJunit4ClassRunner.java:54)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:49)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)\n	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.core.RemotePluginTestRunner.main(RemotePluginTestRunner.java:64)\n	at org.eclipse.swtbot.eclipse.core.UITestApplication.runTests(UITestApplication.java:117)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.testing.WorkbenchTestable$1.run(WorkbenchTestable.java:71)\n	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)',2584,'AAAL3H///+M='),(49,'2011-02-24 19:23:26','Uploaded patch set 2.',2584,'AAAL3H///+o='),(49,'2011-02-24 19:32:55','Uploaded patch set 4.',2584,'AAAL3H///+Y='),(49,'2011-02-28 18:55:15','Patch Set 4:\n\nI don\'t have any idea why those tests are failing :| Maybe you can give me some hints?',2584,'AAAL3H///4o='),(44,'2011-03-02 17:05:17','Uploaded patch set 5.',2584,'AAAL3H///xc='),(44,'2011-03-02 17:07:21','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2584,'AAAL3H///xI='),(44,'2011-03-02 17:07:20','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nRebased to current master. Still fails sometimes, don\'t know why. But it\'s better than before. So let\'s take this as a base for further improvement.',2584,'AAAL3H///xM='),(103,'2011-02-26 22:57:43','Patch Set 1:\n\nJust take the commit you made, amend it and edit the commit message (and the files, if you want). Then commit and push again (make sure, that the Change-Id in the commit message is the same like the one from this change, that should automatically happen if you amend the right commit). Then changed commit should be added as Patchset 2.',2585,'AAAL3H///68='),(123,'2011-02-26 23:53:07','Uploaded patch set 2.',2585,'AAAL3H///6o='),(123,'2011-02-26 22:47:55','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\nEntered as an inline-comment the right bug id.',2585,'AAAL3H///7A='),(103,'2011-02-26 22:19:03','Patch Set 1: (3 inline comments)\n\n',2585,'AAAL3H///7Q='),(123,'2011-03-11 10:04:30','Patch Set 2:\n\nI see, you need first to discuss what you want to offer as EGit API.\n\nYou are right, that it is untransparent to the user, if somebody can change the resources without the knowledge of a user. In the finalizeCommit phase, I am interacting with another system. By this interaction it is possible that some local files change and for my need I _must_ commit these changed files as well.\n\nMaybe we can show the user in that case a second dialog, so that all files for commit are viewable to the user. If the user does not like the modified commit, than the commit process may be canceled.\nBut I need to interact on the selected resources, so putting this phase before showing the first dialog is not an option for me.\n\nIf you do not want to let the class “CommitOperation“ be accessible, than I need to add an additional “call-back” method to the CommitObserver. The CommitObserver should be notified if the commit was successful or not.\n\nYou proposed a data container class with the information needed for commit which could be manipulated by the Observer.\nIt would be great if a CommitObserver-Developer would not need to handle with “indexedFiles” and “untrackedFiles”, only with the files that should be committed. Meta-information should be handled as a black box (in the container or later).\nWould you expect that I should write such a container? I could try to do this if wanted, but at the moment I am not so sure about the requirements for the container. Maybe we should discuss this before.\n\nCheers Adrian',2585,'AAAL3X////c='),(6,'2011-03-11 08:30:48','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(6 inline comments)\n\nI like the idea to open up EGit by offering extension points. The problem is that we have not yet really discussed about a concept of a public API. At the moment all packages are marked as internal.\n\nI still do not quite understand the use-case to manipulate the set of files to be committed. This would be very intransparent to the user.',2585,'AAAL3X////g='),(1,'2011-02-24 15:29:14','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2586,'AAAL3H////g='),(1,'2011-02-24 15:29:14','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2586,'AAAL3H////k='),(44,'2011-02-24 15:14:09','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2586,'AAAL3H////o='),(4,'2011-02-24 15:05:02','Uploaded patch set 2.',2586,'AAAL3H////s='),(1,'2011-02-24 15:29:46','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2587,'AAAL3H////c='),(4,'2011-02-24 15:04:34','Uploaded patch set 2.',2587,'AAAL3H////w='),(1,'2011-02-24 15:29:47','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2587,'AAAL3H////Y='),(4,'2011-02-26 21:30:05','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2588,'AAAL3H///7g='),(4,'2011-02-26 21:30:04','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2588,'AAAL3H///7o='),(4,'2011-02-26 21:29:07','Uploaded patch set 2.',2588,'AAAL3H///7s='),(2,'2011-02-24 17:36:53','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2589,'AAAL3H////A='),(2,'2011-02-24 17:36:54','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2589,'AAAL3H///+8='),(2,'2011-02-24 17:38:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2590,'AAAL3H///+s='),(2,'2011-02-24 17:38:27','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2590,'AAAL3H///+w='),(2,'2011-02-24 23:53:59','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2591,'AAAL3H///+Q='),(2,'2011-02-24 23:53:58','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2591,'AAAL3H///+U='),(49,'2011-02-24 15:58:18','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2592,'AAAL3H////M='),(49,'2011-02-24 15:58:15','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2592,'AAAL3H////Q='),(2,'2011-02-24 17:37:14','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2593,'AAAL3H///+0='),(2,'2011-02-24 17:37:13','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2593,'AAAL3H///+4='),(4,'2011-02-25 20:37:16','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2594,'AAAL3H///88='),(4,'2011-02-25 20:37:16','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2594,'AAAL3H///9A='),(100,'2011-02-25 17:45:27','Uploaded patch set 3.',2594,'AAAL3H///9g='),(100,'2011-02-25 17:40:40','Uploaded patch set 2.',2594,'AAAL3H///9s='),(100,'2011-02-25 18:06:24','Patch Set 3:\n\nPatch sets are all identical. Uploading them was just a mistake...',2594,'AAAL3H///9Y='),(4,'2011-02-25 22:10:15','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased',2595,'AAAL3H///80='),(4,'2011-02-25 22:09:42','Uploaded patch set 3.',2595,'AAAL3H///84='),(4,'2011-02-25 22:10:17','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2595,'AAAL3H///8w='),(100,'2011-02-25 17:40:40','Uploaded patch set 2.',2595,'AAAL3H///9o='),(100,'2011-02-25 18:10:14','Patch Set 2:\n\nSame here... Uploading patch set 2 was a mistake; it\'s identical.',2595,'AAAL3H///9U='),(4,'2011-02-26 23:11:40','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2596,'AAAL3H///60='),(4,'2011-02-26 23:10:58','Uploaded patch set 2.',2596,'AAAL3H///64='),(4,'2011-02-26 23:11:41','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2596,'AAAL3H///6s='),(2,'2011-03-01 16:13:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2597,'AAAL3H///1g='),(2,'2011-03-01 16:12:59','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2597,'AAAL3H///1k='),(9,'2011-03-01 08:31:16','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2597,'AAAL3H///3g='),(9,'2011-03-01 08:30:44','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2597,'AAAL3H///3o='),(9,'2011-03-01 08:30:24','Uploaded patch set 2.',2597,'AAAL3H///3s='),(1,'2011-02-25 15:06:59','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(3 inline comments)\n\n',2597,'AAAL3H///94='),(4,'2011-02-25 20:12:06','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2598,'AAAL3H///9E='),(4,'2011-02-25 20:12:05','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2598,'AAAL3H///9I='),(100,'2011-02-28 10:05:30','Patch Set 3: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2599,'AAAL3H///54='),(4,'2011-02-28 13:01:58','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2599,'AAAL3H///5c='),(4,'2011-02-28 13:01:58','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2599,'AAAL3H///5k='),(100,'2011-02-28 10:03:30','Uploaded patch set 4.',2599,'AAAL3H///6A='),(8,'2011-02-26 17:22:39','Patch Set 3: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2599,'AAAL3H///7w='),(4,'2011-02-25 22:38:41','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased',2599,'AAAL3H///8o='),(4,'2011-02-25 22:38:01','Uploaded patch set 3.',2599,'AAAL3H///8s='),(100,'2011-02-25 18:11:20','Patch Set 2:\n\nSame here... Uploading patch set 2 was a mistake; it\'s identical.',2599,'AAAL3H///9Q='),(100,'2011-02-25 17:40:40','Uploaded patch set 2.',2599,'AAAL3H///9w='),(4,'2011-02-28 13:01:58','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2600,'AAAL3H///5g='),(4,'2011-02-28 13:01:07','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2600,'AAAL3H///5o='),(4,'2011-02-28 13:00:28','Uploaded patch set 6.',2600,'AAAL3H///5s='),(NULL,'2011-02-27 22:00:55','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.',2600,'AAAL3H///6U='),(NULL,'2011-02-26 23:11:41','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.',2600,'AAAL3H///6w='),(NULL,'2011-02-26 21:30:05','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.',2600,'AAAL3H///7k='),(4,'2011-02-25 23:00:29','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased',2600,'AAAL3H///8g='),(4,'2011-02-25 22:52:52','Uploaded patch set 5.',2600,'AAAL3H///8k='),(NULL,'2011-02-25 23:15:30','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.\n\nThe following changes must also be submitted:\n\n* I62af897cda118b3fc7cf42d2b444a685053dc79c\n',2600,'AAAL3H///8U='),(100,'2011-02-25 16:34:10','Uploaded patch set 2.',2600,'AAAL3H///90='),(100,'2011-02-25 17:59:15','Uploaded patch set 4.',2600,'AAAL3H///9c='),(100,'2011-02-25 17:40:41','Uploaded patch set 3.',2600,'AAAL3H///9k='),(100,'2011-02-25 18:15:29','Patch Set 4:\n\nPatch set 4 should now contain everything (again).',2600,'AAAL3H///9M='),(2,'2011-03-01 16:15:03','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2601,'AAAL3H///1U='),(2,'2011-03-01 16:15:02','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2601,'AAAL3H///1Y='),(4,'2011-02-25 23:01:10','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2602,'AAAL3H///8c='),(4,'2011-02-25 23:01:11','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2602,'AAAL3H///8Y='),(4,'2011-02-25 23:23:54','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2603,'AAAL3H///8I='),(4,'2011-02-25 23:23:53','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased',2603,'AAAL3H///8M='),(4,'2011-02-25 23:23:10','Uploaded patch set 2.',2603,'AAAL3H///8Q='),(1,'2011-02-26 01:27:49','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2604,'AAAL3H///74='),(1,'2011-02-26 01:27:47','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nTrivial bug fix.',2604,'AAAL3H///8A='),(1,'2011-02-26 01:27:48','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2605,'AAAL3H///78='),(1,'2011-02-26 01:25:53','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nTrivial merge.',2605,'AAAL3H///8E='),(1,'2011-02-28 03:00:37','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',2606,'AAAL3H///6E='),(89,'2011-03-09 20:02:24','Patch Set 2: Abandoned',2606,'AAAL3H///dc='),(107,'2011-03-07 22:08:36','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/36/',2606,'AAAL3H///hM='),(107,'2011-03-07 22:04:42','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/36/ ',2606,'AAAL3H///hQ='),(1,'2011-03-07 18:22:54','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2606,'AAAL3H///io='),(5,'2011-03-07 09:22:59','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2606,'AAAL3H///kY='),(89,'2011-03-06 19:59:15','Uploaded patch set 2.',2606,'AAAL3H///mY='),(2,'2011-03-01 04:00:27','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2607,'AAAL3H///34='),(2,'2011-03-01 04:00:26','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nlooks good.',2607,'AAAL3H///38='),(2,'2011-03-01 04:00:03','Uploaded patch set 2.',2607,'AAAL3H///4A='),(NULL,'2011-03-01 03:58:29','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2607,'AAAL3H///4E='),(2,'2011-03-01 03:58:28','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2607,'AAAL3H///4I='),(4,'2011-02-27 21:59:17','Uploaded patch set 3.',2608,'AAAL3H///6c='),(103,'2011-02-27 14:49:58','Uploaded patch set 2.',2608,'AAAL3H///6k='),(4,'2011-02-27 22:00:55','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2608,'AAAL3H///6Q='),(4,'2011-02-27 22:00:54','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nimproved label text on preference page to make clear that this configuration option changes the default but still can be overridden in commit dialog',2608,'AAAL3H///6Y='),(4,'2011-03-01 07:26:10','Patch Set 1:\n\nI would prefer to go back to origin/master as this is closest to what the upstream master has',2609,'AAAL3H///3w='),(2,'2011-03-01 01:27:49','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nLooks good, I like where this is going!\n\n- What happens at task deactivation?\n\nby default and easiest solution would be to go back to master. We could add a preference and allow people to choose to go back to master always or the last branch you were on (we would have to remember this in EGit via a preference probably or even better, just check the git ref log)',2609,'AAAL3H///4M='),(103,'2011-02-27 20:44:41','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nMissing features:\n\n-What happens at task deactivation?\n-Currently the branch name is calcutated from Bug ID / Key, maybe part of the title should be there\n-Storing of the configuration of the repositories that are affected in the context (no need to browse the whole context, maybe better performance)\n-Make this feature configurable',2609,'AAAL3H///6g='),(4,'2011-10-26 21:09:45','Patch Set 6:\n\nlooks like this should be rebased onto change I5259b7b23095fcdc4cd7205d648f4714e9458b47  ?',2609,'AABOBn///Sc='),(103,'2011-09-09 09:24:24','Uploaded patch set 5.',2609,'AABOBX///74='),(103,'2011-09-09 12:22:31','Uploaded patch set 6.',2609,'AABOBX///7o='),(103,'2011-09-08 19:43:13','Uploaded patch set 4.',2609,'AABOBX///9c='),(103,'2011-09-08 19:44:37','Patch Set 4:\n\nYou need http://review.mylyn.org/#change,23 and http://review.mylyn.org/#change,21 to compile this change.',2609,'AABOBX///9Y='),(103,'2011-05-09 09:24:40','Patch Set 3: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2609,'AABOIn///Mw='),(2,'2011-05-08 23:56:06','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',2609,'AABOIn///NU='),(107,'2011-05-08 22:05:18','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/654/ : UNSTABLE',2609,'AABOIn///OE='),(103,'2011-05-08 21:57:51','Patch Set 2: (14 inline comments)\n\n',2609,'AABOIn///OI='),(107,'2011-05-08 21:57:28','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/654/ ',2609,'AABOIn///OM='),(103,'2011-05-08 21:57:25','Uploaded patch set 3.',2609,'AABOIn///OQ='),(4,'2011-05-08 21:26:57','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(25 inline comments)\n\n- for auto-proposed branch names I would prefer to have a prefix e.g. \"bug-123456\"\n- I think it should be also possible to have custom branch names by enabling editing of the auto-proposed branch name before creating it\n- association from repository to bug tracker could be stored as git repository configuration parameter e.g. \"bugtracker.url\" and integrated by implementing extension point \"org.eclipse.mylyn.tasks.ui.projectLinkProviders\" [1]\n\n[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Mylyn_Integrator_Reference',2609,'AABOIn///PQ='),(107,'2011-05-08 08:24:40','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/652/ ',2609,'AABOIn///Rc='),(103,'2011-05-08 08:24:36','Uploaded patch set 2.',2609,'AABOIn///Rg='),(107,'2011-05-08 08:32:06','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/652/ : SUCCESS',2609,'AABOIn///RY='),(6,'2011-03-01 09:54:41','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2610,'AAAL3H///3E='),(6,'2011-03-01 09:54:40','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2610,'AAAL3H///3I='),(6,'2011-03-01 09:53:03','Uploaded patch set 2.',2610,'AAAL3H///3M='),(NULL,'2011-03-01 09:46:08','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2610,'AAAL3H///3U='),(6,'2011-03-01 09:46:07','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2610,'AAAL3H///3Y='),(4,'2011-03-06 21:39:06','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2611,'AAAL3H///mM='),(4,'2011-03-06 21:39:05','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2611,'AAAL3H///mQ='),(4,'2011-03-06 21:38:07','Uploaded patch set 2.',2611,'AAAL3H///mU='),(6,'2011-03-01 10:09:15','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2612,'AAAL3H///28='),(6,'2011-03-01 10:09:15','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2612,'AAAL3H///3A='),(6,'2011-03-01 09:53:03','Uploaded patch set 2.',2612,'AAAL3H///3Q='),(4,'2011-02-28 15:40:35','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nthis was wrong',2613,'AAAL3H///5A='),(4,'2011-02-28 15:04:45','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2613,'AAAL3H///5M='),(1,'2011-02-28 14:58:08','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2613,'AAAL3H///5U='),(2,'2011-03-01 01:17:06','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2614,'AAAL3H///4Q='),(2,'2011-03-01 01:17:06','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2614,'AAAL3H///4U='),(2,'2011-03-01 17:06:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2615,'AAAL3H///1M='),(2,'2011-03-01 17:05:59','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nInteresting strategy, looks good.',2615,'AAAL3H///1Q='),(1,'2011-03-01 04:10:11','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nTested manually with `jgit clone`, the progress monitors seem to work as expected now.',2615,'AAAL3H///30='),(4,'2011-03-01 21:28:21','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2616,'AAAL3H///0k='),(4,'2011-03-01 21:28:20','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2616,'AAAL3H///0o='),(4,'2011-03-01 21:27:44','Uploaded patch set 3.',2616,'AAAL3H///0s='),(6,'2011-03-01 16:13:10','Patch Set 1: (3 inline comments)\n\n',2616,'AAAL3H///1c='),(6,'2011-03-01 16:12:55','Uploaded patch set 2.',2616,'AAAL3H///1o='),(4,'2011-03-01 15:36:28','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n(3 inline comments)\n\nworks great and tests pass but some style nits',2616,'AAAL3H///2g='),(1,'2011-03-01 18:09:03','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2617,'AAAL3H///1E='),(1,'2011-03-01 18:09:03','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2617,'AAAL3H///1I='),(49,'2011-03-01 22:07:19','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2618,'AAAL3H///0A='),(49,'2011-03-01 22:07:15','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2618,'AAAL3H///0E='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:27:12','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2619,'AAAL3H///yk='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:27:11','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2619,'AAAL3H///yo='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:27:48','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2620,'AAAL3H///yc='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:27:47','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2620,'AAAL3H///yg='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:28:36','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2621,'AAAL3H///yU='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:28:35','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2621,'AAAL3H///yY='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:43:32','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2622,'AAAL3H///x0='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:43:31','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2622,'AAAL3H///x4='),(4,'2011-03-02 15:11:11','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2623,'AAAL3H///y0='),(6,'2011-03-02 14:32:33','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2623,'AAAL3H///y4='),(4,'2011-03-02 15:11:11','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2623,'AAAL3H///yw='),(6,'2011-03-02 14:31:16','Uploaded patch set 2.',2623,'AAAL3H///zA='),(4,'2011-03-02 13:49:22','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nShouldn\'t Alex be the author of this change as he put it into the referenced bug ?',2623,'AAAL3H///zI='),(6,'2011-03-02 14:24:51','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nChange-Id was missing',2624,'AAAL3H///zE='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:29:13','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2625,'AAAL3H///yM='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:29:12','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2625,'AAAL3H///yQ='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:30:04','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2626,'AAAL3H///yE='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:30:04','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.\n\nHowever, I still think we should get rid of \'Ref\' and simply use String.',2626,'AAAL3H///yI='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:42:58','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2627,'AAAL3H///x8='),(2,'2011-03-02 15:42:58','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nDamn.',2627,'AAAL3H///yA='),(100,'2011-03-02 15:20:23','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n:-(',2627,'AAAL3H///ys='),(1,'2011-03-04 14:22:22','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nThis isn\'t the way to fix the bug that was reported.',2628,'AAAL3H///rc='),(1,'2011-03-02 19:21:09','Patch Set 1:\n\nThe pack is normally closed when the last window to it is evicted from the WindowCache.\n\nThis eviction occurs one of two ways:\n\nThe first is by the weak LRU popping the least-recently-used window in order to release resources to keep the cache under the byte or open file limits. As these windows are popped the open window count on PackFile gets decreased, and the file is closed when the count drops to 0.\n\nThe second is when WindowCache spins the ReferenceQueue. If the JVM GC killed some of our SoftReferences in order to free up heap memory WindowCache will (eventually) spin those now dead references out and decrement the open window count on the associated PackFile. When the count drops to 0, the file is closed.\n\nI just made a patch to C Git today that doesn\'t keep the file open if there is exactly 1 window on it. This might be useful in JGit too, but less so because the default window size is so much smaller (8 Kib in JGit). So it might not be worth my time to try and do.\n\nAre you seeing file leaking or something Chris? This code is one of the most heavily exercised areas in Gerrit Code Review servers and the current version has been running in production pretty solidly for nearly 6 months.',2628,'AAAL3H///w4='),(2,'2011-03-02 19:15:43','Patch Set 1:\n\nOk, that makes sense.\n\nWhen does the pack close otherwise?',2628,'AAAL3H///w8='),(1,'2011-03-02 23:33:29','Patch Set 1:\n\nI just replied on that bug, I think the issue is EGit isn\'t closing the repository when it should, which means the PackFile is still open within JGit\'s caches.\n\nIf EGit wants to delete the repository, it really needs to ensure the packs have been closed first.',2628,'AAAL3H///wg='),(8,'2011-03-02 23:14:43','Patch Set 1:\n\nThis comes from https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=300084.\n\nThe problem can be fixed by replacing the OS layer :)',2628,'AAAL3H///wk='),(1,'2011-03-02 18:00:35','Patch Set 1: Do not submit\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2628,'AAAL3H///xA='),(2,'2011-03-02 22:29:13','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2629,'AAAL3H///w0='),(2,'2011-03-02 22:29:14','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2629,'AAAL3H///ww='),(2,'2011-03-02 22:34:45','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2630,'AAAL3H///wo='),(2,'2011-03-02 22:34:44','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2630,'AAAL3H///ws='),(5,'2011-03-03 15:41:33','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2631,'AAAL3H///v8='),(5,'2011-03-03 16:04:21','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2631,'AAAL3H///vk='),(107,'2011-03-03 15:59:23','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/19/',2631,'AAAL3H///vs='),(107,'2011-03-03 15:57:11','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/19/ ',2631,'AAAL3H///vw='),(107,'2011-03-03 15:54:07','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/18/',2632,'AAAL3H///v0='),(107,'2011-03-03 15:51:52','Patch Set 2: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/18/ ',2632,'AAAL3H///v4='),(5,'2011-03-03 16:04:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2632,'AAAL3H///vo='),(5,'2011-03-03 15:40:23','Patch Set 2: IP review completed\n\n',2632,'AAAL3H///wA='),(5,'2011-03-03 15:39:46','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved\n\n',2632,'AAAL3H///wE='),(107,'2011-03-03 15:28:10','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/jgit.gerrit/17/',2632,'AAAL3H///wI='),(107,'2011-03-03 15:19:53','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/jgit.gerrit/17/ ',2632,'AAAL3H///wM='),(4,'2011-03-03 15:19:41','Uploaded patch set 2.',2632,'AAAL3H///wQ='),(4,'2011-03-06 21:59:55','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2633,'AAAL3H///l8='),(4,'2011-03-06 21:59:55','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2633,'AAAL3H///mA='),(4,'2011-03-06 21:59:30','Uploaded patch set 3.',2633,'AAAL3H///mE='),(4,'2011-03-06 21:58:01','Uploaded patch set 2.',2633,'AAAL3H///mI='),(2,'2011-03-03 16:50:17','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2634,'AAAL3H///vI='),(2,'2011-03-03 16:50:16','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nFixed, thanks Jens.',2634,'AAAL3H///vM='),(2,'2011-03-03 16:49:53','Uploaded patch set 2.',2634,'AAAL3H///vQ='),(5,'2011-03-09 17:12:26','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',2635,'AAAL3H///eI='),(107,'2011-03-08 22:36:44','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/40/ ',2635,'AAAL3H///fc='),(100,'2011-03-08 22:36:41','Uploaded patch set 2.',2635,'AAAL3H///fg='),(100,'2011-03-08 22:42:00','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nStill not final...\r\n\r\nTodos: It should be possible to omit the option when paths are specified. What happens when -o and -all are set together?',2635,'AAAL3H///fM='),(100,'2011-03-08 22:40:25','Patch Set 1: (5 inline comments)\n\n',2635,'AAAL3H///fQ='),(107,'2011-03-08 22:38:55','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/40/ : SUCCESS',2635,'AAAL3H///fY='),(2,'2011-03-07 16:22:20','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nCan you rebase and fix your changes according to the comments?',2635,'AAAL3H///jo='),(5,'2011-03-06 22:53:30','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(5 inline comments)\n\n',2635,'AAAL3H///lE='),(107,'2011-03-03 16:12:21','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/20/ ',2635,'AAAL3H///vg='),(100,'2011-03-03 16:15:53','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nFirst draft...',2635,'AAAL3H///vU='),(107,'2011-03-03 16:14:38','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/20/',2635,'AAAL3H///vY='),(100,'2011-03-11 13:22:11','Uploaded patch set 4.',2635,'AAAL3X////E='),(107,'2011-03-11 13:20:57','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/57/ : SUCCESS',2635,'AAAL3X////Q='),(107,'2011-03-11 13:18:41','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/57/ ',2635,'AAAL3X////U='),(100,'2011-03-11 13:18:38','Uploaded patch set 3.',2635,'AAAL3X////Y='),(100,'2011-03-11 13:25:57','Uploaded patch set 5.',2635,'AAAL3X///+0='),(107,'2011-03-11 13:25:21','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/59/ : SUCCESS',2635,'AAAL3X///+4='),(107,'2011-03-11 13:23:12','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/59/ ',2635,'AAAL3X///+8='),(100,'2011-03-11 13:34:16','Patch Set 2: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2635,'AAAL3X///+c='),(2,'2011-03-11 14:29:59','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2635,'AAAL3X///+Q='),(107,'2011-03-11 13:28:24','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/60/ : SUCCESS',2635,'AAAL3X///+s='),(2,'2011-03-11 14:29:58','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good now.',2635,'AAAL3X///+U='),(107,'2011-03-11 13:26:00','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/60/ ',2635,'AAAL3X///+w='),(100,'2011-03-11 13:34:23','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2635,'AAAL3X///+Y='),(44,'2011-03-04 16:11:46','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2636,'AAAL3H///oA='),(44,'2011-03-04 16:11:44','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2636,'AAAL3H///oE='),(1,'2011-03-04 14:21:59','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2637,'AAAL3H///rg='),(1,'2011-03-04 14:21:58','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved\n\n',2637,'AAAL3H///ro='),(107,'2011-03-04 10:26:52','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/23/',2637,'AAAL3H///sI='),(4,'2011-03-04 10:24:27','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2637,'AAAL3H///sM='),(107,'2011-03-04 10:24:13','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/23/ ',2637,'AAAL3H///sQ='),(107,'2011-03-04 10:36:16','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/24/',2638,'AAAL3H///r8='),(1,'2011-03-04 14:21:59','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2638,'AAAL3H///rk='),(1,'2011-03-04 14:21:51','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved\n\n',2638,'AAAL3H///rs='),(107,'2011-03-04 10:33:59','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/24/ ',2638,'AAAL3H///sA='),(4,'2011-03-04 10:33:31','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2638,'AAAL3H///sE='),(1,'2011-03-04 21:55:32','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2639,'AAAL3H///no='),(107,'2011-03-04 21:53:50','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/29/',2639,'AAAL3H///ns='),(107,'2011-03-04 21:50:35','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/29/ ',2639,'AAAL3H///nw='),(79,'2011-03-04 14:46:58','Patch Set 1: (3 inline comments)\n\nAll addressed in path set 2.',2639,'AAAL3H///q4='),(1,'2011-03-04 14:57:56','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2639,'AAAL3H///qI='),(107,'2011-03-04 10:38:29','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/25/',2639,'AAAL3H///r0='),(107,'2011-03-04 10:36:17','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/25/ ',2639,'AAAL3H///r4='),(79,'2011-03-04 14:45:28','Uploaded patch set 2.',2639,'AAAL3H///rI='),(1,'2011-03-04 14:26:46','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(3 inline comments)\n\n',2639,'AAAL3H///rM='),(4,'2011-03-04 11:30:47','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2639,'AAAL3H///rw='),(1,'2011-03-04 15:17:26','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2640,'AAAL3H///o0='),(1,'2011-03-04 15:17:27','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2640,'AAAL3H///ow='),(107,'2011-03-04 15:06:13','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/26/',2640,'AAAL3H///pk='),(107,'2011-03-04 15:03:43','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/26/ ',2640,'AAAL3H///ps='),(1,'2011-03-04 15:19:06','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2641,'AAAL3H///ok='),(1,'2011-03-04 15:19:05','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2641,'AAAL3H///oo='),(107,'2011-03-04 15:06:14','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/27/ ',2641,'AAAL3H///pg='),(107,'2011-03-04 15:08:36','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/27/',2641,'AAAL3H///pU='),(107,'2011-03-04 15:16:22','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/28/ ',2642,'AAAL3H///o8='),(107,'2011-03-04 15:18:57','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/28/',2642,'AAAL3H///os='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:22:29','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nNo comments in 9 days. I\'m taking that as no objections and submitting as-is.',2642,'AAAL3X///+A='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:22:32','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2642,'AAAL3X///98='),(103,'2011-03-04 21:43:08','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nCould you add this commit as a patchset to your first change (Iece43632086afadf175af6638255041ccaf2bfbb) and abandon this one?',2643,'AAAL3H///n0='),(121,'2011-03-05 03:00:53','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nResubmitted as patch set #3 to change Iece43632086afadf175af6638255041ccaf2bfbb',2643,'AAAL3H///nA=');
INSERT INTO `change_messages` VALUES (4,'2011-03-04 22:32:37','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\nsquash this commit with your previous commit and ensure that\nchange-id footer is the one from the previous commit:\n\nChange-Id: Iece43632086afadf175af6638255041ccaf2bfbb\n\nand push it to gerrit again. This will ensure that the squashed commit ends up as second patchset in that change. When this succeeded abandon this change.',2643,'AAAL3H///nc='),(121,'2011-03-04 22:40:50','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nAccidentally submitted a duplicate.',2644,'AAAL3H///nY='),(5,'2011-03-06 23:04:16','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(4 inline comments)\n\n',2645,'AAAL3H///lA='),(107,'2011-03-05 00:18:55','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/30/',2645,'AAAL3H///nQ='),(107,'2011-03-05 00:14:44','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/30/ ',2645,'AAAL3H///nU='),(100,'2011-03-16 11:56:48','Patch Set 2:\n\nAwaiting comments.',2645,'AAAL3n///0I='),(107,'2011-03-16 11:53:15','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/98/ ',2645,'AAAL3n///0k='),(100,'2011-03-16 11:55:42','Patch Set 1: (4 inline comments)\n\n',2645,'AAAL3n///0M='),(100,'2011-03-16 11:53:12','Uploaded patch set 2.',2645,'AAAL3n///0o='),(107,'2011-03-16 11:55:25','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/98/ : SUCCESS',2645,'AAAL3n///0U='),(100,'2011-03-21 11:39:52','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nChange was already approved (see above) but needed to be rebased.',2645,'AAAL3n///ac='),(107,'2011-03-21 11:36:59','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/162/ : SUCCESS',2645,'AAAL3n///ag='),(107,'2011-03-21 11:34:45','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/162/ ',2645,'AAAL3n///ak='),(46,'2011-03-21 12:03:15','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2645,'AAAL3n///aM='),(100,'2011-03-21 11:34:42','Uploaded patch set 3.',2645,'AAAL3n///ao='),(46,'2011-03-21 12:03:07','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2645,'AAAL3n///aQ='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:32:49','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved\n\nSeems OK, but unstaged changes preventing merge isn\'t abnormal... its the most common way I see my merges fail. :-)',2645,'AAAL3n///qE='),(5,'2011-03-16 19:33:06','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2645,'AAAL3n///yI='),(5,'2011-03-06 23:08:35','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2646,'AAAL3H///k4='),(107,'2011-03-06 22:19:11','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/31/ ',2646,'AAAL3H///l4='),(107,'2011-03-06 22:21:46','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nFAILURE: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/31/',2646,'AAAL3H///lw='),(107,'2011-03-21 13:37:32','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/163/ : SUCCESS',2646,'AAAL3n///aA='),(107,'2011-03-21 13:35:14','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/163/ ',2646,'AAAL3n///aE='),(100,'2011-03-21 13:35:11','Uploaded patch set 3.',2646,'AAAL3n///aI='),(107,'2011-03-16 14:19:13','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/99/ ',2646,'AAAL3n///z4='),(100,'2011-03-16 14:19:10','Uploaded patch set 2.',2646,'AAAL3n///z8='),(46,'2011-03-21 14:19:03','Patch Set 3:\n\nJust some minor remarks.',2646,'AAAL3n///Zk='),(100,'2011-03-16 14:22:37','Patch Set 2:\n\nAwaiting comments.',2646,'AAAL3n///zo='),(100,'2011-03-16 14:21:59','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2646,'AAAL3n///zs='),(107,'2011-03-16 14:21:26','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/99/ : SUCCESS',2646,'AAAL3n///zw='),(46,'2011-03-24 07:18:34','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2646,'AAAL3n//+oE='),(46,'2011-03-24 07:18:27','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2646,'AAAL3n//+oI='),(107,'2011-03-23 09:29:21','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/167/ : SUCCESS',2646,'AAAL3n//+x4='),(46,'2011-03-23 09:41:59','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nDo not submit for the time being. Need to clarify how we deal with incompatible changes in conjunction with the Hudson voting stuff.',2646,'AAAL3n//+xk='),(107,'2011-03-23 09:26:23','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/167/ ',2646,'AAAL3n//+yE='),(46,'2011-03-23 09:26:20','Uploaded patch set 4.',2646,'AAAL3n//+yI='),(100,'2011-03-05 02:14:27','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nUnit tests are failing...',2647,'AAAL3H///nE='),(100,'2011-03-05 01:58:17','Uploaded patch set 2.',2647,'AAAL3H///nI='),(5,'2011-03-24 21:48:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2647,'AAAL3n//+hM='),(5,'2011-03-24 21:47:59','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2647,'AAAL3n//+hQ='),(100,'2011-03-24 11:25:37','Uploaded patch set 3.',2647,'AAAL3n//+m0='),(107,'2011-03-24 11:28:00','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/174/ : SUCCESS',2647,'AAAL3n//+ms='),(107,'2011-03-24 11:25:41','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/174/ ',2647,'AAAL3n//+mw='),(107,'2011-03-24 22:33:06','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/179/ : FAILURE',2648,'AAAL3n//+g0='),(107,'2011-03-24 22:31:23','Patch Set 3: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/179/ ',2648,'AAAL3n//+g8='),(4,'2011-03-24 22:54:15','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2648,'AAAL3n//+gk='),(107,'2011-03-24 22:53:28','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/180/ : SUCCESS',2648,'AAAL3n//+go='),(107,'2011-03-24 22:49:08','Patch Set 3: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/180/ ',2648,'AAAL3n//+gs='),(5,'2011-03-24 20:50:02','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2648,'AAAL3n//+hg='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:55:17','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/172/ : FAILURE',2648,'AAAL3n//+jg='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:54:04','Patch Set 3: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/172/ ',2648,'AAAL3n//+jk='),(107,'2011-03-24 13:05:03','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/158/ : FAILURE',2648,'AAAL3n//+l0='),(107,'2011-03-24 13:03:47','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/158/ ',2648,'AAAL3n//+l4='),(100,'2011-03-24 13:03:43','Uploaded patch set 3.',2648,'AAAL3n//+l8='),(5,'2011-03-24 12:21:35','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2648,'AAAL3n//+mI='),(107,'2011-03-24 11:44:36','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/157/ : FAILURE',2648,'AAAL3n//+mQ='),(107,'2011-03-24 11:43:02','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/157/ ',2648,'AAAL3n//+mU='),(100,'2011-03-24 11:42:59','Uploaded patch set 2.',2648,'AAAL3n//+mY='),(1,'2011-03-05 03:07:23','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2649,'AAAL3H///m4='),(1,'2011-03-05 03:07:23','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2649,'AAAL3H///m8='),(46,'2011-03-21 07:55:57','Uploaded patch set 5.',2650,'AAAL3n///b0='),(NULL,'2011-03-21 07:55:26','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2650,'AAAL3n///b4='),(NULL,'2011-03-21 07:55:15','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2650,'AAAL3n///b8='),(46,'2011-03-21 07:58:17','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2650,'AAAL3n///bs='),(46,'2011-03-21 07:56:17','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nRebased to current master.',2650,'AAAL3n///bw='),(46,'2011-03-21 07:55:15','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThanks Matthias.',2650,'AAAL3n///cA='),(4,'2011-03-20 01:22:09','Patch Set 4:\n\n- rebased to current master\n- fixed problem with lightweight tags',2650,'AAAL3n///dA='),(4,'2011-03-20 01:20:50','Uploaded patch set 4.',2650,'AAAL3n///dE='),(46,'2011-03-17 15:09:08','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nWhen clicking on a lightweight tag, a IncorrectObjectTypeException is thrown.',2650,'AAAL3n///rM='),(4,'2011-03-17 14:34:41','Patch Set 3:\n\n- rebased\n- removed unnecessary checks',2650,'AAAL3n///sA='),(4,'2011-03-17 14:33:21','Uploaded patch set 3.',2650,'AAAL3n///sE='),(4,'2011-03-17 14:31:54','Patch Set 1: (3 inline comments)\n\n',2650,'AAAL3n///sI='),(4,'2011-03-17 14:31:06','Uploaded patch set 2.',2650,'AAAL3n///sY='),(46,'2011-03-17 09:03:53','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(3 inline comments)\n\nCool feature. See inline comments, though.',2650,'AAAL3n///vI='),(89,'2011-03-09 20:02:40','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',2651,'AAAL3H///dY='),(1,'2011-03-07 23:23:36','Patch Set 1:\n\nI think my own change Iafd8e3a6285261412aac6cba8e2c333f8b7b76a5 fixes this, but in a different way.',2651,'AAAL3H///hA='),(1,'2011-03-07 18:30:48','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',2651,'AAAL3H///ic='),(5,'2011-03-07 09:19:50','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(4 inline comments)\n\n',2651,'AAAL3H///kc='),(89,'2011-03-09 19:55:03','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',2652,'AAAL3H///do='),(1,'2011-03-07 18:20:28','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nc',2652,'AAAL3H///is='),(5,'2011-03-07 09:32:33','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2652,'AAAL3H///kU='),(107,'2011-03-06 22:38:31','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nSUCCESS: https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/34/',2652,'AAAL3H///lU='),(107,'2011-03-06 22:35:58','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/34/ ',2652,'AAAL3H///lY='),(126,'2011-03-07 20:53:59','Patch Set 1:\n\n> since its awkward to get the logic right when it isn\'t.\n\nIt is not just awkward, it is necessary to get it right and to support git repositories which are not under the container path.\n\nAs for the GUI view, there must be better ways to handle the truncation. One suggestion is to consider presenting a container relative path for cases where possible and the full path where not.',2653,'AAAL3H///iQ='),(8,'2011-03-07 19:55:31','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nI do not like the way the sharing dialog looks with this. The Repository Path the dialog (almost always) gets truncated.\n\nI do agree with the idea of making the directory absolute in code, since its awkward to get the logic right when it isn\'t.',2653,'AAAL3H///iY='),(8,'2011-03-12 14:34:57','Patch Set 1:\n\nWe could represent the .git-dir path just like we did, but compute\nthe string in the gui.',2653,'AAAL3X///+I='),(8,'2011-03-12 14:34:54','Patch Set 1:\n\nWe could represent the .git-dir path just like we did, but compute\nthe string in the gui.',2653,'AAAL3X///+M='),(2,'2011-03-07 18:00:26','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2654,'AAAL3H///jE='),(2,'2011-03-07 18:00:25','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nSimple fix.',2654,'AAAL3H///jI='),(2,'2011-03-07 15:53:23','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2655,'AAAL3H///j4='),(2,'2011-03-07 15:53:22','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThanks Tomasz!',2655,'AAAL3H///j8='),(2,'2011-03-07 15:52:37','Uploaded patch set 3.',2655,'AAAL3H///kA='),(118,'2011-03-07 15:47:20','Uploaded patch set 2.',2655,'AAAL3H///kE='),(2,'2011-03-07 16:19:28','Uploaded patch set 3.',2656,'AAAL3H///j0='),(2,'2011-03-07 16:21:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2656,'AAAL3H///js='),(2,'2011-03-07 16:21:00','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2656,'AAAL3H///jw='),(118,'2011-03-07 15:35:04','Uploaded patch set 2.',2656,'AAAL3H///kI='),(2,'2011-03-07 14:44:05','Patch Set 1:\n\nCan you fix your changes so there are no formatting issues... that\'s a lot of line changes for no reason.',2656,'AAAL3H///kM='),(2,'2011-03-07 14:44:04','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nCan you fix your changes so there are no formatting issues... that\'s a lot of line changes for no reason.',2656,'AAAL3H///kQ='),(2,'2011-03-07 18:00:40','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2657,'AAAL3H///i8='),(2,'2011-03-07 18:00:40','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nMore tests are always good, thanks Jens.',2657,'AAAL3H///jA='),(44,'2011-03-07 17:47:40','Uploaded patch set 3.',2657,'AAAL3H///jM='),(44,'2011-03-07 17:44:46','Uploaded patch set 2.',2657,'AAAL3H///jQ='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:00:58','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2658,'AAAL3H///iI='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:00:58','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2658,'AAAL3H///iM='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:01:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2659,'AAAL3H///iA='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:01:27','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2659,'AAAL3H///iE='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:01:52','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2660,'AAAL3H///h4='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:01:52','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2660,'AAAL3H///h8='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:02:45','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2661,'AAAL3H///h0='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:02:46','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2661,'AAAL3H///hw='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:03:25','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2662,'AAAL3H///ho='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:03:24','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2662,'AAAL3H///hs='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:05:49','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2663,'AAAL3H///hg='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:05:48','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2663,'AAAL3H///hk='),(2,'2011-03-07 21:07:24','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nmapTree() is still used by EGit (org.eclipse.egit.core.op.CommitOperation.prepareTrees(IFile[], HashMap<Repository, Tree>, IProgressMonitor)) so I\'ll wait a bit on this...',2664,'AAAL3H///hc='),(107,'2011-03-15 22:02:05','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/90/ : SUCCESS',2664,'AAAL3n///2g='),(107,'2011-03-15 21:59:51','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/90/ ',2664,'AAAL3n///2k='),(46,'2011-03-17 11:07:16','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2664,'AAAL3n///t8='),(46,'2011-03-17 11:07:15','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2664,'AAAL3n///uA='),(46,'2011-03-17 08:07:07','Patch Set 1:\n\nI uploaded EGit change I85726413790fc87721271c482f6636f81baf8b82 which removes the last usage of this method from EGit. When this is in, we can submit this, too.',2664,'AAAL3n///v0='),(46,'2011-03-17 08:08:45','Patch Set 1:\n\nSorry, wrong change id. Should be I526d037561b1cc6c7432253d40de5f9b6992d754',2664,'AAAL3n///vw='),(2,'2011-03-07 23:16:08','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2665,'AAAL3H///hE='),(2,'2011-03-07 23:16:07','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThis is a straightforward change.',2665,'AAAL3H///hI='),(89,'2011-03-09 20:01:34','Patch Set 1:\n\nI meant I2259bb45242f104c329d7713e5c8d384466c0734',2666,'AAAL3H///dg='),(89,'2011-03-09 19:58:06','Patch Set 1:\n\nI will abadon I9d6ba79b666294e933d0141c5f6abe6ef8972012, your fix is better.',2666,'AAAL3H///dk='),(89,'2011-03-09 19:52:43','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2666,'AAAL3H///ds='),(107,'2011-03-08 22:25:11','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/37/ : SUCCESS',2666,'AAAL3H///f0='),(107,'2011-03-08 22:22:30','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/37/ ',2666,'AAAL3H///f4='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:23:38','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2666,'AAAL3X///90='),(107,'2011-03-13 23:28:37','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/61/ : SUCCESS',2666,'AAAL3X///9E='),(107,'2011-03-13 23:26:25','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/61/ ',2666,'AAAL3X///9g='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:26:21','Uploaded patch set 2.',2666,'AAAL3X///9o='),(NULL,'2011-03-13 23:23:39','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2666,'AAAL3X///9s='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:26:48','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2666,'AAAL3X///9U='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:26:47','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2666,'AAAL3X///9Y='),(107,'2011-03-08 22:27:42','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/38/ : SUCCESS',2667,'AAAL3H///fs='),(107,'2011-03-08 22:25:12','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/38/ ',2667,'AAAL3H///fw='),(107,'2011-03-13 23:30:50','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/62/ : SUCCESS',2667,'AAAL3X///88='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:23:29','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2667,'AAAL3X///94='),(107,'2011-03-13 23:28:38','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/62/ ',2667,'AAAL3X///9A='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:26:47','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2667,'AAAL3X///9c='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:26:22','Uploaded patch set 2.',2667,'AAAL3X///9k='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:26:48','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2667,'AAAL3X///9Q='),(NULL,'2011-03-13 23:23:39','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2667,'AAAL3X///9w='),(2,'2011-03-08 13:44:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2668,'AAAL3H///gc='),(2,'2011-03-08 13:44:27','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2668,'AAAL3H///gg='),(44,'2011-03-08 10:20:03','Patch Set 1:\n\nI think http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,2635 (support -o in JGit CommitCommand) is a prerequisite.