public class Mockito extends Matchers
This javadoc content is also available on the http://mockito.org web page. All documentation is kept in javadocs because it guarantees consistency between what's on the web and what's in the source code. Also, it makes possible to access documentation straight from the IDE even if you work offline.
Following examples mock a List, because everyone knows its interface (methods
like add(), get(), clear() will be used).
You probably wouldn't mock List class 'in real'.
//Let's import Mockito statically so that the code looks clearer import static org.mockito.Mockito.*; //mock creation List mockedList = mock(List.class); //using mock object mockedList.add("one"); mockedList.clear(); //verification verify(mockedList).add("one"); verify(mockedList).clear();
Once created, mock will remember all interactions. Then you can selectively verify whatever interaction you are interested in.
//You can mock concrete classes, not only interfaces LinkedList mockedList = mock(LinkedList.class); //stubbing when(mockedList.get(0)).thenReturn("first"); when(mockedList.get(1)).thenThrow(new RuntimeException()); //following prints "first" System.out.println(mockedList.get(0)); //following throws runtime exception System.out.println(mockedList.get(1)); //following prints "null" because get(999) was not stubbed System.out.println(mockedList.get(999)); //Although it is possible to verify a stubbed invocation, usually it's just redundant //If your code cares what get(0) returns then something else breaks (often before even verify() gets executed). //If your code doesn't care what get(0) returns then it should not be stubbed. Not convinced? See here. verify(mockedList).get(0);
//stubbing using built-in anyInt() argument matcher when(mockedList.get(anyInt())).thenReturn("element"); //stubbing using hamcrest (let's say isValid() returns your own hamcrest matcher): when(mockedList.contains(argThat(isValid()))).thenReturn("element"); //following prints "element" System.out.println(mockedList.get(999)); //you can also verify using an argument matcher verify(mockedList).get(anyInt());
Argument matchers allow flexible verification or stubbing.
Click here to see
more built-in matchers
and examples of custom argument matchers / hamcrest matchers.
For information solely on custom argument matchers check out javadoc for ArgumentMatcher
class.
Be reasonable with using complicated argument matching. The natural matching style using equals() with occasional anyX() matchers tend to give clean & simple tests. Sometimes it's just better to refactor the code to allow equals() matching or even implement equals() method to help out with testing.
Also, read section 15 or javadoc for ArgumentCaptor
class.
ArgumentCaptor
is a special implementation of an argument matcher that captures argument values for further assertions.
Warning on argument matchers:
If you are using argument matchers, all arguments have to be provided by matchers.
E.g: (example shows verification but the same applies to stubbing):
verify(mock).someMethod(anyInt(), anyString(), eq("third argument")); //above is correct - eq() is also an argument matcher verify(mock).someMethod(anyInt(), anyString(), "third argument"); //above is incorrect - exception will be thrown because third argument is given without an argument matcher.
//using mock mockedList.add("once"); mockedList.add("twice"); mockedList.add("twice"); mockedList.add("three times"); mockedList.add("three times"); mockedList.add("three times"); //following two verifications work exactly the same - times(1) is used by default verify(mockedList).add("once"); verify(mockedList, times(1)).add("once"); //exact number of invocations verification verify(mockedList, times(2)).add("twice"); verify(mockedList, times(3)).add("three times"); //verification using never(). never() is an alias to times(0) verify(mockedList, never()).add("never happened"); //verification using atLeast()/atMost() verify(mockedList, atLeastOnce()).add("three times"); verify(mockedList, atLeast(2)).add("five times"); verify(mockedList, atMost(5)).add("three times");
times(1) is the default. Therefore using times(1) explicitly can be omitted.
doThrow(new RuntimeException()).when(mockedList).clear(); //following throws RuntimeException: mockedList.clear();Read more about doThrow|doAnswer family of methods in paragraph 12.
Initially, stubVoid(Object)
was used for stubbing voids.
Currently stubVoid() is deprecated in favor of doThrow(Throwable)
.
This is because of improved readability and consistency with the family of doAnswer(Answer)
methods.