\nFYI: I also prepared a change for removing GitIndex from CommitOperation.',2669,'AAAL3H///g0='),(2,'2011-03-08 04:02:32','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nneeds to be finished',2669,'AAAL3H///g4='),(2,'2011-03-18 19:04:05','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nNot needed anymore.',2669,'AAAL3n///eM='),(44,'2011-03-18 08:42:31','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nTask was done with change http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,2761.\nChange can be abandoned.',2669,'AAAL3n///lU='),(1,'2011-03-08 22:45:42','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nThis is significantly slower than our current implementation, even though it should produce less garbage. I\'m exploring other alternatives, but this particular approach is dead.',2670,'AAAL3H///e4='),(107,'2011-03-08 22:30:15','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/39/ : SUCCESS',2670,'AAAL3H///fk='),(107,'2011-03-08 22:27:42','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/39/ ',2670,'AAAL3H///fo='),(2,'2011-03-08 13:36:57','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2671,'AAAL3H///gk='),(2,'2011-03-08 13:36:57','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLet\'s do it.',2671,'AAAL3H///go='),(100,'2011-03-08 13:35:50','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nSuccessfully tested that build is fixed.',2671,'AAAL3H///gs='),(6,'2011-03-08 13:31:09','Uploaded patch set 2.',2671,'AAAL3H///gw='),(4,'2011-03-08 22:02:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2672,'AAAL3H///f8='),(4,'2011-03-08 22:02:28','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2672,'AAAL3H///gA='),(8,'2011-03-08 21:43:22','Patch Set 2:\n\nThat would also apply to Linux. Even if some Linux file systems, like XFS, have better resolution the JDK on most drops the sub-seconds parts. For some reason I recall having seen subsecond resolution in Java on Linux, but I\'ve been unable to figure which JDK it was (on Mandriva).',2672,'AAAL3H///gE='),(44,'2011-03-08 19:15:41','Uploaded patch set 2.',2672,'AAAL3H///gI='),(1,'2011-03-08 22:44:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2673,'AAAL3H///e8='),(1,'2011-03-08 22:44:28','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2673,'AAAL3H///fA='),(107,'2011-03-08 22:44:22','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/41/ : SUCCESS',2673,'AAAL3H///fE='),(107,'2011-03-08 22:42:12','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/41/ ',2673,'AAAL3H///fI='),(107,'2011-03-08 23:09:46','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/42/ ',2674,'AAAL3H///e0='),(1,'2011-03-08 23:21:59','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2674,'AAAL3H///eo='),(1,'2011-03-08 23:21:58','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2674,'AAAL3H///es='),(107,'2011-03-08 23:12:00','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/42/ : SUCCESS',2674,'AAAL3H///ew='),(46,'2011-03-17 08:22:05','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2675,'AAAL3n///vc='),(46,'2011-03-17 08:20:20','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nRebased to current master',2675,'AAAL3n///vg='),(46,'2011-03-17 08:19:57','Uploaded patch set 2.',2675,'AAAL3n///vk='),(NULL,'2011-03-17 08:19:39','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2675,'AAAL3n///vo='),(46,'2011-03-17 08:19:36','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2675,'AAAL3n///vs='),(4,'2011-03-16 13:34:51','Uploaded patch set 2.',2676,'AAAL3n///0E='),(4,'2011-03-16 14:25:14','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2676,'AAAL3n///zg='),(4,'2011-03-16 14:25:13','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased to current master',2676,'AAAL3n///zk='),(118,'2011-03-09 14:53:00','Uploaded patch set 2.',2677,'AAAL3H///ec='),(107,'2011-03-09 14:51:12','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/43/ : SUCCESS',2677,'AAAL3H///eg='),(107,'2011-03-09 14:48:54','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/43/ ',2677,'AAAL3H///ek='),(107,'2011-03-09 14:55:18','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/44/ : SUCCESS',2677,'AAAL3H///eU='),(107,'2011-03-09 14:53:03','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/44/ ',2677,'AAAL3H///eY='),(1,'2011-04-06 18:01:57','Patch Set 2: Abandoned\n\nPer Chris, already fixed by another change.',2677,'AAAL4H///5s='),(2,'2011-04-06 17:18:54','Patch Set 2: Do not submit\n\nPlease abandon this change, this is now fixed.',2677,'AAAL4H///5w='),(6,'2011-04-06 12:40:09','Patch Set 2:\n\nThe fix is at http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,3008',2677,'AAAL4H///8M='),(6,'2011-04-06 12:38:37','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nThis is just a workaround which does not solve the root problem that no branch is checked out.\n\nI proposed the fix in a new change: http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,2677',2677,'AAAL4H///8Q='),(2,'2011-03-10 17:39:57','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nlooks good, we should have a small test for this as things like this are easy to screw up at times..',2678,'AAAL3H///aM='),(107,'2011-03-09 17:29:49','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/45/ : SUCCESS',2678,'AAAL3H///eA='),(107,'2011-03-09 17:27:28','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/45/ ',2678,'AAAL3H///eE='),(2,'2011-03-14 21:18:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2678,'AAAL3n///8k='),(2,'2011-03-14 21:18:01','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThis is good, +1',2678,'AAAL3n///8o='),(2,'2011-03-14 20:51:55','Uploaded patch set 2.',2678,'AAAL3n///8s='),(1,'2011-03-09 18:49:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2679,'AAAL3H///d0='),(107,'2011-03-09 18:03:14','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/46/ : SUCCESS',2679,'AAAL3H///d4='),(107,'2011-03-09 18:01:00','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/46/ ',2679,'AAAL3H///d8='),(1,'2011-03-09 18:49:18','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2679,'AAAL3H///dw='),(5,'2011-03-10 09:50:38','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2680,'AAAL3H///cE='),(5,'2011-03-10 09:48:19','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2680,'AAAL3H///cQ='),(107,'2011-03-10 00:57:43','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/47/ : SUCCESS',2680,'AAAL3H///dQ='),(107,'2011-03-10 00:55:31','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/47/ ',2680,'AAAL3H///dU='),(1,'2011-03-10 17:37:40','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2681,'AAAL3H///ak='),(5,'2011-03-10 09:48:39','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2681,'AAAL3H///cM='),(107,'2011-03-10 00:59:55','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/48/ : SUCCESS',2681,'AAAL3H///dI='),(107,'2011-03-10 00:57:44','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/48/ ',2681,'AAAL3H///dM='),(1,'2011-03-10 18:03:01','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2681,'AAAL3H///Zc='),(1,'2011-03-10 18:02:59','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2681,'AAAL3H///Zw='),(5,'2011-03-10 10:05:30','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2682,'AAAL3H///b0='),(5,'2011-03-10 09:49:19','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2682,'AAAL3H///cI='),(107,'2011-03-10 01:02:07','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/49/ : SUCCESS',2682,'AAAL3H///dA='),(107,'2011-03-10 00:59:55','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/49/ ',2682,'AAAL3H///dE='),(1,'2011-03-10 18:02:49','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2682,'AAAL3H///Z0='),(1,'2011-03-10 18:03:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2682,'AAAL3H///Zg='),(NULL,'2011-03-10 17:38:42','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.\n\nThe following changes must also be submitted:\n\n* Ief6f81b91c10ed433d67e0182f558ca70d58a2b0\n* I83d01e5c74fd9e910c633a98ea6f90b59092ba29\n',2683,'AAAL3H///ac='),(NULL,'2011-03-10 18:02:25','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.',2683,'AAAL3H///aE='),(107,'2011-03-10 01:04:22','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/50/ : SUCCESS',2683,'AAAL3H///c4='),(107,'2011-03-10 01:02:07','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/50/ ',2683,'AAAL3H///c8='),(5,'2011-03-10 09:23:55','Patch Set 1: IP review completed\n\n',2683,'AAAL3H///cg='),(5,'2011-03-10 09:23:39','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved\n\n',2683,'AAAL3H///ck='),(5,'2011-03-10 18:02:59','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2683,'AAAL3H///Zs='),(NULL,'2011-03-10 18:02:25','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.',2684,'AAAL3H///aA='),(NULL,'2011-03-10 17:38:43','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.\n\nThe following changes must also be submitted:\n\n* Ief6f81b91c10ed433d67e0182f558ca70d58a2b0\n* I83d01e5c74fd9e910c633a98ea6f90b59092ba29\n',2684,'AAAL3H///aY='),(107,'2011-03-10 01:04:22','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/51/ ',2684,'AAAL3H///c0='),(5,'2011-03-10 09:52:31','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2684,'AAAL3H///cA='),(107,'2011-03-10 01:06:36','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/51/ : SUCCESS',2684,'AAAL3H///cw='),(5,'2011-03-10 18:03:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2684,'AAAL3H///Zo='),(NULL,'2011-03-10 17:38:43','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.\n\nThe following changes must also be submitted:\n\n* Ief6f81b91c10ed433d67e0182f558ca70d58a2b0\n* I83d01e5c74fd9e910c633a98ea6f90b59092ba29\n',2685,'AAAL3H///aU='),(5,'2011-03-10 09:56:40','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2685,'AAAL3H///b8='),(107,'2011-03-10 01:08:47','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/52/ : SUCCESS',2685,'AAAL3H///co='),(107,'2011-03-10 01:06:36','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/52/ ',2685,'AAAL3H///cs='),(NULL,'2011-03-10 18:02:25','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.',2685,'AAAL3H///Z8='),(5,'2011-03-10 18:03:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2685,'AAAL3H///Zk='),(49,'2011-03-10 14:14:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2686,'AAAL3H///a8='),(49,'2011-03-10 14:14:26','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2686,'AAAL3H///bA='),(116,'2011-03-10 14:13:21','Patch Set 2:\n\nrebased',2686,'AAAL3H///bE='),(116,'2011-03-10 14:12:02','Uploaded patch set 2.',2686,'AAAL3H///bI='),(49,'2011-03-10 14:06:37','Patch Set 1:\n\nIlya, can you rebase this ?',2686,'AAAL3H///bM='),(NULL,'2011-03-10 13:53:13','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2686,'AAAL3H///bQ='),(49,'2011-03-10 13:53:11','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2686,'AAAL3H///bU='),(1,'2011-03-10 18:02:24','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nGood idea.\n\nStylistically, I would have pulled the current code into a new private method, and done something like:\n\n  if (!gitPrefixEvaluated) {\n    gitPrefix = theNewPrefixHelperMethod();\n    gitPrefixEvaluated;\n  }',2687,'AAAL3H///aI='),(107,'2011-03-10 12:22:03','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/53/ : SUCCESS',2687,'AAAL3H///bg='),(107,'2011-03-10 12:19:51','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/53/ ',2687,'AAAL3H///bk='),(1,'2011-03-10 18:02:25','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2687,'AAAL3H///Z4='),(1,'2011-03-10 17:38:42','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2688,'AAAL3H///ag='),(1,'2011-03-10 17:38:43','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2688,'AAAL3H///aQ='),(107,'2011-03-10 13:25:32','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/54/ ',2688,'AAAL3H///bc='),(107,'2011-03-10 13:27:51','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/54/ : SUCCESS',2688,'AAAL3H///bY='),(107,'2011-03-11 00:11:26','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/55/ : SUCCESS',2689,'AAAL3X////4='),(107,'2011-03-11 00:09:02','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/55/ ',2689,'AAAL3X////8='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:28:01','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2689,'AAAL3X///9I='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:28:01','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2689,'AAAL3X///9M='),(107,'2011-03-11 00:11:27','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/56/ ',2690,'AAAL3X////0='),(107,'2011-03-11 00:13:43','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/56/ : SUCCESS',2690,'AAAL3X////w='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:44:49','Uploaded patch set 2.',2690,'AAAL3X///80='),(107,'2011-03-13 23:47:11','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/63/ : SUCCESS',2690,'AAAL3X///8k='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:45:13','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2690,'AAAL3X///8o='),(1,'2011-03-13 23:45:12','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2690,'AAAL3X///8s='),(107,'2011-03-13 23:44:52','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/63/ ',2690,'AAAL3X///8w='),(107,'2011-03-11 13:23:11','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/58/ : SUCCESS',2691,'AAAL3X////A='),(100,'2011-03-11 13:21:35','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nHmm, where has the Change-Id gone?',2691,'AAAL3X////I='),(107,'2011-03-11 13:20:57','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/58/ ',2691,'AAAL3X////M='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:35:25','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nNice work Matthias.\n\nLooking at some of the code there, we need to becareful how we manage fonts with SWT... we need to dispose of anything we create after we\'re done using it.',2692,'AAAL3n///40='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:35:25','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2692,'AAAL3n///4w='),(49,'2011-03-13 10:36:40','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nThis patch works great for workspace files, but for non-workspace files it opens an editor with information: \"Could not open the editor: The file does not exist.\".\n\nIMHO the \"Open\" action should support opening non-workspace files or at least should be disabled for those kind of files.',2693,'AAAL3X///+E='),(49,'2011-03-14 08:58:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2693,'AAAL3X///8I='),(49,'2011-03-14 08:58:16','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nI\'ve added minor updates for code formatting and white spaces.\n\nThank you Greg for implementing this feature.',2693,'AAAL3X///8M='),(49,'2011-03-14 08:57:09','Uploaded patch set 3.',2693,'AAAL3X///8Q='),(129,'2011-03-14 07:24:04','Patch Set 2:\n\nUpdated patch set to now include a new action called OpenWorkingFileAction that will handle both IFiles in the workspace and fallback to IFileStore for non-workspace files.',2693,'AAAL3X///8U='),(129,'2011-03-14 05:38:22','Uploaded patch set 2.',2693,'AAAL3X///8Y='),(2,'2011-03-15 16:00:55','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2694,'AAAL3n///4c='),(2,'2011-03-15 16:00:56','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2694,'AAAL3n///4Y='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:37:26','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2695,'AAAL3n///4o='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:37:25','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2695,'AAAL3n///4s='),(4,'2011-03-13 23:38:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- verified to work on Mac \n- needs test on Linux and Windows as well',2695,'AAAL3X///84='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:59:07','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2696,'AAAL3n///4g='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:59:06','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2696,'AAAL3n///4k='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:26:46','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2697,'AAAL3n///5A='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:26:36','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2697,'AAAL3n///5E='),(49,'2011-03-14 01:00:24','Uploaded patch set 2.',2697,'AAAL3X///8c='),(107,'2011-03-14 14:13:16','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/64/ : SUCCESS',2698,'AAAL3n////4='),(107,'2011-03-14 14:10:37','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/64/ ',2698,'AAAL3n////8='),(1,'2011-03-14 15:02:18','Uploaded patch set 2.',2698,'AAAL3n////A='),(1,'2011-03-14 15:01:31','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nUpdated unit test coming soon :-(',2698,'AAAL3n////I='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:07:05','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/70/ : SUCCESS',2698,'AAAL3n///+o='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:04:43','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/70/ ',2698,'AAAL3n///+s='),(2,'2011-03-14 20:41:50','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2698,'AAAL3n///80='),(2,'2011-03-14 20:41:51','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2698,'AAAL3n///8w='),(107,'2011-03-14 14:13:17','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/65/ ',2699,'AAAL3n////0='),(1,'2011-03-14 15:02:18','Uploaded patch set 2.',2699,'AAAL3n////E='),(107,'2011-03-14 14:15:31','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/65/ : SUCCESS',2699,'AAAL3n////w='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:02:21','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/69/ ',2699,'AAAL3n///+8='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:04:42','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/69/ : SUCCESS',2699,'AAAL3n///+w='),(2,'2011-03-14 22:09:41','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2699,'AAAL3n///8M='),(2,'2011-03-14 22:09:40','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2699,'AAAL3n///8Q='),(107,'2011-03-14 14:23:03','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/66/ : SUCCESS',2700,'AAAL3n////o='),(107,'2011-03-14 14:20:45','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/66/ ',2700,'AAAL3n////s='),(1,'2011-03-14 15:03:00','Uploaded patch set 2.',2700,'AAAL3n///+0='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:09:27','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/72/ ',2700,'AAAL3n///+c='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:11:37','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/72/ : SUCCESS',2700,'AAAL3n///+Y='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:00:33','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2700,'AAAL3n///68='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:00:32','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2700,'AAAL3n///7A='),(107,'2011-03-14 14:25:28','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/67/ : SUCCESS',2701,'AAAL3n////g='),(107,'2011-03-14 14:23:04','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/67/ ',2701,'AAAL3n////k='),(1,'2011-03-14 15:03:00','Uploaded patch set 2.',2701,'AAAL3n///+4='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:09:26','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/71/ : SUCCESS',2701,'AAAL3n///+g='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:07:06','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/71/ ',2701,'AAAL3n///+k='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:01:04','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2701,'AAAL3n///60='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:00:55','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2701,'AAAL3n///64='),(107,'2011-03-14 14:41:15','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/68/ ',2702,'AAAL3n////c='),(46,'2011-03-14 14:47:55','Patch Set 1:\n\nOops, wrong bug number: should be\n\nBug: 339829',2702,'AAAL3n////M='),(1,'2011-03-14 14:46:38','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2702,'AAAL3n////Q='),(1,'2011-03-14 14:46:38','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2702,'AAAL3n////U='),(107,'2011-03-14 14:43:34','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/68/ : SUCCESS',2702,'AAAL3n////Y='),(46,'2011-03-15 19:11:39','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nSuperseded by I5f8f3d4684c1426fac9a279ee2750ce737a018b5',2703,'AAAL3n///3Q='),(49,'2011-03-14 22:43:20','Patch Set 1:\n\nYesm change I5f8f3d4684c1426fac9a279ee2750ce737a018b5 is still valid, but now it is based on Shawn\'s  Ifc76a4ba841f2e2e7354bd51306b87b3b9d7f6ab',2703,'AAAL3n///8E='),(4,'2011-03-14 22:38:53','Patch Set 1:\n\nyou abandoned change Ie213a2c0cc5358198c6f539cfca8f5e2041cfc10, so is this still valid ?',2703,'AAAL3n///8I='),(49,'2011-03-14 15:52:04','Patch Set 1:\n\nI think that this change I5f8f3d4684c1426fac9a279ee2750ce737a018b5 would be better solution for fixing this compile problem. Of course if jgit change Ie213a2c0cc5358198c6f539cfca8f5e2041cfc10 would be approved.',2703,'AAAL3n///94='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:23:04','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/73/ : SUCCESS',2704,'AAAL3n///+Q='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:15:50','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/73/ ',2704,'AAAL3n///+U='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:49:54','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2704,'AAAL3n///6c='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:49:53','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good!',2704,'AAAL3n///6g='),(107,'2011-03-15 14:49:51','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/81/ ',2704,'AAAL3n///6k='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:49:39','Uploaded patch set 2.',2704,'AAAL3n///6o='),(NULL,'2011-03-15 14:15:23','Your change requires a recursive merge to resolve.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2704,'AAAL3n///6s='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:15:23','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2704,'AAAL3n///6w='),(107,'2011-03-15 14:52:09','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/81/ : SUCCESS',2704,'AAAL3n///6Y='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:25:19','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/74/ : SUCCESS',2705,'AAAL3n///+I='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:23:05','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/74/ ',2705,'AAAL3n///+M='),(107,'2011-03-15 14:57:06','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/82/ : SUCCESS',2705,'AAAL3n///6E='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:55:47','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2705,'AAAL3n///6I='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:55:47','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2705,'AAAL3n///6M='),(107,'2011-03-15 14:54:50','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/82/ ',2705,'AAAL3n///6Q='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:54:47','Uploaded patch set 2.',2705,'AAAL3n///6U='),(49,'2011-03-14 15:47:43','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nI\'m not sure does those unused parameters are somehow needed by feature protocol implementations.',2706,'AAAL3n///+A='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:46:47','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/75/ ',2706,'AAAL3n///+E='),(49,'2011-03-14 17:57:21','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nReplaced by change Ifc76a4ba841f2e2e7354bd51306b87b3b9d7f6ab',2706,'AAAL3n///88='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:49:08','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/75/ : SUCCESS',2706,'AAAL3n///98='),(49,'2011-03-14 17:26:56','Patch Set 1:\n\nThis make code a little bit complicated when we only want to check does given uri is supported. It would be less complicated if the \'local\' parameter would be allowed to be null. Currently the java-doc doesn\'t mention it can be null, it it is intended to allow local = null, it should be added into java-doc.',2706,'AAAL3n///9E='),(1,'2011-03-14 16:26:01','Patch Set 1: Do not submit\n\n> I\'m not sure does those unused parameters are somehow needed by feature protocol implementations.\n\nExactly. I decided to pass these through so a future implementation could for example define their remote as:\n\n  [remote \"mine\"]\n    url = http://...\n    useMineMagic = true\n\nAnd then check for the useMineMagic variable in the canHandle method. If its set, the transport returns true, if its not, it returns false, allowing fallback to the built-in stock http:// transport.\n\nIt might be overkill, but I think its a good idea to expose the remote information as part of the canHandle decision making.',2706,'AAAL3n///9Y='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:20:35','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2707,'AAAL3n///5I='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:20:34','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2707,'AAAL3n///5M='),(49,'2011-03-14 18:11:33','Uploaded patch set 2.',2707,'AAAL3n///84='),(2,'2011-03-14 21:33:37','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2708,'AAAL3n///8c='),(2,'2011-03-14 21:33:36','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.\n\nIt would be nice to write a test for this. What\'s the best way to test TagOpt.FETCH_TAGS? You\'d have to create a tag that points to something that doesn\'t exist?',2708,'AAAL3n///8g='),(2,'2011-03-14 22:03:47','Patch Set 1:\n\nThanks, for the tip. Should have a test for it now.\n\nhttp://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,2714',2708,'AAAL3n///8U='),(1,'2011-03-14 21:35:27','Patch Set 1:\n\nThe test for this is to make a tag that points at a blob that isn\'t in the master branch... but that still exists. For example the spearce-gpg-pub key in jgit.git.',2708,'AAAL3n///8Y='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:54:53','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/76/ ',2708,'AAAL3n///90='),(107,'2011-03-14 15:57:13','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/76/ : SUCCESS',2708,'AAAL3n///9w='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:57:58','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2709,'AAAL3n///58='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:57:57','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2709,'AAAL3n///6A='),(107,'2011-03-14 16:22:30','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/77/ : SUCCESS',2709,'AAAL3n///9o='),(107,'2011-03-14 16:20:07','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/77/ ',2709,'AAAL3n///9s='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:00:09','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2710,'AAAL3n///50='),(2,'2011-03-15 14:59:36','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks ok.',2710,'AAAL3n///54='),(107,'2011-03-14 16:24:50','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/78/ : SUCCESS',2710,'AAAL3n///9g='),(107,'2011-03-14 16:22:31','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/78/ ',2710,'AAAL3n///9k='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:05:37','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2711,'AAAL3n///5s='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:05:37','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2711,'AAAL3n///5w='),(107,'2011-03-14 16:24:50','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/79/ ',2711,'AAAL3n///9c='),(5,'2011-03-14 16:59:04','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2711,'AAAL3n///9I='),(107,'2011-03-14 16:27:05','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/79/ : SUCCESS',2711,'AAAL3n///9U='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:09:16','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2712,'AAAL3n///5k='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:09:15','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2712,'AAAL3n///5o='),(107,'2011-03-14 16:29:21','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/80/ : SUCCESS',2712,'AAAL3n///9M='),(107,'2011-03-14 16:27:05','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/80/ ',2712,'AAAL3n///9Q='),(107,'2011-03-15 15:11:46','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/83/ ',2713,'AAAL3n///5c='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:11:42','Uploaded patch set 2.',2713,'AAAL3n///5g='),(107,'2011-03-15 15:13:55','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/83/ : SUCCESS',2713,'AAAL3n///5Q='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:11:54','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2713,'AAAL3n///5U='),(2,'2011-03-15 15:11:53','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2713,'AAAL3n///5Y='),(49,'2011-03-14 17:56:05','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nFor me looks great, thank you ;)',2713,'AAAL3n///9A='),(2,'2011-03-15 13:57:33','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2714,'AAAL3n///7M='),(2,'2011-03-15 13:57:32','Patch Set 1:\n\nLooks good.',2714,'AAAL3n///7Q='),(2,'2011-03-15 13:57:24','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2714,'AAAL3n///7U='),(1,'2011-03-14 23:50:34','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2714,'AAAL3n///8A='),(2,'2011-03-15 16:03:59','Patch Set 1:\n\nLooks ok.',2715,'AAAL3n///4M='),(2,'2011-03-15 16:03:38','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2715,'AAAL3n///4Q='),(2,'2011-03-15 16:03:37','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks ok.',2715,'AAAL3n///4U='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:12:45','Patch Set 7: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/189/ : SUCCESS',2716,'AAAL33///1s='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:10:20','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/189/ ',2716,'AAAL33///1w='),(1,'2011-03-29 02:07:28','Uploaded patch set 7.',2716,'AAAL33///2c='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:08:40','Patch Set 8:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/218/ ',2716,'AAAL33///Q0='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:11:04','Patch Set 8: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/218/ : SUCCESS',2716,'AAAL33///Qs='),(1,'2011-04-01 22:03:27','Uploaded patch set 8.',2716,'AAAL33///RQ='),(1,'2011-03-29 16:28:52','Patch Set 7: Do not submit\n\nJunio discovered a major protocol flaw in C Git with this extension. I need to respin this patch to make a correction, no-done can only be used in the stateless RPC mode (aka smart HTTP).',2716,'AAAL33///xI='),(4,'2011-03-15 21:56:39','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2716,'AAAL3n///20='),(107,'2011-03-15 21:59:50','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/89/ : SUCCESS',2716,'AAAL3n///2o='),(107,'2011-03-15 21:57:40','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/89/ ',2716,'AAAL3n///2s='),(1,'2011-03-15 21:57:36','Uploaded patch set 2.',2716,'AAAL3n///2w='),(107,'2011-03-15 21:52:46','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/87/ : SUCCESS',2716,'AAAL3n///3E='),(107,'2011-03-15 21:50:32','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/87/ ',2716,'AAAL3n///3I='),(1,'2011-03-15 01:22:24','Patch Set 1: Do not submit\n\nI\'ve also proposed this to C Git. We should wait for them to adopt the capability before committing the feature to JGit. Its likely they will accept the name, but I don\'t want to go through a name change if someone on the C Git mailing list rejects the name \"no-done\".',2716,'AAAL3n///78='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:37:20','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/148/ ',2716,'AAAL3n///fc='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:39:31','Patch Set 6: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/148/ : SUCCESS',2716,'AAAL3n///fY='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:28:05','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/143/ : SUCCESS',2716,'AAAL3n///go='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:34:05','Uploaded patch set 6.',2716,'AAAL3n///gQ='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:25:52','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/143/ ',2716,'AAAL3n///gs='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:23:36','Uploaded patch set 5.',2716,'AAAL3n///hI='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:28:05','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/136/ : SUCCESS',2716,'AAAL3n///iA='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:25:54','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/136/ ',2716,'AAAL3n///iE='),(1,'2011-03-18 16:12:33','Uploaded patch set 4.',2716,'AAAL3n///jM='),(1,'2011-03-17 18:16:16','Uploaded patch set 3.',2716,'AAAL3n///og='),(107,'2011-03-17 18:18:33','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/121/ : SUCCESS',2716,'AAAL3n///oM='),(107,'2011-03-17 18:16:20','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/121/ ',2716,'AAAL3n///oQ='),(1,'2011-03-24 14:11:07','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nCGit added the no-done capability as of commit 3e63b21aced116badd30a279c479535449a63560. Its now safe for JGit to also add it as the name has been \"officially\" assigned. :-)',2716,'AAAL3n//+lQ='),(107,'2011-04-21 23:31:48','Patch Set 9: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/277/ : SUCCESS',2716,'AAAL4X///7c='),(1,'2011-04-21 23:29:05','Patch Set 9: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nThe no-done extension is now in Git 1.7.5-rc0. Its worth supporting at this point in JGit.',2716,'AAAL4X///7k='),(107,'2011-04-21 23:27:58','Patch Set 9:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/277/ ',2716,'AAAL4X///7o='),(1,'2011-04-21 23:27:55','Uploaded patch set 9.',2716,'AAAL4X///7s='),(1,'2011-04-21 23:33:36','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2716,'AAAL4X///7Y='),(107,'2011-03-15 21:55:03','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/88/ : SUCCESS',2717,'AAAL3n///24='),(107,'2011-03-15 21:52:47','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/88/ ',2717,'AAAL3n///3A='),(107,'2011-03-17 18:02:41','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/120/ : SUCCESS',2717,'AAAL3n///oo='),(107,'2011-03-17 18:00:30','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/120/ ',2717,'AAAL3n///os='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:55:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2717,'AAAL3n///pI='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:55:28','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nFairly trivial fix, no comments in 2 days so I\'m keeping it. :-)',2717,'AAAL3n///pM='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:55:09','Uploaded patch set 2.',2717,'AAAL3n///pQ='),(100,'2011-03-15 12:55:43','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nTrivial change. Ready to submit from my point of view.',2718,'AAAL3n///74='),(2,'2011-03-15 13:49:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2718,'AAAL3n///7c='),(2,'2011-03-15 13:49:18','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2718,'AAAL3n///7Y='),(100,'2011-03-15 12:58:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nTrivial change. Ready to submit from my point of view.',2719,'AAAL3n///70='),(5,'2011-03-15 13:12:05','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2719,'AAAL3n///7k='),(5,'2011-03-15 13:12:04','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\n',2719,'AAAL3n///7o='),(5,'2011-03-15 13:11:41','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2719,'AAAL3n///7s='),(1,'2011-03-15 15:33:49','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2720,'AAAL3n///44='),(2,'2011-03-15 13:59:25','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2720,'AAAL3n///7E='),(2,'2011-03-15 13:59:24','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine, thanks!',2720,'AAAL3n///7I='),(100,'2011-03-15 13:00:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nTrivial change. Ready to submit from my point of view.',2720,'AAAL3n///7w='),(1,'2011-03-16 00:08:47','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2721,'AAAL3n///14='),(8,'2011-03-15 23:50:17','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2721,'AAAL3n///2A='),(1,'2011-03-15 17:18:00','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',2721,'AAAL3n///3k='),(107,'2011-03-15 17:07:28','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/84/ : SUCCESS',2721,'AAAL3n///4E='),(107,'2011-03-15 17:04:43','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/84/ ',2721,'AAAL3n///4I='),(1,'2011-04-06 20:07:07','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nMerged as commit 11e2e746c13cc94cabc96e708f3c6a2b159b5995',2721,'AAAL4H///4U='),(107,'2011-03-15 17:10:13','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/85/ : SUCCESS',2722,'AAAL3n///38='),(1,'2011-03-15 17:21:37','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2722,'AAAL3n///3c='),(107,'2011-03-15 17:07:28','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/85/ ',2722,'AAAL3n///4A='),(107,'2011-05-20 21:16:15','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/463/ : SUCCESS',2722,'AABOJH////0='),(107,'2011-05-20 21:13:07','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/463/ ',2722,'AABOJH////4='),(4,'2011-05-20 21:13:03','Uploaded patch set 2.',2722,'AABOJH////8='),(4,'2011-05-20 21:23:11','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- added new constructor for CredentialsItem.Password to enable passing prompt message',2722,'AABOJH////c='),(1,'2011-05-23 15:23:22','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2722,'AABOJH///0M='),(4,'2011-05-21 22:17:52','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2722,'AABOJH///7A='),(107,'2011-05-21 22:06:08','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/466/ ',2722,'AABOJH///7c='),(4,'2011-05-21 22:06:05','Uploaded patch set 3.',2722,'AABOJH///7g='),(107,'2011-05-21 22:09:51','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/466/ : SUCCESS',2722,'AABOJH///7M='),(107,'2011-05-23 22:50:08','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/481/ : SUCCESS',2722,'AABOJX///8E='),(107,'2011-05-23 22:46:17','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/481/ ',2722,'AABOJX///8I='),(4,'2011-05-23 22:46:12','Uploaded patch set 4.',2722,'AABOJX///8M='),(4,'2011-05-25 16:08:17','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2722,'AABOJX///n8='),(4,'2011-05-25 16:08:16','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2722,'AABOJX///oA='),(107,'2011-03-15 17:12:54','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/86/ : SUCCESS',2723,'AAAL3n///30='),(107,'2011-03-15 17:10:13','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/86/ ',2723,'AAAL3n///34='),(130,'2011-03-15 17:14:39','Patch Set 1:\n\nAhem, sorry if I mess things up here, I\'m new to Gerrit...\nActually I wanted to submit just two changes, I969f3931 and one with the changesets that fix secure storage usage.\n\nI didn\'t expect to create one review request per local commit...',2723,'AAAL3n///3w='),(1,'2011-03-15 17:21:55','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nWe don\'t typically do merge commits.',2723,'AAAL3n///3Y='),(107,'2011-05-20 21:22:43','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/847/ ',2724,'AABOJH////g='),(4,'2011-05-20 21:26:49','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2724,'AABOJH////I='),(4,'2011-05-20 21:20:51','Uploaded patch set 2.',2724,'AABOJH////s='),(107,'2011-05-20 21:24:54','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/847/ : FAILURE',2724,'AABOJH////Y='),(4,'2011-05-21 22:24:06','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n- adapted tests\n- rebased',2724,'AABOJH///60='),(107,'2011-05-21 22:21:57','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/862/ : SUCCESS',2724,'AABOJH///64='),(107,'2011-05-21 22:14:59','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/862/ ',2724,'AABOJH///7E='),(4,'2011-05-21 22:06:31','Uploaded patch set 3.',2724,'AABOJH///7U='),(2,'2011-05-23 16:52:18','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2724,'AABOJX////o='),(2,'2011-05-23 16:52:17','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2724,'AABOJX////s='),(4,'2011-05-20 21:35:05','Uploaded patch set 4.',2725,'AABOJH////A='),(107,'2011-05-20 21:28:07','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/848/ : FAILURE',2725,'AABOJH////E='),(107,'2011-05-20 21:22:38','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/846/ : FAILURE',2725,'AABOJH////k='),(4,'2011-05-20 21:26:37','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2725,'AABOJH////M='),(107,'2011-05-20 21:20:54','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/846/ ',2725,'AABOJH////o='),(107,'2011-05-20 21:26:05','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/848/ ',2725,'AABOJH////Q='),(4,'2011-05-20 21:26:02','Uploaded patch set 3.',2725,'AABOJH////U='),(4,'2011-05-20 21:20:51','Uploaded patch set 2.',2725,'AABOJH////w='),(107,'2011-05-20 21:36:59','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/849/ : FAILURE',2725,'AABOJH///+0='),(4,'2011-05-20 21:36:01','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2725,'AABOJH///+4='),(107,'2011-05-20 21:35:09','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/849/ ',2725,'AABOJH///+8='),(4,'2011-05-21 22:19:02','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2725,'AABOJH///68='),(107,'2011-05-21 22:14:59','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/861/ : SUCCESS',2725,'AABOJH///7I='),(107,'2011-05-21 22:06:34','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/861/ ',2725,'AABOJH///7Q='),(4,'2011-05-21 22:06:30','Uploaded patch set 5.',2725,'AABOJH///7Y='),(107,'2011-05-25 16:50:07','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/923/ : SUCCESS',2725,'AABOJX///nI='),(4,'2011-05-25 16:43:44','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2725,'AABOJX///nM='),(4,'2011-05-25 16:43:43','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2725,'AABOJX///nQ='),(107,'2011-05-25 16:42:54','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/923/ ',2725,'AABOJX///nU='),(4,'2011-05-25 16:42:49','Uploaded patch set 6.',2725,'AABOJX///nY='),(4,'2011-03-15 22:48:31','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nplease rebase this patch series onto origin/master to get rid of this merge commit',2726,'AAAL3n///2Q='),(4,'2011-05-20 21:54:30','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nthis is not required as Iba3b8729 has been rebased',2726,'AABOJH///+g='),(4,'2011-03-30 23:18:29','Patch Set 2: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2727,'AAAL33///hw='),(100,'2011-03-30 15:00:39','Patch Set 2: (4 inline comments)\n\n',2727,'AAAL33///mA='),(107,'2011-04-01 08:55:29','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/310/ : FAILURE',2727,'AAAL33///XE='),(107,'2011-04-01 08:03:48','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/308/ : FAILURE',2727,'AAAL33///Xg='),(107,'2011-04-01 08:47:05','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/310/ ',2727,'AAAL33///XI='),(107,'2011-04-01 08:03:08','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/308/ ',2727,'AAAL33///Xk='),(8,'2011-04-01 08:47:00','Uploaded patch set 4.',2727,'AAAL33///XM='),(8,'2011-04-01 08:03:05','Uploaded patch set 3.',2727,'AAAL33///Xo='),(8,'2011-03-15 22:38:45','Uploaded patch set 2.',2727,'AAAL3n///2c='),(4,'2011-03-20 01:46:08','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(5 inline comments)\n\ndidn\'t expect that project handling in Eclipse looks that messy, kudos for trying to work around that mess',2727,'AAAL3n///cc='),(8,'2011-03-21 22:10:34','Patch Set 2: (1 inline comment)\n\nI didn\'t expect that either. I cannot really see why I should have to go guessing where projects are located, rather than just use such a convenient looking method like getLocationURI. Maybe I\'m missing some nice utility method.',2727,'AAAL3n///X8='),(4,'2011-04-05 22:55:06','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(4 inline comments)\n\nI tried this with a clone of jgit repo and when moving one of the projects one level down, e.g. org.eclipse.jgit to x/org.eclipse.jgit\nthis seems to work at first glance, but when committing this change only the additions for the new location will be committed, but the removal of the old resources is missing. Looks like these removals have to be staged in the move delete hook.',2727,'AAAL4H///9U='),(107,'2011-04-21 15:50:12','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/457/ : SUCCESS',2727,'AAAL4H//+04='),(107,'2011-04-21 15:38:57','Patch Set 5: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/457/ ',2727,'AAAL4H//+1E='),(107,'2011-04-21 10:28:49','Patch Set 5: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/456/ : ABORTED',2727,'AAAL4H//+2s='),(107,'2011-04-21 10:12:38','Patch Set 5: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/456/ ',2727,'AAAL4H//+2w='),(107,'2011-04-20 17:27:45','Patch Set 5: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/438/ : ABORTED',2727,'AAAL4H//+88='),(8,'2011-04-20 17:12:57','Patch Set 4: (4 inline comments)\n\n',2727,'AAAL4H//+9A='),(8,'2011-04-20 17:03:43','Patch Set 4:\n\nThe problem lies in the commit dialog that only sees changes within projects and therefore not removed files in the old location of the projects. The move/delete hook updates the\nindex as it should, but the commit dialog does not follow\nthe standard Git process for committing. That has to be\naddressed separately.',2727,'AAAL4H//+9c='),(107,'2011-04-20 17:12:42','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/438/ ',2727,'AAAL4H//+9E='),(8,'2011-04-20 17:12:38','Uploaded patch set 5.',2727,'AAAL4H//+9I='),(8,'2011-04-24 21:33:01','Patch Set 5:\n\nMatthias: I\'ve added Bug 343715 for the issue you discovered.',2727,'AAAL4n///x4='),(6,'2011-08-17 14:40:29','Patch Set 9: (2 inline comments)\n\nNow I found out why testMoveProjectWithinGitRepoMoveFromLevelZeroDownOne fails even if I change it as described above: the fix of Bug 307140 will still not allow for moving a project to a subfolder.\n\nPlease see my inline comments.',2727,'AABOAn///BE='),(6,'2011-08-17 13:33:59','Patch Set 9:\n\nThat\' strange: The fix contained in the patch file of bug 307140 for class FileStore is not there in my eclipse installation (Version: 3.7.0 Build id: I20110613-1736).\n\nI had changed the call in test method testMoveProjectWithinGitRepoMoveFromLevelZeroDownOne to\n\ndotestMoveProjectWithinRepo(\"P/\", \"Project-1\", \"P/Project-1/\", \"P2\", \"P/\"); to avoid the problem with the project located in the same folder as the repo,\n\nbut now I get an exception from ResourceTree.standardMoveProject(ResourceTree.java:1085): \n\njava.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\\Eclipse\\workspaces\\junit-workspace\\P\\Project-1\\P2\\.project (The system cannot find the path specified)\n\nDid you successfully run the test with eclipse 3.7.0?',2727,'AABOAn///Bo='),(6,'2011-08-17 13:13:24','Patch Set 9: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nTest case testMoveProjectWithinGitRepoMoveFromLevelZeroDownOne will even fail if the fix of 307140 is there, because in GitMoveDeleteHook, l. 220 we check if (!srcm.getGitDir().startsWith(\"../\")) and fail in this case',2727,'AABOAn///Bw='),(107,'2011-08-17 12:48:06','Patch Set 9: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1454/ : FAILURE',2727,'AABOAn///CA='),(6,'2011-08-17 12:44:01','Patch Set 9: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n- Fixed maven build\n- rebased',2727,'AABOAn///CQ='),(107,'2011-08-17 12:43:24','Patch Set 9:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1454/ ',2727,'AABOAn///CU='),(6,'2011-08-17 12:43:21','Uploaded patch set 9.',2727,'AABOAn///CY='),(4,'2011-08-10 22:56:57','Patch Set 8:\n\nthe tests run ok from Eclipse but don\'t from Maven. I suspect this is caused by the fact that from maven the tests don\'t run on a full Eclipse platform but on a very reduced platform, so probably we have to enhance the set of bundles used to setup the test environment, see the ui test\'s pom how this could be done. Another option would be to define an explicit target platform like what we do in egit-github',2727,'AABOAn///i8='),(107,'2011-08-10 21:44:57','Patch Set 8: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1398/ : FAILURE',2727,'AABOAn///j0='),(107,'2011-08-10 21:41:02','Patch Set 8:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1398/ ',2727,'AABOAn///j8='),(8,'2011-08-10 21:40:59','Uploaded patch set 8.',2727,'AABOAn///kA='),(NULL,'2011-08-10 18:42:27','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2727,'AABOAn///lg='),(8,'2011-08-10 18:42:26','Patch Set 7: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2727,'AABOAn///lk='),(6,'2011-08-22 15:31:14','Patch Set 10: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n',2727,'AABOAn//+oQ='),(6,'2011-08-22 15:31:01','Patch Set 10: (3 inline comments)\n\nPlease see my inline comments.',2727,'AABOAn//+oU='),(107,'2011-08-29 21:00:44','Patch Set 11: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1563/ : SUCCESS',2727,'AABOAn//+R4='),(8,'2011-08-29 20:52:28','Patch Set 10: (3 inline comments)\n\n',2727,'AABOAn//+SA='),(107,'2011-08-29 20:50:09','Patch Set 11:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1563/ ',2727,'AABOAn//+SI='),(8,'2011-08-29 20:50:03','Uploaded patch set 11.',2727,'AABOAn//+SM='),(107,'2011-08-20 00:32:46','Patch Set 10: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1503/ : FAILURE',2727,'AABOAn//+ug='),(107,'2011-08-20 00:29:14','Patch Set 10:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1503/ ',2727,'AABOAn//+uk='),(8,'2011-08-20 00:29:10','Uploaded patch set 10.',2727,'AABOAn//+uo='),(6,'2011-08-30 15:46:23','Patch Set 11: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(4 inline comments)\n\n',2727,'AABOBH////4='),(6,'2011-08-31 07:21:26','Patch Set 11: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2727,'AABOBH///+c='),(8,'2011-08-30 21:40:28','Patch Set 11: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2727,'AABOBH///+s='),(8,'2011-09-08 00:59:36','Patch Set 11: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2727,'AABOBH///b8='),(107,'2011-09-18 19:31:48','Patch Set 14: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1617/ : FAILURE',2727,'AABOBX///qk='),(107,'2011-09-18 19:27:48','Patch Set 14:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1617/ ',2727,'AABOBX///qo='),(8,'2011-09-18 19:27:44','Uploaded patch set 14.',2727,'AABOBX///qs='),(8,'2011-09-18 09:33:56','Uploaded patch set 13.',2727,'AABOBX///rc='),(8,'2011-09-17 23:00:04','Patch Set 12:\n\nStill RFC-status. We need more tests and fix moving the repository. As I see it the Repository API has to change somehow for this to work, i.e. we must be able to disconnect all users or (option 2) verify that there are no users and abort if there are.',2727,'AABOBX///rg='),(107,'2011-09-17 22:54:33','Patch Set 12: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1615/ : SUCCESS',2727,'AABOBX///rk='),(107,'2011-09-18 09:45:06','Patch Set 13: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1616/ : SUCCESS',2727,'AABOBX///rM='),(107,'2011-09-17 22:43:32','Patch Set 12:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1615/ ',2727,'AABOBX///ro='),(8,'2011-09-17 22:43:15','Uploaded patch set 12.',2727,'AABOBX///rs='),(107,'2011-09-18 09:34:00','Patch Set 13:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1616/ ',2727,'AABOBX///rY='),(107,'2011-09-25 22:00:59','Patch Set 15: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1683/ : FAILURE',2727,'AABOBX///TE='),(107,'2011-09-25 22:00:23','Patch Set 15:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1683/ ',2727,'AABOBX///TI='),(8,'2011-09-25 22:00:19','Uploaded patch set 15.',2727,'AABOBX///TM='),(107,'2011-09-30 17:05:01','Patch Set 15: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1720/ ',2727,'AABOBX//++A='),(107,'2011-10-05 20:13:08','Patch Set 19: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1739/ : SUCCESS',2727,'AABOBX//+04='),(107,'2011-10-05 20:01:22','Patch Set 19: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1739/ ',2727,'AABOBX//+08='),(107,'2011-10-03 22:26:26','Patch Set 19: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1734/ ',2727,'AABOBX//+30='),(107,'2011-10-03 22:38:01','Patch Set 19: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1734/ : UNSTABLE',2727,'AABOBX//+3w='),(107,'2011-10-02 11:20:34','Patch Set 19: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1732/ : UNSTABLE',2727,'AABOBX//+5M='),(107,'2011-10-02 11:11:03','Patch Set 19:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1732/ ',2727,'AABOBX//+5Q='),(8,'2011-10-02 11:10:53','Uploaded patch set 19.',2727,'AABOBX//+5U='),(8,'2011-10-01 08:43:06','Uploaded patch set 18.',2727,'AABOBX//+60='),(107,'2011-10-01 08:54:44','Patch Set 18: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1726/ : SUCCESS',2727,'AABOBX//+6s='),(107,'2011-10-01 08:43:09','Patch Set 18:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1726/ ',2727,'AABOBX//+6w='),(107,'2011-09-30 21:58:47','Patch Set 17: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1723/ : SUCCESS',2727,'AABOBX//+78='),(107,'2011-09-30 21:29:10','Patch Set 16:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1722/ ',2727,'AABOBX//+80='),(107,'2011-09-30 21:44:32','Patch Set 17:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1723/ ',2727,'AABOBX//+8M='),(107,'2011-09-30 21:44:31','Patch Set 16:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1722/ : SUCCESS',2727,'AABOBX//+8Q='),(8,'2011-09-30 21:29:28','Uploaded patch set 17.',2727,'AABOBX//+8w='),(107,'2011-09-30 17:25:07','Patch Set 15: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1720/ : UNSTABLE',2727,'AABOBX//+94='),(8,'2011-09-30 21:21:35','Uploaded patch set 16.',2727,'AABOBX//+9Q='),(107,'2011-11-13 19:53:38','Patch Set 20: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/2018/ : SUCCESS',2727,'AABOCH///E0='),(6,'2011-11-14 08:46:36','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2727,'AABOCH///Eg='),(6,'2011-11-14 08:46:29','Patch Set 20: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nMany thanks, Robin!',2727,'AABOCH///Ek='),(107,'2011-11-13 19:38:11','Patch Set 20:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/2018/ ',2727,'AABOCH///FA='),(8,'2011-11-13 19:38:04','Uploaded patch set 20.',2727,'AABOCH///FE='),(8,'2011-11-13 19:36:31','Patch Set 19: (6 inline comments)\n\n',2727,'AABOCH///FI='),(6,'2011-11-07 13:16:28','Patch Set 19: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(6 inline comments)\n\nPlease see my inline comments.\n\nI think the change is otherwise ready to submit. We should tackle the open issues with another commit:\n\n- Move a project outside of a git repo\n- What else?',2727,'AABOCH///oU='),(8,'2011-05-30 21:26:40','Uploaded patch set 7.',2727,'AABOJn///w0='),(8,'2011-05-30 20:47:15','Uploaded patch set 6.',2727,'AABOJn///w4='),(1,'2011-03-15 23:43:01','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2728,'AAAL3n///2I='),(107,'2011-03-15 22:46:24','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/91/ : SUCCESS',2728,'AAAL3n///2U='),(107,'2011-03-15 22:44:12','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/91/ ',2728,'AAAL3n///2Y='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:45:52','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2728,'AAAL3n///p8='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:45:51','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2728,'AAAL3n///qA='),(107,'2011-03-16 15:29:04','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/101/ : SUCCESS',2728,'AAAL3n///y4='),(4,'2011-03-16 15:27:32','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2728,'AAAL3n///y8='),(107,'2011-03-16 15:25:05','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/101/ ',2728,'AAAL3n///zI='),(4,'2011-03-16 15:25:02','Uploaded patch set 2.',2728,'AAAL3n///zM='),(46,'2011-03-21 08:56:20','Uploaded patch set 4.',2729,'AAAL3n///a4='),(46,'2011-03-21 08:58:37','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nSee inline comment.',2729,'AAAL3n///aw='),(4,'2011-03-16 15:41:19','Uploaded patch set 3.',2729,'AAAL3n///y0='),(4,'2011-03-16 15:26:53','Uploaded patch set 2.',2729,'AAAL3n///zE='),(4,'2011-04-21 22:41:24','Patch Set 5: Abandoned\n\nreplaced by I81fc58cdf2aa30898bea57cf3c8431d76a3195c0 to retarget for 0.12',2729,'AAAL4X///84='),(107,'2011-04-21 22:44:48','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/462/ : UNSTABLE',2729,'AAAL4X///8w='),(4,'2011-04-21 22:34:24','Patch Set 4: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2729,'AAAL4X///9I='),(107,'2011-04-21 22:33:49','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/462/ ',2729,'AAAL4X///9U='),(4,'2011-04-21 22:33:46','Uploaded patch set 5.',2729,'AAAL4X///9Y='),(107,'2011-03-16 00:37:31','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/92/ ',2730,'AAAL3n///10='),(1,'2011-03-16 00:44:21','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2730,'AAAL3n///1g='),(1,'2011-03-16 00:44:21','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2730,'AAAL3n///1k='),(107,'2011-03-16 00:39:48','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/92/ : SUCCESS',2730,'AAAL3n///1w='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:27:37','Patch Set 7: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/195/ : SUCCESS',2731,'AAAL33///08='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:25:15','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/195/ ',2731,'AAAL33///1A='),(1,'2011-03-29 02:07:29','Uploaded patch set 7.',2731,'AAAL33///2E='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:08:39','Patch Set 8:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/217/ : SUCCESS',2731,'AAAL33///Q4='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:06:06','Patch Set 8:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/217/ ',2731,'AAAL33///Q8='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:59:52','Uploaded patch set 8.',2731,'AAAL33///R0='),(1,'2011-04-01 22:00:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2731,'AAAL33///Rk='),(1,'2011-04-01 22:00:01','Patch Set 8: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nNo comments for several weeks, builds and passes tests, so submitting as-is.',2731,'AAAL33///Ro='),(107,'2011-03-16 00:45:14','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/93/ : SUCCESS',2731,'AAAL3n///1c='),(107,'2011-03-16 00:43:04','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/93/ ',2731,'AAAL3n///1o='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:52:52','Patch Set 6: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/154/ : SUCCESS',2731,'AAAL3n///eo='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:50:42','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/154/ ',2731,'AAAL3n///es='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:34:06','Uploaded patch set 6.',2731,'AAAL3n///f4='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:34:48','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/146/ : SUCCESS',2731,'AAAL3n///fo='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:23:36','Uploaded patch set 5.',2731,'AAAL3n///g8='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:32:34','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/146/ ',2731,'AAAL3n///gU='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:34:44','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/139/ : SUCCESS',2731,'AAAL3n///ho='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:32:32','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/139/ ',2731,'AAAL3n///hs='),(1,'2011-03-18 16:12:34','Uploaded patch set 4.',2731,'AAAL3n///jA='),(107,'2011-03-17 18:25:07','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/124/ : SUCCESS',2731,'AAAL3n///n0='),(107,'2011-03-17 18:22:57','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/124/ ',2731,'AAAL3n///n4='),(1,'2011-03-17 18:16:17','Uploaded patch set 3.',2731,'AAAL3n///oU='),(107,'2011-03-16 21:15:10','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/104/ : SUCCESS',2731,'AAAL3n///xk='),(107,'2011-03-16 21:12:52','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/104/ ',2731,'AAAL3n///xo='),(1,'2011-03-16 21:12:48','Uploaded patch set 2.',2731,'AAAL3n///xs='),(100,'2011-03-16 11:19:52','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\nSome style nits...',2732,'AAAL3n///00='),(107,'2011-03-16 10:41:23','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/95/ : SUCCESS',2732,'AAAL3n///1M='),(107,'2011-03-16 10:39:11','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/95/ ',2732,'AAAL3n///1Q='),(46,'2011-03-18 06:58:19','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2732,'AAAL3n///l0='),(46,'2011-03-18 06:58:18','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2732,'AAAL3n///l4='),(107,'2011-03-18 06:57:34','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/128/ : SUCCESS',2732,'AAAL3n///l8='),(100,'2011-03-17 22:15:16','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2732,'AAAL3n///m8='),(46,'2011-03-18 06:55:59','Patch Set 4:\n\nRebased to current master and renamed test class from TestCommitOnly to CommitOnlyTest.',2732,'AAAL3n///mA='),(46,'2011-03-18 06:38:25','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2732,'AAAL3n///mc='),(107,'2011-03-18 06:55:19','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/128/ ',2732,'AAAL3n///mE='),(46,'2011-03-18 06:55:15','Uploaded patch set 4.',2732,'AAAL3n///mI='),(107,'2011-03-18 06:47:44','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/127/ : SUCCESS',2732,'AAAL3n///mM='),(107,'2011-03-18 06:45:29','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/127/ ',2732,'AAAL3n///mQ='),(46,'2011-03-18 06:45:26','Uploaded patch set 3.',2732,'AAAL3n///mU='),(NULL,'2011-03-18 06:38:26','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2732,'AAAL3n///mY='),(107,'2011-03-16 20:58:13','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/103/ ',2732,'AAAL3n///x0='),(5,'2011-03-16 20:58:10','Uploaded patch set 2.',2732,'AAAL3n///x4='),(5,'2011-03-16 20:58:00','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2732,'AAAL3n///x8='),(107,'2011-03-16 21:00:30','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/103/ : SUCCESS',2732,'AAAL3n///xw='),(100,'2011-03-16 11:16:50','Patch Set 1:\n\nAwaiting comments',2733,'AAAL3n///1A='),(107,'2011-03-16 11:14:39','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/96/ : SUCCESS',2733,'AAAL3n///1E='),(107,'2011-03-16 11:12:28','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/96/ ',2733,'AAAL3n///1I='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:37:14','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/141/ ',2733,'AAAL3n///hc='),(5,'2011-03-18 17:16:53','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2733,'AAAL3n///hQ='),(5,'2011-03-18 17:16:52','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2733,'AAAL3n///hU='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:39:25','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/141/ : SUCCESS',2733,'AAAL3n///hY='),(5,'2011-03-18 16:14:43','Uploaded patch set 3.',2733,'AAAL3n///i0='),(NULL,'2011-03-18 15:34:16','Change cannot be merged due to unsatisfiable dependencies.\n\nThe following dependency errors were found:\n\n* Depends on patch set 1 of Ieb089668, however the current patch set is 2.\n\nPlease rebase the change and upload a replacement commit.',2733,'AAAL3n///jU='),(5,'2011-03-18 11:45:09','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2733,'AAAL3n///kk='),(107,'2011-03-17 09:49:23','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/111/ ',2733,'AAAL3n///uc='),(100,'2011-03-17 09:49:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',2733,'AAAL3n///ug='),(100,'2011-03-17 09:59:59','Patch Set 1: (3 inline comments)\n\nSorry for mixing things up. There now is a separate change for the refactorings (Ieb089668834d0a395c9ab192c555538917dfdc47).',2733,'AAAL3n///uI='),(107,'2011-03-17 09:51:39','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/111/ : SUCCESS',2733,'AAAL3n///uU='),(5,'2011-03-16 23:06:17','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this; IP review completed\n\n(3 inline comments)\n\nI was near to give up reviewing this. I spent more than one hour looking at this before I got the point. \n\nYou did a few refactorings (extracting blocks into own methods) and moving code around alltogether which made it\nhard for me to find out where you really changed stuff semantically. If we are touching these core parts like merge algorithm I suggest that we really split pure refactorings/cleanup into an own proposal and do the real fixes in a seperate one. I bet that this is much faster to review although we have one proposal more.',2733,'AAAL3n///xQ='),(107,'2011-03-16 11:42:47','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/97/ : SUCCESS',2734,'AAAL3n///0s='),(107,'2011-03-16 11:40:37','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/97/ ',2734,'AAAL3n///0w='),(100,'2011-03-21 10:04:32','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nChange was already approved (see above) but needed to be rebased.',2734,'AAAL3n///as='),(46,'2011-03-21 11:58:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2734,'AAAL3n///aU='),(46,'2011-03-21 11:57:57','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2734,'AAAL3n///aY='),(107,'2011-03-21 08:44:04','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/161/ : SUCCESS',2734,'AAAL3n///bA='),(107,'2011-03-21 08:41:52','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/161/ ',2734,'AAAL3n///bE='),(100,'2011-03-21 08:41:49','Uploaded patch set 2.',2734,'AAAL3n///bI='),(8,'2011-03-16 21:52:41','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2734,'AAAL3n///xg='),(79,'2011-03-16 13:52:50','Patch Set 1:\n\nIMO the configuration isn\'t even necessary. It should just default to the workspace location in the clone wizard and allow choosing another directory there.',2735,'AAAL3n///0A='),(4,'2011-03-16 16:16:37','Patch Set 1:\n\n- supporting variables here is a good idea\n- there was a reason to move the default out of the workspace see [1] and [2]. Other than CVS or SVN not just the working tree is affected but also the cloned repository, if you decide to throw away the Eclipse workspace also your repository is gone. Hence I prefer to leave the default outside the eclipse workspace.\n\n[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=326374\n[2] http://egit.eclipse.org/w/?p=egit.git;a=commit;h=1f972b32da0923e29f78476273b8205eda6051ec',2735,'AAAL3n///yc='),(79,'2011-03-16 17:25:04','Patch Set 1:\n\nI have read the bug report, but don\'t see what the problem is. Of course there are name conflicts if you try to create a new project in the workspace with the same directory as the repository (duh). When the project is named the same as the repository, it\'s even now not possible to have another project named the same (Eclipse limitation). And the second point sounds like a bug in M2Eclipse. It seems to me the reporter didn\'t understand the difference between the workspace directory structure and projects. And all these points also apply to CVS and SVN.\n\nIf you delete the workspace, all directories within are also deleted, that should also obvious and is no different than when you have uncommitted changes in CVS or SVN checkouts. Also, if you delete the project in Eclipse including project contents on disk, you also lost your repo.\n\nAll I\'m trying to say is this: Please reconsider the decision for the default. We are migrating from CVS to Git in our company and this behaviour irritated all people without exception as I was showing them how to use EGit. It will also irritate other as EGit adoption grows.',2735,'AAAL3n///yM='),(8,'2011-12-06 21:02:35','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nMatthias, I interpret your comment like you approve of this\nchange, though I suspect it need to be rebased.',2735,'AABOC3///aM='),(1,'2011-04-01 19:28:57','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nMoved to another change.',2736,'AAAL33///Tg='),(2,'2011-03-16 16:08:46','Patch Set 1:\n\nUse the right Change-Id: then :)\n\nChange-Id: I969f39315216141f10d645d58120141b77b3b3cf',2736,'AAAL3n///yg='),(130,'2011-03-16 16:07:54','Patch Set 1:\n\nThanks. Looks like I\'m quite good at hitting all those traps, although I\'m afraid there are some more.\n\nI actually wanted to create a new patch set for http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,2721\nI\'ll read up on gerrit before I mess things up further.',2736,'AAAL3n///yk='),(4,'2011-03-16 15:49:14','Patch Set 1:\n\nthis error message from gerrit is explained here :\nhttps://android.git.kernel.org/?p=tools/gerrit.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/error-squash-commits-first.txt;h=138ad98951d9b44f06cfaa8e1ed846695cdcd73e;hb=HEAD',2736,'AAAL3n///yw='),(130,'2011-03-16 16:17:02','Patch Set 1:\n\nThat\'s what I did actually, but when I amended my previous commit it ended up as \nChange-Id: Change-Id: I969f39315216141f10d645d58120141b77b3b3cf\n\nSo close to getting it right ;-)',2736,'AAAL3n///yY='),(107,'2011-03-16 14:33:20','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/100/ ',2736,'AAAL3n///zc='),(130,'2011-03-16 15:18:13','Patch Set 1:\n\nI know, I already have a fix for that, I\'m just struggling how to push the fix into gerrit (tells me to squash previous commits).',2736,'AAAL3n///zQ='),(2,'2011-03-16 15:15:51','Patch Set 1:\n\nThe test build came with a lot of errors...\n\nResults :\n\nTests in error: \n  testPullConfigRenameLocalBranch(org.eclipse.jgit.api.BranchCommandTest)\n  testRenameLocalBranch(org.eclipse.jgit.api.BranchCommandTest)\n  testRenameRemoteTrackingBranch(org.eclipse.jgit.api.BranchCommandTest)\n  testGetRefs_IgnoresGarbageRef2(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefDirectoryTest)\n  testRenameBranchNoPreviousLog(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameBranchHasPreviousLog(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameCurrentBranch(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameBranchAlsoInPack(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameBranchCannotLockAFileHEADisFromLockHEAD(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameBranchCannotLockAFileHEADisFromLockFrom(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameBranchCannotLockAFileHEADisFromLockTo(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameBranchCannotLockAFileHEADisToLockFrom(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameBranchCannotLockAFileHEADisToLockTo(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameBranchCannotLockAFileHEADisOtherLockFrom(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameBranchCannotLockAFileHEADisOtherLockTo(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameRefNameColission1avoided(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)\n  testRenameRefNameColission2avoided(org.eclipse.jgit.storage.file.RefUpdateTest)',2736,'AAAL3n///zU='),(107,'2011-03-16 14:35:24','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/100/ : FAILURE',2736,'AAAL3n///zY='),(100,'2011-03-17 10:06:14','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nWait for JGit change to be reviewed.',2737,'AAAL3n///uE='),(46,'2011-03-24 14:09:23','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2737,'AAAL3n//+lc='),(46,'2011-03-24 14:09:22','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2737,'AAAL3n//+lg='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:08:28','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/160/ : SUCCESS',2737,'AAAL3n//+lk='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:04:41','Patch Set 2: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/160/ ',2737,'AAAL3n//+lo='),(107,'2011-03-24 11:41:46','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/156/ : FAILURE',2737,'AAAL3n//+mc='),(107,'2011-03-24 11:40:30','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/156/ ',2737,'AAAL3n//+mg='),(100,'2011-03-24 11:40:26','Uploaded patch set 2.',2737,'AAAL3n//+mk='),(100,'2011-03-24 11:35:39','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nJGit change has been merged.',2737,'AAAL3n//+mo='),(46,'2011-03-16 16:35:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2738,'AAAL3n///yQ='),(46,'2011-03-16 16:35:28','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2738,'AAAL3n///yU='),(2,'2011-04-02 01:27:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2739,'AAAL33///N0='),(2,'2011-04-02 01:27:29','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2739,'AAAL33///N4='),(107,'2011-04-02 01:27:15','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/228/ ',2739,'AAAL33///N8='),(107,'2011-04-02 01:29:47','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/228/ : SUCCESS',2739,'AAAL33///Nw='),(2,'2011-04-02 01:27:11','Uploaded patch set 3.',2739,'AAAL33///OA='),(NULL,'2011-04-02 00:12:48','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2739,'AAAL33///Po='),(1,'2011-04-02 00:12:48','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2739,'AAAL33///Ps='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:42:48','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/221/ : SUCCESS',2739,'AAAL33///QQ='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:40:22','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/221/ ',2739,'AAAL33///QU='),(2,'2011-04-01 22:40:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',2739,'AAAL33///QY='),(1,'2011-04-01 19:28:29','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(5 inline comments)\n\n',2739,'AAAL33///Tk='),(107,'2011-03-16 16:01:09','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/102/ : SUCCESS',2739,'AAAL3n///yo='),(107,'2011-03-16 15:58:49','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/102/ ',2739,'AAAL3n///ys='),(49,'2011-03-18 09:29:01','Uploaded patch set 2.',2740,'AAAL3n///ks='),(107,'2011-03-23 06:25:17','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/108/ ',2740,'AAAL3n//+0A='),(4,'2011-03-23 06:25:14','Uploaded patch set 3.',2740,'AAAL3n//+0E='),(107,'2011-03-23 06:35:27','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/108/ : FAILURE',2740,'AAAL3n//+z0='),(4,'2011-03-23 06:27:29','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n- rebased',2740,'AAAL3n//+z4='),(4,'2011-03-23 06:26:57','Uploaded patch set 4.',2740,'AAAL3n//+z8='),(4,'2011-03-23 06:46:35','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2740,'AAAL3n//+zc='),(107,'2011-03-23 06:45:59','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/109/ : SUCCESS',2740,'AAAL3n//+zk='),(107,'2011-03-23 06:35:28','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/109/ ',2740,'AAAL3n//+zw='),(49,'2011-03-17 20:45:05','Patch Set 1:\n\nThe main problem of testing synchronize view performance is to build a testing repository with proper history size and that could be created anaing for each test run.\n\nI don\'t know how we could build such repository in test case, rest of this test case seams to be pretty simple. Any ideas how such repo can be created in test case?',2741,'AAAL3n///nA='),(2,'2011-03-17 20:32:24','Patch Set 1:\n\nDariusz, any toughts on how to have a performance test so we don\'t introduce this issue again? This issue seems to pop up sometimes and doesn\'t make our users that happy when it occurs.',2741,'AAAL3n///nE='),(2,'2011-03-22 16:08:26','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2741,'AAAL3n//+68='),(2,'2011-03-22 16:08:26','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThanks Dariusz.',2741,'AAAL3n//+7A='),(49,'2011-03-22 15:57:57','Patch Set 2:\n\nRebased on current master.\n\nI think that users are anxious for this performance improvement.',2741,'AAAL3n//+7I='),(49,'2011-03-22 15:56:10','Uploaded patch set 2.',2741,'AAAL3n//+7M='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:25:14','Patch Set 6: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/194/ : SUCCESS',2746,'AAAL33///1E='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:22:58','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/194/ ',2746,'AAAL33///1I='),(1,'2011-03-29 02:07:29','Uploaded patch set 6.',2746,'AAAL33///2I='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:59:52','Uploaded patch set 7.',2746,'AAAL33///R4='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:06:06','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/216/ : SUCCESS',2746,'AAAL33///RA='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:03:45','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/216/ ',2746,'AAAL33///RE='),(1,'2011-04-01 22:00:01','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2746,'AAAL33///Rg='),(1,'2011-04-01 22:00:00','Patch Set 7: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nNo comments for several weeks, builds and passes tests, so submitting as-is.',2746,'AAAL33///Rs='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:48:25','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/153/ ',2746,'AAAL3n///e0='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:50:41','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/153/ : SUCCESS',2746,'AAAL3n///ew='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:34:06','Uploaded patch set 5.',2746,'AAAL3n///f8='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:30:24','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/145/ ',2746,'AAAL3n///gc='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:32:33','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/145/ : SUCCESS',2746,'AAAL3n///gY='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:30:20','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/138/ ',2746,'AAAL3n///h0='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:23:36','Uploaded patch set 4.',2746,'AAAL3n///hA='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:32:32','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/138/ : SUCCESS',2746,'AAAL3n///hw='),(1,'2011-03-18 16:12:34','Uploaded patch set 3.',2746,'AAAL3n///jE='),(107,'2011-03-17 18:22:56','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/123/ : SUCCESS',2746,'AAAL3n///n8='),(107,'2011-03-17 18:20:46','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/123/ ',2746,'AAAL3n///oA='),(1,'2011-03-17 18:16:17','Uploaded patch set 2.',2746,'AAAL3n///oY='),(107,'2011-03-17 00:22:15','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/105/ : SUCCESS',2746,'AAAL3n///ws='),(107,'2011-03-17 00:19:22','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/105/ ',2746,'AAAL3n///ww='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:20:34','Patch Set 6: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/192/ : SUCCESS',2748,'AAAL33///1U='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:17:58','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/192/ ',2748,'AAAL33///1Y='),(1,'2011-03-29 02:07:29','Uploaded patch set 6.',2748,'AAAL33///2Q='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:59:51','Uploaded patch set 7.',2748,'AAAL33///R8='),(1,'2011-04-01 22:00:01','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2748,'AAAL33///Rc='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:03:44','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/215/ : SUCCESS',2748,'AAAL33///RI='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:01:29','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/215/ ',2748,'AAAL33///RU='),(1,'2011-04-01 22:00:00','Patch Set 7: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nNo comments for several weeks, builds and passes tests, so submitting as-is.',2748,'AAAL33///Rw='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:46:13','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/151/ : SUCCESS',2748,'AAAL3n///fA='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:44:03','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/151/ ',2748,'AAAL3n///fE='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:34:06','Uploaded patch set 5.',2748,'AAAL3n///gE='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:30:23','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/144/ : SUCCESS',2748,'AAAL3n///gg='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:28:06','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/144/ ',2748,'AAAL3n///gk='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:30:19','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/137/ : SUCCESS',2748,'AAAL3n///h4='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:28:06','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/137/ ',2748,'AAAL3n///h8='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:23:36','Uploaded patch set 4.',2748,'AAAL3n///hE='),(1,'2011-03-18 16:12:34','Uploaded patch set 3.',2748,'AAAL3n///jI='),(1,'2011-03-17 18:16:16','Uploaded patch set 2.',2748,'AAAL3n///oc='),(107,'2011-03-17 18:20:46','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/122/ : SUCCESS',2748,'AAAL3n///oE='),(107,'2011-03-17 18:18:34','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/122/ ',2748,'AAAL3n///oI='),(107,'2011-03-17 04:28:38','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/106/ : SUCCESS',2748,'AAAL3n///wQ='),(107,'2011-03-17 04:26:12','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/106/ ',2748,'AAAL3n///wU='),(107,'2011-03-17 17:58:16','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/119/ ',2749,'AAAL3n///o4='),(107,'2011-03-17 18:00:29','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/119/ : SUCCESS',2749,'AAAL3n///ow='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:54:12','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2749,'AAAL3n///pg='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:54:13','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2749,'AAAL3n///pU='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:53:46','Uploaded patch set 2.',2749,'AAAL3n///pw='),(4,'2011-03-17 12:33:15','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2749,'AAAL3n///t4='),(107,'2011-03-17 04:55:18','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/107/ : SUCCESS',2749,'AAAL3n///wI='),(107,'2011-03-17 04:53:06','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/107/ ',2749,'AAAL3n///wM='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:53:45','Uploaded patch set 2.',2750,'AAAL3n///p4='),(107,'2011-03-17 17:55:59','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/117/ : SUCCESS',2750,'AAAL3n///pE='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:54:04','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2750,'AAAL3n///pk='),(107,'2011-03-17 17:53:49','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/117/ ',2750,'AAAL3n///ps='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:54:12','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2750,'AAAL3n///pY='),(4,'2011-03-17 12:35:57','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2750,'AAAL3n///t0='),(107,'2011-03-17 04:57:32','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/108/ : SUCCESS',2750,'AAAL3n///wA='),(107,'2011-03-17 04:55:19','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/108/ ',2750,'AAAL3n///wE='),(107,'2011-03-17 17:58:16','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/118/ : SUCCESS',2751,'AAAL3n///o8='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:53:46','Uploaded patch set 2.',2751,'AAAL3n///p0='),(107,'2011-03-17 17:56:00','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/118/ ',2751,'AAAL3n///pA='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:54:12','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2751,'AAAL3n///pc='),(1,'2011-03-17 17:53:57','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2751,'AAAL3n///po='),(4,'2011-03-17 12:37:47','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2751,'AAAL3n///tw='),(107,'2011-03-17 04:59:46','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/109/ : SUCCESS',2751,'AAAL3n///v4='),(107,'2011-03-17 04:57:33','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/109/ ',2751,'AAAL3n///v8='),(46,'2011-03-17 09:33:38','Uploaded patch set 2.',2752,'AAAL3n///u4='),(44,'2011-03-17 09:27:34','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nTypo in Commit Message',2752,'AAAL3n///u8='),(44,'2011-03-17 09:37:03','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2752,'AAAL3n///us='),(44,'2011-03-17 09:37:03','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2752,'AAAL3n///uw='),(46,'2011-03-17 09:33:56','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nBotched change id by amending',2753,'AAAL3n///u0='),(100,'2011-03-18 12:37:02','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2754,'AAAL3n///j0='),(107,'2011-03-18 12:36:48','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/129/ : SUCCESS',2754,'AAAL3n///j8='),(5,'2011-03-18 15:34:16','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2754,'AAAL3n///jQ='),(5,'2011-03-18 15:33:47','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2754,'AAAL3n///jY='),(107,'2011-03-18 12:34:35','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/129/ ',2754,'AAAL3n///kA='),(100,'2011-03-18 12:34:32','Uploaded patch set 2.',2754,'AAAL3n///kE='),(5,'2011-03-18 12:16:31','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\nmuch better now. This is still a mixture of refactorings and semantical changes (the \"untracked files\" check) but ok for me.',2754,'AAAL3n///kM='),(107,'2011-03-17 09:44:12','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/110/ : SUCCESS',2754,'AAAL3n///uk='),(107,'2011-03-17 09:41:31','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/110/ ',2754,'AAAL3n///uo='),(46,'2011-03-17 14:59:44','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\nCalling the pull operation several times makes the user experience a bit ugly, for example when it comes to errors (multiple error pop-ups etc.)... Also the result dialog currently would be shown several times... Not sure how problematic this is in reality. In the long run, we might need to improve PullOperation to accept multiple repos in its constructor and make sure error handling.\n\nIn any case, I\'d like to get a second opinion on this aspect.',2755,'AAAL3n///rY='),(79,'2011-03-21 16:19:18','Patch Set 3:\n\nInline comments are fixed in changeset 3.\n\nYes, ideally there would be only one result dialog, with the results grouped by repository. A tree view may be a good idea, something like:\n\n• Repo 1: already up to date\n• Repo 2: pulled\n  • Fetched master into origin/master\n    • Commit 1\n    • Commit 2\n  • Merge branch \'master\' of git:origin\n    • Parent commit 1\n    • Parent commit 2',2755,'AAAL3n///ZA='),(79,'2011-03-21 16:13:31','Uploaded patch set 3.',2755,'AAAL3n///ZE='),(79,'2011-03-21 16:13:05','Uploaded patch set 2.',2755,'AAAL3n///ZI='),(46,'2011-03-22 07:10:21','Patch Set 3:\n\nGood idea to improve the PullResultDialog (see Robins remarks in the previous patch set). We might even get away without having to change the PullOperation here... Robin, could you come up with some fix for that?\n\nWithout the PullResultDialog improvements, I\'d rather have another opinion before accepting this because of the user experience issues described in patch set 1.',2755,'AAAL3n//++Q='),(NULL,'2011-03-24 16:50:56','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2755,'AAAL3n//+i0='),(46,'2011-03-24 16:50:56','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2755,'AAAL3n//+i4='),(46,'2011-03-24 17:00:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2755,'AAAL3n//+ig='),(46,'2011-03-24 17:00:20','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2755,'AAAL3n//+ik='),(107,'2011-03-24 16:59:03','Patch Set 6: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/175/ : SUCCESS',2755,'AAAL3n//+io='),(107,'2011-03-24 16:55:23','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/175/ ',2755,'AAAL3n//+is='),(46,'2011-03-24 16:55:19','Uploaded patch set 6.',2755,'AAAL3n//+iw='),(107,'2011-03-23 22:41:38','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/148/ : SUCCESS',2755,'AAAL3n//+p8='),(107,'2011-03-23 22:37:54','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/148/ ',2755,'AAAL3n//+qA='),(79,'2011-03-23 22:37:49','Patch Set 5:\n\nPatch set 5: Added Signed-off-by and rebased to master.',2755,'AAAL3n//+qI='),(79,'2011-03-23 22:36:49','Uploaded patch set 5.',2755,'AAAL3n//+qM='),(107,'2011-03-23 18:34:15','Patch Set 4: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/134/ ',2755,'AAAL3n//+s0='),(107,'2011-03-23 18:38:02','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/134/ : SUCCESS',2755,'AAAL3n//+sw='),(107,'2011-03-23 16:07:12','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/127/ ',2755,'AAAL3n//+ug='),(107,'2011-03-23 16:17:33','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/127/ : FAILURE',2755,'AAAL3n//+uM='),(79,'2011-03-23 16:06:37','Patch Set 4:\n\nDone. The new but about the result dialog is here:\n\nhttps://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=340780',2755,'AAAL3n//+uo='),(79,'2011-03-23 16:05:50','Uploaded patch set 4.',2755,'AAAL3n//+us='),(46,'2011-03-23 09:07:04','Patch Set 3:\n\nOk, I suggest the following:\n\n* create a bug that says something like \"PullResultDialog should be able to show results for multiple Repositories\"\n* update the commit message (remove the RFC prefix and the \"proof of concept\" part, describe the issue we discussed here and mention that new bug)\n\nI might be able to get around to working on the PullResultDialog these days, but we should have a bug first.',2755,'AAAL3n//+yc='),(79,'2011-03-23 08:49:21','Patch Set 3:\n\nI will work on it, but can\'t give any estimates as to when I\'ll be able to submit it.\n\nIn the meantime, it would be nice if this simple implementation could get in. IMO it\'s better than no support for pull multiple, and it doesn\'t negatively affect the interaction for pulling one.',2755,'AAAL3n//+yg='),(46,'2011-03-23 09:07:35','Patch Set 3:\n\nOk, I suggest the following:\n\n* create a bug that says something like \"PullResultDialog should be able to show results for multiple Repositories\"\n* update the commit message (remove the RFC prefix and the \"proof of concept\" part, describe the issue we discussed here and mention that new bug)\n\nI might be able to get around to working on the PullResultDialog these days, but we should have a bug first.',2755,'AAAL3n//+yQ='),(46,'2011-03-23 09:07:14','Patch Set 3:\n\nOk, I suggest the following:\n\n* create a bug that says something like \"PullResultDialog should be able to show results for multiple Repositories\"\n* update the commit message (remove the RFC prefix and the \"proof of concept\" part, describe the issue we discussed here and mention that new bug)\n\nI might be able to get around to working on the PullResultDialog these days, but we should have a bug first.',2755,'AAAL3n//+yU='),(46,'2011-03-23 09:07:08','Patch Set 3:\n\nOk, I suggest the following:\n\n* create a bug that says something like \"PullResultDialog should be able to show results for multiple Repositories\"\n* update the commit message (remove the RFC prefix and the \"proof of concept\" part, describe the issue we discussed here and mention that new bug)\n\nI might be able to get around to working on the PullResultDialog these days, but we should have a bug first.',2755,'AAAL3n//+yY='),(49,'2011-03-17 14:40:21','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2756,'AAAL3n///r0='),(49,'2011-03-17 14:40:15','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLook good. Thank you.',2756,'AAAL3n///r4='),(46,'2011-03-18 12:57:16','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2757,'AAAL3n///js='),(46,'2011-03-18 12:57:15','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2757,'AAAL3n///jw='),(100,'2011-03-18 11:58:28','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2757,'AAAL3n///kc='),(46,'2011-03-18 10:01:15','Uploaded patch set 2.',2757,'AAAL3n///ko='),(49,'2011-03-17 14:45:43','Uploaded patch set 3.',2758,'AAAL3n///ro='),(46,'2011-03-17 15:01:09','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2758,'AAAL3n///rQ='),(46,'2011-03-17 15:01:09','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2758,'AAAL3n///rU='),(46,'2011-03-17 14:27:52','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2758,'AAAL3n///sc='),(46,'2011-03-17 13:54:10','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\nI think this change can be made much smaller by doing the logic as in my inline comment.',2758,'AAAL3n///tk='),(46,'2011-03-17 14:09:29','Patch Set 2: (1 inline comment)\n\nGreat. Just a very minor remark regarding the comment, sorry.',2758,'AAAL3n///tM='),(49,'2011-03-17 14:04:23','Patch Set 2:\n\nThank you Mathias for hints ;)',2758,'AAAL3n///tU='),(49,'2011-03-17 14:03:35','Uploaded patch set 2.',2758,'AAAL3n///tY='),(49,'2011-03-18 09:21:32','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nMathias was right, proper configuration of \'upstream\' solves UX issues',2759,'AAAL3n///k8='),(46,'2011-03-17 14:26:33','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nHmm... I\'m afraid I disagree, at least with the suggested implementation. The RepositorySelectionPage is used all over the place, and when using it e.g. in the clone wizard, the URI field is clearly the one that should get focus (the remote selection combo wouldn\'t even be visible there and you\'d get a NullPointer with your code).\n\nI\'m not quite sure how this should be done. Perhaps you need to check if the remote field is active (a new method isRemoteSelected() similar to isUriSelected()) or something.