List firstMock = mock(List.class); List secondMock = mock(List.class); //using mocks firstMock.add("was called first"); secondMock.add("was called second"); //create inOrder object passing any mocks that need to be verified in order InOrder inOrder = inOrder(firstMock, secondMock); //following will make sure that firstMock was called before secondMock inOrder.verify(firstMock).add("was called first"); inOrder.verify(secondMock).add("was called second");Verification in order is flexible - you don't have to verify all interactions one-by-one but only those that you are interested in testing in order.
Also, you can create InOrder object passing only mocks that are relevant for in-order verification.
//using mocks - only mockOne is interacted mockOne.add("one"); //ordinary verification verify(mockOne).add("one"); //verify that method was never called on a mock verify(mockOne, never()).add("two"); //verify that other mocks were not interacted verifyZeroInteractions(mockTwo, mockThree);
//using mocks mockedList.add("one"); mockedList.add("two"); verify(mockedList).add("one"); //following verification will fail verifyNoMoreInteractions(mockedList);A word of warning: Some users who did a lot of classic, expect-run-verify mocking tend to use verifyNoMoreInteractions() very often, even in every test method. verifyNoMoreInteractions() is not recommended to use in every test method. verifyNoMoreInteractions() is a handy assertion from the interaction testing toolkit. Use it only when it's relevant. Abusing it leads to overspecified, less maintainable tests. You can find further reading here.
See also never()
- it is more explicit and
communicates the intent well.
public class ArticleManagerTest { @Mock private ArticleCalculator calculator; @Mock private ArticleDatabase database; @Mock private UserProvider userProvider; private ArticleManager manager;Important! This needs to be somewhere in the base class or a test runner:
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(testClass);You can use built-in runner:
MockitoJUnitRunner
.
Read more here: MockitoAnnotations
Iterable
or simply
collections. Those offer natural ways of stubbing (e.g. using real
collections). In rare scenarios stubbing consecutive calls could be useful,
though:
when(mock.someMethod("some arg")) .thenThrow(new RuntimeException()) .thenReturn("foo"); //First call: throws runtime exception: mock.someMethod("some arg"); //Second call: prints "foo" System.out.println(mock.someMethod("some arg")); //Any consecutive call: prints "foo" as well (last stubbing wins). System.out.println(mock.someMethod("some arg"));Alternative, shorter version of consecutive stubbing:
when(mock.someMethod("some arg")) .thenReturn("one", "two", "three");
Answer
interface.
Yet another controversial feature which was not included in Mockito originally. We recommend using simple stubbing with thenReturn() or thenThrow() only. Those two should be just enough to test/test-drive any clean & simple code.
when(mock.someMethod(anyString())).thenAnswer(new Answer() { Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) { Object[] args = invocation.getArguments(); Object mock = invocation.getMock(); return "called with arguments: " + args; } }); //Following prints "called with arguments: foo" System.out.println(mock.someMethod("foo"));
when(Object)
because the compiler does not like void methods inside brackets...
doThrow(Throwable)
replaces the stubVoid(Object)
method for stubbing voids.
The main reason is improved readability and consistency with the family of doAnswer() methods.
Use doThrow() when you want to stub a void method with an exception:
doThrow(new RuntimeException()).when(mockedList).clear(); //following throws RuntimeException: mockedList.clear();Read more about other methods:
Real spies should be used carefully and occasionally, for example when dealing with legacy code.
Spying on real objects can be associated with "partial mocking" concept. Before the release 1.8, Mockito spies were not real partial mocks. The reason was we thought partial mock is a code smell. At some point we found legitimate use cases for partial mocks (3rd party interfaces, interim refactoring of legacy code, the full article is here)
List list = new LinkedList(); List spy = spy(list); //optionally, you can stub out some methods: when(spy.size()).thenReturn(100); //using the spy calls real methods spy.add("one"); spy.add("two"); //prints "one" - the first element of a list System.out.println(spy.get(0)); //size() method was stubbed - 100 is printed System.out.println(spy.size()); //optionally, you can verify verify(spy).add("one"); verify(spy).add("two");
when(Object)
for stubbing spies. Example:
List list = new LinkedList(); List spy = spy(list); //Impossible: real method is called so spy.get(0) throws IndexOutOfBoundsException (the list is yet empty) when(spy.get(0)).thenReturn("foo"); //You have to use doReturn() for stubbing doReturn("foo").when(spy).get(0);2. Watch out for final methods. Mockito doesn't mock final methods so the bottom line is: when you spy on real objects + you try to stub a final method = trouble. What will happen is the real method will be called *on mock* but *not on the real instance* you passed to the spy() method. Typically you may get a NullPointerException because mock instances don't have fields initiated.