\n\nBTW, you shouldn\'t have to go through the push wizard every time you push to Gerrit. Just add the Gerrit URI as push URI and the correspondig push spec to your \"origin\" spec and hit \"Push to Upstream\"... from the team menu or repo view context menu on the repo node. As long as your local branch is based on origin/master, all should be done for you automatically.',2759,'AAAL3n///sk='),(46,'2011-03-17 17:16:08','Uploaded patch set 2.',2760,'AAAL3n///qc='),(46,'2011-03-17 17:19:46','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2760,'AAAL3n///qI='),(46,'2011-03-17 17:19:46','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nJust added a few unit tests to protect us from regression.',2760,'AAAL3n///qM='),(107,'2011-03-17 17:18:24','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/116/ : SUCCESS',2760,'AAAL3n///qQ='),(5,'2011-03-17 15:51:56','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\nI first thought that change-id computation should be in EGit\nand that we should provide a generic callback allowing\nto modify commit messages. But I learned that \nchange-id computation so near to JGit that I think it\'s ok to have the change-id as JGit concept. Therefore I agree to this proposal.',2760,'AAAL3n///qs='),(107,'2011-03-17 17:16:11','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/116/ ',2760,'AAAL3n///qY='),(107,'2011-03-17 14:21:24','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/112/ : SUCCESS',2760,'AAAL3n///s4='),(107,'2011-03-17 14:18:59','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/112/ ',2760,'AAAL3n///tI='),(46,'2011-03-18 07:19:28','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n(5 inline comments)\n\nI have added some inline comments to consider for upcoming refactorings, but for the moment it looks good enough.',2761,'AAAL3n///lc='),(46,'2011-03-18 07:19:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2761,'AAAL3n///lY='),(44,'2011-03-17 17:59:23','Uploaded patch set 3.',2761,'AAAL3n///o0='),(44,'2011-03-17 18:15:50','Uploaded patch set 4.',2761,'AAAL3n///ok='),(44,'2011-03-17 15:13:26','Uploaded patch set 2.',2761,'AAAL3n///rI='),(46,'2011-03-17 15:45:22','Uploaded patch set 2.',2764,'AAAL3n///qw='),(4,'2011-03-23 06:04:47','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2764,'AAAL3n//+0I='),(49,'2011-03-23 15:55:44','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2764,'AAAL3n//+vA='),(49,'2011-03-23 15:55:39','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2764,'AAAL3n//+vE='),(107,'2011-03-23 13:30:30','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/125/ : SUCCESS',2764,'AAAL3n//+vg='),(107,'2011-03-23 13:20:03','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/125/ ',2764,'AAAL3n//+vk='),(46,'2011-03-23 13:20:00','Uploaded patch set 5.',2764,'AAAL3n//+vo='),(46,'2011-03-23 11:48:38','Uploaded patch set 4.',2764,'AAAL3n//+wk='),(107,'2011-03-23 12:15:37','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/121/ : FAILURE',2764,'AAAL3n//+wQ='),(107,'2011-03-23 12:05:41','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/121/ ',2764,'AAAL3n//+wU='),(107,'2011-03-23 07:10:17','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/111/ : FAILURE',2764,'AAAL3n//+zI='),(107,'2011-03-23 06:58:31','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/111/ ',2764,'AAAL3n//+zM='),(46,'2011-03-23 06:58:27','Uploaded patch set 3.',2764,'AAAL3n//+zU='),(46,'2011-03-17 15:44:18','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nOops.',2765,'AAAL3n///q0='),(107,'2011-03-17 17:15:46','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/115/ : SUCCESS',2766,'AAAL3n///qg='),(107,'2011-03-17 17:13:35','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/115/ ',2766,'AAAL3n///qk='),(46,'2011-03-17 17:16:35','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nBotched',2766,'AAAL3n///qU='),(1,'2011-03-17 19:41:22','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(3 inline comments)\n\n',2767,'AAAL3n///nc='),(1,'2011-03-17 19:54:51','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2767,'AAAL3n///nI='),(1,'2011-03-17 19:54:50','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2767,'AAAL3n///nM='),(107,'2011-03-17 19:53:38','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/126/ : SUCCESS',2767,'AAAL3n///nQ='),(107,'2011-03-17 19:34:30','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/125/ : SUCCESS',2767,'AAAL3n///ns='),(107,'2011-03-17 19:51:25','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/126/ ',2767,'AAAL3n///nU='),(107,'2011-03-17 19:32:13','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/125/ ',2767,'AAAL3n///nw='),(2,'2011-03-17 19:51:22','Uploaded patch set 2.',2767,'AAAL3n///nY='),(49,'2011-03-17 23:46:28','Uploaded patch set 2.',2768,'AAAL3n///m4='),(4,'2011-03-23 03:12:57','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nthis test fails on my Mac, how do you know that 11 sec is enough ?',2768,'AAAL3n//+0Y='),(49,'2011-03-23 17:29:26','Patch Set 2:\n\nChris, why you suggest to have a separate project for performance tests?',2768,'AAAL3n//+tg='),(2,'2011-03-23 16:28:28','Patch Set 2:\n\nWe need some type of smoke test to ensure we don\'t break the speed of the sync view. We could create a new plug-in that hosts the performance tests and use the existing org.eclipse.test.performance framework or something else.',2768,'AAAL3n//+ts='),(46,'2011-03-23 09:14:07','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nI have another objection: we shouldn\'t have performance tests in our regular test suite at all.',2768,'AAAL3n//+yM='),(107,'2011-04-10 22:14:02','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/365/ ',2768,'AAAL4H///rc='),(49,'2011-04-10 22:13:58','Uploaded patch set 3.',2768,'AAAL4H///rg='),(107,'2011-04-10 22:14:55','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/365/ : FAILURE',2768,'AAAL4H///rY='),(107,'2011-08-20 22:57:59','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1508/ : FAILURE',2768,'AABOAn//+sk='),(49,'2011-08-20 23:00:52','Patch Set 4: Abandoned\n\nI think that after new synchronize implementation this change isn\'t needed any more.',2768,'AABOAn//+sM='),(107,'2011-08-20 22:57:41','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1508/ ',2768,'AABOAn//+ss='),(49,'2011-08-20 22:57:31','Uploaded patch set 4.',2768,'AABOAn//+sw='),(46,'2011-03-18 12:57:40','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2769,'AAAL3n///jk='),(46,'2011-03-18 12:57:40','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2769,'AAAL3n///jo='),(100,'2011-03-18 12:09:35','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nWhen I run the BranchAndResetActionTest I still see 3 errors, but when checking out a state before the referenced change, I see the same results. And without this fix, there a 5 errors. So this fix seem to work as expected.',2769,'AAAL3n///kQ='),(46,'2011-03-18 09:25:40','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nSuperseded by Dariusz\' change.',2770,'AAAL3n///kw='),(49,'2011-03-18 09:20:25','Patch Set 1:\n\nChange I85af6f964f11be4f3bdb6e3c44c85da97d15ec49 should also fix those tests, at least if fixes it on my machine.',2770,'AAAL3n///lA='),(46,'2011-03-18 09:07:16','Patch Set 1:\n\nAgreed. I\'ll be glad to help out with that (we should really try to get a build soon). Let me know if this makes sense and where to look for (I was guessing that one would have to switch to \"File system mode\" in the synch view or something).',2770,'AAAL3n///lE='),(49,'2011-03-18 09:05:01','Patch Set 1:\n\nIMHO instead of disabling it we should fix them, I\'ll work on fixing it this later today.',2770,'AAAL3n///lM='),(49,'2011-03-18 09:05:01','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nIMHO instead of disabling it we should fix them, I\'ll work on fixing it this later today.',2770,'AAAL3n///lQ='),(46,'2011-03-18 12:57:58','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2771,'AAAL3n///jc='),(46,'2011-03-18 12:57:56','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2771,'AAAL3n///jg='),(100,'2011-03-18 11:55:37','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nTotally makes sense. But UI tests are still failing for me :-(',2771,'AAAL3n///kg='),(46,'2011-03-18 09:05:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',2771,'AAAL3n///lI='),(46,'2011-03-18 09:25:13','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2772,'AAAL3n///k0='),(46,'2011-03-18 09:25:11','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThat fixes the failing test cases, too. Thanks Dariusz.',2772,'AAAL3n///k4='),(2,'2011-03-18 21:28:05','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2773,'AAAL3n///d8='),(2,'2011-03-18 21:28:05','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2773,'AAAL3n///eA='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:12:35','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/130/ ',2773,'AAAL3n///i4='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:14:53','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/130/ : SUCCESS',2773,'AAAL3n///iw='),(2,'2011-03-19 16:32:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2774,'AAAL3n///dg='),(2,'2011-03-19 16:32:19','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2774,'AAAL3n///dk='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:17:05','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/131/ : SUCCESS',2774,'AAAL3n///io='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:14:54','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/131/ ',2774,'AAAL3n///is='),(2,'2011-03-19 16:33:16','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2775,'AAAL3n///dc='),(2,'2011-03-19 16:33:19','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2775,'AAAL3n///dU='),(2,'2011-03-19 16:33:19','Patch Set 2:\n\nLooks fine.',2775,'AAAL3n///dY='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:59:45','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/157/ : SUCCESS',2775,'AAAL3n///eQ='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:57:31','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/157/ ',2775,'AAAL3n///eU='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:34:07','Uploaded patch set 2.',2775,'AAAL3n///fs='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:19:17','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/132/ : SUCCESS',2775,'AAAL3n///ig='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:17:05','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/132/ ',2775,'AAAL3n///ik='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:15:28','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/190/ : SUCCESS',2776,'AAAL33///1k='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:12:46','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/190/ ',2776,'AAAL33///1o='),(1,'2011-03-29 02:07:28','Uploaded patch set 3.',2776,'AAAL33///2Y='),(107,'2011-04-01 21:52:30','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/211/ ',2776,'AAAL33///S4='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:53:37','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2776,'AAAL33///Sk='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:53:36','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nNo comments for several weeks, builds and passes tests, so submitting as-is.',2776,'AAAL33///Ss='),(107,'2011-04-01 21:54:45','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/211/ : SUCCESS',2776,'AAAL33///SU='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:52:27','Uploaded patch set 4.',2776,'AAAL33///TI='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:41:47','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/149/ : SUCCESS',2776,'AAAL3n///fQ='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:39:31','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/149/ ',2776,'AAAL3n///fU='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:34:05','Uploaded patch set 2.',2776,'AAAL3n///gM='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:19:17','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/133/ ',2776,'AAAL3n///ic='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:21:30','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/133/ : SUCCESS',2776,'AAAL3n///iY='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:17:57','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/191/ : SUCCESS',2777,'AAAL33///1c='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:15:28','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/191/ ',2777,'AAAL33///1g='),(1,'2011-03-29 02:07:28','Uploaded patch set 3.',2777,'AAAL33///2U='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:53:37','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2777,'AAAL33///Sg='),(107,'2011-04-01 21:56:58','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/212/ : SUCCESS',2777,'AAAL33///SM='),(107,'2011-04-01 21:54:46','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/212/ ',2777,'AAAL33///SQ='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:53:36','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nNo comments for several weeks, builds and passes tests, so submitting as-is.',2777,'AAAL33///Sw='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:52:27','Uploaded patch set 4.',2777,'AAAL33///TE='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:44:02','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/150/ : SUCCESS',2777,'AAAL3n///fI='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:41:48','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/150/ ',2777,'AAAL3n///fM='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:34:06','Uploaded patch set 2.',2777,'AAAL3n///gI='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:23:44','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/134/ : SUCCESS',2777,'AAAL3n///iQ='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:21:31','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/134/ ',2777,'AAAL3n///iU='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:22:57','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/193/ : SUCCESS',2778,'AAAL33///1M='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:20:34','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/193/ ',2778,'AAAL33///1Q='),(1,'2011-03-29 02:07:29','Uploaded patch set 3.',2778,'AAAL33///2M='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:53:36','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nNo comments for several weeks, builds and passes tests, so submitting as-is.',2778,'AAAL33///S0='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:53:37','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2778,'AAAL33///Sc='),(107,'2011-04-01 21:59:14','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/213/ : SUCCESS',2778,'AAAL33///SE='),(107,'2011-04-01 21:56:59','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/213/ ',2778,'AAAL33///SI='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:52:27','Uploaded patch set 4.',2778,'AAAL33///TA='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:48:24','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/152/ : SUCCESS',2778,'AAAL3n///e4='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:46:14','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/152/ ',2778,'AAAL3n///e8='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:34:06','Uploaded patch set 2.',2778,'AAAL3n///gA='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:25:53','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/135/ : SUCCESS',2778,'AAAL3n///iI='),(107,'2011-03-18 16:23:44','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/135/ ',2778,'AAAL3n///iM='),(46,'2011-03-22 18:05:54','Patch Set 2: (2 inline comments)\n\nNot giving a score here, as I\'m not understanding the code well enough. But you may want to check if my inline comments are helpful.',2779,'AAAL3n//+6M='),(49,'2011-03-22 15:58:37','Patch Set 2:\n\nRebased on current master',2779,'AAAL3n//+7E='),(49,'2011-03-22 15:56:10','Uploaded patch set 2.',2779,'AAAL3n//+7Q='),(49,'2011-07-20 11:04:42','Patch Set 2: Abandoned\n\nOutdated idea ...',2779,'AABOAX//+rw='),(46,'2011-03-18 17:26:29','Uploaded patch set 2.',2780,'AAAL3n///hM='),(107,'2011-03-23 06:46:00','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/110/ ',2780,'AAAL3n//+zg='),(4,'2011-03-23 06:45:44','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2780,'AAAL3n//+zo='),(4,'2011-03-23 06:58:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2780,'AAAL3n//+zQ='),(4,'2011-03-23 06:44:51','Uploaded patch set 3.',2780,'AAAL3n//+zs='),(107,'2011-03-23 06:56:32','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/110/ : SUCCESS',2780,'AAAL3n//+zY='),(46,'2011-03-21 08:37:21','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2781,'AAAL3n///bM='),(46,'2011-03-21 08:37:20','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2781,'AAAL3n///bQ='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:30:00','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/196/ : SUCCESS',2782,'AAAL33///00='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:27:37','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/196/ ',2782,'AAAL33///04='),(1,'2011-03-29 02:07:30','Uploaded patch set 3.',2782,'AAAL33///2A='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:01:28','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/214/ : SUCCESS',2782,'AAAL33///RY='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:52:27','Uploaded patch set 4.',2782,'AAAL33///S8='),(107,'2011-04-01 21:59:14','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/214/ ',2782,'AAAL33///SA='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:53:36','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nNo comments for several weeks, builds and passes tests, so submitting as-is.',2782,'AAAL33///So='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:53:38','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2782,'AAAL33///SY='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:55:02','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/155/ : SUCCESS',2782,'AAAL3n///eg='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:52:52','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/155/ ',2782,'AAAL3n///ek='),(1,'2011-03-18 18:34:07','Uploaded patch set 2.',2782,'AAAL3n///f0='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:23:39','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/142/ ',2782,'AAAL3n///g0='),(107,'2011-03-18 18:25:51','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/142/ : SUCCESS',2782,'AAAL3n///gw='),(1,'2011-03-27 20:48:45','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2783,'AAAL33////E='),(1,'2011-03-27 20:48:44','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nThanks',2783,'AAAL33////I='),(107,'2011-03-21 07:37:13','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/160/ : SUCCESS',2783,'AAAL3n///cE='),(51,'2011-03-21 07:35:55','Patch Set 1:\n\nI was wrong about the commit message: it\'s an IndexOutOfBoundsException.',2783,'AAAL3n///cI='),(107,'2011-03-21 07:35:01','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/160/ ',2783,'AAAL3n///cM='),(51,'2011-03-21 07:34:57','Uploaded patch set 2.',2783,'AAAL3n///cQ='),(8,'2011-03-20 21:25:57','Patch Set 1:\n\nI don\'t see where the NPE is. On the other hand I was not handling the result of RawParseUtils.next properly.',2783,'AAAL3n///cY='),(1,'2011-03-18 21:49:16','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n',2783,'AAAL3n///d4='),(107,'2011-03-18 19:09:39','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/158/ : SUCCESS',2783,'AAAL3n///eE='),(107,'2011-03-18 19:07:27','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/158/ ',2783,'AAAL3n///eI='),(1,'2011-03-21 15:57:25','Patch Set 2:\n\nLooks better now, at least I understand what bug is being fixed.\n\nAny chance we can get a unit test to cover this failure and prevent a regression?',2783,'AAAL3n///ZM='),(51,'2011-03-22 16:41:00','Patch Set 3:\n\nTest case added.',2783,'AAAL3n//+6k='),(107,'2011-03-22 16:40:09','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/165/ : SUCCESS',2783,'AAAL3n//+6o='),(107,'2011-03-22 16:37:54','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/165/ ',2783,'AAAL3n//+6s='),(51,'2011-03-22 16:37:51','Uploaded patch set 3.',2783,'AAAL3n//+6w='),(46,'2011-03-21 08:34:37','Uploaded patch set 2.',2784,'AAAL3n///bc='),(NULL,'2011-03-21 08:32:49','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2784,'AAAL3n///bg='),(46,'2011-03-21 08:32:48','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2784,'AAAL3n///bk='),(46,'2011-03-21 08:35:11','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2784,'AAAL3n///bU='),(46,'2011-03-21 08:35:10','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2784,'AAAL3n///bY='),(4,'2011-03-28 21:44:15','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2785,'AAAL33///5I='),(4,'2011-03-28 21:44:14','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2785,'AAAL33///5M='),(107,'2011-03-28 21:42:37','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/215/ : SUCCESS',2785,'AAAL33///5Q='),(107,'2011-03-28 21:38:34','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/215/ ',2785,'AAAL33///5U='),(4,'2011-03-28 21:38:29','Uploaded patch set 3.',2785,'AAAL33///5Y='),(5,'2011-03-21 08:49:46','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2785,'AAAL3n///a8='),(46,'2011-03-21 08:00:16','Uploaded patch set 2.',2785,'AAAL3n///bo='),(4,'2011-03-24 19:26:31','Uploaded patch set 2.',2786,'AAAL3n//+h0='),(4,'2011-03-24 19:24:53','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2786,'AAAL3n//+h4='),(4,'2011-03-24 19:31:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2786,'AAAL3n//+hk='),(107,'2011-03-24 19:30:22','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/177/ : SUCCESS',2786,'AAAL3n//+ho='),(4,'2011-03-24 19:27:16','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- fixed style nits',2786,'AAAL3n//+hs='),(107,'2011-03-24 19:26:35','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/177/ ',2786,'AAAL3n//+hw='),(44,'2011-03-21 18:04:46','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2787,'AAAL3n///Yg='),(44,'2011-03-21 18:04:46','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- checked on Windows 7 and Ubuntu',2787,'AAAL3n///Yk='),(44,'2011-03-21 18:01:33','Uploaded patch set 3.',2787,'AAAL3n///Yo='),(46,'2011-03-21 14:27:08','Uploaded patch set 2.',2787,'AAAL3n///Zg='),(44,'2011-03-21 18:33:26','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2788,'AAAL3n///YY='),(46,'2011-03-22 06:58:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',2788,'AAAL3n//++U='),(107,'2011-03-22 22:14:41','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/104/ : FAILURE',2788,'AAAL3n//+1k='),(107,'2011-03-22 22:51:26','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/105/ : FAILURE',2788,'AAAL3n//+1M='),(107,'2011-03-22 22:04:24','Patch Set 3: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/104/ ',2788,'AAAL3n//+1o='),(107,'2011-03-22 22:39:57','Patch Set 3: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/105/ ',2788,'AAAL3n//+1Y='),(107,'2011-03-22 19:15:12','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/103/ : FAILURE',2788,'AAAL3n//+5w='),(107,'2011-03-22 19:01:36','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/103/ ',2788,'AAAL3n//+6A='),(46,'2011-03-22 17:46:56','Uploaded patch set 3.',2788,'AAAL3n//+6Y='),(44,'2011-03-22 15:49:06','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2788,'AAAL3n//+7U='),(44,'2011-03-24 09:46:29','Patch Set 6: Build Successful\n\n',2788,'AAAL3n//+nc='),(107,'2011-03-24 09:44:58','Patch Set 6: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/155/ : SUCCESS',2788,'AAAL3n//+ng='),(44,'2011-03-24 09:43:02','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nRebased to current master.\nChecked on Windows 7 and Ubuntu.',2788,'AAAL3n//+nk='),(107,'2011-03-24 09:40:37','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/155/ ',2788,'AAAL3n//+no='),(44,'2011-03-24 09:40:34','Uploaded patch set 6.',2788,'AAAL3n//+ns='),(44,'2011-03-24 09:46:30','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2788,'AAAL3n//+nY='),(107,'2011-03-23 18:43:07','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/135/ : SUCCESS',2788,'AAAL3n//+so='),(107,'2011-03-23 18:39:24','Patch Set 5: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/135/ ',2788,'AAAL3n//+ss='),(107,'2011-03-23 16:27:32','Patch Set 5: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/128/ : FAILURE',2788,'AAAL3n//+tw='),(46,'2011-03-23 15:56:53','Uploaded patch set 4.',2788,'AAAL3n//+u0='),(107,'2011-03-23 16:17:34','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/128/ ',2788,'AAAL3n//+uI='),(107,'2011-03-23 16:07:11','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/126/ : FAILURE',2788,'AAAL3n//+uk='),(46,'2011-03-23 16:17:26','Uploaded patch set 5.',2788,'AAAL3n//+uQ='),(107,'2011-03-23 15:56:56','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/126/ ',2788,'AAAL3n//+uw='),(49,'2011-03-21 14:39:35','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nI hope it will fix this issue.',2789,'AAAL3n///Zc='),(49,'2011-03-21 14:39:38','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2789,'AAAL3n///ZY='),(46,'2011-03-21 14:47:59','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2790,'AAAL3n///ZQ='),(46,'2011-03-21 14:47:58','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2790,'AAAL3n///ZU='),(44,'2011-03-21 17:45:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2791,'AAAL3n///Y0='),(44,'2011-03-21 17:45:27','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2791,'AAAL3n///Y4='),(4,'2011-03-23 22:52:26','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2792,'AAAL3n//+p0='),(4,'2011-03-23 22:52:25','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2792,'AAAL3n//+p4='),(107,'2011-03-23 22:37:53','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/147/ : SUCCESS',2792,'AAAL3n//+qE='),(107,'2011-03-23 22:34:09','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/147/ ',2792,'AAAL3n//+qQ='),(4,'2011-03-23 22:34:05','Uploaded patch set 2.',2792,'AAAL3n//+qU='),(8,'2011-03-21 19:59:36','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2793,'AAAL3n///YE='),(2,'2011-03-22 16:27:48','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2793,'AAAL3n//+60='),(2,'2011-03-22 16:27:47','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine!',2793,'AAAL3n//+64='),(4,'2011-03-28 22:02:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2794,'AAAL33///40='),(4,'2011-03-28 22:02:29','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2794,'AAAL33///44='),(107,'2011-03-28 22:01:31','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/216/ : SUCCESS',2794,'AAAL33///48='),(107,'2011-03-28 21:57:32','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/216/ ',2794,'AAAL33///5A='),(4,'2011-03-28 21:57:29','Uploaded patch set 2.',2794,'AAAL33///5E='),(44,'2011-03-21 17:17:49','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nverified on Windows 7 and Ubuntu',2795,'AAAL3n///Y8='),(44,'2011-03-21 17:47:39','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2795,'AAAL3n///Ys='),(44,'2011-03-21 17:47:38','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2795,'AAAL3n///Yw='),(46,'2011-03-22 08:41:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2796,'AAAL3n//+9k='),(46,'2011-03-22 08:41:20','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2796,'AAAL3n//+9o='),(46,'2011-03-22 10:52:42','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nNice feature. The only thing is missing is that it must be possible to activate the pop-up again. This should be possible using a Git Preference page. Since we need to reorganize these pages anyway, we can do this separately. I opened bug 340630 for this reorg stuff and mentioned this change there, too.',2797,'AAAL3n//+80='),(79,'2011-03-22 10:23:44','Uploaded patch set 3.',2797,'AAAL3n//+84='),(79,'2011-03-22 10:18:01','Patch Set 2:\n\nAbout the \"Signed-off-by\", do I have to put my name there?',2797,'AAAL3n//+88='),(46,'2011-03-22 10:52:43','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2797,'AAAL3n//+8w='),(46,'2011-03-22 10:15:28','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nStill no singed-off (see inline comment on commit message)',2797,'AAAL3n//+9A='),(79,'2011-03-22 10:12:52','Uploaded patch set 2.',2797,'AAAL3n//+9I='),(79,'2011-03-22 10:12:13','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2797,'AAAL3n//+9M='),(46,'2011-03-22 08:40:42','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(4 inline comments)\n\nSee inline comments',2797,'AAAL3n//+9s='),(46,'2011-03-22 07:42:12','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(3 inline comments)\n\nFirst of all, great contribution, thanks Kevin. There are just a few \"style nits\" here.\nFeel free to contact me directly if I\'m being unclear with anything.',2875,'AAAL3n//++A='),(46,'2011-03-22 15:29:58','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2875,'AAAL3n//+7c='),(46,'2011-03-22 15:29:58','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2875,'AAAL3n//+7g='),(2,'2011-03-22 15:22:50','Uploaded patch set 2.',2875,'AAAL3n//+7k='),(44,'2011-03-22 09:16:20','Uploaded patch set 2.',2876,'AAAL3n//+9g='),(46,'2011-03-22 10:08:42','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2876,'AAAL3n//+9U='),(46,'2011-03-22 10:08:41','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2876,'AAAL3n//+9Y='),(46,'2011-03-22 11:00:08','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2877,'AAAL3n//+8o='),(46,'2011-03-22 11:00:08','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2877,'AAAL3n//+8s='),(4,'2011-03-28 22:24:57','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2878,'AAAL33///38='),(4,'2011-03-28 22:24:56','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2878,'AAAL33///4A='),(107,'2011-03-28 22:21:32','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/219/ : SUCCESS',2878,'AAAL33///4E='),(107,'2011-03-28 22:17:45','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/219/ ',2878,'AAAL33///4I='),(4,'2011-03-28 22:17:41','Uploaded patch set 2.',2878,'AAAL33///4M='),(4,'2011-03-28 22:38:36','Uploaded patch set 2.',2879,'AAAL33///30='),(4,'2011-03-28 22:43:39','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2879,'AAAL33///3k='),(4,'2011-03-28 22:43:39','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2879,'AAAL33///3o='),(107,'2011-03-28 22:42:38','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/220/ : SUCCESS',2879,'AAAL33///3s='),(107,'2011-03-28 22:38:40','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/220/ ',2879,'AAAL33///3w='),(1,'2011-03-27 21:02:42','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2880,'AAAL33///+s='),(5,'2011-04-02 00:15:32','Uploaded patch set 2.',2880,'AAAL33///Pc='),(1,'2011-04-02 00:20:07','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2880,'AAAL33///PI='),(1,'2011-04-02 00:20:07','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2880,'AAAL33///PM='),(107,'2011-04-02 00:18:12','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/224/ : SUCCESS',2880,'AAAL33///PQ='),(107,'2011-04-02 00:15:42','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/224/ ',2880,'AAAL33///PU='),(5,'2011-03-22 15:08:48','Patch Set 1: (3 inline comments)\n\n',2880,'AAAL3n//+7o='),(107,'2011-03-22 12:10:31','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/164/ : SUCCESS',2880,'AAAL3n//+8g='),(107,'2011-03-22 12:08:12','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/164/ ',2880,'AAAL3n//+8k='),(1,'2011-03-22 14:11:50','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',2880,'AAAL3n//+8M='),(1,'2011-03-22 14:08:25','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2880,'AAAL3n//+8Y='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:04:26','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/263/ : SUCCESS',2881,'AAAL33///nI='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:55:40','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/263/ ',2881,'AAAL33///nM='),(4,'2011-03-30 13:13:18','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2881,'AAAL33///oM='),(4,'2011-03-30 13:13:17','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nthanks, this looks better',2881,'AAAL33///oQ='),(4,'2011-03-30 13:12:32','Uploaded patch set 3.',2881,'AAAL33///oU='),(107,'2011-03-30 09:07:59','Patch Set 2: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/251/ ',2881,'AAAL33///p0='),(107,'2011-03-30 08:56:17','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/250/ : FAILURE',2881,'AAAL33///p4='),(107,'2011-03-30 09:18:29','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/251/ : SUCCESS',2881,'AAAL33///pw='),(107,'2011-03-30 08:42:44','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/250/ ',2881,'AAAL33///qA='),(46,'2011-03-30 08:42:41','Uploaded patch set 2.',2881,'AAAL33///qE='),(4,'2011-03-29 22:30:17','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',2881,'AAAL33///uU='),(107,'2011-03-29 22:53:23','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/237/ : FAILURE',2882,'AAAL33///t0='),(107,'2011-03-29 22:43:08','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/237/ ',2882,'AAAL33///t4='),(4,'2011-03-29 22:34:31','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2882,'AAAL33///uA='),(4,'2011-03-29 22:34:30','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2882,'AAAL33///uE='),(4,'2011-03-29 22:33:55','Uploaded patch set 2.',2882,'AAAL33///uI='),(46,'2011-03-22 14:24:44','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2883,'AAAL3n//+8E='),(46,'2011-03-22 14:24:43','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2883,'AAAL3n//+8I='),(46,'2011-03-22 14:26:34','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2884,'AAAL3n//+74='),(46,'2011-03-22 14:26:33','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2884,'AAAL3n//+78='),(44,'2011-03-22 14:26:05','Uploaded patch set 2.',2884,'AAAL3n//+8A='),(107,'2011-03-23 23:08:09','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/149/ : SUCCESS',2885,'AAAL3n//+pc='),(4,'2011-03-23 23:05:07','Patch Set 2:\n\nrebased to current master to fix build error caused by incompatible jgit change',2885,'AAAL3n//+po='),(107,'2011-03-23 23:04:26','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/149/ ',2885,'AAAL3n//+ps='),(4,'2011-03-23 23:04:22','Uploaded patch set 2.',2885,'AAAL3n//+pw='),(107,'2011-03-23 22:22:46','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/146/ : FAILURE',2885,'AAAL3n//+qg='),(107,'2011-03-23 22:21:31','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/146/ ',2885,'AAAL3n//+qk='),(107,'2012-01-17 07:58:04','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/2356/ : UNSTABLE',2885,'AABODX//+j0='),(107,'2012-01-17 07:43:15','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/2356/ ',2885,'AABODX//+j4='),(46,'2012-01-17 07:43:12','Uploaded patch set 3.',2885,'AABODX//+j8='),(107,'2012-01-20 07:47:28','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/2394/ : SUCCESS',2885,'AABODX//+SY='),(4,'2012-01-20 07:32:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2885,'AABODX//+TI='),(4,'2012-01-20 07:32:00','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2885,'AABODX//+TM='),(107,'2012-01-20 07:31:41','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/2394/ ',2885,'AABODX//+TQ='),(4,'2012-01-20 07:31:37','Uploaded patch set 4.',2885,'AABODX//+TU='),(2,'2011-03-22 22:24:44','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2886,'AAAL3n//+1c='),(2,'2011-03-22 22:24:43','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2886,'AAAL3n//+1g='),(107,'2011-03-22 18:53:41','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/166/ : SUCCESS',2886,'AAAL3n//+6E='),(107,'2011-03-22 18:51:03','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/166/ ',2886,'AAAL3n//+6I='),(46,'2011-03-23 08:41:43','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2887,'AAAL3n//+yk='),(46,'2011-03-23 08:41:42','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2887,'AAAL3n//+yo='),(107,'2011-03-23 08:21:46','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/113/ : FAILURE',2887,'AAAL3n//+ys='),(107,'2011-03-23 08:11:15','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/113/ ',2887,'AAAL3n//+yw='),(107,'2011-03-24 07:21:30','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/154/ : FAILURE',2888,'AAAL3n//+n0='),(46,'2011-03-24 07:20:56','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\nMust only be submitted once the corresponding JGit change is in.',2888,'AAAL3n//+n4='),(107,'2011-03-24 07:20:13','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/154/ ',2888,'AAAL3n//+n8='),(46,'2011-03-24 09:12:39','Patch Set 3: Abandoned\n\nUse http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,2737 instead',2888,'AAAL3n//+nw='),(46,'2011-03-24 07:20:09','Uploaded patch set 3.',2888,'AAAL3n//+oA='),(46,'2011-03-23 09:31:43','Uploaded patch set 2.',2888,'AAAL3n//+x0='),(107,'2011-03-23 09:28:26','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/114/ : FAILURE',2888,'AAAL3n//+x8='),(46,'2011-03-23 09:41:36','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nDo not submit for the time being. Need to clarify how we deal with incompatible changes in conjunction with the Hudson voting stuff.',2888,'AAAL3n//+xo='),(107,'2011-03-23 09:32:58','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/115/ : FAILURE',2888,'AAAL3n//+xs='),(107,'2011-03-23 09:31:46','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/115/ ',2888,'AAAL3n//+xw='),(107,'2011-03-23 09:26:40','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/114/ ',2888,'AAAL3n//+yA='),(2,'2011-03-23 16:25:34','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2889,'AAAL3n//+t0='),(2,'2011-03-23 16:25:34','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThis is a simple fix and hudson was wrong.',2889,'AAAL3n//+t4='),(107,'2011-03-23 11:55:43','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/119/ : FAILURE',2889,'AAAL3n//+wg='),(107,'2011-03-23 11:45:34','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/119/ ',2889,'AAAL3n//+ws='),(46,'2011-03-23 11:45:30','Uploaded patch set 2.',2889,'AAAL3n//+ww='),(107,'2011-03-23 10:14:10','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/116/ : FAILURE',2889,'AAAL3n//+xc='),(107,'2011-03-23 10:04:04','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/116/ ',2889,'AAAL3n//+xg='),(2,'2011-03-23 16:23:47','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2890,'AAAL3n//+t8='),(2,'2011-03-23 16:23:47','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThis is a good first effort.\n\nThanks Christian.',2890,'AAAL3n//+uA='),(2,'2011-03-23 16:11:28','Uploaded patch set 2.',2890,'AAAL3n//+uc='),(5,'2011-03-23 16:17:57','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2890,'AAAL3n//+uE='),(107,'2011-03-23 16:14:03','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/170/ : SUCCESS',2890,'AAAL3n//+uU='),(107,'2011-03-23 16:11:32','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/170/ ',2890,'AAAL3n//+uY='),(107,'2011-03-23 10:30:42','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/168/ : SUCCESS',2890,'AAAL3n//+xU='),(107,'2011-03-23 10:28:30','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/168/ ',2890,'AAAL3n//+xY='),(46,'2011-03-23 11:42:49','Patch Set 2: Abandoned\n\nNot reproducible after rebase to master',2891,'AAAL3n//+w0='),(107,'2011-03-23 11:14:51','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/118/ : FAILURE',2891,'AAAL3n//+w4='),(107,'2011-03-23 11:04:52','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/118/ ',2891,'AAAL3n//+w8='),(46,'2011-03-23 11:04:48','Uploaded patch set 2.',2891,'AAAL3n//+xA='),(NULL,'2011-03-23 11:01:21','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2891,'AAAL3n//+xE='),(46,'2011-03-23 11:01:10','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2891,'AAAL3n//+xI='),(107,'2011-03-23 11:00:16','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/117/ : SUCCESS',2891,'AAAL3n//+xM='),(107,'2011-03-23 10:49:37','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/117/ ',2891,'AAAL3n//+xQ='),(46,'2011-03-23 12:28:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2892,'AAAL3n//+wA='),(46,'2011-03-23 12:28:28','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2892,'AAAL3n//+wE='),(107,'2011-03-23 12:27:44','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/122/ : SUCCESS',2892,'AAAL3n//+wI='),(107,'2011-03-23 12:17:29','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/122/ ',2892,'AAAL3n//+wM='),(4,'2011-03-23 22:10:48','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nthanks Kevin',2893,'AAAL3n//+q0='),(208,'2011-03-23 21:16:43','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nLooks good',2893,'AAAL3n//+q4='),(107,'2011-03-23 21:16:17','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/144/ : SUCCESS',2893,'AAAL3n//+q8='),(4,'2011-03-23 22:10:49','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2893,'AAAL3n//+qw='),(4,'2011-03-23 21:13:30','Patch Set 2:\n\nrebased to current master to fix build error coming from incompatible jgit change',2893,'AAAL3n//+rA='),(107,'2011-03-23 21:12:37','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/144/ ',2893,'AAAL3n//+rE='),(4,'2011-03-23 21:12:34','Uploaded patch set 2.',2893,'AAAL3n//+rI='),(107,'2011-03-23 21:05:24','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/143/ : FAILURE',2893,'AAAL3n//+rM='),(107,'2011-03-23 21:04:14','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/143/ ',2893,'AAAL3n//+rQ='),(107,'2011-03-23 17:08:06','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/129/ : FAILURE',2893,'AAAL3n//+tk='),(107,'2011-03-23 16:58:04','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/129/ ',2893,'AAAL3n//+to='),(46,'2011-03-23 18:59:39','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nWrong commit',2894,'AAAL3n//+sk='),(107,'2011-03-23 18:04:08','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/131/ ',2894,'AAAL3n//+tc='),(46,'2011-03-23 18:14:22','Patch Set 1: Do not submit\n\nBotched the commits somehow',2894,'AAAL3n//+tQ='),(107,'2011-03-23 18:14:16','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/131/ : FAILURE',2894,'AAAL3n//+tY='),(46,'2011-03-23 18:59:49','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nWrong commit',2895,'AAAL3n//+sg='),(107,'2011-03-23 18:24:09','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/132/ : FAILURE',2895,'AAAL3n//+tA='),(46,'2011-03-23 18:14:52','Patch Set 1: Do not submit\n\nBotched the commits somehow',2895,'AAAL3n//+tM='),(107,'2011-03-23 18:14:17','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/132/ ',2895,'AAAL3n//+tU='),(107,'2011-03-23 18:34:15','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/133/ : FAILURE',2896,'AAAL3n//+s4='),(107,'2011-03-23 18:24:09','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/133/ ',2896,'AAAL3n//+s8='),(46,'2011-03-23 19:00:00','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nWrong commit',2896,'AAAL3n//+sc='),(46,'2011-03-23 18:15:35','Patch Set 1: Do not submit\n\nBotched the commits somehow',2896,'AAAL3n//+tI='),(4,'2011-03-25 02:06:40','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- fixed whitespace errors',2897,'AAAL3n//+f0='),(4,'2011-03-25 02:05:42','Uploaded patch set 4.',2897,'AAAL3n//+f8='),(4,'2011-03-25 02:16:38','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2897,'AAAL3n//+fc='),(107,'2011-03-25 02:15:45','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/184/ : SUCCESS',2897,'AAAL3n//+fg='),(107,'2011-03-25 02:11:55','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/184/ ',2897,'AAAL3n//+fk='),(107,'2011-03-25 02:11:54','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/183/ : SUCCESS',2897,'AAAL3n//+fo='),(107,'2011-03-25 02:07:55','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/183/ ',2897,'AAAL3n//+fs='),(107,'2011-03-25 02:07:55','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/182/ : SUCCESS',2897,'AAAL3n//+fw='),(4,'2011-03-25 02:04:29','Uploaded patch set 3.',2897,'AAAL3n//+gA='),(4,'2011-03-25 02:03:21','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2897,'AAAL3n//+gE='),(107,'2011-03-25 02:02:53','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/182/ ',2897,'AAAL3n//+gI='),(4,'2011-03-25 02:02:49','Uploaded patch set 2.',2897,'AAAL3n//+gM='),(107,'2011-03-23 19:03:59','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/136/ : SUCCESS',2897,'AAAL3n//+sU='),(107,'2011-03-23 19:00:15','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/136/ ',2897,'AAAL3n//+sY='),(4,'2011-03-28 09:25:10','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2898,'AAAL33///8c='),(107,'2011-03-25 18:10:32','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/193/ : SUCCESS',2898,'AAAL3n//+b0='),(4,'2011-03-25 18:09:47','Uploaded patch set 3.',2898,'AAAL3n//+b4='),(4,'2011-03-25 18:09:48','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2898,'AAAL3n//+b8='),(107,'2011-03-25 18:14:12','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/194/ : SUCCESS',2898,'AAAL3n//+bk='),(4,'2011-03-25 18:12:02','Patch Set 3:\n\n- rebased\n- added missing license header',2898,'AAAL3n//+bo='),(4,'2011-03-25 18:11:40','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2898,'AAAL3n//+bs='),(107,'2011-03-25 18:10:33','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/194/ ',2898,'AAAL3n//+bw='),(107,'2011-03-25 18:06:30','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/193/ ',2898,'AAAL3n//+cE='),(4,'2011-03-25 18:06:24','Uploaded patch set 2.',2898,'AAAL3n//+cI='),(107,'2011-03-23 19:13:21','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/137/ : SUCCESS',2898,'AAAL3n//+sM='),(107,'2011-03-23 19:09:35','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/137/ ',2898,'AAAL3n//+sQ='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:16:32','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/164/ : FAILURE',2899,'AAAL3n//+k0='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:14:57','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/164/ ',2899,'AAAL3n//+k4='),(46,'2011-03-24 15:11:09','Patch Set 5: Abandoned\n\nWrong commit?',2899,'AAAL3n//+kc='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:25:27','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/165/ : SUCCESS',2899,'AAAL3n//+ko='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:21:47','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/165/ ',2899,'AAAL3n//+ks='),(46,'2011-03-24 14:21:43','Uploaded patch set 5.',2899,'AAAL3n//+kw='),(46,'2011-03-24 14:10:59','Uploaded patch set 4.',2899,'AAAL3n//+lY='),(107,'2011-03-23 20:29:26','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/140/ ',2899,'AAAL3n//+r0='),(46,'2011-03-23 20:29:23','Uploaded patch set 2.',2899,'AAAL3n//+r4='),(107,'2011-03-23 20:23:18','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/139/ : FAILURE',2899,'AAAL3n//+r8='),(46,'2011-03-23 20:42:53','Uploaded patch set 3.',2899,'AAAL3n//+rc='),(107,'2011-03-23 20:46:41','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/142/ : SUCCESS',2899,'AAAL3n//+rU='),(107,'2011-03-23 20:31:00','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/140/ : FAILURE',2899,'AAAL3n//+rw='),(107,'2011-03-23 20:42:57','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/142/ ',2899,'AAAL3n//+rY='),(107,'2011-03-23 20:21:52','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/139/ ',2899,'AAAL3n//+sA='),(107,'2011-03-23 20:09:13','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/138/ : FAILURE',2899,'AAAL3n//+sE='),(107,'2011-03-23 20:07:54','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/138/ ',2899,'AAAL3n//+sI='),(107,'2011-03-23 20:42:39','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/141/ : SUCCESS',2900,'AAAL3n//+rg='),(2,'2011-03-23 20:41:06','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2900,'AAAL3n//+rk='),(2,'2011-03-23 20:41:06','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThanks, was on my list to finish today.',2900,'AAAL3n//+ro='),(107,'2011-03-23 20:38:52','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/141/ ',2900,'AAAL3n//+rs='),(49,'2011-03-23 22:23:22','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2901,'AAAL3n//+qc='),(107,'2011-03-23 22:21:30','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/145/ : SUCCESS',2901,'AAAL3n//+qo='),(107,'2011-03-23 22:17:39','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/145/ ',2901,'AAAL3n//+qs='),(49,'2011-03-23 22:23:25','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2901,'AAAL3n//+qY='),(2,'2011-03-23 23:06:18','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2902,'AAAL3n//+pg='),(2,'2011-03-23 23:06:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLet\'s get our first build going :)',2902,'AAAL3n//+pk='),(100,'2011-03-28 07:30:12','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2903,'AAAL33///8o='),(2,'2011-03-31 21:38:47','Uploaded patch set 6.',2903,'AAAL33///Z0='),(107,'2011-03-31 21:47:51','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/304/ : SUCCESS',2903,'AAAL33///Zk='),(2,'2011-03-31 21:39:16','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2903,'AAAL33///Zo='),(2,'2011-03-31 21:39:15','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good, thanks Kevin and others.',2903,'AAAL33///Zs='),(107,'2011-03-31 21:38:51','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/304/ ',2903,'AAAL33///Zw='),(107,'2011-03-25 20:42:19','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/199/ : SUCCESS',2903,'AAAL3n//+ak='),(107,'2011-03-25 20:37:55','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/199/ ',2903,'AAAL3n//+ao='),(208,'2011-03-25 20:37:51','Uploaded patch set 5.',2903,'AAAL3n//+as='),(107,'2011-03-25 17:00:41','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/188/ : FAILURE',2903,'AAAL3n//+dE='),(107,'2011-03-25 16:59:28','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/188/ ',2903,'AAAL3n//+dI='),(208,'2011-03-25 16:59:24','Uploaded patch set 4.',2903,'AAAL3n//+dM='),(100,'2011-03-25 09:01:38','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(4 inline comments)\n\nSome minor remarks...',2903,'AAAL3n//+ek='),(107,'2011-03-24 16:22:18','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/174/ : FAILURE',2903,'AAAL3n//+i8='),(107,'2011-03-24 16:21:05','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/174/ ',2903,'AAAL3n//+jI='),(208,'2011-03-24 16:20:59','Uploaded patch set 3.',2903,'AAAL3n//+jM='),(49,'2011-03-24 00:49:28','Patch Set 2: (3 inline comments)\n\nPlease see my comments',2903,'AAAL3n//+o4='),(107,'2011-03-24 00:41:32','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/151/ : SUCCESS',2903,'AAAL3n//+pI='),(107,'2011-03-24 00:37:46','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/151/ ',2903,'AAAL3n//+pM='),(208,'2011-03-24 00:37:42','Uploaded patch set 2.',2903,'AAAL3n//+pQ='),(107,'2011-03-24 00:20:46','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/150/ : FAILURE',2903,'AAAL3n//+pU='),(107,'2011-03-24 00:19:30','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/150/ ',2903,'AAAL3n//+pY='),(1,'2011-03-27 20:46:40','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2904,'AAAL33////M='),(1,'2011-03-27 20:46:39','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2904,'AAAL33////Q='),(107,'2011-03-24 10:29:01','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/173/ : SUCCESS',2904,'AAAL3n//+m4='),(107,'2011-03-24 10:26:23','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/173/ ',2904,'AAAL3n//+m8='),(9,'2011-03-24 10:26:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',2904,'AAAL3n//+nA='),(107,'2011-03-24 10:19:29','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/171/ : SUCCESS',2904,'AAAL3n//+nM='),(107,'2011-03-24 10:16:53','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/171/ ',2904,'AAAL3n//+nU='),(46,'2011-03-25 08:20:13','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2905,'AAAL3n//+fA='),(46,'2011-03-25 08:20:11','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2905,'AAAL3n//+fE='),(107,'2011-03-25 08:18:53','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/185/ : SUCCESS',2905,'AAAL3n//+fI='),(107,'2011-03-25 08:15:06','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/185/ ',2905,'AAAL3n//+fM='),(46,'2011-03-25 08:15:03','Uploaded patch set 2.',2905,'AAAL3n//+fQ='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:55:18','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/173/ ',2905,'AAAL3n//+jc='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:56:30','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/173/ : FAILURE',2905,'AAAL3n//+jY='),(107,'2011-03-24 13:39:50','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/159/ : FAILURE',2905,'AAAL3n//+ls='),(107,'2011-03-24 13:38:36','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/159/ ',2905,'AAAL3n//+lw='),(46,'2011-03-24 15:11:21','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',2906,'AAAL3n//+kY='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:12:16','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/161/ : FAILURE',2906,'AAAL3n//+lM='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:11:02','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/161/ ',2906,'AAAL3n//+lU='),(46,'2011-03-24 15:11:33','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',2907,'AAAL3n//+kU='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:13:31','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/162/ : FAILURE',2907,'AAAL3n//+lE='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:12:16','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/162/ ',2907,'AAAL3n//+lI='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:14:56','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/163/ : FAILURE',2908,'AAAL3n//+k8='),(46,'2011-03-24 15:11:48','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',2908,'AAAL3n//+kQ='),(107,'2011-03-24 14:13:31','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/163/ ',2908,'AAAL3n//+lA='),(107,'2011-03-28 22:55:29','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/221/ ',2909,'AAAL33///3c='),(4,'2011-03-28 22:55:25','Uploaded patch set 2.',2909,'AAAL33///3g='),(4,'2011-03-28 23:04:06','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2909,'AAAL33///3Q='),(4,'2011-03-28 23:04:06','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2909,'AAAL33///3U='),(107,'2011-03-28 22:59:11','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/221/ : SUCCESS',2909,'AAAL33///3Y='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:04:22','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/166/ : SUCCESS',2909,'AAAL3n//+kg='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:00:31','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/166/ ',2909,'AAAL3n//+kk='),(107,'2011-03-31 12:02:18','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/288/ : SUCCESS',2910,'AAAL33///eo='),(107,'2011-03-31 11:53:24','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/288/ ',2910,'AAAL33///es='),(46,'2011-03-31 11:29:09','Uploaded patch set 3.',2910,'AAAL33///fM='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:32:56','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/260/ : SUCCESS',2910,'AAAL33///ng='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:22:32','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/260/ ',2910,'AAAL33///nw='),(46,'2011-03-30 12:53:00','Uploaded patch set 2.',2910,'AAAL33///o0='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:25:11','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/167/ : SUCCESS',2910,'AAAL3n//+kI='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:21:24','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/167/ ',2910,'AAAL3n//+kM='),(107,'2011-04-19 22:48:45','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/429/ : UNSTABLE',2910,'AAAL4H///Ak='),(107,'2011-04-19 22:39:00','Patch Set 4: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/429/ ',2910,'AAAL4H///B0='),(6,'2011-04-19 08:36:34','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2910,'AAAL4H///Gw='),(107,'2011-04-18 16:05:13','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/405/ : UNSTABLE',2910,'AAAL4H///JQ='),(107,'2011-04-18 15:55:26','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/405/ ',2910,'AAAL4H///JY='),(6,'2011-04-18 15:26:53','Uploaded patch set 4.',2910,'AAAL4H///KU='),(4,'2011-04-20 22:56:00','Patch Set 4: Abandoned\n\nreplaced by Ifae9d6c900ef2c8dc115916b2bdb59cc566a8278 to retarget for 0.12',2910,'AAAL4H//+7k='),(107,'2011-03-31 11:45:43','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/286/ : SUCCESS',2911,'AAAL33///e4='),(107,'2011-03-31 11:36:57','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/286/ ',2911,'AAAL33///e8='),(46,'2011-03-31 11:29:08','Uploaded patch set 3.',2911,'AAAL33///fU='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:22:31','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/259/ : SUCCESS',2911,'AAAL33///n0='),(46,'2011-03-30 12:53:00','Uploaded patch set 2.',2911,'AAAL33///o4='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:12:00','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/259/ ',2911,'AAAL33///oY='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:29:04','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/168/ : SUCCESS',2911,'AAAL3n//+kA='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:25:13','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/168/ ',2911,'AAAL3n//+kE='),(107,'2011-04-19 22:48:50','Patch Set 5: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/430/ ',2911,'AAAL4H///Ag='),(107,'2011-04-19 22:59:03','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/430/ : SUCCESS',2911,'AAAL4H///AQ='),(107,'2011-04-19 16:02:51','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/419/ ',2911,'AAAL4H///Fc='),(6,'2011-04-19 15:47:40','Uploaded patch set 5.',2911,'AAAL4H///Fs='),(107,'2011-04-19 16:13:37','Patch Set 5: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/419/ : UNSTABLE',2911,'AAAL4H///FY='),(6,'2011-04-19 14:06:33','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(4 inline comments)\n\n',2911,'AAAL4H///GY='),(107,'2011-04-18 15:48:06','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/403/ : SUCCESS',2911,'AAAL4H///Jk='),(6,'2011-04-18 15:26:52','Uploaded patch set 4.',2911,'AAAL4H///Kc='),(107,'2011-04-18 15:37:20','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/403/ ',2911,'AAAL4H///KI='),(4,'2011-04-20 22:56:47','Patch Set 5: Abandoned\n\nreplaced by I10b2a80c002b38e645a9869267d533bdb09432d3 to retarget for 0.12',2911,'AAAL4H//+7g='),(107,'2011-03-31 17:04:52','Patch Set 7: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/298/ : SUCCESS',2912,'AAAL33///b8='),(107,'2011-03-31 16:55:59','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/298/ ',2912,'AAAL33///cA='),(46,'2011-03-31 16:11:21','Uploaded patch set 5.',2912,'AAAL33///cc='),(46,'2011-03-31 16:55:56','Uploaded patch set 7.',2912,'AAAL33///cE='),(107,'2011-03-31 16:39:07','Patch Set 6: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/297/ : FAILURE',2912,'AAAL33///cI='),(107,'2011-03-31 16:30:49','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/297/ ',2912,'AAAL33///cM='),(46,'2011-03-31 16:30:45','Uploaded patch set 6.',2912,'AAAL33///cQ='),(107,'2011-03-31 16:20:38','Patch Set 5: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/296/ : FAILURE',2912,'AAAL33///cU='),(107,'2011-03-31 16:11:25','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/296/ ',2912,'AAAL33///cY='),(46,'2011-03-31 13:31:17','Uploaded patch set 4.',2912,'AAAL33///ec='),(107,'2011-03-31 14:36:33','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/291/ : FAILURE',2912,'AAAL33///eM='),(107,'2011-03-31 14:28:51','Patch Set 4: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/291/ ',2912,'AAAL33///eQ='),(107,'2011-03-31 13:38:58','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/290/ : FAILURE',2912,'AAAL33///eU='),(107,'2011-03-31 13:31:20','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/290/ ',2912,'AAAL33///eY='),(107,'2011-03-31 11:36:56','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/285/ : FAILURE',2912,'AAAL33///fA='),(107,'2011-03-31 11:29:11','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/285/ ',2912,'AAAL33///fI='),(46,'2011-03-31 11:29:08','Uploaded patch set 3.',2912,'AAAL33///fY='),(107,'2011-03-30 16:24:32','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/272/ : FAILURE',2912,'AAAL33///k4='),(107,'2011-03-30 16:15:01','Patch Set 2: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/272/ ',2912,'AAAL33///lM='),(46,'2011-03-30 12:52:59','Uploaded patch set 2.',2912,'AAAL33///o8='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:11:59','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/258/ : FAILURE',2912,'AAAL33///oc='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:02:31','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/258/ ',2912,'AAAL33///ok='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:32:49','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/169/ : SUCCESS',2912,'AAAL3n//+j4='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:29:05','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/169/ ',2912,'AAAL3n//+j8='),(107,'2011-04-19 22:38:59','Patch Set 9: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/428/ : UNSTABLE',2912,'AAAL4H///B4='),(107,'2011-04-19 22:29:23','Patch Set 9: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/428/ ',2912,'AAAL4H///B8='),(6,'2011-04-19 15:07:22','Patch Set 8: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nThe label \"Branch...\" in the Git command group should be changed to \"Switch to...\"',2912,'AAAL4H///F4='),(107,'2011-04-19 16:02:50','Patch Set 9: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/418/ : ABORTED',2912,'AAAL4H///Fg='),(107,'2011-04-19 15:47:46','Patch Set 9:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/418/ ',2912,'AAAL4H///Fk='),(6,'2011-04-19 15:47:39','Uploaded patch set 9.',2912,'AAAL4H///Fw='),(6,'2011-04-18 15:26:51','Uploaded patch set 8.',2912,'AAAL4H///Kg='),(107,'2011-04-18 15:37:19','Patch Set 8: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/402/ : UNSTABLE',2912,'AAAL4H///KM='),(107,'2011-04-18 15:26:55','Patch Set 8:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/402/ ',2912,'AAAL4H///KQ='),(4,'2011-04-20 22:57:34','Patch Set 9: Abandoned\n\nreplaced by I6884d6d2f6870f0440a59c29e8416da882e2cf71 to retarget for 0.12',2912,'AAAL4H//+7c='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:32:50','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/170/ ',2913,'AAAL3n//+j0='),(46,'2011-03-24 16:21:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2913,'AAAL3n//+jA='),(46,'2011-03-24 16:21:27','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2913,'AAAL3n//+jE='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:36:35','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/170/ : SUCCESS',2913,'AAAL3n//+jw='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:40:18','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/171/ : SUCCESS',2914,'AAAL3n//+jo='),(46,'2011-03-24 16:20:43','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2914,'AAAL3n//+jQ='),(107,'2011-03-24 15:36:36','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/171/ ',2914,'AAAL3n//+js='),(46,'2011-03-24 16:20:40','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2914,'AAAL3n//+jU='),(46,'2011-03-30 08:53:41','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nObsolete',2915,'AAAL33///p8='),(107,'2011-03-24 17:19:26','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/176/ ',2915,'AAAL3n//+ic='),(107,'2011-03-24 17:23:10','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/176/ : SUCCESS',2915,'AAAL3n//+iY='),(2,'2011-03-29 17:30:09','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2916,'AAAL33///wg='),(2,'2011-03-29 17:30:09','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2916,'AAAL33///wk='),(208,'2011-03-26 00:30:12','Uploaded patch set 4.',2916,'AAAL3n//+ac='),(210,'2011-03-26 08:44:45','Patch Set 4:\n\nUnit tests fail on master. We have only few integration tests, i\'am working on new unit tests using Mockito.',2916,'AAAL3n//+aY='),(208,'2011-03-24 19:14:16','Patch Set 3:\n\nI don\'t think the unit tests pass on master.',2916,'AAAL3n//+iA='),(208,'2011-03-24 19:10:38','Uploaded patch set 3.',2916,'AAAL3n//+iE='),(208,'2011-03-24 19:09:37','Uploaded patch set 2.',2916,'AAAL3n//+iI='),(4,'2011-03-24 18:58:49','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\nI tried running the tests and get some failures, I am not sure if I start the tests correctly. Could you add a section to the contributor guide [1] how to run tests for egit-github ?\n\n[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/EGit/Contributor_Guide#Tests',2916,'AAAL3n//+iM='),(210,'2011-03-26 20:17:02','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nCan connect to github repositories, looks good to me.\nUnit tests fail, but i think some unit (integration) tests are buggy ...',2916,'AAAL3n//+Z0='),(2,'2011-03-24 22:29:52','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2917,'AAAL3n//+hA='),(2,'2011-03-24 22:29:52','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good, thanks.',2917,'AAAL3n//+hE='),(2,'2011-03-24 22:29:31','Uploaded patch set 2.',2917,'AAAL3n//+hI='),(210,'2011-03-28 22:37:05','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2918,'AAAL33///34='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:09:04','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2918,'AAAL33///ik='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:09:04','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThanks Kevin!',2918,'AAAL33///io='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:08:43','Uploaded patch set 4.',2918,'AAAL33///iw='),(2,'2011-03-24 22:32:05','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nCan you rebase and fix the merge conflicts?',2918,'AAAL3n//+g4='),(208,'2011-03-24 23:06:59','Uploaded patch set 3.',2918,'AAAL3n//+gg='),(208,'2011-03-24 20:53:41','Uploaded patch set 2.',2918,'AAAL3n//+hc='),(208,'2011-03-25 17:06:30','Uploaded patch set 3.',2919,'AAAL3n//+c0='),(107,'2011-03-25 17:05:33','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/189/ : SUCCESS',2919,'AAAL3n//+c4='),(107,'2011-03-25 17:01:39','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/189/ ',2919,'AAAL3n//+c8='),(107,'2011-03-25 17:10:14','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/190/ : SUCCESS',2919,'AAAL3n//+ck='),(208,'2011-03-25 17:07:35','Patch Set 3: Restored',2919,'AAAL3n//+co='),(46,'2011-03-25 17:58:24','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2919,'AAAL3n//+cQ='),(208,'2011-03-25 17:06:56','Patch Set 3: Abandoned\n\nDidn\'t fix commit message per feedback',2919,'AAAL3n//+cs='),(46,'2011-03-25 17:58:23','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2919,'AAAL3n//+cU='),(107,'2011-03-25 17:06:33','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/190/ ',2919,'AAAL3n//+cw='),(208,'2011-03-25 17:01:35','Uploaded patch set 2.',2919,'AAAL3n//+dA='),(46,'2011-03-25 11:21:34','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2919,'AAAL3n//+eM='),(46,'2011-03-25 11:20:24','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nThanks a lot for your contribution. You definitely found a bug here... However, I don\'t think this change would fix bug 339986 (if I\'m not mistaken, the stack trace deals with AdditionalRefsNode, not ErrorNode)...\nPlease update the commit message accordingly (see inline comments).',2919,'AAAL3n//+eY='),(107,'2011-03-24 21:13:42','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/178/ : SUCCESS',2919,'AAAL3n//+hU='),(107,'2011-03-24 21:10:02','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/178/ ',2919,'AAAL3n//+hY='),(2,'2011-03-24 22:46:18','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nDon\'t push as this gives us a lot of compiler errors and demonstrates that we need to clean up our code a bit.',2920,'AAAL3n//+gw='),(4,'2011-03-31 23:11:29','Patch Set 2:\n\nI doubt this is really useful, to my experience both the number of tags and remotes isn\'t changing often so what\'s the point in seeing these numbers ? What\'s changing much more often is the number of local branches but I also don\'t see why the number would be important. If certain platforms don\'t show if the node has content or not we should rather file a bug for SWT to fix this.',2921,'AAAL33///Yc='),(107,'2011-03-25 18:23:20','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/195/ ',2921,'AAAL3n//+bc='),(208,'2011-03-25 18:23:16','Uploaded patch set 2.',2921,'AAAL3n//+bg='),(107,'2011-03-25 18:27:07','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/195/ : SUCCESS',2921,'AAAL3n//+bQ='),(208,'2011-03-25 18:24:10','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2921,'AAAL3n//+bU='),(46,'2011-03-25 08:24:29','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nAside from the minor inline remark, I\'d like to challenge the use case: what is the added value for the user of the view to see the number of tags and remotes?\n\nThey already have the \"hasChildren\" indicator next to the respective node, so they can already see whether there are tags or remotes and we should be careful not to clutter the tree with pointless information.',2921,'AAAL3n//+e4='),(107,'2011-03-25 00:17:11','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/181/ ',2921,'AAAL3n//+gc='),(107,'2011-03-25 00:20:57','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/181/ : SUCCESS',2921,'AAAL3n//+gY='),(2,'2011-04-08 18:38:52','Patch Set 2:\n\nI like this change, just it\'s mostly aesthetic.\n\nIt would also be cool to style labels for branches so you\'d get a shorten SHA-1 and message... similar output to \'git branch -v\' but have that styled.',2921,'AAAL4H///wc='),(208,'2011-05-13 00:52:08','Patch Set 2: Abandoned',2921,'AABOI3///5Y='),(49,'2011-05-12 23:04:30','Patch Set 2:\n\nI don\'t think so that this feature could be useful. I just don\'t see any use case for it.',2921,'AABOI3///7Y='),(107,'2011-03-25 02:06:12','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/175/ : SUCCESS',2922,'AAAL3n//+f4='),(5,'2011-03-25 07:51:33','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2922,'AAAL3n//+fU='),(5,'2011-03-25 07:51:22','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2922,'AAAL3n//+fY='),(107,'2011-03-25 02:02:32','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/175/ ',2922,'AAAL3n//+gQ='),(4,'2011-03-28 23:22:07','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2923,'AAAL33///28='),(4,'2011-03-28 23:22:07','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2923,'AAAL33///3A='),(107,'2011-03-28 23:19:39','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/222/ : SUCCESS',2923,'AAAL33///3E='),(107,'2011-03-28 23:15:55','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/222/ ',2923,'AAAL33///3I='),(4,'2011-03-28 23:15:51','Uploaded patch set 2.',2923,'AAAL33///3M='),(107,'2011-03-25 10:08:28','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/186/ : SUCCESS',2923,'AAAL3n//+ec='),(107,'2011-03-25 10:04:43','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/186/ ',2923,'AAAL3n//+eg='),(46,'2011-03-25 11:36:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2924,'AAAL3n//+d8='),(46,'2011-03-25 11:36:28','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2924,'AAAL3n//+eA='),(107,'2011-03-25 11:36:04','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/187/ : SUCCESS',2924,'AAAL3n//+eE='),(107,'2011-03-25 11:32:23','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/187/ ',2924,'AAAL3n//+eI='),(1,'2011-03-27 20:55:54','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nThanks.',2925,'AAAL33////A='),(1,'2011-03-27 20:55:54','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2925,'AAAL33///+8='),(107,'2011-03-25 13:55:02','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/176/ : SUCCESS',2925,'AAAL3n//+d0='),(107,'2011-03-25 13:52:46','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/176/ ',2925,'AAAL3n//+d4='),(107,'2011-03-25 14:05:58','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/177/ : SUCCESS',2925,'AAAL3n//+do='),(107,'2011-03-25 14:03:42','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/177/ ',2925,'AAAL3n//+ds='),(9,'2011-03-25 14:03:39','Uploaded patch set 2.',2925,'AAAL3n//+dw='),(2,'2011-03-30 16:20:37','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2926,'AAAL33///lA='),(2,'2011-03-30 16:20:36','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2926,'AAAL33///lE='),(11,'2011-03-30 15:36:15','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2926,'AAAL33///lg='),(11,'2011-03-30 15:35:05','Uploaded patch set 3.',2926,'AAAL33///lk='),(209,'2011-03-30 14:35:42','Uploaded patch set 2.',2926,'AAAL33///m0='),(11,'2011-03-29 08:27:24','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2926,'AAAL33///z4='),(46,'2011-03-29 06:17:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2927,'AAAL33///0g='),(46,'2011-03-29 06:16:57','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2927,'AAAL33///0k='),(107,'2011-03-28 20:10:48','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/214/ : SUCCESS',2927,'AAAL33///5g='),(107,'2011-03-28 20:06:30','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/214/ ',2927,'AAAL33///5k='),(208,'2011-03-28 17:08:09','Uploaded patch set 2.',2927,'AAAL33///5s='),(46,'2011-03-28 14:34:08','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nVery good idea. See inline remark, though.',2927,'AAAL33///7Y='),(100,'2011-03-28 08:15:15','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nGood idea!',2927,'AAAL33///8g='),(107,'2011-03-25 17:44:53','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/191/ : SUCCESS',2927,'AAAL3n//+cc='),(107,'2011-03-25 17:41:07','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/191/ ',2927,'AAAL3n//+cg='),(79,'2011-03-31 20:54:01','Patch Set 1: (13 inline comments)\n\nIt\'s much better than before, good work. I added some comments.',2928,'AAAL33///ac='),(79,'2011-04-04 07:35:59','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2928,'AAAL33///J4='),(107,'2011-04-04 07:02:36','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/329/ : SUCCESS',2928,'AAAL33///KI='),(107,'2011-04-04 06:53:47','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/329/ ',2928,'AAAL33///KM='),(46,'2011-04-04 06:53:43','Uploaded patch set 5.',2928,'AAAL33///KQ='),(79,'2011-04-03 16:47:54','Patch Set 4: (2 inline comments)\n\nSorry to nag, still some comments.',2928,'AAAL33///Mw='),(46,'2011-04-01 09:21:56','Uploaded patch set 4.',2928,'AAAL33///Wc='),(107,'2011-04-01 10:32:23','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/314/ : SUCCESS',2928,'AAAL33///WI='),(79,'2011-04-01 09:13:08','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\nTrying again, please see the inline reply here.',2928,'AAAL33///Wk='),(107,'2011-04-01 10:23:34','Patch Set 4: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/314/ ',2928,'AAAL33///WM='),(79,'2011-04-01 09:12:24','Patch Set 3:\n\nPlease see inline reply.',2928,'AAAL33///Wo='),(107,'2011-04-01 09:30:11','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/313/ : FAILURE',2928,'AAAL33///WQ='),(46,'2011-04-01 09:22:35','Patch Set 4:\n\nOk, I\'m giving up on the capitalization.',2928,'AAAL33///WU='),(107,'2011-04-01 09:21:59','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/313/ ',2928,'AAAL33///WY='),(107,'2011-04-01 07:25:07','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/306/ : FAILURE',2928,'AAAL33///X0='),(46,'2011-04-01 07:17:16','Patch Set 3:\n\nRebased to current master.',2928,'AAAL33///X4='),(107,'2011-04-01 07:16:56','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/306/ ',2928,'AAAL33///X8='),(107,'2011-04-01 07:34:54','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/307/ : SUCCESS',2928,'AAAL33///Xs='),(107,'2011-04-01 07:26:12','Patch Set 3: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/307/ ',2928,'AAAL33///Xw='),(46,'2011-04-01 07:16:52','Uploaded patch set 3.',2928,'AAAL33///YA='),(107,'2011-04-01 07:10:11','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/305/ : SUCCESS',2928,'AAAL33///YE='),(46,'2011-04-01 07:00:24','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\nAll comments done with two small exceptions (see inline comments).',2928,'AAAL33///YI='),(107,'2011-04-01 06:59:37','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/305/ ',2928,'AAAL33///YM='),(46,'2011-04-01 06:59:34','Uploaded patch set 2.',2928,'AAAL33///YQ='),(107,'2011-03-25 18:00:02','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/192/ : SUCCESS',2928,'AAAL3n//+cM='),(107,'2011-03-25 17:56:19','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/192/ ',2928,'AAAL3n//+cY='),(107,'2011-04-05 20:12:29','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/341/ ',2928,'AAAL4H////A='),(2,'2011-04-05 19:53:17','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2928,'AAAL4H////E='),(2,'2011-04-05 19:53:16','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThe failure is due to sync tests, good otherwise.',2928,'AAAL4H////I='),(107,'2011-04-05 19:50:12','Patch Set 6: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/340/ : FAILURE',2928,'AAAL4H////M='),(107,'2011-04-05 19:42:00','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/340/ ',2928,'AAAL4H////Q='),(2,'2011-04-05 19:41:56','Uploaded patch set 6.',2928,'AAAL4H////U='),(107,'2011-04-05 20:18:07','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/342/ ',2928,'AAAL4H///+0='),(107,'2011-04-05 20:16:19','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/341/ : FAILURE',2928,'AAAL4H///+4='),(107,'2011-04-05 20:58:51','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/344/ : UNSTABLE',2928,'AAAL4H///+g='),(107,'2011-04-05 20:49:43','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/344/ ',2928,'AAAL4H///+k='),(107,'2011-04-05 20:41:23','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/343/ : FAILURE',2928,'AAAL4H///+o='),(107,'2011-04-05 20:32:31','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/343/ ',2928,'AAAL4H///+s='),(107,'2011-04-05 20:27:05','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/342/ : FAILURE',2928,'AAAL4H///+w='),(209,'2011-03-27 00:46:58','Patch Set 1:\n\nWhen installing from the update site generated by Tycho (both locally and from Hudson), after restarting, the connector did not load properly: I could not create a new task repository and there were errors in the log. I checked the generated core Jar and it was basically empty (it contained just the META-INF folder I believe). Adding the dot fixed the issue for me.',2929,'AAAL33////4='),(210,'2011-03-26 21:51:04','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nHi Fabian, i cannot reproduce you problem. Is the dot really the problem?',2929,'AAAL33////8='),(210,'2011-03-27 20:36:29','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nHi Fabian, ok i am reproducing the problem now ... Perhaps a Tycho problem?',2929,'AAAL33////c='),(209,'2011-03-27 21:19:53','Patch Set 1:\n\nI think the dot is a standard entry in build.properties files and was simply missing.',2929,'AAAL33///+o='),(210,'2011-03-28 10:20:49','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2929,'AAAL33///8Y='),(2,'2011-03-30 21:16:44','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2929,'AAAL33///j4='),(2,'2011-03-30 21:16:44','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good, thanks.',2929,'AAAL33///j8='),(11,'2011-03-30 16:21:36','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2929,'AAAL33///k8='),(2,'2011-03-30 21:16:20','Uploaded patch set 2.',2929,'AAAL33///kA='),(NULL,'2011-03-30 21:13:47','Change cannot be merged due to unsatisfiable dependencies.\n\nThe following dependency errors were found:\n\n* Depends on patch set 1 of If47fbd5d, however the current patch set is 3.\n\nPlease rebase the change and upload a replacement commit.',2929,'AAAL33///kE='),(2,'2011-03-30 21:13:47','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2929,'AAAL33///kI='),(11,'2011-03-30 16:07:47','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nBefore this change I have a lot of exceptions:\n\n    Plug-in org.eclipse.mylyn.github.ui was unable to load class org.eclipse.mylyn.github.internal.GitHubRepositoryConnector.\n    ...\n    Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.mylyn.github.internal.GitHubRepositoryConnector\n    ...\n    !MESSAGE Plug-in org.eclipse.mylyn.github.ui was unable to load class org.eclipse.mylyn.github.internal.GitHubRepositoryConnector.\n    !STACK 0\n    java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.mylyn.github.internal.GitHubRepositoryConnector\n\nIn general +1 but after a second \'bin.includes\' removed, see comment inline.',2929,'AAAL33///lQ='),(2,'2011-03-30 21:07:31','Uploaded patch set 3.',2930,'AAAL33///kg='),(11,'2011-03-30 19:28:26','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n- rebase onto current master;\n- fix whitespace error\n- make site\'s artifactId consistent with other modules',2930,'AAAL33///kk='),(2,'2011-03-30 21:13:25','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2930,'AAAL33///kM='),(11,'2011-03-30 19:22:42','Uploaded patch set 2.',2930,'AAAL33///ko='),(2,'2011-03-30 21:13:25','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good, thanks guys.',2930,'AAAL33///kQ='),(2,'2011-03-30 21:13:10','Uploaded patch set 5.',2930,'AAAL33///kU='),(2,'2011-03-30 21:12:55','Uploaded patch set 4.',2930,'AAAL33///kY='),(11,'2011-04-01 11:56:31','Patch Set 5:\n\nHudson is unable to provide generated update site since this change.\n\nHudson expects it under org.eclipse.mylyn.github-site/target/org.eclipse.mylyn.github-updatesite-0.1.0-SNAPSHOT-site.zip (see https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/egit-github/8/console) but it has been moved to org.eclipse.mylyn.github-site/target/github-updatesite.zip (see https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/egit-github/9/console).',2930,'AAAL33///V8='),(2,'2011-04-01 13:07:01','Patch Set 5:\n\nFixed... was a hudson configuration issue\n\nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/egit-github/10/',2930,'AAAL33///VQ='),(46,'2011-03-28 14:41:54','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2931,'AAAL33///7Q='),(46,'2011-03-28 14:41:53','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2931,'AAAL33///7U='),(100,'2011-03-28 07:56:50','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nLooks better!',2931,'AAAL33///8k='),(107,'2011-03-25 20:32:10','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/197/ : SUCCESS',2931,'AAAL3n//+a8='),(107,'2011-03-25 20:27:59','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/197/ ',2931,'AAAL3n//+bA='),(107,'2011-03-25 20:27:58','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/196/ : SUCCESS',2931,'AAAL3n//+bE='),(208,'2011-03-25 20:25:10','Uploaded patch set 2.',2931,'AAAL3n//+bI='),(107,'2011-03-25 20:24:13','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/196/ ',2931,'AAAL3n//+bM='),(208,'2011-03-25 20:35:10','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nIncorrectly pushed',2932,'AAAL3n//+a0='),(107,'2011-03-25 20:33:27','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/198/ ',2932,'AAAL3n//+a4='),(107,'2011-03-25 20:37:10','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/198/ : SUCCESS',2932,'AAAL3n//+aw='),(210,'2011-03-28 21:37:43','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nGithub task repository appears in \"Bugs\" category now.',2933,'AAAL33///5c='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:06:11','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2933,'AAAL33///i4='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:06:11','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nFixed, thanks!',2933,'AAAL33///i8='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:06:01','Uploaded patch set 2.',2933,'AAAL33///jA='),(NULL,'2011-03-30 22:05:12','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2933,'AAAL33///jM='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:05:12','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good, thanks Kevin!',2933,'AAAL33///jQ='),(210,'2011-03-29 19:35:39','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nsee also http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,2966',2934,'AAAL33///vk='),(208,'2011-03-25 22:26:29','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nI would wait on this until:\n\nhttp://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,2916\n\nAs that is a more important change since the current\ncode uses a deprecated auth mechanism.',2934,'AAAL3n//+ag='),(210,'2011-03-26 16:49:25','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nHi Kevin, OK i think that your commit is more important. I think also about making GitHubService only dependent from commons-logging and commons-httpclient, so it can be used also on a non-Eclipse context. I could become a \"Java API\" for GitHub Issues API ... What do you think about this?',2934,'AAAL3n//+aU='),(107,'2011-03-28 22:10:25','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/217/ : SUCCESS',2935,'AAAL33///4g='),(107,'2011-03-28 22:06:41','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/217/ ',2935,'AAAL33///4o='),(79,'2011-03-28 22:06:38','Uploaded patch set 2.',2935,'AAAL33///4w='),(107,'2011-03-30 22:09:02','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/273/ : FAILURE',2935,'AAAL33///is='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:00:21','Uploaded patch set 3.',2935,'AAAL33///j0='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:00:56','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2935,'AAAL33///jo='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:00:55','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2935,'AAAL33///js='),(107,'2011-03-30 22:00:24','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/273/ ',2935,'AAAL33///jw='),(4,'2011-03-30 13:18:18','Patch Set 2:\n\nthis is bug 338603',2935,'AAAL33///oE='),(2,'2011-03-29 17:33:32','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nWe have a bug open for this somewhere too, need to find it.',2935,'AAAL33///wY='),(107,'2011-03-26 19:35:34','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/200/ : SUCCESS',2935,'AAAL3n//+aI='),(107,'2011-03-26 19:31:29','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/200/ ',2935,'AAAL3n//+aQ='),(11,'2011-03-27 11:17:19','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nA project reference string in the project set file should support versioning of the reference\'s format like:\n\n    git://egit.eclipse.org/egit.git|1.0|master|org.eclipse.egit',2936,'AAAL33////0='),(11,'2011-03-27 11:34:33','Patch Set 1:\n\nBTW, I8a370b829e8ab6a964552e1ffe79abc856e2714d fixes failed build on Hudson.',2936,'AAAL33////o='),(11,'2011-03-29 07:54:30','Patch Set 2: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2936,'AAAL33///0M='),(103,'2011-03-29 07:32:34','Patch Set 2: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2936,'AAAL33///0U='),(107,'2011-03-28 22:10:25','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/218/ ',2936,'AAAL33///4c='),(79,'2011-03-28 22:09:21','Patch Set 2:\n\nMykola: I squashed your change about the pom into this one, so that we can have a clean build here, I hope that\'s ok.\n\nAlso added a version string at the front of the reference string (as CVS and SVN do).',2936,'AAAL33///4k='),(107,'2011-03-28 22:14:12','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/218/ : SUCCESS',2936,'AAAL33///4Q='),(79,'2011-03-28 22:06:38','Uploaded patch set 2.',2936,'AAAL33///4s='),(79,'2011-03-28 22:13:50','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2936,'AAAL33///4U='),(107,'2011-03-31 16:10:58','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/295/ : FAILURE',2936,'AAAL33///cg='),(79,'2011-03-31 16:09:08','Patch Set 3:\n\nGuys, I need some help here with the clone destination directory.\n\nThe problem is this: GitProjectSetCapability is in core (not ui), because it is configured in GitProviderType, which in turn is configured in the \"org.eclipse.team.core.repository\" extension point in core/plugin.xml.\n\nSo showing a dialog is not possible from GitProjectSetCapability, right?\n\nOk, so maybe we can just use the \"default_repository_dir\" preference? The problem with this is that this preference is also in ui. Can we move it to core? I don\'t know, it\'s used in GitPreferenceRoot via the preference store.',2936,'AAAL33///ck='),(107,'2011-03-31 16:02:15','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/295/ ',2936,'AAAL33///co='),(79,'2011-03-31 16:02:12','Uploaded patch set 3.',2936,'AAAL33///cs='),(79,'2011-04-03 19:24:31','Uploaded patch set 4.',2936,'AAAL33///Mc='),(107,'2011-04-03 19:33:03','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/324/ : FAILURE',2936,'AAAL33///MQ='),(79,'2011-04-03 19:25:34','Patch Set 4:\n\nChanges:\n- Fixed some TODOs\n- Internationalized messages',2936,'AAAL33///MU='),(107,'2011-04-03 19:24:35','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/324/ ',2936,'AAAL33///MY='),(79,'2011-03-29 20:23:10','Patch Set 2: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2936,'AAAL33///vI='),(107,'2011-03-26 19:36:07','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/201/ : FAILURE',2936,'AAAL3n//+aA='),(107,'2011-03-26 19:35:35','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/201/ ',2936,'AAAL3n//+aE='),(79,'2011-03-26 19:35:06','Patch Set 1:\n\nThere are some TODOs in the code where I need some advise and I don\'t know if the org.eclipse.egit.psf-feature works like this.',2936,'AAAL3n//+aM='),(103,'2011-03-26 19:40:39','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2936,'AAAL3n//+Z4='),(107,'2011-04-11 19:54:17','Patch Set 5: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/367/ : UNSTABLE',2936,'AAAL4H///k8='),(107,'2011-04-12 12:22:43','Patch Set 6: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/368/ : UNSTABLE',2936,'AAAL4H///kk='),(107,'2011-04-12 12:12:36','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/368/ ',2936,'AAAL4H///ko='),(79,'2011-04-12 12:12:33','Uploaded patch set 6.',2936,'AAAL4H///ks='),(107,'2011-04-11 19:41:11','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/367/ ',2936,'AAAL4H///lA='),(79,'2011-04-11 19:41:07','Uploaded patch set 5.',2936,'AAAL4H///lE='),(4,'2011-04-15 15:30:28','Patch Set 7: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(6 inline comments)\n\nNice work :-)\n\nI think the clone should go to the default source folder instead of the workspace. Also see the discussion thread [1].\n\n[1] http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/egit-dev/msg02002.html',2936,'AAAL4H///N8='),(79,'2011-04-15 20:07:11','Patch Set 7: (6 inline comments)\n\nThanks for the review, Matthias!',2936,'AAAL4H///NM='),(79,'2011-04-14 20:18:45','Uploaded patch set 7.',2936,'AAAL4H///T0='),(79,'2011-04-14 20:34:19','Patch Set 7:\n\n- Add the repository to the Repositories View (thanks Manuel)\n- Change separator from \"|\" to \",\" (same as CVS and Subclipse)',2936,'AAAL4H///Tg='),(107,'2011-04-14 20:30:45','Patch Set 7: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/387/ : SUCCESS',2936,'AAAL4H///Tk='),(107,'2011-04-14 20:18:49','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/387/ ',2936,'AAAL4H///Tw='),(103,'2011-04-14 15:06:52','Patch Set 6:\n\nI just did a quick try, and the cloned repository wasn\'t added to the view. I will try it another time, when i\'m at home, my business notebook is not the best one.',2936,'AAAL4H///Wc='),(79,'2011-04-14 14:55:30','Patch Set 6:\n\n1. Hm, they\'re not? They should be, will have a look later.\n2. That can be a problem, depending on the URLs used. Unfortunately, we can\'t add custom UI to the import/export process.',2936,'AAAL4H///XQ='),(103,'2011-04-14 14:08:00','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nI have 2 points:\n\n- It would be nice if the cloned repository were added to the Repositories View automatically\n- Choosing a different username for the clone operation would also be nice. If i export a Team project set, all repository urls contain my username for the repositories (since we have no anonymous access). So everybody have to edit the psf-file manually and add their usernames.',2936,'AAAL4H///Yg='),(79,'2011-04-20 12:54:34','Patch Set 7: (1 inline comment)\n\nPlease see inline reply.',2936,'AAAL4H//++g='),(4,'2011-04-20 11:50:53','Patch Set 7: (3 inline comments)\n\n',2936,'AAAL4H//++o='),(103,'2011-06-21 12:00:44','Patch Set 12:\n\nThat\'s no problem. If it would be discarded, then i would have to write something own, now i just used it to spare my efforts (and to bring my other features into a runnable state).',2936,'AABOAH///+I='),(11,'2011-06-21 11:49:53','Patch Set 12:\n\nManuel, I\'m not sure you can rely on ProjectReference right now as this feature is sill WIP.',2936,'AABOAH///+M='),(103,'2011-06-21 11:28:37','Patch Set 12:\n\nCan you extract ProjectReference as separate class? I would need this for my work (or should i push a new patchset with my suggestions)?',2936,'AABOAH///+Q='),(4,'2011-08-02 14:45:41','Patch Set 14: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; Build Successful; Unclean IP, do not check in\n\nsubmitted CQ 5438 for IP review',2936,'AABOAn///6o='),(4,'2011-08-02 14:44:21','Uploaded patch set 14.',2936,'AABOAn///6s='),(79,'2011-08-02 11:08:04','Patch Set 13:\n\nRebased and confirmed to work in Helios here.\n\nProbably the problem was that in 97fa14744a9d9ad8983975d09d9a44fdb04946ab, org.eclipse.egit.core.internal.GitRepositoryProviderType was added in org.eclipse.egit.core/plugin.xml. In earlier patches on this change, it the class was org.eclipse.egit.core.GitProviderType.',2936,'AABOAn///7E='),(4,'2011-08-01 22:56:30','Patch Set 12: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nI tried rebasing this to current master but then project set export doesn\'t work anymore, it\'s then always exporting (using Indigo workbench) :\n\n<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?>\n<psf version=\"2.0\">\n<provider id=\"org.eclipse.egit.core.GitProvider\"/>\n</psf>\n\nwithout rebasing it works fine. I couldn\'t spot the reason. Could you rebase and fix this problem then I will start IP review to get this change approved and will accept it. The remaining issues you listed in bug 296082 can be done in subsequent changes.',2936,'AABOAn///7g='),(79,'2011-08-02 11:03:38','Uploaded patch set 13.',2936,'AABOAn///7I='),(79,'2011-08-16 15:54:36','Patch Set 16:\n\nI dadn\'t yet seen the FindBugs warnings. I\'ll fix these in a subsequent change.',2936,'AABOAn///K8='),(4,'2011-08-16 16:06:31','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2936,'AABOAn///Kk='),(4,'2011-08-16 16:06:30','Patch Set 16: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nCQ 5438 was approved',2936,'AABOAn///Ko='),(107,'2011-08-16 16:04:48','Patch Set 16: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1444/ : SUCCESS',2936,'AABOAn///Ks='),(107,'2011-08-16 15:54:28','Patch Set 16: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1444/ ',2936,'AABOAn///LA='),(4,'2011-08-16 15:37:25','Patch Set 15: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2936,'AABOAn///Lc='),(107,'2011-08-16 15:36:47','Patch Set 16:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1443/ ',2936,'AABOAn///Lk='),(4,'2011-08-16 15:36:43','Uploaded patch set 16.',2936,'AABOAn///Lo='),(4,'2011-08-16 15:36:24','Patch Set 15: (1 inline comment)\n\nwill upload a fix for this minor issue in a minute',2936,'AABOAn///Ls='),(107,'2011-08-16 15:44:31','Patch Set 16: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1443/ : UNSTABLE',2936,'AABOAn///LY='),(4,'2011-08-09 20:38:56','Patch Set 15:\n\nI pushed change I65d7607528e29330144fcef0e9b7ec23ea1b4787 for review to fix the other license files.\n\nI filed bug 354300 to track that we should delete the psf-feature when our minimum requirement becomes 3.7',2936,'AABOAn///og='),(4,'2011-08-09 13:39:48','Patch Set 15: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; Build Successful; Unclean IP, do not check in\n\nupdated org.eclipse.egit.psf-feature/epl-v10.html as requested by Gunnar to not include proprietary bits\n\nalso updated CQ 5438',2936,'AABOAn///p0='),(107,'2011-08-09 13:38:32','Patch Set 15:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1386/ ',2936,'AABOAn///p4='),(4,'2011-08-09 13:38:27','Uploaded patch set 15.',2936,'AABOAn///p8='),(79,'2011-08-09 15:06:35','Patch Set 15:\n\nBy the way, epl-v10.html was copied from another feature (don\'t know if egit or egit.mylyn), so they also should be cleaned up.