It is the default answer so it will be used only when you don't stub the method call.
Foo mock = mock(Foo.class, Mockito.RETURNS_SMART_NULLS); Foo mockTwo = mock(Foo.class, new YourOwnAnswer());
Read more about this interesting implementation of Answer: RETURNS_SMART_NULLS
ArgumentCaptor<Person> argument = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(Person.class); verify(mock).doSomething(argument.capture()); assertEquals("John", argument.getValue().getName());Warning: it is recommended to use ArgumentCaptor with verification but not with stubbing. Using ArgumentCaptor with stubbing may decrease test readability because captor is created outside of assert (aka verify or 'then') block. Also it may reduce defect localization because if stubbed method was not called then no argument is captured.
In a way ArgumentCaptor is related to custom argument matchers (see javadoc for ArgumentMatcher
class).
Both techniques can be used for making sure certain arguments where passed to mocks.
However, ArgumentCaptor may be a better fit if:
ArgumentMatcher
are usually better for stubbing.
Before release 1.8 spy() was not producing real partial mocks and it was confusing for some users.
Read more about spying: here or in javadoc for spy(Object)
method.
//you can create partial mock with spy() method: List list = spy(new LinkedList()); //you can enable partial mock capabilities selectively on mocks: Foo mock = mock(Foo.class); //Be sure the real implementation is 'safe'. //If real implementation throws exceptions or depends on specific state of the object then you're in trouble. when(mock.someMethod()).thenCallRealMethod();As usual you are going to read the partial mock warning: Object oriented programming is more less tackling complexity by dividing the complexity into separate, specific, SRPy objects. How does partial mock fit into this paradigm? Well, it just doesn't... Partial mock usually means that the complexity has been moved to a different method on the same object. In most cases, this is not the way you want to design your application.
However, there are rare cases when partial mocks come handy: dealing with code you cannot change easily (3rd party interfaces, interim refactoring of legacy code etc.) However, I wouldn't use partial mocks for new, test-driven & well-designed code.
Instead of reset() please consider writing simple, small and focused test methods over lengthy, over-specified tests. First potential code smell is reset() in the middle of the test method. This probably means you're testing too much. Follow the whisper of your test methods: "Please keep us small & focused on single behavior". There are several threads about it on mockito mailing list.
The only reason we added reset() method is to make it possible to work with container-injected mocks. See issue 55 (here) or FAQ (here).
Don't harm yourself. reset() in the middle of the test method is a code smell (you're probably testing too much).
List mock = mock(List.class); when(mock.size()).thenReturn(10); mock.add(1); reset(mock); //at this point the mock forgot any interactions & stubbing
In case of questions you may also post to mockito mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/mockito
Next, you should know that Mockito validates if you use it correctly all the time.
However, there's a gotcha so please read the javadoc for validateMockitoUsage()
Start learning about BDD here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavior_Driven_Development
The problem is that current stubbing api with canonical role of when word does not integrate nicely with //given //when //then comments.
It's because stubbing belongs to given component of the test and not to the when component of the test.
Hence BDDMockito
class introduces an alias so that you stub method calls with BDDMockito.given(Object)
method.
Now it really nicely integrates with the given component of a BDD style test!
Here is how the test might look like:
import static org.mockito.BDDMockito.*; Seller seller = mock(Seller.class); Shop shop = new Shop(seller); public void shouldBuyBread() throws Exception { //given given(seller.askForBread()).willReturn(new Bread()); //when Goods goods = shop.buyBread(); //then assertThat(goods, containBread()); }
WARNING: This should be rarely used in unit testing.
The behaviour was implemented for a specific use case of a BDD spec that had an unreliable external dependency. This was in a web environment and the objects from the external dependency were being serialized to pass between layers.
To create serializable mock use MockSettings.serializable()
:
List serializableMock = mock(List.class, withSettings().serializable());
The mock can be serialized assuming all the normal serialization requirements are met by the class.
Making a real object spy serializable is a bit more effort as the spy(...) method does not have an overloaded version which accepts MockSettings. No worries, you will hardly ever use it.
List