\n\nAnother thought: Should we somewhere document/add a TODO that we can delete the psf-feature as soon as Eclipse 3.7 is our minimal requirement?',2936,'AABOAn///pk='),(107,'2011-08-09 13:44:41','Patch Set 15: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1386/ : SUCCESS',2936,'AABOAn///pw='),(107,'2011-04-29 17:24:37','Patch Set 8:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/569/ ',2936,'AABOIn///+c='),(107,'2011-04-29 17:31:49','Patch Set 8: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/569/ : UNSTABLE',2936,'AABOIn///+Q='),(79,'2011-04-29 17:16:32','Patch Set 8:\n\n- Fixed style nits\n- Add Incubation to feature name\n- Add psf feature to update site (category)',2936,'AABOIn///+s='),(79,'2011-04-29 17:14:55','Uploaded patch set 8.',2936,'AABOIn///+w='),(4,'2011-05-03 22:31:01','Patch Set 11: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n- rebased\n- fixed versions to match next planned release (1.0.0)\n\nwe still need to find a solution how to share preference for timeout',2936,'AABOIn///ss='),(107,'2011-05-03 22:24:51','Patch Set 11: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/605/ : UNSTABLE',2936,'AABOIn///tE='),(107,'2011-05-03 22:17:41','Patch Set 11:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/605/ ',2936,'AABOIn///tI='),(107,'2011-05-03 22:03:07','Patch Set 9: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/602/ : FAILURE',2936,'AABOIn///tk='),(4,'2011-05-03 22:17:36','Uploaded patch set 11.',2936,'AABOIn///tM='),(107,'2011-05-03 22:02:23','Patch Set 9: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/602/ ',2936,'AABOIn///to='),(107,'2011-05-03 22:08:51','Patch Set 10: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/604/ : FAILURE',2936,'AABOIn///tQ='),(107,'2011-05-03 22:08:34','Patch Set 10:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/604/ ',2936,'AABOIn///tU='),(4,'2011-05-03 22:08:30','Uploaded patch set 10.',2936,'AABOIn///tY='),(107,'2011-05-03 09:25:44','Patch Set 9: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/595/ : FAILURE',2936,'AABOIn///y4='),(79,'2011-05-03 09:25:14','Patch Set 9:\n\n- Use LinkedHashMap to get the same order the projects are listed in the file instead of a random order.',2936,'AABOIn///y8='),(107,'2011-05-03 09:23:55','Patch Set 9:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/595/ ',2936,'AABOIn///zA='),(79,'2011-05-03 09:23:51','Uploaded patch set 9.',2936,'AABOIn///zE='),(107,'2011-06-14 11:21:48','Patch Set 12:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1044/ ',2936,'AABOKH///k0='),(79,'2011-06-14 11:21:44','Uploaded patch set 12.',2936,'AABOKH///k4='),(79,'2011-06-14 11:41:55','Patch Set 12:\n\n- Update versions to 1.1\n- Update to eclipse.org\'s latest SUA\n- Remove incubation from name\n- Add epl-v10.html',2936,'AABOKH///kc='),(107,'2011-06-14 11:29:28','Patch Set 12: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/1044/ : SUCCESS',2936,'AABOKH///kw='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:04:15','Uploaded patch set 2.',2937,'AAAL33///jc='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:04:26','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2937,'AAAL33///jU='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:04:26','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good, thanks Christian!',2937,'AAAL33///jY='),(107,'2011-03-27 11:28:04','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/202/ : SUCCESS',2938,'AAAL33////s='),(107,'2011-03-27 11:24:14','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/202/ ',2938,'AAAL33////w='),(11,'2011-03-29 20:59:10','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nIncluded in I1500cc37',2938,'AAAL33///vA='),(107,'2011-03-27 18:50:54','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/178/ : SUCCESS',2939,'AAAL33////g='),(107,'2011-03-27 18:48:34','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/178/ ',2939,'AAAL33////k='),(1,'2011-03-27 20:45:14','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nMinor nits, the fix looks correct.',2939,'AAAL33////U='),(107,'2011-03-27 21:49:57','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/179/ : SUCCESS',2939,'AAAL33///+A='),(107,'2011-03-27 21:47:37','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/179/ ',2939,'AAAL33///+E='),(8,'2011-03-27 21:47:33','Uploaded patch set 2.',2939,'AAAL33///+I='),(107,'2011-03-28 05:45:07','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/182/ : SUCCESS',2939,'AAAL33///88='),(107,'2011-03-28 05:42:50','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/182/ ',2939,'AAAL33///9A='),(8,'2011-03-28 05:42:47','Uploaded patch set 3.',2939,'AAAL33///9M='),(1,'2011-03-27 22:39:20','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2939,'AAAL33///9U='),(1,'2011-04-01 19:05:34','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2939,'AAAL33///UM='),(1,'2011-04-01 19:05:33','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2939,'AAAL33///UQ='),(8,'2011-04-01 08:13:40','Patch Set 2: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2939,'AAAL33///XU='),(107,'2011-03-27 21:37:56','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/203/ : SUCCESS',2940,'AAAL33///+c='),(49,'2011-03-27 21:35:47','Patch Set 1:\n\nI\'m not sure does this is the proper way of implementing dynamic contribution into popupMenus extension point ... but it seams to work ;)',2940,'AAAL33///+g='),(107,'2011-03-27 21:34:08','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/203/ ',2940,'AAAL33///+k='),(107,'2011-03-27 21:43:29','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/204/ : SUCCESS',2940,'AAAL33///+M='),(49,'2011-03-27 21:40:23','Patch Set 2:\n\nUpdated formatting in plugin.xml file.',2940,'AAAL33///+Q='),(107,'2011-03-27 21:39:48','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/204/ ',2940,'AAAL33///+U='),(49,'2011-03-27 21:39:45','Uploaded patch set 2.',2940,'AAAL33///+Y='),(107,'2011-03-29 00:56:47','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/224/ : SUCCESS',2940,'AAAL33///2k='),(49,'2011-03-29 00:53:40','Patch Set 3:\n\nThank you Mathias for hint! ;)\n\nRebased.',2940,'AAAL33///2o='),(107,'2011-03-29 00:53:06','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/224/ ',2940,'AAAL33///2s='),(49,'2011-03-29 00:53:02','Uploaded patch set 3.',2940,'AAAL33///2w='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:17:49','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nVery good initiative. However, I see an issue with storing the repository state in the project node persistently.\n\nFortunately enough, there is no need for doing so. We now build our own \"Team\" menu using the org.eclipse.ui.menus contribution. It should be easy enough to add the actions there (in the plugin.xml go to org.eclipse.ui.menus->popup:org.eclipse.ui.popoup.any?...->T&eam. Look at the \"R&emote\" node to see how to add commands there).\n\nIt\'s also better in the long run not to rely on the org.eclipse.ui.popupMenus extension....',2940,'AAAL33///7M='),(46,'2011-03-31 09:26:10','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2940,'AAAL33///f8='),(46,'2011-03-31 08:05:35','Uploaded patch set 7.',2940,'AAAL33///g0='),(46,'2011-03-31 09:26:10','Patch Set 8: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nThanks a lot Dariusz.',2940,'AAAL33///gA='),(107,'2011-03-31 08:39:44','Patch Set 7: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/281/ : FAILURE',2940,'AAAL33///gc='),(107,'2011-03-31 09:16:09','Patch Set 8: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/283/ : SUCCESS',2940,'AAAL33///gE='),(107,'2011-03-31 08:29:23','Patch Set 7: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/281/ ',2940,'AAAL33///gg='),(46,'2011-03-31 09:07:07','Patch Set 8:\n\nRebased to current master and fixed a problem with the HistoryView UI tests.',2940,'AAAL33///gI='),(107,'2011-03-31 08:27:30','Patch Set 7: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/280/ : FAILURE',2940,'AAAL33///gk='),(107,'2011-03-31 09:06:17','Patch Set 8:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/283/ ',2940,'AAAL33///gM='),(107,'2011-03-31 08:16:58','Patch Set 7: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/280/ ',2940,'AAAL33///go='),(46,'2011-03-31 09:06:13','Uploaded patch set 8.',2940,'AAAL33///gQ='),(107,'2011-03-31 08:16:28','Patch Set 7: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/279/ : FAILURE',2940,'AAAL33///gs='),(107,'2011-03-31 08:52:43','Patch Set 7: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/282/ : FAILURE',2940,'AAAL33///gU='),(107,'2011-03-31 08:05:39','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/279/ ',2940,'AAAL33///gw='),(107,'2011-03-31 08:42:21','Patch Set 7: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/282/ ',2940,'AAAL33///gY='),(49,'2011-03-30 18:27:57','Patch Set 6: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2940,'AAAL33///ks='),(46,'2011-03-30 05:59:54','Patch Set 6: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nHopefully the last one... We should also cleanup the menu labels (I found some issue with the one used in the Repositories View), but don\'t worry about this right now.',2940,'AAAL33///rk='),(107,'2011-03-29 19:13:42','Patch Set 6: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/230/ : SUCCESS',2940,'AAAL33///v4='),(49,'2011-03-29 19:10:14','Patch Set 5: (4 inline comments)\n\n',2940,'AAAL33///v8='),(107,'2011-03-29 19:09:53','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/230/ ',2940,'AAAL33///wA='),(49,'2011-03-29 19:09:49','Uploaded patch set 6.',2940,'AAAL33///wE='),(46,'2011-03-29 15:00:46','Patch Set 4:\n\nOh, and I think I\'d move the getRef method there, too.',2940,'AAAL33///x4='),(107,'2011-03-29 15:11:13','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/229/ : SUCCESS',2940,'AAAL33///xg='),(46,'2011-03-29 15:25:04','Patch Set 5: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(4 inline comments)\n\n',2940,'AAAL33///xQ='),(107,'2011-03-29 15:07:11','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/229/ ',2940,'AAAL33///xs='),(49,'2011-03-29 15:07:07','Uploaded patch set 5.',2940,'AAAL33///xw='),(46,'2011-03-29 14:59:54','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nYes, almost there: if you let AbstractRebaseComandHandler extend from AbstratSharedCommandHandler, we can save some more coding...',2940,'AAAL33///yA='),(107,'2011-03-29 14:52:23','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/227/ : SUCCESS',2940,'AAAL33///yI='),(49,'2011-03-29 14:49:11','Patch Set 4:\n\nRebased, also I\'ve considered Mathias suggestions.',2940,'AAAL33///yM='),(107,'2011-03-29 14:48:14','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/227/ ',2940,'AAAL33///yU='),(49,'2011-03-29 14:48:11','Uploaded patch set 4.',2940,'AAAL33///yY='),(46,'2011-03-29 13:34:21','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nMuch better. However, there is  a ClassCastException now (see my inline comment).\n\nIn addition, you might want to move the command implementations from the repository.tree package into the commands.shared package (and also use the abstract handler class there). I introduced this package to hold all command implementations that are not specific for the RepoView or Team context menu; feel free to add a \"getRef()\" method to the abstract class for later re-use.',2940,'AAAL33///zE='),(107,'2011-03-28 05:47:24','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/183/ : SUCCESS',2941,'AAAL33///80='),(107,'2011-03-28 05:45:08','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/183/ ',2941,'AAAL33///84='),(107,'2011-03-27 22:03:16','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/180/ : SUCCESS',2941,'AAAL33///90='),(107,'2011-03-27 21:59:36','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/180/ ',2941,'AAAL33///98='),(NULL,'2011-03-27 22:38:08','Change could not be merged because of a missing dependency.\n\nThe following changes must also be submitted:\n\n* I5a58ee45c2d2ae5322f87fd6972526169b2918c8\n',2941,'AAAL33///9c='),(5,'2011-03-27 22:23:08','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2941,'AAAL33///9g='),(8,'2011-03-28 05:42:47','Uploaded patch set 2.',2941,'AAAL33///9I='),(1,'2011-04-01 19:20:38','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2941,'AAAL33///T8='),(1,'2011-04-01 19:20:37','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2941,'AAAL33///UE='),(107,'2011-03-28 05:49:37','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/184/ : SUCCESS',2942,'AAAL33///8s='),(107,'2011-03-28 05:47:26','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/184/ ',2942,'AAAL33///8w='),(8,'2011-03-28 05:42:48','Uploaded patch set 2.',2942,'AAAL33///9E='),(5,'2011-03-27 22:22:47','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2942,'AAAL33///9k='),(107,'2011-03-27 22:06:26','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/181/ : SUCCESS',2942,'AAAL33///9o='),(1,'2011-03-27 22:40:25','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved\n\n',2942,'AAAL33///9Q='),(107,'2011-03-27 22:03:17','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/181/ ',2942,'AAAL33///9w='),(1,'2011-04-01 19:20:37','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2942,'AAAL33///UA='),(1,'2011-04-01 19:20:27','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2942,'AAAL33///UI='),(107,'2011-03-27 21:59:57','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/205/ ',2943,'AAAL33///94='),(107,'2011-03-27 22:05:32','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/205/ : SUCCESS',2943,'AAAL33///9s='),(107,'2011-04-03 23:03:02','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/326/ : SUCCESS',2943,'AAAL33///Lc='),(4,'2011-04-03 22:54:48','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2943,'AAAL33///Lk='),(4,'2011-04-03 22:54:48','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2943,'AAAL33///Lo='),(107,'2011-04-03 22:54:22','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/326/ ',2943,'AAAL33///Ls='),(4,'2011-04-03 22:54:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',2943,'AAAL33///Lw='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:56:42','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2944,'AAAL33///6A='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:56:41','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2944,'AAAL33///6E='),(107,'2011-03-28 13:08:03','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/206/ : SUCCESS',2944,'AAAL33///8Q='),(107,'2011-03-28 13:04:12','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/206/ ',2944,'AAAL33///8U='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:29:20','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2945,'AAAL33///64='),(107,'2011-03-28 15:36:07','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/210/ : SUCCESS',2945,'AAAL33///6o='),(107,'2011-03-28 15:32:23','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/210/ ',2945,'AAAL33///6s='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:54:45','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2945,'AAAL33///6Y='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:28:31','Uploaded patch set 2.',2945,'AAAL33///7A='),(107,'2011-03-28 13:16:20','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/207/ : SUCCESS',2945,'AAAL33///8I='),(107,'2011-03-28 13:12:40','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/207/ ',2945,'AAAL33///8M='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:29:42','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2946,'AAAL33///60='),(107,'2011-03-28 15:28:34','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/209/ ',2946,'AAAL33///68='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:54:54','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2946,'AAAL33///6U='),(107,'2011-03-28 15:32:22','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/209/ : SUCCESS',2946,'AAAL33///6w='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:28:31','Uploaded patch set 2.',2946,'AAAL33///7E='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:24:50','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2946,'AAAL33///7I='),(107,'2011-03-28 13:30:48','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/208/ : SUCCESS',2946,'AAAL33///8A='),(107,'2011-03-28 13:27:04','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/208/ ',2946,'AAAL33///8E='),(107,'2011-03-28 13:54:41','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/185/ : SUCCESS',2947,'AAAL33///74='),(107,'2011-03-28 13:52:23','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/185/ ',2947,'AAAL33///78='),(1,'2011-03-28 14:15:42','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2947,'AAAL33///7k='),(5,'2011-03-29 14:35:48','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2947,'AAAL33///yk='),(1,'2011-03-29 14:04:40','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2947,'AAAL33///ys='),(5,'2011-03-29 11:00:18','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nabandoned because the same functionality can be reached by\nGit.init().setDirectory(...).call()',2947,'AAAL33///zg='),(5,'2011-03-29 10:59:17','Patch Set 1: Do not submit\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2947,'AAAL33///zk='),(5,'2011-03-29 08:23:55','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nI like that. \'Failed\' is much better than \'Abnormal\'.',2948,'AAAL33///0A='),(107,'2011-03-28 14:03:22','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/186/ ',2948,'AAAL33///70='),(1,'2011-03-28 14:17:51','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved\n\nSince Christian was added as a reviewer, I\'ll let him also look at this before submitting.',2948,'AAAL33///7g='),(107,'2011-03-28 14:05:36','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/186/ : SUCCESS',2948,'AAAL33///7w='),(5,'2011-03-29 08:23:56','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2948,'AAAL33///z8='),(107,'2011-03-28 15:43:55','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/211/ : SUCCESS',2949,'AAAL33///6g='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:55:45','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2949,'AAAL33///6I='),(107,'2011-03-28 15:40:09','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/211/ ',2949,'AAAL33///6k='),(46,'2011-03-28 15:55:44','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2949,'AAAL33///6M='),(107,'2011-03-28 15:59:56','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/212/ : SUCCESS',2950,'AAAL33///50='),(107,'2011-03-28 15:54:32','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/212/ ',2950,'AAAL33///6c='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:22:14','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/265/ : SUCCESS',2950,'AAAL33///m4='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:13:22','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/265/ ',2950,'AAAL33///m8='),(4,'2011-03-30 13:31:46','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2950,'AAAL33///nk='),(4,'2011-03-30 13:31:45','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2950,'AAAL33///no='),(4,'2011-03-30 13:30:57','Uploaded patch set 2.',2950,'AAAL33///ns='),(107,'2011-03-28 15:59:20','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/187/ : SUCCESS',2951,'AAAL33///54='),(1,'2011-03-28 15:57:45','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2951,'AAAL33///58='),(1,'2011-03-28 16:12:36','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2951,'AAAL33///5w='),(107,'2011-03-28 15:55:16','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/187/ ',2951,'AAAL33///6Q='),(107,'2011-03-28 20:02:17','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/213/ ',2952,'AAAL33///5o='),(107,'2011-03-30 07:16:08','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/247/ : FAILURE',2952,'AAAL33///q0='),(107,'2011-03-30 07:07:35','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/247/ ',2952,'AAAL33///q4='),(46,'2011-03-30 07:07:32','Uploaded patch set 3.',2952,'AAAL33///q8='),(107,'2011-03-30 07:39:12','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/248/ : SUCCESS',2952,'AAAL33///qs='),(46,'2011-03-30 08:28:46','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2952,'AAAL33///qU='),(107,'2011-03-30 07:30:18','Patch Set 3: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/248/ ',2952,'AAAL33///qw='),(46,'2011-03-30 08:28:46','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2952,'AAAL33///qY='),(107,'2011-03-30 07:05:04','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/246/ : FAILURE',2952,'AAAL33///rA='),(107,'2011-03-30 06:10:54','Patch Set 2: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/244/ ',2952,'AAAL33///rc='),(107,'2011-03-30 06:56:27','Patch Set 2: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/246/ ',2952,'AAAL33///rE='),(107,'2011-03-30 06:19:28','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/244/ : FAILURE',2952,'AAAL33///rY='),(107,'2011-03-29 23:42:55','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/241/ : FAILURE',2952,'AAAL33///s4='),(4,'2011-03-29 23:34:29','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2952,'AAAL33///tI='),(107,'2011-03-29 23:34:04','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/241/ ',2952,'AAAL33///tQ='),(4,'2011-03-29 23:34:01','Uploaded patch set 2.',2952,'AAAL33///tU='),(46,'2011-03-29 10:11:24','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2952,'AAAL33///zs='),(107,'2011-03-28 23:31:21','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/223/ : SUCCESS',2953,'AAAL33///20='),(107,'2011-03-28 23:27:36','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/223/ ',2953,'AAAL33///24='),(107,'2011-04-03 22:51:22','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/325/ : FAILURE',2953,'AAAL33///L0='),(4,'2011-04-03 22:46:22','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2953,'AAAL33///L4='),(4,'2011-04-03 22:46:21','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2953,'AAAL33///L8='),(107,'2011-04-03 22:45:02','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/325/ ',2953,'AAAL33///MA='),(4,'2011-04-03 22:44:57','Uploaded patch set 2.',2953,'AAAL33///ME='),(49,'2011-03-29 01:04:21','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nCommit message should contain Change-id also please see how we are handling information about bug fixes in commits eg. change http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,2953\n\nAlso first line of commit message should be more descriptive then before Change-id should be added information about corresponding bugzilla issue.',2954,'AAAL33///2g='),(210,'2011-03-29 09:24:23','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nCommit message is not complete.',2954,'AAAL33///z0='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:10:19','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/188/ : SUCCESS',2955,'AAAL33///10='),(107,'2011-03-29 02:07:31','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/188/ ',2955,'AAAL33///14='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:40:08','Uploaded patch set 2.',2955,'AAAL33///Tc='),(107,'2011-04-01 21:42:32','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/210/ : SUCCESS',2955,'AAAL33///TM='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:41:01','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2955,'AAAL33///TQ='),(1,'2011-04-01 21:41:01','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n(Per Matthias Sohn)',2955,'AAAL33///TU='),(107,'2011-04-01 21:40:12','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/210/ ',2955,'AAAL33///TY='),(4,'2011-03-31 22:54:41','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2955,'AAAL33///Yo='),(210,'2011-03-29 08:13:27','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nSorry for this ...',2956,'AAAL33///0E='),(2,'2011-04-04 20:08:57','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2957,'AAAL33///Ic='),(2,'2011-04-04 20:08:57','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2957,'AAAL33///IY='),(5,'2011-03-29 13:36:51','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2958,'AAAL33///y8='),(5,'2011-03-29 13:36:50','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2958,'AAAL33///zA='),(107,'2011-03-29 12:52:14','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/225/ : SUCCESS',2958,'AAAL33///zU='),(107,'2011-03-29 12:48:18','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/225/ ',2958,'AAAL33///zY='),(1,'2011-03-29 14:02:43','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2959,'AAAL33///y0='),(1,'2011-03-29 14:02:43','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2959,'AAAL33///y4='),(107,'2011-03-29 13:27:38','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/198/ : SUCCESS',2959,'AAAL33///zM='),(107,'2011-03-29 13:25:19','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/198/ ',2959,'AAAL33///zQ='),(2,'2011-03-29 17:23:04','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2960,'AAAL33///xA='),(2,'2011-03-29 17:23:03','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2960,'AAAL33///xE='),(107,'2011-03-29 14:44:30','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/226/ : SUCCESS',2960,'AAAL33///yc='),(107,'2011-03-29 14:40:43','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/226/ ',2960,'AAAL33///yg='),(107,'2011-03-30 23:25:28','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/276/ ',2961,'AAAL33///hc='),(49,'2011-03-30 23:25:24','Uploaded patch set 5.',2961,'AAAL33///hg='),(46,'2011-03-31 06:07:10','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2961,'AAAL33///hI='),(46,'2011-03-31 06:07:09','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nGreat work, thanks Dariusz.',2961,'AAAL33///hM='),(107,'2011-03-30 23:34:21','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/276/ : SUCCESS',2961,'AAAL33///hQ='),(107,'2011-03-30 23:10:49','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/275/ : FAILURE',2961,'AAAL33///iA='),(49,'2011-03-30 23:02:48','Patch Set 4:\n\nrebased and now we are using int flags instead of booleans',2961,'AAAL33///iM='),(107,'2011-03-30 23:02:20','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/275/ ',2961,'AAAL33///iQ='),(49,'2011-03-30 23:02:16','Uploaded patch set 4.',2961,'AAAL33///iU='),(46,'2011-03-30 06:10:07','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n>> Additionally I\'ve split setRootsToShow() methods into four additional methods that are more descriptive than four boolean parameters. IMHO this way it is more readable what we want to achieve and I just don\'t like methods that have more then two parameter in the same type.\n\nI agree with your remarks about too many parameters. How about using the pattern found in SWT, where you use logical \"OR\" like\n\npublic final static int LOCAL_BRANCHES = 1<<1;\npublic final static int REMOTE_BRANCHES = 1<<2;\n\n...\n\npublic AbstractBranchSelectionDialog(Shell shell, Repository repo, int nodesToShow) {\n...\nshowLocal = nodesToShow & LOCAL_BRANCHEES != 0;\n}\n\nIn the subclass, you\'d do someething like\n\npublic RebaseTargetSelectionDialog(Shell shell, Repository repo){\n\nsuper(shell, repo, LOCAL_BRANCHES | REMOTE_BRANCHES);\n\n}',2961,'AAAL33///rg='),(49,'2011-03-30 00:09:48','Uploaded patch set 3.',2961,'AAAL33///sc='),(107,'2011-03-30 00:19:47','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/243/ : FAILURE',2961,'AAAL33///sQ='),(49,'2011-03-30 00:10:12','Patch Set 3:\n\nUpdated commit message',2961,'AAAL33///sU='),(107,'2011-03-30 00:09:52','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/243/ ',2961,'AAAL33///sY='),(107,'2011-03-29 19:58:26','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/231/ ',2961,'AAAL33///vc='),(49,'2011-03-29 19:58:23','Uploaded patch set 2.',2961,'AAAL33///vg='),(107,'2011-03-29 20:02:07','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/231/ : SUCCESS',2961,'AAAL33///vU='),(49,'2011-03-29 20:01:30','Patch Set 1:\n\nOK, I\'ve implemented this behavior. Now remote branches are only expanded in rebase dialog, also current branch is only selected in branch dialog.\n\nAdditionally I\'ve split setRootsToShow() methods into four additional methods that are more descriptive than four boolean parameters. IMHO this way it is more readable what we want to achieve and I just don\'t like methods that have more then two parameter in the same type.',2961,'AAAL33///vY='),(46,'2011-03-29 15:06:26','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nNot sure if this is the right thing to do. Depending on the use case, you might rather expand the local branches node...\nI suggest to either offer a method on the AbstractBranchSelectionDialog to expand some or all nodes (similar to setRootsToShow, maybe the new method could be called setRootsToExpand) and call this from the concrete subclass (in this case the RebaseTargetSelectionDialog).',2961,'AAAL33///x0='),(107,'2011-03-29 15:00:35','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/228/ : SUCCESS',2961,'AAAL33///x8='),(49,'2011-03-29 15:09:50','Patch Set 1:\n\nI think that it always would be useful. In \"worst case\" both nodes (local and remote) would be expanded with can be helpful IMHO. As far as I understood this code it will select given branch, or expand local branch node and then expand remote branch node so in many cases both nodes would be expanded with isn\'t bad idea IMHO',2961,'AAAL33///xk='),(46,'2011-03-29 15:37:42','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this; No score\n\n>> As far as I understood this code it will select given branch, \n\nYou have a point here indeed, and I guess this is wrong more often than not; rebase is actually an example where it\'s wrong. Perhaps we need some boolean in the constructor telling the abstract class whether it should select the current branch or not.\n\nExpanding both nodes might look like a good idea in most cases, but that could be done with the method discussed before as well.\n\nOn the other hand, I wonder what happens when you start having really many branches and expand both nodes.  Opening the local node might even push the remotes node out of sight so that you\'d have to either collapse local or scroll down to get a chance to see the remotes node...\n\nFor Rebase, I guess that most of the time you would rebase onto something remote (that\'s at least my working style). Thus one would probably want to only expand remotes, not local, which again is something you would need the new method for...',2961,'AAAL33///xM='),(107,'2011-03-29 14:56:45','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/228/ ',2961,'AAAL33///yE='),(210,'2011-03-29 19:17:09','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',2962,'AAAL33///v0='),(210,'2011-03-29 19:17:31','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',2963,'AAAL33///vw='),(210,'2011-03-29 19:17:41','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',2964,'AAAL33///vs='),(210,'2011-03-29 19:17:58','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',2965,'AAAL33///vo='),(210,'2011-04-15 15:26:48','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',2966,'AAAL4H///OA='),(49,'2011-03-29 23:43:21','Patch Set 1:\n\nDamn ... I was sure that I was writing \'was not\' ;> ;)',2967,'AAAL33///s0='),(4,'2011-03-29 23:41:45','Patch Set 1:\n\nI see, then you didn\'t mean : \"In any of those builds SynchronizeViewTest was failed\" but the opposite :-) I will try your change on mac and if that\'s ok accept it',2967,'AAAL33///s8='),(107,'2011-03-30 00:03:28','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/242/ : FAILURE',2967,'AAAL33///sg='),(4,'2011-03-29 23:53:45','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2967,'AAAL33///sk='),(4,'2011-03-29 23:53:44','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- accepting as synch view tests succeed now',2967,'AAAL33///so='),(107,'2011-03-29 23:53:05','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/242/ ',2967,'AAAL33///ss='),(4,'2011-03-29 23:53:02','Uploaded patch set 2.',2967,'AAAL33///sw='),(107,'2011-03-29 22:43:07','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/236/ : FAILURE',2967,'AAAL33///t8='),(49,'2011-03-29 23:40:19','Patch Set 1:\n\nBecause another test are failing. Those failing tests don\'t have anything to deal with this change, it only fixes tests in SynchronizeViewTest case not any other test suites or test cases',2967,'AAAL33///tA='),(107,'2011-03-29 23:26:38','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/240/ : FAILURE',2967,'AAAL33///tc='),(4,'2011-03-29 23:36:08','Patch Set 1:\n\nwhy do consistently failing tests qualify for submitting this change ?',2967,'AAAL33///tE='),(107,'2011-03-29 23:18:57','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/240/ ',2967,'AAAL33///tg='),(107,'2011-03-29 23:16:39','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/239/ : FAILURE',2967,'AAAL33///tk='),(107,'2011-03-29 23:06:22','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/239/ ',2967,'AAAL33///to='),(107,'2011-03-29 23:03:44','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/238/ : FAILURE',2967,'AAAL33///ts='),(107,'2011-03-29 22:53:23','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/238/ ',2967,'AAAL33///tw='),(49,'2011-03-29 23:30:02','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nI\'ve run seven times hudson CI build. In any of those builds SynchronizeViewTest was failed therefore I think that this change can be merged into master.',2967,'AAAL33///tY='),(107,'2011-03-29 21:11:36','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/232/ : SUCCESS',2967,'AAAL33///u0='),(49,'2011-03-29 21:08:03','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n',2967,'AAAL33///u4='),(107,'2011-03-29 21:07:51','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/232/ ',2967,'AAAL33///u8='),(107,'2011-03-29 22:21:19','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/235/ ',2967,'AAAL33///ug='),(107,'2011-03-29 22:19:05','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/234/ : FAILURE',2967,'AAAL33///uk='),(107,'2011-03-29 22:32:45','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/236/ ',2967,'AAAL33///uM='),(107,'2011-03-29 22:08:47','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/234/ ',2967,'AAAL33///uo='),(107,'2011-03-29 22:31:35','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/235/ : FAILURE',2967,'AAAL33///uQ='),(107,'2011-03-29 21:45:42','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/233/ : FAILURE',2967,'AAAL33///us='),(107,'2011-03-29 21:35:11','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/233/ ',2967,'AAAL33///uw='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:02:05','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2968,'AAAL33///jg='),(2,'2011-03-30 22:02:04','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2968,'AAAL33///jk='),(107,'2011-03-30 01:06:36','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/200/ : SUCCESS',2968,'AAAL33///sI='),(107,'2011-03-30 01:04:09','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/200/ ',2968,'AAAL33///sM='),(5,'2011-04-02 07:38:07','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2969,'AAAL33///Nc='),(5,'2011-04-02 07:38:06','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2969,'AAAL33///Ng='),(107,'2011-04-02 07:37:37','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/229/ : SUCCESS',2969,'AAAL33///Nk='),(107,'2011-04-02 07:35:17','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/229/ ',2969,'AAAL33///No='),(5,'2011-04-02 07:35:13','Uploaded patch set 3.',2969,'AAAL33///Ns='),(5,'2011-04-01 23:38:38','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2969,'AAAL33///Pw='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:16:00','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/220/ : FAILURE',2969,'AAAL33///Qc='),(107,'2011-04-01 22:13:41','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/220/ ',2969,'AAAL33///Qg='),(1,'2011-04-01 22:10:01','Uploaded patch set 2.',2969,'AAAL33///Qw='),(107,'2011-03-30 01:08:55','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/201/ : SUCCESS',2969,'AAAL33///sA='),(107,'2011-03-30 01:06:37','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/201/ ',2969,'AAAL33///sE='),(1,'2011-03-31 22:21:25','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2969,'AAAL33///ZU='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:48:36','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/204/ ',2970,'AAAL33///mc='),(2,'2011-03-30 14:48:33','Uploaded patch set 3.',2970,'AAAL33///mg='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:51:12','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/204/ : SUCCESS',2970,'AAAL33///mY='),(2,'2011-03-30 03:44:29','Uploaded patch set 2.',2970,'AAAL33///r0='),(107,'2011-03-30 03:41:12','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/202/ : FAILURE',2970,'AAAL33///r4='),(107,'2011-03-30 03:38:55','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/202/ ',2970,'AAAL33///r8='),(107,'2011-03-30 03:46:58','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/203/ : SUCCESS',2970,'AAAL33///rs='),(107,'2011-03-30 03:44:32','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/203/ ',2970,'AAAL33///rw='),(1,'2011-03-31 22:27:16','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(5 inline comments)\n\n',2970,'AAAL33///Y8='),(107,'2011-04-06 19:46:56','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/242/ : SUCCESS',2970,'AAAL4H///4o='),(107,'2011-04-06 19:44:29','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/242/ ',2970,'AAAL4H///4s='),(2,'2011-04-06 19:44:26','Uploaded patch set 4.',2970,'AAAL4H///4w='),(1,'2011-04-11 15:01:44','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2970,'AAAL4H///nI='),(1,'2011-04-11 15:01:43','Patch Set 6: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2970,'AAAL4H///nM='),(2,'2011-04-11 02:23:44','Patch Set 4: (8 inline comments)\n\n',2970,'AAAL4H///o0='),(107,'2011-04-11 02:28:58','Patch Set 6: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/251/ : SUCCESS',2970,'AAAL4H///oc='),(107,'2011-04-11 02:26:32','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/251/ ',2970,'AAAL4H///og='),(107,'2011-04-11 02:26:31','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/250/ : SUCCESS',2970,'AAAL4H///ok='),(2,'2011-04-11 02:26:25','Uploaded patch set 6.',2970,'AAAL4H///oo='),(107,'2011-04-11 02:23:58','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/250/ ',2970,'AAAL4H///os='),(2,'2011-04-11 02:23:54','Uploaded patch set 5.',2970,'AAAL4H///ow='),(1,'2011-04-11 00:49:41','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(22 inline comments)\n\n',2970,'AAAL4H///pY='),(46,'2011-03-30 06:55:18','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2971,'AAAL33///rI='),(46,'2011-03-30 06:55:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2971,'AAAL33///rM='),(107,'2011-03-30 06:54:23','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/245/ : SUCCESS',2971,'AAAL33///rQ='),(107,'2011-03-30 06:43:52','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/245/ ',2971,'AAAL33///rU='),(107,'2011-03-31 09:26:52','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/284/ ',2972,'AAAL33///f0='),(46,'2011-03-31 09:26:48','Uploaded patch set 3.',2972,'AAAL33///f4='),(46,'2011-03-31 10:03:52','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2972,'AAAL33///fo='),(46,'2011-03-31 10:03:51','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2972,'AAAL33///fs='),(107,'2011-03-31 09:35:54','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/284/ : SUCCESS',2972,'AAAL33///fw='),(6,'2011-03-30 15:08:50','Uploaded patch set 2.',2972,'AAAL33///l0='),(107,'2011-03-30 15:25:47','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/271/ : SUCCESS',2972,'AAAL33///lo='),(107,'2011-03-30 15:15:15','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/271/ ',2972,'AAAL33///ls='),(107,'2011-03-30 08:27:25','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/249/ ',2972,'AAAL33///qc='),(107,'2011-03-30 08:37:51','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/249/ : SUCCESS',2972,'AAAL33///qI='),(107,'2011-03-31 15:09:11','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/292/ ',2973,'AAAL33///dc='),(4,'2011-03-31 15:09:08','Uploaded patch set 3.',2973,'AAAL33///dg='),(107,'2011-03-31 15:17:49','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/292/ : FAILURE',2973,'AAAL33///dQ='),(4,'2011-03-31 15:09:30','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2973,'AAAL33///dU='),(4,'2011-03-31 15:09:29','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2973,'AAAL33///dY='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:32:57','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/261/ ',2973,'AAAL33///nc='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:43:22','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/261/ : SUCCESS',2973,'AAAL33///nY='),(46,'2011-03-30 12:55:11','Uploaded patch set 2.',2973,'AAAL33///os='),(107,'2011-03-30 10:49:06','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/254/ ',2973,'AAAL33///pc='),(107,'2011-03-30 10:47:19','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/253/ : FAILURE',2973,'AAAL33///pg='),(107,'2011-03-30 10:37:11','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/253/ ',2973,'AAAL33///pk='),(107,'2011-03-30 10:36:30','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/252/ : FAILURE',2973,'AAAL33///po='),(107,'2011-03-30 10:26:29','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/252/ ',2973,'AAAL33///ps='),(107,'2011-03-30 10:59:27','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/254/ : FAILURE',2973,'AAAL33///pY='),(100,'2011-03-30 11:44:26','Patch Set 1:\n\nPrevious change needs to be rebased in order to fix the build issues...',2974,'AAAL33///pE='),(107,'2011-03-30 11:39:00','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/255/ : FAILURE',2974,'AAAL33///pQ='),(107,'2011-03-30 11:38:11','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/255/ ',2974,'AAAL33///pU='),(8,'2011-04-01 09:10:08','Uploaded patch set 2.',2974,'AAAL33///W0='),(107,'2011-04-01 09:19:08','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/312/ : SUCCESS',2974,'AAAL33///Wg='),(107,'2011-04-01 09:10:11','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/312/ ',2974,'AAAL33///Ww='),(100,'2011-12-01 13:25:51','Patch Set 2: Abandoned\n\nObsolete',2974,'AABOC3///uM='),(100,'2011-04-04 08:10:40','Uploaded patch set 2.',2975,'AAAL33///J0='),(107,'2011-04-04 08:19:09','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/331/ : FAILURE',2975,'AAAL33///Jo='),(107,'2011-04-04 08:10:44','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/331/ ',2975,'AAAL33///Jw='),(100,'2011-03-30 11:45:23','Patch Set 1:\n\nPrevious changes need to be rebased in order to fix the build issues...',2975,'AAAL33///pA='),(107,'2011-03-30 11:41:36','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/256/ : FAILURE',2975,'AAAL33///pI='),(107,'2011-03-30 11:40:51','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/256/ ',2975,'AAAL33///pM='),(100,'2011-12-01 13:35:07','Patch Set 2: Abandoned\n\nObsolete',2975,'AABOC3///uI='),(8,'2011-05-01 22:11:18','Patch Set 2:\n\nI suggest this be tested manually too, to make sure we\ndom\'t see unexpected parallell activities.',2975,'AABOIn///6U='),(107,'2011-03-31 18:32:21','Patch Set 4: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/301/ : SUCCESS',2976,'AAAL33///bc='),(107,'2011-03-31 18:20:25','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/301/ ',2976,'AAAL33///bg='),(46,'2011-03-31 18:20:22','Uploaded patch set 4.',2976,'AAAL33///bk='),(107,'2011-03-31 18:17:02','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/300/ : SUCCESS',2976,'AAAL33///bo='),(107,'2011-03-31 18:07:47','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/300/ ',2976,'AAAL33///bs='),(46,'2011-03-31 18:07:44','Uploaded patch set 3.',2976,'AAAL33///bw='),(107,'2011-03-31 11:45:43','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/287/ ',2976,'AAAL33///e0='),(107,'2011-03-31 11:53:23','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/287/ : FAILURE',2976,'AAAL33///ew='),(46,'2011-03-31 11:29:09','Uploaded patch set 2.',2976,'AAAL33///fQ='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:02:30','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/257/ : FAILURE',2976,'AAAL33///oo='),(107,'2011-03-30 12:53:03','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/257/ ',2976,'AAAL33///ow='),(107,'2011-04-19 23:09:47','Patch Set 6: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/431/ : UNSTABLE',2976,'AAAL4H///AE='),(107,'2011-04-19 22:59:04','Patch Set 6: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/431/ ',2976,'AAAL4H///AM='),(6,'2011-04-19 15:46:17','Patch Set 5: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nAssume (Un)changed is only visible for projects',2976,'AAAL4H///F0='),(6,'2011-04-19 15:47:41','Uploaded patch set 6.',2976,'AAAL4H///Fo='),(107,'2011-04-19 16:24:25','Patch Set 6: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/420/ : UNSTABLE',2976,'AAAL4H///FQ='),(107,'2011-04-19 16:13:37','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/420/ ',2976,'AAAL4H///FU='),(107,'2011-04-18 15:55:25','Patch Set 5: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/404/ : UNSTABLE',2976,'AAAL4H///Jc='),(107,'2011-04-18 15:48:07','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/404/ ',2976,'AAAL4H///Jg='),(6,'2011-04-18 15:26:52','Uploaded patch set 5.',2976,'AAAL4H///KY='),(4,'2011-04-19 23:33:34','Patch Set 6: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(5 inline comments)\n\nrename branch: \n- should preselect currently checked out branch and auto-expand the tree to reduce number of clicks required to use the dialog\n\ndelete branch: \n- tree should be auto-expanded\n\nadvanced menu:\n- use same icons as in repo view for delete, rename branch\n- separate branch actions and tag action by separator\n\nassume unchanged, no assume unchanged: \n- hitting stack overflow when called',2976,'AAAL4H//+/s='),(4,'2011-04-20 22:58:45','Patch Set 6: Abandoned\n\nreplaced by I8a62bcee301caf07f3104b4b54495ce78442c9ff to retarget for 0.12\n\nthe retargeted patch series fixes the problems mentioned here',2976,'AAAL4H//+7Y='),(46,'2011-03-30 13:19:43','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2977,'AAAL33///n4='),(46,'2011-03-30 13:19:43','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\n',2977,'AAAL33///n8='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:13:21','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/264/ : SUCCESS',2977,'AAAL33///nA='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:04:27','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/264/ ',2977,'AAAL33///nE='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:55:38','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/262/ : FAILURE',2977,'AAAL33///nQ='),(107,'2011-03-30 13:43:23','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/262/ ',2977,'AAAL33///nU='),(46,'2011-03-30 13:19:22','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2977,'AAAL33///oA='),(46,'2011-03-30 13:08:35','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nTwo whitespace errors.',2977,'AAAL33///og='),(4,'2011-03-30 13:15:54','Uploaded patch set 2.',2977,'AAAL33///oI='),(107,'2011-03-30 22:36:35','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/274/ ',2978,'AAAL33///ic='),(4,'2011-03-30 23:04:23','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2978,'AAAL33///iE='),(4,'2011-03-30 22:36:32','Uploaded patch set 3.',2978,'AAAL33///ig='),(4,'2011-03-30 23:04:22','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2978,'AAAL33///iI='),(107,'2011-03-30 22:45:40','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/274/ : SUCCESS',2978,'AAAL33///iY='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:45:16','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/267/ ',2978,'AAAL33///mk='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:45:15','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/266/ : FAILURE',2978,'AAAL33///mo='),(46,'2011-03-30 14:42:23','Uploaded patch set 2.',2978,'AAAL33///ms='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:53:58','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/267/ : FAILURE',2978,'AAAL33///mU='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:36:44','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/266/ ',2978,'AAAL33///mw='),(107,'2011-04-04 08:27:51','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/332/ : FAILURE',2979,'AAAL33///Jg='),(107,'2011-04-04 08:19:10','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/332/ ',2979,'AAAL33///Jk='),(100,'2011-04-04 08:14:00','Uploaded patch set 2.',2979,'AAAL33///Js='),(100,'2011-03-30 14:55:07','Patch Set 1:\n\nPrevious changes need to be rebased in order to fix the build issues...',2979,'AAAL33///mI='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:54:47','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/268/ : FAILURE',2979,'AAAL33///mM='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:54:05','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/268/ ',2979,'AAAL33///mQ='),(100,'2011-12-01 13:35:32','Patch Set 2: Abandoned\n\nObsolete',2979,'AABOC3///uE='),(107,'2011-03-31 15:31:06','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/293/ : SUCCESS',2980,'AAAL33///dE='),(107,'2011-03-31 15:22:17','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/293/ ',2980,'AAAL33///dI='),(100,'2011-03-31 15:22:14','Uploaded patch set 2.',2980,'AAAL33///dM='),(4,'2011-03-30 23:16:18','Patch Set 1:\n\nthis happens when toggle \"Link with Editor and Selection\" in history view is down',2980,'AAAL33///h4='),(4,'2011-03-30 23:15:00','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nwhen toggling \"Show all branches\" this always throws an exception\n\n\n!MESSAGE TreeWalk has not been set\n!STACK 0\njava.lang.IllegalStateException: TreeWalk has not been set\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.internal.history.CommitFileDiffViewer.getTreeWalk(CommitFileDiffViewer.java:384)\n	at org.eclipse.egit.ui.internal.history.FileDiffContentProvider.inputChanged(FileDiffContentProvider.java:30)\n	at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.ContentViewer.handleDispose(ContentViewer.java:171)\n	at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer.handleDispose(StructuredViewer.java:2302)\n	at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTableViewer.handleDispose(AbstractTableViewer.java:223)\n	at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.ContentViewer$2.widgetDisposed(ContentViewer.java:214)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.TypedListener.handleEvent(TypedListener.java:123)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:84)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.sendEvent(Display.java:3776)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1367)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1390)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1371)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.release(Widget.java:1216)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.release(Control.java:2556)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite.releaseChildren(Composite.java:902)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.release(Widget.java:1219)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.release(Control.java:2556)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite.releaseChildren(Composite.java:902)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.release(Widget.java:1219)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.release(Control.java:2556)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite.releaseChildren(Composite.java:902)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.release(Widget.java:1219)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.release(Control.java:2556)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite.releaseChildren(Composite.java:902)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.release(Widget.java:1219)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.release(Control.java:2556)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite.releaseChildren(Composite.java:902)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.release(Widget.java:1219)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.release(Control.java:2556)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite.releaseChildren(Composite.java:902)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.release(Widget.java:1219)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.release(Control.java:2556)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite.releaseChildren(Composite.java:902)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.release(Widget.java:1219)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.release(Control.java:2556)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite.releaseChildren(Composite.java:902)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.release(Widget.java:1219)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.release(Control.java:2556)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.dispose(Widget.java:625)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.PartPane.dispose(PartPane.java:180)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ViewPane.dispose(ViewPane.java:193)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchPartReference.dispose(WorkbenchPartReference.java:681)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchPage.disposePart(WorkbenchPage.java:1721)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchPage.partRemoved(WorkbenchPage.java:1713)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ViewFactory.releaseView(ViewFactory.java:257)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Perspective.dispose(Perspective.java:292)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchPage.dispose(WorkbenchPage.java:1792)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchWindow.closeAllPages(WorkbenchWindow.java:861)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchWindow.hardClose(WorkbenchWindow.java:1696)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchWindow.busyClose(WorkbenchWindow.java:734)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchWindow.access$0(WorkbenchWindow.java:710)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchWindow$5.run(WorkbenchWindow.java:826)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:70)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchWindow.close(WorkbenchWindow.java:824)\n	at org.eclipse.jface.window.WindowManager.close(WindowManager.java:109)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$18.run(Workbench.java:1106)\n	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.SafeRunner.run(SafeRunner.java:42)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.busyClose(Workbench.java:1103)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.access$15(Workbench.java:1032)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$25.run(Workbench.java:1276)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:70)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.close(Workbench.java:1274)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.close(Workbench.java:1246)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchWindow.busyClose(WorkbenchWindow.java:731)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchWindow.access$0(WorkbenchWindow.java:710)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchWindow$5.run(WorkbenchWindow.java:826)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:70)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchWindow.close(WorkbenchWindow.java:824)\n	at org.eclipse.jface.window.Window.handleShellCloseEvent(Window.java:741)\n	at org.eclipse.jface.window.Window$3.shellClosed(Window.java:687)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.TypedListener.handleEvent(TypedListener.java:98)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:84)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.sendEvent(Display.java:3776)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1367)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1390)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1375)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Shell.closeWidget(Shell.java:548)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Shell.windowShouldClose(Shell.java:2029)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.windowProc(Display.java:4974)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.internal.cocoa.OS.objc_msgSendSuper(Native Method)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.callSuper(Widget.java:220)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.windowSendEvent(Widget.java:1943)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Shell.windowSendEvent(Shell.java:2025)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.windowProc(Display.java:5040)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.internal.cocoa.OS.objc_msgSendSuper(Native Method)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.applicationSendEvent(Display.java:4582)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.applicationProc(Display.java:4659)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.internal.cocoa.OS.objc_msgSend(Native Method)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.internal.cocoa.NSApplication.sendEvent(NSApplication.java:115)\n	at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:3274)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:2640)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runUI(Workbench.java:2604)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.access$4(Workbench.java:2438)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$7.run(Workbench.java:671)\n	at org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:332)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:664)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149)\n	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.start(IDEApplication.java:115)\n	at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:196)\n	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:110)\n	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:79)\n	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:369)\n	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:179)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)\n	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)\n	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)\n	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)\n	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:619)\n	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:574)\n	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1407)\n	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1383)',2980,'AAAL33///h8='),(107,'2011-03-30 15:06:31','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/269/ : SUCCESS',2980,'AAAL33///l8='),(107,'2011-03-30 14:57:35','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/269/ ',2980,'AAAL33///mE='),(107,'2011-04-07 22:42:10','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/359/ ',2980,'AAAL4H///x0='),(4,'2011-04-07 22:42:06','Uploaded patch set 3.',2980,'AAAL4H///x4='),(4,'2011-04-07 22:53:25','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2980,'AAAL4H///xk='),(4,'2011-04-07 22:53:24','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful\n\n',2980,'AAAL4H///xo='),(107,'2011-04-07 22:51:34','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/359/ : UNSTABLE',2980,'AAAL4H///xs='),(4,'2011-04-07 22:42:41','Patch Set 3: IP review completed\n\nrebased',2980,'AAAL4H///xw='),(2,'2011-03-31 21:30:18','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2981,'AAAL33///aA='),(107,'2011-03-31 21:30:08','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/303/ ',2981,'AAAL33///aE='),(2,'2011-03-31 21:30:05','Uploaded patch set 2.',2981,'AAAL33///aI='),(NULL,'2011-03-31 21:29:16','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2981,'AAAL33///aM='),(2,'2011-03-31 21:29:16','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThis is cleaner.',2981,'AAAL33///aQ='),(107,'2011-03-30 15:06:32','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/270/ ',2981,'AAAL33///l4='),(107,'2011-03-30 15:15:14','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/270/ : SUCCESS',2981,'AAAL33///lw='),(107,'2011-03-31 21:38:27','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/303/ : FAILURE',2981,'AAAL33///Z4='),(2,'2011-03-31 21:30:18','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2981,'AAAL33///Z8='),(4,'2011-03-30 23:23:24','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2982,'AAAL33///ho='),(4,'2011-03-30 23:26:11','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',2982,'AAAL33///hU='),(107,'2011-03-30 15:48:20','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/205/ ',2982,'AAAL33///lc='),(107,'2011-03-30 15:50:40','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/205/ : SUCCESS',2982,'AAAL33///lY='),(5,'2011-04-02 00:43:41','Patch Set 1: (5 inline comments)\n\n',2982,'AAAL33///Oc='),(107,'2011-04-02 00:42:59','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/226/ ',2982,'AAAL33///Og='),(5,'2011-04-02 00:42:56','Uploaded patch set 2.',2982,'AAAL33///Ok='),(1,'2011-04-02 00:46:34','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2982,'AAAL33///OM='),(107,'2011-04-02 00:45:44','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/226/ : SUCCESS',2982,'AAAL33///OU='),(1,'2011-04-02 00:45:30','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2982,'AAAL33///OY='),(4,'2011-04-01 15:35:05','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2982,'AAAL33///UU='),(4,'2011-03-31 22:51:06','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',2982,'AAAL33///Ys='),(1,'2011-03-31 22:08:33','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2982,'AAAL33///Zc='),(2,'2011-03-30 21:11:51','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nbad',2983,'AAAL33///kc='),(4,'2011-03-31 15:44:01','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2984,'AAAL33///c0='),(4,'2011-03-31 15:44:00','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2984,'AAAL33///c4='),(107,'2011-03-31 15:43:40','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/294/ ',2984,'AAAL33///c8='),(107,'2011-03-31 15:52:15','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/294/ : FAILURE',2984,'AAAL33///cw='),(4,'2011-03-31 15:43:36','Uploaded patch set 3.',2984,'AAAL33///dA='),(107,'2011-03-31 12:10:50','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/289/ : FAILURE',2984,'AAAL33///eg='),(107,'2011-03-31 12:02:19','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/289/ ',2984,'AAAL33///ek='),(46,'2011-03-31 11:30:22','Uploaded patch set 2.',2984,'AAAL33///fE='),(15,'2011-03-31 10:25:46','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2984,'AAAL33///fg='),(107,'2011-03-31 06:38:02','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/278/ : SUCCESS',2984,'AAAL33///g4='),(107,'2011-03-31 06:28:52','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/278/ ',2984,'AAAL33///g8='),(107,'2011-03-31 06:28:15','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/277/ : FAILURE',2984,'AAAL33///hA='),(107,'2011-03-31 06:19:12','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/277/ ',2984,'AAAL33///hE='),(107,'2011-03-31 17:58:12','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/299/ : FAILURE',2985,'AAAL33///b0='),(107,'2011-03-31 17:49:18','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/299/ ',2985,'AAAL33///b4='),(4,'2011-03-31 22:45:06','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',2985,'AAAL33///Y4='),(4,'2011-04-06 20:44:12','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2985,'AAAL4H///2k='),(4,'2011-04-06 20:44:11','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- verified ui tests locally',2985,'AAAL4H///2o='),(107,'2011-04-06 20:30:41','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/356/ ',2985,'AAAL4H///30='),(4,'2011-04-06 20:30:37','Uploaded patch set 2.',2985,'AAAL4H///34='),(107,'2011-04-06 20:40:28','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/356/ : UNSTABLE',2985,'AAAL4H///3E='),(2,'2011-03-31 21:28:43','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2986,'AAAL33///aU='),(2,'2011-03-31 21:28:42','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2986,'AAAL33///aY='),(107,'2011-03-31 18:42:11','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/302/ : FAILURE',2986,'AAAL33///bU='),(107,'2011-03-31 18:32:56','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/302/ ',2986,'AAAL33///bY='),(107,'2011-04-01 12:22:35','Patch Set 2: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/316/ ',2987,'AAAL33///V0='),(4,'2011-04-01 12:22:10','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\ngood idea',2987,'AAAL33///V4='),(8,'2011-04-01 13:14:05','Patch Set 2:\n\nThose errors are not my fault :) Works here.',2987,'AAAL33///VE='),(107,'2011-04-01 12:34:22','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/316/ : FAILURE',2987,'AAAL33///Vw='),(107,'2011-04-01 09:04:55','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/311/ : FAILURE',2987,'AAAL33///W4='),(107,'2011-04-01 08:55:53','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/311/ ',2987,'AAAL33///W8='),(8,'2011-04-01 08:55:50','Uploaded patch set 2.',2987,'AAAL33///XA='),(107,'2011-04-01 08:08:21','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/309/ ',2987,'AAAL33///Xc='),(107,'2011-04-01 08:16:33','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/309/ : FAILURE',2987,'AAAL33///XQ='),(6,'2011-04-06 14:22:49','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2987,'AAAL4H///60='),(6,'2011-04-06 14:22:48','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2987,'AAAL4H///64='),(107,'2011-04-06 14:22:27','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/352/ (2/3)',2987,'AAAL4H///68='),(107,'2011-04-06 14:33:45','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/352/ (3/3)',2987,'AAAL4H///6g='),(107,'2011-04-06 14:44:06','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/352/ : FAILURE \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/352/ : UNSTABLE \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/352/ : UNSTABLE',2987,'AAAL4H///6Y='),(107,'2011-04-06 14:22:27','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/352/ (1/3)',2987,'AAAL4H///7A='),(6,'2011-04-06 14:22:23','Uploaded patch set 3.',2987,'AAAL4H///7E='),(NULL,'2011-04-06 14:20:35','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',2987,'AAAL4H///7Q='),(6,'2011-04-06 14:20:34','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nGood idea!',2987,'AAAL4H///7U='),(107,'2011-04-01 11:32:20','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/315/ : SUCCESS',2988,'AAAL33///WA='),(107,'2011-04-01 11:23:27','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/315/ ',2988,'AAAL33///WE='),(4,'2011-04-05 23:37:04','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2988,'AAAL4H///84='),(4,'2011-04-05 23:37:02','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- verified ui tests locally',2988,'AAAL4H///88='),(107,'2011-04-05 23:35:19','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/348/ : UNSTABLE',2988,'AAAL4H///9A='),(107,'2011-04-05 23:25:52','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/348/ ',2988,'AAAL4H///9E='),(4,'2011-04-05 23:25:49','Uploaded patch set 2.',2988,'AAAL4H///9I='),(4,'2011-04-01 15:14:51','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2989,'AAAL33///Uc='),(4,'2011-04-01 15:14:49','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2989,'AAAL33///Uk='),(107,'2011-04-01 12:55:12','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/318/ ',2989,'AAAL33///Vc='),(107,'2011-04-01 12:55:11','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/317/ : FAILURE',2989,'AAAL33///Vg='),(44,'2011-04-01 12:52:33','Uploaded patch set 3.',2989,'AAAL33///Vk='),(107,'2011-04-01 13:12:03','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/319/ : SUCCESS',2989,'AAAL33///VM='),(44,'2011-04-01 12:51:05','Uploaded patch set 2.',2989,'AAAL33///Vo='),(107,'2011-04-01 12:46:31','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/317/ ',2989,'AAAL33///Vs='),(107,'2011-04-01 13:03:26','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/319/ ',2989,'AAAL33///VU='),(107,'2011-04-01 13:03:25','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/318/ : FAILURE',2989,'AAAL33///VY='),(107,'2011-04-04 23:08:14','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/335/ : FAILURE',2990,'AAAL33///H8='),(4,'2011-04-04 23:00:47','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2990,'AAAL33///IA='),(4,'2011-04-04 23:00:46','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',2990,'AAAL33///IE='),(107,'2011-04-04 23:00:16','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/335/ ',2990,'AAAL33///II='),(4,'2011-04-04 23:00:13','Uploaded patch set 3.',2990,'AAAL33///IM='),(107,'2011-04-04 07:33:08','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/330/ : SUCCESS',2990,'AAAL33///J8='),(100,'2011-04-04 09:19:02','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',2990,'AAAL33///JU='),(107,'2011-04-04 07:24:28','Patch Set 2: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/330/ ',2990,'AAAL33///KA='),(107,'2011-04-01 13:34:25','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/321/ : FAILURE',2990,'AAAL33///U0='),(107,'2011-04-01 13:25:58','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/321/ ',2990,'AAAL33///U4='),(46,'2011-04-01 13:25:55','Uploaded patch set 2.',2990,'AAAL33///U8='),(107,'2011-04-01 13:20:12','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/320/ : FAILURE',2990,'AAAL33///VA='),(107,'2011-04-01 13:12:03','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/320/ ',2990,'AAAL33///VI='),(4,'2011-04-01 15:14:49','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2991,'AAAL33///Ug='),(4,'2011-04-01 15:13:27','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',2991,'AAAL33///Uo='),(107,'2011-04-01 14:40:09','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/322/ : SUCCESS',2991,'AAAL33///Us='),(107,'2011-04-01 14:31:49','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/322/ ',2991,'AAAL33///Uw='),(5,'2011-04-02 00:14:17','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nsorry, went to the wrong proposal',2992,'AAAL33///Pg='),(107,'2011-04-02 00:12:56','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/223/ ',2992,'AAAL33///Pk='),(107,'2011-04-02 00:15:41','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/223/ : SUCCESS',2992,'AAAL33///PY='),(2,'2011-04-02 13:44:27','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2993,'AAAL33///NU='),(2,'2011-04-02 13:44:26','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',2993,'AAAL33///NY='),(1,'2011-04-02 00:25:19','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nI\'d like to get this in soon, I need it to fix Gerrit Code Review.',2993,'AAAL33///O8='),(107,'2011-04-02 00:27:14','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/225/ : SUCCESS',2993,'AAAL33///Ow='),(107,'2011-04-02 00:24:49','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/225/ ',2993,'AAAL33///PA='),(2,'2011-04-02 17:35:54','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2994,'AAAL33///NM='),(2,'2011-04-02 17:35:53','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',2994,'AAAL33///NQ='),(107,'2011-04-02 00:48:18','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/227/ : SUCCESS',2994,'AAAL33///OE='),(1,'2011-04-02 00:47:29','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nI also would like to see this go in soon, so I can bring it into Gerrit. I think its a useful change when JGit is acting as a Git server.',2994,'AAAL33///OI='),(107,'2011-04-02 00:45:44','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/227/ ',2994,'AAAL33///OQ='),(2,'2011-04-03 14:51:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2995,'AAAL33///M8='),(2,'2011-04-03 14:51:19','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nSimple change.',2995,'AAAL33///NA='),(107,'2011-04-02 22:38:51','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/230/ : SUCCESS',2995,'AAAL33///NE='),(107,'2011-04-02 22:35:43','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/230/ ',2995,'AAAL33///NI='),(1,'2011-04-04 17:31:42','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(6 inline comments)\n\n',2996,'AAAL33///Io='),(107,'2011-04-03 17:45:05','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/231/ : SUCCESS',2996,'AAAL33///Mg='),(107,'2011-04-03 17:42:18','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/231/ ',2996,'AAAL33///Ms='),(107,'2011-04-05 16:54:41','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/235/ ',2996,'AAAL4H////c='),(79,'2011-04-05 16:54:39','Patch Set 1: (6 inline comments)\n\n',2996,'AAAL4H////g='),(79,'2011-04-05 16:54:29','Uploaded patch set 2.',2996,'AAAL4H////k='),(107,'2011-04-05 16:57:23','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/235/ : SUCCESS',2996,'AAAL4H////Y='),(2,'2011-04-06 18:35:26','Uploaded patch set 3.',2996,'AAAL4H///5c='),(2,'2011-04-06 18:35:21','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\nlooks good',2996,'AAAL4H///5g='),(2,'2011-04-06 18:39:12','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2996,'AAAL4H///5M='),(2,'2011-04-06 18:39:11','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nlooks good',2996,'AAAL4H///5Q='),(107,'2011-04-06 18:38:16','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/240/ : SUCCESS',2996,'AAAL4H///5U='),(107,'2011-04-06 18:35:38','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/240/ ',2996,'AAAL4H///5Y='),(107,'2011-04-03 17:43:37','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/323/ : FAILURE',2997,'AAAL33///Mk='),(107,'2011-04-03 17:42:40','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/323/ ',2997,'AAAL33///Mo='),(4,'2011-04-06 21:41:33','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nthanks a lot, this fixes a very disturbing bug',2997,'AAAL4H///10='),(4,'2011-04-06 21:41:34','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2997,'AAAL4H///1w='),(107,'2011-04-06 21:17:13','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/357/ : SUCCESS',2997,'AAAL4H///2I='),(107,'2011-04-06 21:07:12','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/357/ ',2997,'AAAL4H///2M='),(79,'2011-04-06 21:07:09','Uploaded patch set 2.',2997,'AAAL4H///2Q='),(1,'2011-04-03 23:55:18','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2998,'AAAL33///K4='),(107,'2011-04-04 00:23:22','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/233/ : SUCCESS',2998,'AAAL33///Kc='),(4,'2011-04-04 00:21:15','Patch Set 1: (1 inline comment)\n\n',2998,'AAAL33///Kg='),(107,'2011-04-04 00:20:34','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/233/ ',2998,'AAAL33///Ko='),(4,'2011-04-04 00:20:31','Uploaded patch set 2.',2998,'AAAL33///Ks='),(1,'2011-04-04 01:50:33','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2998,'AAAL33///KU='),(1,'2011-04-04 01:50:32','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',2998,'AAAL33///KY='),(8,'2011-04-03 23:04:13','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',2998,'AAAL33///LY='),(107,'2011-04-03 21:55:12','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/232/ : SUCCESS',2998,'AAAL33///MI='),(107,'2011-04-03 21:47:33','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/232/ ',2998,'AAAL33///MM='),(107,'2011-04-05 00:11:10','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/338/ : FAILURE',2999,'AAAL33///HE='),(107,'2011-04-05 00:02:50','Patch Set 2: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/338/ ',2999,'AAAL33///HI='),(107,'2011-04-05 00:00:30','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/337/ : FAILURE',2999,'AAAL33///HM='),(107,'2011-04-04 23:52:21','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/337/ ',2999,'AAAL33///HQ='),(4,'2011-04-04 23:52:18','Uploaded patch set 2.',2999,'AAAL33///HU='),(4,'2011-04-04 23:49:59','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(3 inline comments)\n\nwill push fixes for these minor issues in a minute',2999,'AAAL33///HY='),(107,'2011-04-03 23:15:28','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/327/ : FAILURE',2999,'AAAL33///LQ='),(107,'2011-04-03 23:09:05','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/327/ ',2999,'AAAL33///LU='),(107,'2011-04-05 21:58:51','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/345/ : UNSTABLE',2999,'AAAL4H///+I='),(107,'2011-04-05 21:49:47','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/345/ ',2999,'AAAL4H///+M='),(4,'2011-04-05 21:49:44','Uploaded patch set 3.',2999,'AAAL4H///+Q='),(4,'2011-04-05 22:23:42','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- verified ui tests locally',2999,'AAAL4H///90='),(4,'2011-04-05 22:25:11','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',2999,'AAAL4H///9w='),(2,'2011-04-04 12:42:59','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3000,'AAAL33///JM='),(2,'2011-04-04 12:42:58','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nSimple fix. Curious why you need them public :)',3000,'AAAL33///JQ='),(107,'2011-04-03 23:58:53','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/328/ ',3000,'AAAL33///K0='),(5,'2011-04-04 07:08:27','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',3000,'AAAL33///KE='),(107,'2011-04-04 00:07:26','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/328/ : SUCCESS',3000,'AAAL33///Kw='),(107,'2011-04-04 23:20:51','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/336/ ',3001,'AAAL33///H0='),(4,'2011-04-04 23:20:48','Uploaded patch set 2.',3001,'AAAL33///H4='),(107,'2011-04-04 23:26:57','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/336/ : FAILURE',3001,'AAAL33///Ho='),(4,'2011-04-04 23:21:12','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3001,'AAAL33///Hs='),(4,'2011-04-04 23:21:11','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',3001,'AAAL33///Hw='),(107,'2011-04-04 08:58:44','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/333/ ',3001,'AAAL33///Jc='),(107,'2011-04-04 09:10:37','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/333/ : FAILURE',3001,'AAAL33///JY='),(5,'2011-04-04 18:23:57','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3002,'AAAL33///Ig='),(5,'2011-04-04 18:23:56','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',3002,'AAAL33///Ik='),(107,'2011-04-04 16:09:12','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/234/ : SUCCESS',3002,'AAAL33///JE='),(107,'2011-04-04 16:06:25','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/234/ ',3002,'AAAL33///JI='),(2,'2011-04-05 14:52:36','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nLooks good but can you split the launch file away from the other changes? Just upload a changeset with just the launch file... it\'s good to separate changesets from each other :)',3003,'AAAL33///G4='),(2,'2011-04-05 14:53:53','Patch Set 1: (4 inline comments)\n\n',3003,'AAAL33///Gk='),(2,'2011-04-05 22:13:12','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3003,'AAAL4H///+A='),(210,'2011-04-05 21:35:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',3003,'AAAL4H///+c='),(2,'2011-04-05 22:13:12','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3003,'AAAL4H///+E='),(210,'2011-04-05 21:47:24','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n.launch file and superfluous whitespaces removed',3003,'AAAL4H///+U='),(210,'2011-04-05 21:45:09','Uploaded patch set 3.',3003,'AAAL4H///+Y='),(107,'2011-04-04 22:41:10','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/334/ : FAILURE',3004,'AAAL33///IQ='),(107,'2011-04-04 22:33:11','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/334/ ',3004,'AAAL33///IU='),(6,'2011-04-06 13:51:48','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3004,'AAAL4H///7g='),(6,'2011-04-06 13:51:47','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nYep, this works!\n\nThanks, Dariusz, and greetings to Poland',3004,'AAAL4H///7k='),(107,'2011-04-05 00:47:52','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/339/ : FAILURE',3005,'AAAL33///G8='),(107,'2011-04-05 00:39:34','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/339/ ',3005,'AAAL33///HA='),(107,'2011-04-05 22:45:16','Patch Set 2: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/347/ ',3005,'AAAL4H///9c='),(107,'2011-04-05 22:43:30','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/346/ : UNSTABLE',3005,'AAAL4H///9g='),(208,'2011-04-05 22:41:47','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',3005,'AAAL4H///9k='),(4,'2011-04-05 22:56:11','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3005,'AAAL4H///9M='),(107,'2011-04-05 22:36:02','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/346/ ',3005,'AAAL4H///9o='),(4,'2011-04-05 22:56:10','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- fixed too wide commit message header',3005,'AAAL4H///9Q='),(4,'2011-04-05 22:35:58','Uploaded patch set 2.',3005,'AAAL4H///9s='),(107,'2011-04-05 22:55:02','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/347/ : SUCCESS',3005,'AAAL4H///9Y='),(210,'2011-04-05 20:14:10','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',3006,'AAAL4H///+8='),(2,'2011-04-05 22:13:26','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3007,'AAAL4H///94='),(2,'2011-04-05 22:13:26','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good :)',3007,'AAAL4H///98='),(2,'2011-04-06 17:15:58','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3008,'AAAL4H///6A='),(2,'2011-04-06 17:15:57','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3008,'AAAL4H///6E='),(107,'2011-04-06 13:11:06','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/239/ : SUCCESS',3008,'AAAL4H///70='),(107,'2011-04-06 13:08:36','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/239/ ',3008,'AAAL4H///74='),(107,'2011-04-06 12:24:04','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/236/ ',3008,'AAAL4H///80='),(6,'2011-04-06 13:06:07','Uploaded patch set 2.',3008,'AAAL4H///8E='),(107,'2011-04-06 12:27:31','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/236/ : FAILURE',3008,'AAAL4H///8o='),(2,'2011-04-06 17:17:40','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3009,'AAAL4H///54='),(2,'2011-04-06 17:17:40','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good, thanks Stefan.',3009,'AAAL4H///58='),(107,'2011-04-06 13:08:35','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/238/ : SUCCESS',3009,'AAAL4H///78='),(107,'2011-04-06 13:06:10','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/238/ ',3009,'AAAL4H///8A='),(107,'2011-04-06 12:31:02','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/237/ : FAILURE',3009,'AAAL4H///8g='),(6,'2011-04-06 13:06:07','Uploaded patch set 2.',3009,'AAAL4H///8I='),(107,'2011-04-06 12:27:31','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/237/ ',3009,'AAAL4H///8k='),(107,'2011-04-06 14:34:08','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/353/ (1/3)',3010,'AAAL4H///6c='),(6,'2011-04-06 14:27:49','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',3010,'AAAL4H///6k='),(107,'2011-04-06 14:59:14','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/353/ : UNSTABLE \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/353/ : UNSTABLE \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/353/ : UNSTABLE',3010,'AAAL4H///6M='),(107,'2011-04-06 14:48:00','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/353/ (3/3)',3010,'AAAL4H///6Q='),(6,'2011-04-06 14:27:34','Uploaded patch set 2.',3010,'AAAL4H///6s='),(107,'2011-04-06 14:44:07','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/353/ (2/3)',3010,'AAAL4H///6U='),(100,'2011-04-06 14:21:37','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',3010,'AAAL4H///7I='),(107,'2011-04-06 12:35:50','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/349/ : UNSTABLE',3010,'AAAL4H///8c='),(107,'2011-04-06 12:24:42','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/349/ ',3010,'AAAL4H///8w='),(4,'2011-04-07 22:16:12','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3010,'AAAL4H///yE='),(4,'2011-04-07 22:16:10','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nverified ui tests locally',3010,'AAAL4H///yI='),(107,'2011-04-07 22:15:20','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/358/ : UNSTABLE',3010,'AAAL4H///yM='),(4,'2011-04-07 22:05:54','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nrebased',3010,'AAAL4H///yQ='),(107,'2011-04-07 22:05:13','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/358/ ',3010,'AAAL4H///yU='),(4,'2011-04-07 22:05:09','Uploaded patch set 3.',3010,'AAAL4H///yY='),(2,'2011-04-06 19:53:48','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3011,'AAAL4H///4g='),(2,'2011-04-06 19:53:47','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThe JGit change is in now. It\'s nice to see some simplification going on ;)',3011,'AAAL4H///4k='),(6,'2011-04-06 12:25:55','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nDepends on JGit change http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,3009',3011,'AAAL4H///8s='),(107,'2011-04-06 12:36:28','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/350/ : FAILURE',3011,'AAAL4H///8U='),(107,'2011-04-06 12:35:51','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/350/ ',3011,'AAAL4H///8Y='),(4,'2011-04-06 20:19:09','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3012,'AAAL4H///38='),(4,'2011-04-06 20:19:08','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nrebased',3012,'AAAL4H///4A='),(4,'2011-04-06 20:04:59','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',3012,'AAAL4H///4c='),(107,'2011-04-06 20:17:05','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/355/ : UNSTABLE',3012,'AAAL4H///4E='),(107,'2011-04-06 20:07:41','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/355/ ',3012,'AAAL4H///4M='),(4,'2011-04-06 20:07:35','Uploaded patch set 2.',3012,'AAAL4H///4Q='),(NULL,'2011-04-06 20:04:59','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',3012,'AAAL4H///4Y='),(107,'2011-04-06 17:17:51','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/351/ : SUCCESS \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/354/ : UNSTABLE',3012,'AAAL4H///50='),(107,'2011-04-06 17:08:28','Patch Set 1: No score; No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/354/ (2/2)',3012,'AAAL4H///6I='),(107,'2011-04-06 13:58:15','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this; Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/351/ : SUCCESS \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/351/ : FAILURE \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/351/ : UNSTABLE',3012,'AAAL4H///7c='),(107,'2011-04-06 13:48:53','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/351/ (3/3)',3012,'AAAL4H///7o='),(107,'2011-04-06 13:36:54','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/351/ (2/3)',3012,'AAAL4H///7s='),(107,'2011-04-06 13:36:54','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/351/ (1/3)',3012,'AAAL4H///7w='),(107,'2011-04-06 20:41:43','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/243/ ',3013,'AAAL4H///20='),(79,'2011-04-06 20:41:39','Uploaded patch set 2.',3013,'AAAL4H///24='),(1,'2011-04-06 20:48:44','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3013,'AAAL4H///2c='),(107,'2011-04-06 20:44:20','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/243/ : SUCCESS',3013,'AAAL4H///2g='),(1,'2011-04-06 20:42:52','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',3013,'AAAL4H///2s='),(79,'2011-04-06 20:41:49','Patch Set 1: (2 inline comments)\n\n',3013,'AAAL4H///2w='),(1,'2011-04-06 19:33:44','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',3013,'AAAL4H///40='),(107,'2011-04-06 19:18:20','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/241/ : SUCCESS',3013,'AAAL4H///5A='),(107,'2011-04-06 19:15:52','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/241/ ',3013,'AAAL4H///5E='),(1,'2011-04-06 21:23:33','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3014,'AAAL4H///18='),(1,'2011-04-06 21:23:32','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',3014,'AAAL4H///2A='),(107,'2011-04-06 21:04:44','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/244/ : SUCCESS',3014,'AAAL4H///2U='),(107,'2011-04-06 21:02:13','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/244/ ',3014,'AAAL4H///2Y='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:23:32','Uploaded patch set 3.',3015,'AAAL4H///0g='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:26:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3015,'AAAL4H///0M='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:26:20','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nI\'m happy enough with this change. It needs a bit more work but we can work on that in the future. Thanks for your feedback earlier.',3015,'AAAL4H///0Q='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:25:50','Uploaded patch set 5.',3015,'AAAL4H///0U='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:20:41','Uploaded patch set 2.',3015,'AAAL4H///0w='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:25:06','Uploaded patch set 4.',3015,'AAAL4H///0Y='),(208,'2011-04-07 19:36:54','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',3015,'AAAL4H///1E='),(210,'2011-04-07 19:32:25','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(6 inline comments)\n\nLooks good to me modulo comments and non existing Eclipse job.\n\nSee also https://github.com/smilebase/org.eclipse.gist\nthis ist my gist sandbox ... I will move this code also to egit-github',3015,'AAAL4H///1M='),(2,'2011-04-07 17:59:23','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nWe need to wrap the actual creation of a Gist within an Eclipse job... and then we\'ll be good.',3015,'AAAL4H///1s='),(210,'2011-04-07 20:47:13','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',3016,'AAAL4H///08='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:27:20','Uploaded patch set 2.',3016,'AAAL4H///0A='),(NULL,'2011-04-07 21:26:37','Your change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\nPlease merge (or rebase) the change locally and upload the resolution for review.',3016,'AAAL4H///0E='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:26:37','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',3016,'AAAL4H///0I='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:27:28','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3016,'AAAL4H///z4='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:27:28','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3016,'AAAL4H///z8='),(210,'2011-04-07 20:48:09','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',3017,'AAAL4H///04='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:29:15','Uploaded patch set 2.',3017,'AAAL4H///zg='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:29:31','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3017,'AAAL4H///zU='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:29:31','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3017,'AAAL4H///zY='),(210,'2011-04-15 15:24:54','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',3018,'AAAL4H///OM='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:37:52','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nI agree with Kevin. I would do Gists as another task repository since they support comments and multiple revisions.',3018,'AAAL4H///y0='),(208,'2011-04-07 21:35:25','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nI saw Gists fitting into the task list as a different type of task repository, instead of a separate view.',3018,'AAAL4H///y4='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:59:49','Patch Set 1:\n\nTrue, to an extent. However, you can think of it as a task related to a snippet that you comment and collaborate on. You generally create a gist to get feedback on it.',3018,'AAAL4H///yk='),(210,'2011-04-07 21:53:55','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nOK convinced ... but a gist is not a task (from logical point of view) ...',3018,'AAAL4H///yo='),(210,'2011-04-07 20:59:37','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nnasty bug ...',3019,'AAAL4H///00='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:28:27','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3019,'AAAL4H///zo='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:28:27','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3019,'AAAL4H///zs='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:28:14','Uploaded patch set 2.',3019,'AAAL4H///zw='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:20:52','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\noops!',3020,'AAAL4H///0s='),(2,'2011-04-07 21:33:06','Uploaded patch set 2.',3021,'AAAL4H///y8='),(2,'2011-04-07 22:00:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3021,'AAAL4H///yc='),(2,'2011-04-07 22:00:01','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nGood to go.',3021,'AAAL4H///yg='),(208,'2011-04-07 21:50:35','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\nGood for now, I queued up with our designer creating custom icons to be able to distinguish issues, pull requests, and gists.',3021,'AAAL4H///ys='),(210,'2011-04-07 21:40:49','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',3021,'AAAL4H///yw='),(2,'2011-04-08 05:12:48','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3022,'AAAL4H///w0='),(2,'2011-04-08 05:12:48','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3022,'AAAL4H///w4='),(208,'2011-04-07 22:29:40','Uploaded patch set 3.',3022,'AAAL4H///x8='),(208,'2011-04-08 00:07:04','Uploaded patch set 4.',3022,'AAAL4H///xQ='),(208,'2011-04-07 22:27:54','Uploaded patch set 2.',3022,'AAAL4H///yA='),(2,'2011-04-07 22:59:21','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3023,'AAAL4H///xc='),(2,'2011-04-07 22:59:21','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThat\'as cleaner!',3023,'AAAL4H///xg='),(2,'2011-04-07 23:57:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3024,'AAAL4H///xU='),(2,'2011-04-07 23:57:19','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3024,'AAAL4H///xY='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:56:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3025,'AAAL4H///eM='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:56:29','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3025,'AAAL4H///eQ='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:56:15','Uploaded patch set 3.',3025,'AAAL4H///eU='),(208,'2011-04-12 19:04:48','Uploaded patch set 2.',3025,'AAAL4H///gM='),(107,'2011-04-08 00:34:19','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/361/ : UNSTABLE',3026,'AAAL4H///w8='),(4,'2011-04-08 07:41:37','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3026,'AAAL4H///ws='),(4,'2011-04-08 07:41:36','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n',3026,'AAAL4H///ww='),(107,'2011-04-08 00:25:14','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/361/ ',3026,'AAAL4H///xA='),(107,'2011-04-08 00:25:13','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/360/ : UNSTABLE',3026,'AAAL4H///xE='),(208,'2011-04-08 00:20:20','Uploaded patch set 2.',3026,'AAAL4H///xI='),(107,'2011-04-08 00:17:52','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/360/ ',3026,'AAAL4H///xM='),(2,'2011-04-08 17:21:25','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3027,'AAAL4H///wk='),(2,'2011-04-08 17:21:24','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nSmall fix, this adds a proper branding icon, instead of the 16x16 icon that was adorning mylyn repository overlays.',3027,'AAAL4H///wo='),(2,'2011-04-10 18:10:36','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3028,'AAAL4H///t0='),(2,'2011-04-10 18:10:36','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3028,'AAAL4H///t4='),(2,'2011-04-10 18:10:24','Uploaded patch set 3.',3028,'AAAL4H///t8='),(208,'2011-04-08 17:57:12','Uploaded patch set 2.',3028,'AAAL4H///wg='),(2,'2011-04-09 21:10:18','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3029,'AAAL4H///wE='),(2,'2011-04-09 21:10:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good, thanks Christian.',3029,'AAAL4H///wI='),(210,'2011-06-13 18:36:38','Patch Set 1: Abandoned',3030,'AABOKH///oo='),(210,'2011-04-15 21:05:30','Patch Set 2: Abandoned',3031,'AAAL4H///NE='),(11,'2011-04-09 21:42:38','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nChristian, could you rebase it on top of the master? I\'m going to submit it but have no time to review two other dependencies right now.',3031,'AAAL4H///wA='),(210,'2011-04-09 20:58:35','Uploaded patch set 2.',3031,'AAAL4H///wM='),(11,'2011-04-09 08:00:13','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',3031,'AAAL4H///wQ='),(107,'2011-04-09 21:58:43','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/245/ : SUCCESS',3032,'AAAL4H///v0='),(107,'2011-04-09 21:56:05','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/245/ ',3032,'AAAL4H///v8='),(2,'2011-04-09 22:13:09','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3032,'AAAL4H///vk='),(2,'2011-04-09 22:13:08','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3032,'AAAL4H///vo='),(107,'2011-04-09 21:58:16','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/362/ ',3033,'AAAL4H///v4='),(11,'2011-04-09 22:42:00','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved\n\nOk, https://issues.sonatype.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10030&version=10874 sounds promissing ;-)',3033,'AAAL4H///vc='),(2,'2011-04-09 22:13:49','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\nbesides it being the general right thing to do (use the latest version of a library out)',3033,'AAAL4H///vg='),(107,'2011-04-09 22:09:49','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/362/ : SUCCESS',3033,'AAAL4H///vs='),(11,'2011-04-09 22:08:06','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nMatthias, could you provide some details in commit message why do we need this?',3033,'AAAL4H///vw='),(11,'2011-04-09 22:42:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3033,'AAAL4H///vY='),(2,'2011-04-09 23:12:23','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3034,'AAAL4H///u8='),(2,'2011-04-09 23:12:22','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks fine.',3034,'AAAL4H///vA='),(107,'2011-04-09 23:07:40','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/247/ : SUCCESS',3034,'AAAL4H///vE='),(107,'2011-04-09 23:05:10','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/247/ ',3034,'AAAL4H///vI='),(107,'2011-04-09 23:05:09','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/246/ : SUCCESS',3034,'AAAL4H///vM='),(4,'2011-04-09 23:03:36','Uploaded patch set 2.',3034,'AAAL4H///vQ='),(107,'2011-04-09 23:02:40','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/246/ ',3034,'AAAL4H///vU='),(2,'2011-04-09 23:17:36','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3035,'AAAL4H///u0='),(11,'2011-04-09 23:16:24','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; IP review completed\n\n',3035,'AAAL4H///u4='),(2,'2011-04-09 23:17:36','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3035,'AAAL4H///uw='),(2,'2011-04-09 23:23:19','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3036,'AAAL4H///uo='),(2,'2011-04-09 23:23:18','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nSimple fix.',3036,'AAAL4H///us='),(2,'2011-04-10 17:58:40','Patch Set 1:\n\nHeh, you know you could of just attached a new patchset with the Change-Id and things would have worked ok?\n\nChange-Id: I24ac4c3621bf7c9d06a2f9866b4ce01e038cdd28',3037,'AAAL4H///ug='),(208,'2011-04-10 17:57:10','Patch Set 1: Abandoned\n\nForgot to compute gerrit change id in commit message',3037,'AAAL4H///uk='),(208,'2011-04-10 18:00:01','Patch Set 1:\n\nYeah, I forgot to and instead just clicked the compute change id button and when I re-pushed it pushed to a new review.',3037,'AAAL4H///uQ='),(2,'2011-04-10 17:59:07','Uploaded patch set 2.',3038,'AAAL4H///uc='),(2,'2011-04-10 17:59:18','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3038,'AAAL4H///uU='),(2,'2011-04-10 17:59:17','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3038,'AAAL4H///uY='),(6,'2011-04-11 09:37:50','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3039,'AAAL4H///oI='),(6,'2011-04-11 09:37:49','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nRun tests locally.',3039,'AAAL4H///oM='),(107,'2011-04-10 18:11:36','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/363/ : UNSTABLE',3039,'AAAL4H///tw='),(107,'2011-04-10 18:01:33','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/363/ ',3039,'AAAL4H///uM='),(2,'2011-04-10 18:08:47','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3040,'AAAL4H///uA='),(2,'2011-04-10 18:08:46','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3040,'AAAL4H///uE='),(2,'2011-04-10 18:08:37','Uploaded patch set 2.',3040,'AAAL4H///uI='),(2,'2011-04-10 18:23:17','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3041,'AAAL4H///tk='),(2,'2011-04-10 18:23:17','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3041,'AAAL4H///to='),(2,'2011-04-10 18:23:06','Uploaded patch set 2.',3041,'AAAL4H///ts='),(2,'2011-04-10 19:11:06','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3042,'AAAL4H///tM='),(2,'2011-04-10 19:11:06','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThis looks good. In the future, I prefer us to use the latest version of httpclient from httpcomponents',3042,'AAAL4H///tQ='),(2,'2011-04-10 19:10:23','Uploaded patch set 2.',3042,'AAAL4H///tY='),(6,'2011-04-11 12:17:04','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks reasonable',3043,'AAAL4H///nc='),(6,'2011-04-11 12:17:04','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3043,'AAAL4H///nY='),(107,'2011-04-10 19:05:44','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/364/ : SUCCESS',3043,'AAAL4H///tc='),(107,'2011-04-10 18:55:32','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/364/ ',3043,'AAAL4H///tg='),(8,'2011-04-11 20:37:03','Patch Set 7:\n\nMy main point was that C Git ignored \"latin-1\" since it did not recognize it. I could as well have written \"fubar\" as the encoding and it would have been treated the same.',3044,'AAAL4H///k4='),(1,'2011-04-11 16:56:29','Patch Set 6: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\n',3044,'AAAL4H///l0='),(107,'2011-04-11 16:54:55','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/255/ ',3044,'AAAL4H///l8='),(107,'2011-04-11 16:59:58','Patch Set 7: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/256/ : SUCCESS',3044,'AAAL4H///lk='),(107,'2011-04-11 16:57:28','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/256/ ',3044,'AAAL4H///lo='),(107,'2011-04-11 16:57:27','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/255/ : SUCCESS',3044,'AAAL4H///ls='),(1,'2011-04-11 17:09:06','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3044,'AAAL4H///lU='),(2,'2011-04-11 16:56:58','Uploaded patch set 7.',3044,'AAAL4H///lw='),(1,'2011-04-11 17:09:06','Patch Set 7: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',3044,'AAAL4H///lY='),(2,'2011-04-11 16:54:52','Uploaded patch set 6.',3044,'AAAL4H///mA='),(107,'2011-04-11 16:48:31','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/254/ ',3044,'AAAL4H///mc='),(107,'2011-04-11 16:50:59','Patch Set 5: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/254/ : SUCCESS',3044,'AAAL4H///mE='),(107,'2011-04-11 16:48:31','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/253/ : SUCCESS',3044,'AAAL4H///mg='),(1,'2011-04-11 16:50:32','Patch Set 5: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(3 inline comments)\n\n',3044,'AAAL4H///mI='),(2,'2011-04-11 16:46:30','Uploaded patch set 5.',3044,'AAAL4H///mk='),(107,'2011-04-11 16:45:28','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/253/ ',3044,'AAAL4H///mo='),(2,'2011-04-11 16:45:24','Uploaded patch set 4.',3044,'AAAL4H///ms='),(1,'2011-04-11 15:08:58','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(5 inline comments)\n\n',3044,'AAAL4H///mw='),(107,'2011-04-11 02:47:10','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/252/ : SUCCESS',3044,'AAAL4H///oQ='),(107,'2011-04-11 02:44:39','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/252/ ',3044,'AAAL4H///oU='),(2,'2011-04-11 02:44:36','Uploaded patch set 3.',3044,'AAAL4H///oY='),(8,'2011-04-10 20:57:54','Patch Set 2:\n\nC Git does not support any (iso-)?latin-\\d+ header.',3044,'AAAL4H///r8='),(1,'2011-04-11 00:25:17','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(3 inline comments)\n\nC Git permits the user to set any string they want into the i18n.commitencoding variable in the config file. If this isn\'t UTF-8 or utf-8, then the string is stored as-is into the \"encoding\" header of a commit object.\n\nI suspect the bug reporter had some user enter \"latin-1\" into this variable and create a ton of commits with it. C Git when reading commits tries to honor the encoding header, and then falls back when it doesn\'t understand it. That fallback is probably working here to allow the latin-1 encoding header.\n\nIMHO, JGit will need to support this header, just like we need to support that damn leading \'0\' in the mode field of tree objects, thanks to GitHub\'s online web editor.\n\nOf course, according to http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets the correct alias is \'latin1\', not \'latin-1\'. *sigh*',3044,'AAAL4H///rA='),(107,'2011-04-10 19:24:11','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/249/ : SUCCESS',3044,'AAAL4H///s8='),(8,'2011-04-10 20:55:18','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n1) Can we ban the word \"fix\" and its inclinations from commit messages?\n\n2) C Git does not understand the name iso-latin-1, so why should JGit?',3044,'AAAL4H///sA='),(107,'2011-04-10 19:21:42','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/249/ ',3044,'AAAL4H///tA='),(2,'2011-04-10 19:21:38','Uploaded patch set 2.',3044,'AAAL4H///tE='),(107,'2011-04-10 19:13:25','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/248/ : SUCCESS',3044,'AAAL4H///tI='),(107,'2011-04-10 19:10:47','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/248/ ',3044,'AAAL4H///tU='),(2,'2011-04-10 19:29:31','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3045,'AAAL4H///s0='),(2,'2011-04-10 19:29:18','Uploaded patch set 2.',3045,'AAAL4H///s4='),(2,'2011-04-10 19:29:31','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3045,'AAAL4H///sw='),(2,'2011-04-10 19:43:56','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3046,'AAAL4H///sg='),(2,'2011-04-10 19:43:55','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3046,'AAAL4H///sk='),(2,'2011-04-10 19:42:48','Uploaded patch set 3.',3046,'AAAL4H///so='),(208,'2011-04-10 19:40:21','Uploaded patch set 2.',3046,'AAAL4H///ss='),(208,'2011-04-10 19:59:32','Uploaded patch set 2.',3047,'AAAL4H///sc='),(2,'2011-04-10 20:01:33','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3047,'AAAL4H///sQ='),(2,'2011-04-10 20:01:32','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3047,'AAAL4H///sU='),(2,'2011-04-10 20:01:22','Uploaded patch set 3.',3047,'AAAL4H///sY='),(2,'2011-04-10 20:26:15','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3048,'AAAL4H///sE='),(2,'2011-04-10 20:26:14','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3048,'AAAL4H///sI='),(2,'2011-04-10 20:26:02','Uploaded patch set 2.',3048,'AAAL4H///sM='),(208,'2011-04-10 21:09:01','Uploaded patch set 3.',3049,'AAAL4H///r0='),(208,'2011-04-10 21:07:52','Uploaded patch set 2.',3049,'AAAL4H///r4='),(2,'2011-04-10 21:19:45','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3049,'AAAL4H///ro='),(2,'2011-04-10 21:19:45','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3049,'AAAL4H///rs='),(2,'2011-04-10 21:19:33','Uploaded patch set 4.',3049,'AAAL4H///rw='),(2,'2011-04-11 00:39:42','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3050,'AAAL4H///q0='),(2,'2011-04-11 00:39:42','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3050,'AAAL4H///q4='),(2,'2011-04-11 00:39:22','Uploaded patch set 2.',3050,'AAAL4H///q8='),(2,'2011-04-11 11:27:07','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3051,'AAAL4H///ng='),(2,'2011-04-11 11:27:07','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3051,'AAAL4H///nk='),(2,'2011-04-11 11:26:56','Uploaded patch set 3.',3051,'AAAL4H///no='),(208,'2011-04-10 21:45:48','Uploaded patch set 2.',3051,'AAAL4H///rk='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:55:43','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3052,'AAAL4H///h4='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:55:43','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3052,'AAAL4H///h8='),(208,'2011-04-11 16:50:03','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve\n\n',3052,'AAAL4H///mU='),(6,'2011-04-11 12:38:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3053,'AAAL4H///nQ='),(6,'2011-04-11 12:37:59','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nThanks, Dariusz',3053,'AAAL4H///nU='),(107,'2011-04-10 22:52:05','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/366/ : UNSTABLE',3053,'AAAL4H///rQ='),(107,'2011-04-10 22:42:38','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/366/ ',3053,'AAAL4H///rU='),(2,'2011-04-11 11:20:01','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3054,'AAAL4H///n8='),(2,'2011-04-11 11:20:01','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3054,'AAAL4H///oA='),(2,'2011-04-11 11:19:47','Uploaded patch set 2.',3054,'AAAL4H///oE='),(2,'2011-04-11 11:24:00','Uploaded patch set 3.',3055,'AAAL4H///n0='),(2,'2011-04-11 11:23:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',3055,'AAAL4H///n4='),(2,'2011-04-11 11:24:41','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3055,'AAAL4H///ns='),(2,'2011-04-11 11:24:40','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3055,'AAAL4H///nw='),(2,'2011-04-12 12:59:13','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good!',3056,'AAAL4H///kc='),(2,'2011-04-12 12:58:59','Uploaded patch set 4.',3056,'AAAL4H///kg='),(2,'2011-04-12 12:59:13','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3056,'AAAL4H///kY='),(208,'2011-04-11 17:07:44','Uploaded patch set 3.',3056,'AAAL4H///lc='),(208,'2011-04-11 17:06:55','Uploaded patch set 2.',3056,'AAAL4H///lg='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:06:21','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3057,'AAAL4H///kM='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:06:20','Patch Set 5: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3057,'AAAL4H///kQ='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:06:10','Uploaded patch set 5.',3057,'AAAL4H///kU='),(208,'2011-04-11 18:06:36','Uploaded patch set 4.',3057,'AAAL4H///lI='),(208,'2011-04-11 18:01:57','Uploaded patch set 3.',3057,'AAAL4H///lM='),(208,'2011-04-11 17:45:03','Uploaded patch set 2.',3057,'AAAL4H///lQ='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:08:09','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3058,'AAAL4H///kA='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:08:08','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3058,'AAAL4H///kE='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:07:59','Uploaded patch set 2.',3058,'AAAL4H///kI='),(NULL,'2011-04-12 13:14:35','Change cannot be merged due to unsatisfiable dependencies.\n\nThe following dependency errors were found:\n\n* Depends on commit 0c3c89cf0eeb42a8af5fae91dc3e634a80fb8c91 which has no change associated with it.\n\nPlease rebase the change and upload a replacement commit.',3059,'AAAL4H///j0='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:14:35','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3059,'AAAL4H///j4='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:13:45','Uploaded patch set 3.',3059,'AAAL4H///j8='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:17:50','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3059,'AAAL4H///jo='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:17:49','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3059,'AAAL4H///js='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:17:36','Uploaded patch set 4.',3059,'AAAL4H///jw='),(208,'2011-04-11 21:00:26','Uploaded patch set 2.',3059,'AAAL4H///k0='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:22:16','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3060,'AAAL4H///jc='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:22:15','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3060,'AAAL4H///jg='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:21:30','Uploaded patch set 2.',3060,'AAAL4H///jk='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:28:50','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3061,'AAAL4H///jQ='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:28:49','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3061,'AAAL4H///jU='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:28:18','Uploaded patch set 2.',3061,'AAAL4H///jY='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:30:35','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3062,'AAAL4H///jE='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:30:34','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good!',3062,'AAAL4H///jI='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:30:24','Uploaded patch set 2.',3062,'AAAL4H///jM='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:35:10','Uploaded patch set 2.',3063,'AAAL4H///i0='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:35:23','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3063,'AAAL4H///is='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:35:23','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3063,'AAAL4H///iw='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:34:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3064,'AAAL4H///i4='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:33:35','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3064,'AAAL4H///i8='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:33:18','Uploaded patch set 2.',3064,'AAAL4H///jA='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:37:40','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3065,'AAAL4H///ig='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:37:40','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good!',3065,'AAAL4H///ik='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:37:26','Uploaded patch set 2.',3065,'AAAL4H///io='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:39:32','Uploaded patch set 2.',3066,'AAAL4H///ic='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:39:51','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3066,'AAAL4H///iU='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:39:51','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good. Sucks that we have to use Mylyn internals though...',3066,'AAAL4H///iY='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:42:07','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3067,'AAAL4H///iI='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:42:07','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3067,'AAAL4H///iM='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:41:55','Uploaded patch set 3.',3067,'AAAL4H///iQ='),(208,'2011-04-12 01:00:30','Uploaded patch set 2.',3067,'AAAL4H///kw='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:54:59','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3068,'AAAL4H///iA='),(2,'2011-04-12 13:54:59','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nSimple fix.',3068,'AAAL4H///iE='),(208,'2011-04-12 18:12:38','Patch Set 2:\n\nThanks, overlooked that one.',3069,'AAAL4H///g4='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:05:33','Uploaded patch set 2.',3069,'AAAL4H///hc='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:07:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3069,'AAAL4H///hU='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:07:20','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nIf you\'re going to work with images Kevin, checkout GitHubImages instead :)',3069,'AAAL4H///hY='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:15:38','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3070,'AAAL4H///gg='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:15:37','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good!',3070,'AAAL4H///gk='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:15:25','Uploaded patch set 2.',3070,'AAAL4H///go='),(4,'2011-04-13 14:04:00','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- verified locally',3071,'AAAL4H///cc='),(107,'2011-04-13 14:03:28','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/376/ ',3071,'AAAL4H///cg='),(4,'2011-04-13 14:03:24','Uploaded patch set 2.',3071,'AAAL4H///ck='),(107,'2011-04-13 14:14:41','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/376/ : SUCCESS',3071,'AAAL4H///cQ='),(4,'2011-04-13 14:04:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3071,'AAAL4H///cY='),(107,'2011-04-12 22:00:52','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/373/ : UNSTABLE',3071,'AAAL4H///fo='),(107,'2011-04-12 21:51:25','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/373/ ',3071,'AAAL4H///fs='),(107,'2011-04-12 15:50:50','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/369/ ',3071,'AAAL4H///h0='),(107,'2011-04-12 16:03:53','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/369/ : UNSTABLE',3071,'AAAL4H///hw='),(107,'2011-04-13 23:14:05','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/379/ : ABORTED',3072,'AAAL4H///a0='),(4,'2011-04-13 23:04:43','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3072,'AAAL4H///a4='),(4,'2011-04-13 23:04:42','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- rebased\n- improved texts on gerrit configuration page\n- added handling of Gerrit HTTP path prefix for smart HTTP\n- verified locally',3072,'AAAL4H///a8='),(107,'2011-04-13 23:25:40','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/380/ : UNSTABLE',3072,'AAAL4H///as='),(107,'2011-04-13 23:14:06','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/380/ ',3072,'AAAL4H///aw='),(4,'2011-04-13 23:03:01','Uploaded patch set 3.',3072,'AAAL4H///bA='),(107,'2011-04-13 22:59:02','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/379/ ',3072,'AAAL4H///bE='),(4,'2011-04-13 22:58:58','Uploaded patch set 2.',3072,'AAAL4H///bI='),(107,'2011-04-12 22:11:06','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/374/ : SUCCESS',3072,'AAAL4H///fg='),(107,'2011-04-12 22:00:53','Patch Set 1: No score\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/374/ ',3072,'AAAL4H///fk='),(107,'2011-04-12 16:20:56','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/370/ : ABORTED',3072,'AAAL4H///ho='),(107,'2011-04-12 16:03:54','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/370/ ',3072,'AAAL4H///hs='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:17:00','Uploaded patch set 2.',3073,'AAAL4H///gc='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:17:26','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3073,'AAAL4H///gU='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:17:26','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good!',3073,'AAAL4H///gY='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:10:02','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3074,'AAAL4H///hI='),(208,'2011-04-12 16:48:54','Uploaded patch set 2.',3074,'AAAL4H///hk='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:10:02','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3074,'AAAL4H///hM='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:09:45','Uploaded patch set 3.',3074,'AAAL4H///hQ='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:12:34','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3075,'AAAL4H///g8='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:12:34','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3075,'AAAL4H///hA='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:12:01','Uploaded patch set 2.',3075,'AAAL4H///hE='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:14:10','Uploaded patch set 3.',3076,'AAAL4H///g0='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:14:30','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3076,'AAAL4H///gs='),(2,'2011-04-12 18:14:30','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nSeems reasonable.',3076,'AAAL4H///gw='),(208,'2011-04-12 17:56:07','Uploaded patch set 2.',3076,'AAAL4H///hg='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:53:07','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3077,'AAAL4H///eo='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:53:06','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nYay for NLS',3077,'AAAL4H///es='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:52:52','Uploaded patch set 3.',3077,'AAAL4H///ew='),(208,'2011-04-12 18:51:36','Uploaded patch set 2.',3077,'AAAL4H///gQ='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:54:29','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3078,'AAAL4H///ec='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:54:19','Uploaded patch set 2.',3078,'AAAL4H///eg='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:54:30','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3078,'AAAL4H///eY='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:58:12','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3079,'AAAL4H///d8='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:58:12','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3079,'AAAL4H///eA='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:57:59','Uploaded patch set 3.',3079,'AAAL4H///eE='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:57:39','Uploaded patch set 2.',3079,'AAAL4H///eI='),(2,'2011-04-15 15:16:42','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3080,'AAAL4H///Oo='),(2,'2011-04-15 15:16:42','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good!',3080,'AAAL4H///Os='),(2,'2011-04-15 15:16:30','Uploaded patch set 2.',3080,'AAAL4H///Ow='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:59:16','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3081,'AAAL4H///d0='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:59:06','Uploaded patch set 2.',3081,'AAAL4H///d4='),(2,'2011-04-13 02:59:17','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3081,'AAAL4H///dw='),(4,'2011-04-12 23:35:41','Uploaded patch set 2.',3082,'AAAL4H///fc='),(4,'2011-04-12 23:48:26','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3082,'AAAL4H///fE='),(4,'2011-04-12 23:48:25','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- agreed with Shawn and Chris\n- ip log uploaded to https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=341839',3082,'AAAL4H///fI='),(107,'2011-04-12 23:38:22','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/258/ : SUCCESS',3082,'AAAL4H///fU='),(107,'2011-04-12 23:35:45','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/258/ ',3082,'AAAL4H///fY='),(107,'2011-04-12 21:25:20','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/257/ : SUCCESS',3082,'AAAL4H///gE='),(107,'2011-04-12 21:22:42','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/257/ ',3082,'AAAL4H///gI='),(107,'2011-04-12 23:49:37','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/375/ : SUCCESS',3083,'AAAL4H///e4='),(4,'2011-04-12 23:49:14','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3083,'AAAL4H///e8='),(107,'2011-04-12 21:41:08','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/372/ ',3083,'AAAL4H///f0='),(4,'2011-04-12 21:41:05','Uploaded patch set 2.',3083,'AAAL4H///f4='),(107,'2011-04-12 21:37:16','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/371/ : SUCCESS',3083,'AAAL4H///f8='),(4,'2011-04-12 23:49:14','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n- agreed with Shawn and Chris\n- ip log uploaded to https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=341839',3083,'AAAL4H///fA='),(107,'2011-04-12 23:39:16','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/375/ ',3083,'AAAL4H///fM='),(4,'2011-04-12 23:39:13','Uploaded patch set 3.',3083,'AAAL4H///fQ='),(107,'2011-04-12 21:50:47','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/372/ : UNSTABLE',3083,'AAAL4H///fw='),(107,'2011-04-12 21:26:51','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/371/ ',3083,'AAAL4H///gA='),(210,'2011-04-13 18:32:10','Uploaded patch set 3.',3084,'AAAL4H///bg='),(208,'2011-04-13 14:59:02','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nSee inline comments',3084,'AAAL4H///cE='),(210,'2011-04-13 07:11:11','Uploaded patch set 2.',3084,'AAAL4H///dE='),(208,'2011-04-13 04:51:38','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(1 inline comment)\n\nSee inline comments',3084,'AAAL4H///dM='),(2,'2011-04-15 15:17:58','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3084,'AAAL4H///Oc='),(2,'2011-04-15 15:17:57','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3084,'AAAL4H///Og='),(2,'2011-04-15 15:17:46','Uploaded patch set 4.',3084,'AAAL4H///Ok='),(2,'2011-04-13 03:01:23','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3085,'AAAL4H///dk='),(2,'2011-04-13 03:01:23','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3085,'AAAL4H///do='),(2,'2011-04-13 03:01:10','Uploaded patch set 2.',3085,'AAAL4H///ds='),(2,'2011-04-13 03:02:29','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good!',3086,'AAAL4H///dc='),(2,'2011-04-13 03:02:17','Uploaded patch set 2.',3086,'AAAL4H///dg='),(2,'2011-04-13 03:02:29','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3086,'AAAL4H///dY='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:39:46','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3087,'AAAL4H///aQ='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:39:45','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3087,'AAAL4H///aU='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:39:30','Uploaded patch set 4.',3087,'AAAL4H///aY='),(208,'2011-04-13 15:26:02','Uploaded patch set 3.',3087,'AAAL4H///cA='),(2,'2011-04-13 06:53:32','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\ncan you redo this in a way to split it under the 250 line limit (e.g., multiple changesets)?',3087,'AAAL4H///dI='),(208,'2011-04-13 02:35:04','Uploaded patch set 2.',3087,'AAAL4H///e0='),(208,'2011-04-13 03:03:36','Uploaded patch set 2.',3088,'AAAL4H///dU='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:41:58','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3088,'AAAL4H///Z0='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:41:46','Uploaded patch set 3.',3088,'AAAL4H///Z4='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:41:59','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3088,'AAAL4H///Zw='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:40:44','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3089,'AAAL4H///aE='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:40:43','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3089,'AAAL4H///aI='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:40:28','Uploaded patch set 2.',3089,'AAAL4H///aM='),(208,'2011-04-13 15:44:10','Uploaded patch set 2.',3090,'AAAL4H///b0='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:49:01','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3090,'AAAL4H///X0='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:48:51','Uploaded patch set 4.',3090,'AAAL4H///X4='),(NULL,'2011-04-14 14:45:46','Change cannot be merged due to unsatisfiable dependencies.\n\nThe following dependency errors were found:\n\n* Depends on commit a699a11ed74fa4b1bc1bc25c87cfc38af5c032b6 which has no change associated with it.\n\nPlease rebase the change and upload a replacement commit.',3090,'AAAL4H///X8='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:49:01','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3090,'AAAL4H///Xw='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:45:46','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3090,'AAAL4H///YA='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:38:07','Uploaded patch set 3.',3090,'AAAL4H///YM='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:41:06','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3091,'AAAL4H///aA='),(208,'2011-04-13 02:53:23','Uploaded patch set 2.',3091,'AAAL4H///ek='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:41:06','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3091,'AAAL4H///Z8='),(208,'2011-04-13 15:32:11','Uploaded patch set 2.',3092,'AAAL4H///b8='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:43:00','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3092,'AAAL4H///Zc='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:42:59','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3092,'AAAL4H///Zg='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:42:46','Uploaded patch set 3.',3092,'AAAL4H///Zk='),(NULL,'2011-04-14 01:42:18','Change cannot be merged due to unsatisfiable dependencies.\n\nThe following dependency errors were found:\n\n* Depends on patch set 3 of I9c60f286, however the current patch set is 4.\n\nPlease rebase the change and upload a replacement commit.',3092,'AAAL4H///Zo='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:42:17','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3092,'AAAL4H///Zs='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:44:34','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3093,'AAAL4H///ZQ='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:44:33','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3093,'AAAL4H///ZU='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:44:10','Uploaded patch set 2.',3093,'AAAL4H///ZY='),(208,'2011-04-13 15:39:53','Uploaded patch set 2.',3094,'AAAL4H///b4='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:46:10','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3094,'AAAL4H///ZE='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:46:09','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good!',3094,'AAAL4H///ZI='),(2,'2011-04-14 01:45:59','Uploaded patch set 3.',3094,'AAAL4H///ZM='),(208,'2011-04-13 17:06:17','Uploaded patch set 2.',3095,'AAAL4H///bw='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:51:20','Patch Set 3:\n\nLooks good.',3095,'AAAL4H///Xg='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:51:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3095,'AAAL4H///Xk='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:51:20','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3095,'AAAL4H///Xo='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:51:10','Uploaded patch set 3.',3095,'AAAL4H///Xs='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:55:14','Uploaded patch set 2.',3096,'AAAL4H///Xc='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:55:24','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3096,'AAAL4H///XU='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:55:24','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3096,'AAAL4H///XY='),(208,'2011-04-13 17:46:30','Uploaded patch set 2.',3097,'AAAL4H///bs='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:58:03','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3097,'AAAL4H///XE='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:58:02','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3097,'AAAL4H///XI='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:57:41','Uploaded patch set 3.',3097,'AAAL4H///XM='),(208,'2011-04-13 18:24:21','Uploaded patch set 3.',3098,'AAAL4H///bk='),(208,'2011-04-13 18:22:25','Uploaded patch set 2.',3098,'AAAL4H///bo='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:59:11','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3098,'AAAL4H///W4='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:59:10','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3098,'AAAL4H///W8='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:58:50','Uploaded patch set 4.',3098,'AAAL4H///XA='),(2,'2011-04-14 14:59:58','Uploaded patch set 2.',3099,'AAAL4H///W0='),(2,'2011-04-14 15:02:44','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3099,'AAAL4H///Ws='),(2,'2011-04-14 15:01:25','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3099,'AAAL4H///Ww='),(107,'2011-04-13 21:49:18','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/377/ ',3100,'AAAL4H///bc='),(107,'2011-04-13 22:15:27','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/378/ : ABORTED',3100,'AAAL4H///bM='),(107,'2011-04-13 22:00:25','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/378/ ',3100,'AAAL4H///bQ='),(107,'2011-04-13 22:00:24','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/377/ : SUCCESS',3100,'AAAL4H///bU='),(8,'2011-04-13 21:51:07','Uploaded patch set 2.',3100,'AAAL4H///bY='),(107,'2011-04-14 07:17:17','Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/382/ : UNSTABLE',3100,'AAAL4H///Y0='),(4,'2011-04-14 07:03:53','Patch Set 3: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\nrebased',3100,'AAAL4H///Y4='),(107,'2011-04-14 07:03:16','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/382/ ',3100,'AAAL4H///Y8='),(4,'2011-04-14 07:31:19','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3100,'AAAL4H///Ys='),(4,'2011-04-14 07:31:18','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nverified ui tests locally',3100,'AAAL4H///Yw='),(4,'2011-04-14 07:03:11','Uploaded patch set 3.',3100,'AAAL4H///ZA='),(4,'2011-04-13 23:39:35','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3101,'AAAL4H///ac='),(4,'2011-04-13 23:39:33','Patch Set 1: Looks good to me, approved; IP review completed\n\n',3101,'AAAL4H///ag='),(107,'2011-04-13 23:38:55','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/381/ : SUCCESS',3101,'AAAL4H///ak='),(107,'2011-04-13 23:25:41','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/381/ ',3101,'AAAL4H///ao='),(2,'2011-04-14 15:05:52','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3102,'AAAL4H///Wg='),(2,'2011-04-14 15:05:52','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good.',3102,'AAAL4H///Wk='),(2,'2011-04-14 15:05:23','Uploaded patch set 2.',3102,'AAAL4H///Wo='),(2,'2011-04-14 15:07:55','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3103,'AAAL4H///WQ='),(2,'2011-04-14 15:07:55','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\n+1',3103,'AAAL4H///WU='),(2,'2011-04-14 15:07:45','Uploaded patch set 2.',3103,'AAAL4H///WY='),(2,'2011-04-14 15:17:11','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3104,'AAAL4H///WE='),(2,'2011-04-14 15:17:11','Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good!',3104,'AAAL4H///WI='),(2,'2011-04-14 15:11:09','Uploaded patch set 2.',3104,'AAAL4H///WM='),(214,'2011-04-19 21:53:35','Uploaded patch set 3.',3105,'AAAL4H///C0='),(107,'2011-04-19 22:13:56','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/266/ : SUCCESS',3105,'AAAL4H///CI='),(2,'2011-04-19 22:11:54','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3105,'AAAL4H///CM='),(2,'2011-04-19 22:11:53','Patch Set 4: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nLooks good to me now, thanks Bernard.',3105,'AAAL4H///CQ='),(107,'2011-04-19 21:56:19','Patch Set 3: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/265/ : SUCCESS',3105,'AAAL4H///Cs='),(107,'2011-04-19 22:11:25','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/266/ ',3105,'AAAL4H///CU='),(107,'2011-04-19 21:53:39','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/265/ ',3105,'AAAL4H///Cw='),(2,'2011-04-19 22:11:22','Uploaded patch set 4.',3105,'AAAL4H///CY='),(1,'2011-04-19 17:09:35','Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(3 inline comments)\n\n',3105,'AAAL4H///FA='),(107,'2011-04-19 02:55:38','Patch Set 2: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/264/ : SUCCESS',3105,'AAAL4H///Ho='),(107,'2011-04-19 02:53:02','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/264/ ',3105,'AAAL4H///Hs='),(214,'2011-04-19 02:52:58','Uploaded patch set 2.',3105,'AAAL4H///Hw='),(1,'2011-04-18 14:14:44','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(2 inline comments)\n\n',3105,'AAAL4H///Kk='),(107,'2011-04-14 14:34:34','Patch Set 1: Build Successful\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/259/ : SUCCESS',3105,'AAAL4H///YU='),(107,'2011-04-14 14:31:23','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/jgit.gerrit/259/ ',3105,'AAAL4H///YY='),(214,'2011-04-14 14:41:19','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nThis is work-in progress.  Feedback welcome.',3106,'AAAL4H///YE='),(107,'2011-04-14 14:39:37','Patch Set 1: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/383/ : FAILURE',3106,'AAAL4H///YI='),(107,'2011-04-14 14:37:54','Patch Set 1:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/383/ ',3106,'AAAL4H///YQ='),(107,'2011-05-12 18:05:19','Patch Set 9:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/696/ ',3106,'AABOI3///+0='),(2,'2011-05-12 18:05:15','Uploaded patch set 9.',3106,'AABOI3///+4='),(107,'2011-05-12 18:19:28','Patch Set 10:\n\nBuild Successful \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/697/ : SUCCESS',3106,'AABOI3///+c='),(107,'2011-05-12 18:12:26','Patch Set 10:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/697/ ',3106,'AABOI3///+g='),(107,'2011-05-12 18:12:25','Patch Set 9:\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/696/ : UNSTABLE',3106,'AABOI3///+k='),(2,'2011-05-12 18:08:20','Change has been successfully merged into the git repository.',3106,'AABOI3///+o='),(2,'2011-05-12 18:08:20','Patch Set 10: Looks good to me, approved; Build Successful; IP review completed\n\nCQ 5115 is now approved.\n\nChanged name to \'Git Staging\'\n\nThanks for the contribution and patience Bernard.',3106,'AABOI3///+s='),(2,'2011-05-12 18:07:53','Uploaded patch set 10.',3106,'AABOI3///+w='),(44,'2011-05-18 13:26:44','Patch Set 10: (5 inline comments)\n\nStaging view is a great thing. I like the UI layout.\nI have some concerns regarding the update of the staging view using reload (calculating IndexDiff). IndexDiff.diff is very expensive on big repos. On the other hand IndexChangedEvent / RefsChangedEvent occur in many situations. So I\'m not sure if it\'s feasible to update the view based on these events.',3106,'AABOI3///RQ='),(107,'2011-05-02 13:35:38','Patch Set 4:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/581/ ',3106,'AABOIn///50='),(214,'2011-05-02 13:35:34','Uploaded patch set 4.',3106,'AABOIn///54='),(214,'2011-05-02 13:38:33','Patch Set 4: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nInitial attempt at adding a gitx like UI for the staging view.  I\'ve left the tree implementation in place for the moment and added this version along side.',3106,'AABOIn///5s='),(107,'2011-05-02 13:36:46','Patch Set 4: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/581/ : FAILURE',3106,'AABOIn///5w='),(107,'2011-05-01 19:01:28','Patch Set 3: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/577/ : FAILURE',3106,'AABOIn///60='),(107,'2011-05-01 19:00:11','Patch Set 3:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/577/ ',3106,'AABOIn///64='),(2,'2011-05-01 19:00:08','Uploaded patch set 3.',3106,'AABOIn///68='),(2,'2011-05-01 18:56:32','Patch Set 2:\n\nWhen do you plan on contributing a new changeset Bernard? I\'m going to put this changeset through the eclipse.org IP process soon.',3106,'AABOIn///7A='),(214,'2011-04-30 10:44:04','Patch Set 1: (13 inline comments)\n\nPatchset 2 just addresses the style implementation issues, next up refactor the view to a gitx style.',3106,'AABOIn///7E='),(107,'2011-04-30 10:43:10','Patch Set 2: Build Failed\n\nBuild Failed \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/576/ : FAILURE',3106,'AABOIn///7I='),(107,'2011-04-30 10:42:01','Patch Set 2:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/576/ ',3106,'AABOIn///7M='),(214,'2011-04-30 10:41:58','Uploaded patch set 2.',3106,'AABOIn///7Q='),(4,'2011-04-29 19:52:27','Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n(15 inline comments)\n\nI did some testing and compared this view with the staging/commit view provided by GitX.\nI think the UI should rather follow what GitX does, I think this is close to optimal.\n\nI would propose to do the following changes:\n- add a combo to select the repository, if you feel you really need a way to have a staging view for all repositories add an entry \"<all>\" to this combo, I think looking at staged changes for multiple repos isn\'t really useful and requires more scrolling\n- divide the staging view horizontally into three panes in the same way as GitX does:\n   - list of unstaged files in the left pane, decorate modified, deleted, untracked files with different decorators, this removes the need for a lot of tree nodes\n   - draft for commit message in the middle (could reuse the new stuff done by Kevin)\n   - list of staged change on the right side, decorate to show details about staged changes\n- I would prefer flat file lists as this removes the need to open/collapse unnecessary tree nodes which also eat up vertical screen real estate (compare the two screenshots I attached to bug 313263 comparing current EGit proposal and GitX)',3106,'AABOIn///84='),(107,'2011-05-05 15:15:08','Patch Set 8: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/630/ : UNSTABLE',3106,'AABOIn///i4='),(107,'2011-05-05 15:07:49','Patch Set 8:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/630/ ',3106,'AABOIn///i8='),(4,'2011-05-05 16:21:30','Patch Set 8: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve; Unclean IP, do not check in\n\nLooks good as first iteration. Has been submitted to IP review. Hence blocked via IP review flag until CQ has been approved. \n\nSubsequent iterations should be done in additional changes depending on this one to not invalidate the started IP review process for this first part.',3106,'AABOIn///ig='),(2,'2011-05-05 15:07:45','Uploaded patch set 8.',3106,'AABOIn///jA='),(4,'2011-05-05 14:40:36','Patch Set 7:\n\nThe commit pane still grabs more horizontal space than necessary according to auto-wrapping limit.\n\nThe vertical distance between the checkboxes isn\'t consistent (the bottom one has a bit larger distance).\n\nDrag&Drop doesn\'t yet work, right ?\n\nI noticed that when a project shared with git is selected and then the staging view is opened via \"Window > Show View > Git > Staging View\" the selection isn\'t used to fill the staging view initially, so you have to click the project again to get the staging view filled with the data for the repository this project is in.\n\nAdding Jens as a reviewer to comment on your last two open points.',3106,'AABOIn///jE='),(107,'2011-05-05 12:06:09','Patch Set 7: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/629/ : UNSTABLE',3106,'AABOIn///kE='),(214,'2011-05-05 12:03:35','Patch Set 7: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nThis changeset\n* converts to the 2 pane horizonal view\n* removes modified overlay and just uses the > indicator\n* renamed StagedNode to StagingEntry\n* fixes the naming on the UI objects\n* correctly shows partially staged decorations\n\nOpen issues from previous comments\n* implement a job (general performance/UI threading issues too?)\n* implement exception handling (not sure on the correct approach for eclipse plugins)',3106,'AABOIn///kI='),(107,'2011-05-05 11:58:28','Patch Set 7:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/629/ ',3106,'AABOIn///kM='),(4,'2011-05-05 08:59:23','Patch Set 6:\n\nI think this is the preferred layout. So let\'s start with this and only add options when this seems to be necessary after the new view has been used in the wild for a while. \n\nIn a later step we should add another gitx-ish diff view enabling staging and unstaging of individual hunks (equivalent to git add -i). This could probably reuse the diff view implementation of Kevin\'s new commit viewer which has been integrated into the History View context menu yesterday. \n\nThe width of the commit message pane when resizing the view should be limited to the width signaled by the vertical line showing where the automatic wrapper will start wrapping the lines and the file path panes should grab all remaining horizontal space. This way we gain maximum width for the typically lengthy file paths.',3106,'AABOIn///ko='),(214,'2011-05-05 11:58:23','Uploaded patch set 7.',3106,'AABOIn///kQ='),(6,'2011-05-09 13:18:40','Patch Set 8: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\n',3106,'AABOIn///L8='),(214,'2011-05-05 03:54:53','Patch Set 6: (1 inline comment)\n\nThat screen shot looks good.  Do you think its preferable or we should just have both accessible by a menu option?',3106,'AABOIn///lA='),(4,'2011-05-09 14:41:28','Patch Set 8:\n\nwill fix commit message when CQ has been approved',3106,'AABOIn///LE='),(6,'2011-05-09 13:18:26','Patch Set 8:\n\nShouldn\'t the commit message be adapted to the content of the change? Is that still possible now that the CQ is started?',3106,'AABOIn///MA='),(4,'2011-05-04 15:46:41','Patch Set 6: (4 inline comments)\n\nI uploaded another iteration for the mockup in bug 313263',3106,'AABOIn///nk='),(107,'2011-05-04 14:05:13','Patch Set 6: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nBuild Unstable \n \nhttps://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/618/ : UNSTABLE',3106,'AABOIn///o4='),(107,'2011-05-04 13:58:02','Patch Set 6:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/618/ ',3106,'AABOIn///pE='),(214,'2011-05-04 13:57:47','Patch Set 6: I would prefer that you didn\'t submit this\n\nThis patchset removes the original implementation from Remy and just leaves the new gitx style code.\n\nAlso adds sorting for filename entries, displays the selected repository and its state and add support for git repository view selections.\n\nThere is also the beginnings of drag and drop support between working tree and index.',3106,'AABOIn///pM='),(214,'2011-05-04 13:52:38','Uploaded patch set 6.',3106,'AABOIn///pQ='),(107,'2011-05-03 22:59:47','Patch Set 5:\n\nBuild Started https://hudson.eclipse.org/sandbox/job/egit.gerrit/610/ ',3106,'AABOIn///r8='),